Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kontraproduktives Verhalten durch Schädigung öffentlicher Güter

  • Chapter
Wirtschaftspsychologie

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Unter Produktivität wird im weitesten Sinne die Summe produktiver Maßnahmen und Verhaltensweisen verstanden. Produktivität ist gleichzeitig die Voraussetzung für dauerhaftes Überleben von Organismen. Der Begriff findet in verschiedenen Disziplinen Verwendung: In der Ökologie wird die Fitness einer Spezies durch ihre Produktivität bestimmt (Townsend, Harper & Begon, 2003). In der Psychologie wird Produktivität mit Glück in Verbindung gebracht und dieses als grundlegende Handlungsmotivation angesehen. Erich Fromm definiert Produktivität als »die Realisierung der dem Menschen eigenen Möglichkeiten, also den Gebrauch der eigenen Kräfte« (Fromm, 1947, S. 59). In der Volkswirtschaftslehre wird unter Produktivität das (Mengen-) Verhältnis zwischen erzeugten Gütern und dafür investierten Mitteln verstanden (Stocker, 2004). Mit wachsender Produktivität steigt der Wohlstand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, V. L. & Greenberger, D. B. (1978). Enjoyment of destruction: The role of uncertainty. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 4(2), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allingham, M. & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J. Jackson, B. & McKee, M. (2004, June). Audit information dissemination, taxpayer communication and compliance: an experimental approach. IRS Research Conference, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., Sanchez, I. & deJuan, A. (1995). Economic and noneconomic factors in tax compliance. Kyklos, 48, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., Erard, B. & Feinstein, J. S. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, J. C. (1987). Income tax evasion and the tax schedule: Some experimental results. Public Finance, 42(3), 357–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S. & Schmidt, P. (1993). Determinanten der Verkehrsmittelwahl-Eine Anwendung der Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 24, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1976). The economic approach to human behaviour. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1984). Corporate crime in the pharmaceutical industry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. (2003). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and noncompliant actions. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 15–40). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. & Ahmed., E. (2005). A threat to tax morale: The case of Australian higher education policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 523–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V., Schneider, F., Reinhart, M. & Murphy, K. (2003). Charting the shoals of the cash economy. In V. Braithwaite (Hrsg.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 93–108). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Larsen, R. (1978). Intrinsic rewards in school crime. New York: National Council on Crime and Delinquency: Hackensack.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmata. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De More, S. W., Fisher, J. D. & Baron, R. M. (1988). The equity control model as a predictor of vandalism among college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enste, D. & Schneider, F. (2005, März). Schattenwirtschaft und irreguläre Beschäftigung: Irrtümer, Zusammenhänge und Lösungen. Paper, vorgestellt auf der Jahrestagung Illegalität in Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (2006). Standard Eurobarometer, Nr. 66. Brüssel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. (2001, 28. April). Über Vernunft, Wille und Eigennutz hinaus: Ansätze zu einer neuen Synthese von Psychologie und Ökonomie. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, S. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetchenhauer, D. (1998). Versicherungsbetrug. Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse betrügerischen Verhaltens gegenüber einem anonymen Geschädigten. BadenBaden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. D. & Baron, R. M. (1982). An equity-based model of vandalism. Population and Environment, 5, 182–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. & Benz, M. (2001). Ökonomie und Psychologie: eine Übersicht (Working Paper Nr. 92). Zürich: Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. & Eichenberger, R. (2002). Democratic governance for a globalized world. Kyklos, 55(2), 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. & Stutzer, A. (2006). Environmental morale and motivation (Working Paper, Nr. 288). Zürich: Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, N., Maital, S. & Rutenberg, A. (1978). A simulation study of income tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 10, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1947). Psychoanalyse und Ethik. Bausteine zu einer humanistischen Charakterologie. GA II, S. 1–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gërxhani, K. & Schram, A. (in press). Tax evasion and income source: A comparative experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1997). Bounded rationality: Models of fast and frugal inference. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 133, 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. P. (1996). The psychology of vandalism. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, H. & Rees, R. (2004). Microeconomics. Harlow: Financial Times, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, H. B. (1794). Troisième rapport sur le vandalisme. In Oeuvres II (pp. 256–278, 321-257).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassebrauck, M. (1985). Retributive und distributive Gerechtigkeit im Aufteilungsverhalten von Kindern. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberger Institut für Internationale Konfliktforschung (2006). Konfliktbarometer: 15. jährliche Konfliktanalyse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, A. & Matthies, E. (1998). Umweltpsychologie: Umweltkrise, Gesellschaft und Individuum. Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerdee, T. H. & Rosen, B. (1974). Effects of opportunity to communicate and visibility of individual decisions on behaviour in the common interest. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 712–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, J. P. & Rapoport, A. (1974). Test of the bargaining set and kernel models in threeperson games. In A. Rapoport (Ed.), Game theory as a theory of conflict resolution (pp. 119–160). Dordrecht, NL: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G. & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological behaviours dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 598–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner, G., Feld, L. P. & Savioz, M. R. (1999). Die direkte Demokratie. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E. (1998). Differential representations of taxes: Analysis of free associations and judgments of five employment groups. Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(1), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E. (2003). Wirtschaftspsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E. & Maciejovsky, B. (2001). Tax compliance within the context of gain and loss situations, expected and current asset position, and profession. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B. & Schneider, F. (2003). Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax flight: Do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 535–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M, Zak, P.J., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamnek, S., Olbrich, G., & Schaefer, W. (2000). Tatort Sozialstaat: Schwarzarbeit, Leistungsmissbrauch, Steuerhinterziehung und ihre (Hinter)Gründe. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (1979). An empirical assessment of tax mentality. Public Finance, 34(2), 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. & Raiffa., H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. & Calvin, L. D. (1978). A study of admitted income tax evasion. Law and Society Review, 13, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBarnet, D. (2001). When compliance is not the solution but the problem: From changes in law to changes in attitude. Canberra: Australian National University, Centre for Tax System Integrity.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffery, E. J. & Baron, J. (2004). Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 679–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M. & Brewer, M. B. (Eds.). (1983). Solving social dilemmata: A review. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, H. (1994). Zur Kritik der Sprache von Gesetzen. Anmerkungen eines Sprachwissenschaftlers. In C. Smekal & T. Engelbert (Hrsg.), Stand und Entwicklung der Finanzpsychologie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestler, C. & Salvenmoser, S. (2005). Wirtschaftskriminalität 2005. Frankfurt/M.: PricewaterhouseCoopers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. v. & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orviska, M. & Hudson, J. (2002). Tax evasion, civic duty and the law abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. G. & Hyun, J. K. (2003). Examining the determinants of tax compliance by experimental data: A case of Korea. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25, 673–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelzmann, L. (2006). Wirtschaftspsychologie. Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. & WeckHannemann, H. (1992). Steuerhinterziehung: Einige romantische, realistische und nicht zuletzt empirische Befunde. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften, 112(3), 433–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. & WeckHannemann, H. (1996). Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice, 88(1–2), 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porschke, C. & Witte, E. H. (2002). Psychologische Faktoren der Steuergerechtigkeit. Wirtschaftspsychologie. 4(1), 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B. & Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The trans-situational-influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. L., Hite, P. A. & Bradley, C. F. (1994). Understanding attitudes toward progressive taxation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(2), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, Y. & Braithwaite, V. (2003). Taxpayers’ perceptions of practitioners: Finding one who is effective and does the right thing? Journal of Business Ethics, 46(4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1959). Fiscal psychology: A new branch of public finance. National Tax Journal, 12, 340–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1960). Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1975). Einführung in die Geld-und Finanzpsychologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider (2006). Nur noch leicht sinkende Schattenwirtschaft in Deutschland im Jahr 2006. Fluch oder Segen? (Forschungsbericht). Linz: Universität, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, S. H. (1973). Normative explanations of helping behaviour. A critique proposal and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. (2002). Corporate crime, law, and social control. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J., Blumenthal, M. & Christian, C. (2001). Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. Journal of Public Economics, 79(3), 455–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, M. W., & Thomas, J. E. (1982). Audit probabilities and tax evasion decision: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2, 241–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, F. (2004). Moderne Volkswirtschaftslehre: Logik der Marktwirtschaft. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strümpel, B. (1966). Disguised tax burden compliance costs of German business men and professionals. National Tax Journal, 12, 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strümpel, B. (1969). The contribution of survey research to public finance. In A. T. Peacock (Ed.), The contribution of survey research to public finance. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. (1949). White-collar crime. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2003). To evade taxes or not to evade: That is the question. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(3), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2005). Tax morale in Latin America. Public Choice, 122(1–2), 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R., Harper, J. L. & Begon, M. E. (2003). Ökologie. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tyszka, T. (1994, Juli). Cognitive representation of economics. Paper presented at IAREP/SABE Kolloquium, Rotterdam, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestermark, S. D. & Blaufeld, P. D. (1978). Controlling vandalism in the school: A complete security handbook for administrators. West Nyack, NY: Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E. H. Walster, G. W. & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wärneryd, K. & Walerud, B. (1982). Taxes and economic behaviour: Some interview data on tax evasion in Sweden. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2, 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waschulewski, U. (2002). Die Wertpsychologie Eduard Sprangers: eine Untersuchung zur Aktualität der »Lebensformen«. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M. (2005). Misperception of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 862–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiswede, G. (2000). Einführung in die Wirtschaftspsychologie. München: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Wirtschaftspsychologie, Bildungspsychologie und Evaluation der Universität Wien, Universitätsstr. 7, A-1010, Wien

    Prof. Dr. Erich Kirchler & Dipl.-Psych. Julia Pitters

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Erich Kirchler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dipl.-Psych. Julia Pitters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Psychologie, insbes. Wirtschafts- und Sozialpsychologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nürnberg

    Klaus Moser

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kirchler, E., Pitters, J. (2007). Kontraproduktives Verhalten durch Schädigung öffentlicher Güter. In: Moser, K. (eds) Wirtschaftspsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71637-2_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation