Skip to main content

Comparing Two IRT Models for Conjunctive Skills

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5091))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A step in ITS often involve multiple skills. Thus a step requiring a conjunction of skills is harder than steps that require requiring each individual skill only. We developed two Item-Response Models – Additive Factor Model (AFM) and Conjunctive Factor Model (CFM) – to model the conjunctive skills in the student data sets. Both models are compared on simulated data sets and a real assessment data set. We showed that CFM was as good as or better than AFM in the mean cross validation errors on the simulated data. In the real data set CFM is not clearly better. However, AFM is essentially performing as a conjunctive model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kurt VanLehn, K.K., Skogsholm, A., Nwaigwe, A., Hausmann, R.G.M., Weinstein, A., Billings, B.: Whats in a step? Toward general, abstract representations of tutoring system log data. In: Conati, C., McCoy, K., Paliouras, G. (eds.) UM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4511. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mitrovic, A., Koedinger, K.R., Martin, B.: A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Tutoring and Constraint-Based Modeling. In: User Modeling 2003. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B.: Learning Factors Analysis - A General Method for Cognitive Model Evaluation and Improvement. In: 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Embretson, S.: Multicomponent Response Models. In: Linden, W.V.D., Hambleton, R.K. (eds.) Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koedinger, K.R., Nathan, M.J.: The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Beverley P. Woolf Esma Aïmeur Roger Nkambou Susanne Lajoie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B. (2008). Comparing Two IRT Models for Conjunctive Skills. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5091. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_111

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_111

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69130-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69132-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics