Abstract
Currently, there are little guidelines on building quality standard-compliant learning courses. Although educational theories can be guidelines, there are difficulties in the practical use. An approach to the problem is to build a theory-aware and standard-compliant authoring system based on an ontology that establishes a multi-paradigm conceptual basis for learning/instructional theories. This paper discusses the feasibility of building such an ontology, as well as the functionality of a theory-aware authoring tool based on it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J.R.: Rules of the Mind. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1993)
Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T., Maclaus, G.F.: Hanbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. McGraw-Hill (1971)
Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E.: e-learning and the science of instruction, 2nd edn., Preiffer (2007)
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., Newman, S.E.: Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, 453–494 (1989)
Devedzic, V.: Semantic Web and Education. Springer (2006)
Dicheva, D.: O4E Wiki, http://o4e.iiscs.wssu.edu/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Articles
Dick, W., Carey, L., Carey, J.O.: The systematic design of instruction, 5th edn. Addison-Wesley Educational Publisher Inc. (2001)
Gagne, R.M., Briggs, L.J.: Principles of Instructional Design, 2nd edn., Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1979)
Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R.: Ontological Support for a Theory-Eclectic Approach to Instructional and Learning Design. In: Nejdl, W., Tochtermann, K. (eds.) EC-TEL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4227, pp. 155–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R.: Theory-aware Explanation Support for Standard-compliant Scenario Building. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Semantic Technology for Learning (held in ICCE 2007), pp. 104–109 (2007), http://www.ei.sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp/hayashi/ICCE2007WS-CR-hay-final.pdf
Hmelo, C.E., Guzdial, M.: Of black and glass boxes: Scaffolding for doing and learning. In: Proc. ICLS 1996, pp. 128–133 (1996)
Hogan, K., Pressley, M.: Scaffolding Student Learning: instructional approaches and issues. Brookline Books, Cambridge (1997)
Jonassen, D.: Designing constructivist learning environment. Instructional-design theories and models A new paradigm of instructional theory, 215–239 (1999)
Keller, J.M., Kopp, T.W.: An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models, 289–320 (1987)
Koedinger, K.R., Aleven, V.A.W.M.M., Heffernan, N.T.: Toward a Rapid Development Environment for Cognitive Tutors. In: Proc. of AIED 2003, pp. 455–457 (2003)
Kozaki, K., Kitamura, Y., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: Hozo: An Environment for Building/Using Ontologies Based on a Fundamental Consideration of “Role” and “Relationship”. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 213–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Merrill, M.D., Tennyson, R.D.: Concept Teaching: An Instructional Design Guide. Educational Technology, Englewood Cliffs (1977)
Merrill, M.D.: Component display theory, Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status, Hillsdale, pp. 279–333 (1983)
Mizoguchi, R., Bourdeau, J.: Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome Common AI-ED Problems. IJAIED 11(2), 107–121 (2000)
Mizoguchi, R., Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J.: Inside Theory-Aware and Standards-Compliant Authoring System. In: Proc. of SWEL 2007, pp. 1–18 (2007)
Murray, T., Blessing, S., Ainsworth, S.: Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments: Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive, Interactive and Intelligent Educational Software. Springer (2003)
Nkambou, R., Gauthier, G., Frasson, C.: CREAM-Tools: An Authoring Environment for Curriculum and Course Building in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Proc. of CALICSE 1996, pp. 186–194 (1996)
Psyché, V.: CIAO, an Interface Agent Prototype to facilitate the use of ontology in intelligent authoring system. In: Proc. of I2LOR 2004 (2004)
Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.): Instructional Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1987)
Schwartz, D., Xiaodong, L., Brophy, L., Bransford, S., J.D.: Toward the Development of Flexibly Adaptive Instructional Designs, Instructional-design theories and models A new paradigm of instructional theory, pp. 183–213 (1999)
Wang, E., Kim, Y.S.: Issues in Integrating Teaching Strategies from Learning Theories and Extended SWRL Rules. In: Proc. of the workshop on Semantic Technology for Education (held in ICCE 2007), pp. 110–113 (2007), http://credits.skku.edu/credits/publications/WangKimSTfL07IssuesIntegrating.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R. (2008). Structurization of Learning/Instructional Design Knowledge for Theory-Aware Authoring Systems. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5091. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_60
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69130-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69132-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)