Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stand und Perspektiven der politikwissenschaftlichen Terrorismusforschung

  • Chapter
Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag möchte eine kurze Einführung in den Stand und die Perspektiven der politikwissenschaftlichen Terrorismusforschung bieten. In der Politikwissenschaft sind vor allem drei Fragestellungen immer wieder im Mittelpunkt der Forschung zu finden: Was ist Terrorismus? Was verursacht Terrorismus? Welche Gegenmaßnahmen können gegen den Terrorismus eingesetzt werden? Der Artikel trägt die jeweils einschlägigen Forschungsergebnisse zusammen und bietet so einen Überblick über den derzeitigen Erkenntnisstand bezüglich dieser policy-relevanten Fragen. Darüber hinaus möchte der Beitrag einige der Problematiken der Terrorismusforschung aufzeigen und über neuere Entwicklungen wie der Kritischen Terrorismusforschung reflektieren. Im Ergebnis wird festgestellt, dass sowohl traditionelle als auch kritische Herangehensweisen häufig um dieselben Probleme kreisen und substanzielle Fortschritte so erschwert werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Aldrich, R. J. (2004). Transatlantic Intelligence and Security Cooperation. International Affairs, 80(4), 731–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arce M., Daniel G. & Sandler, T. (2005). Counterterrorism: A Game–Theoretic Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, M. (2004). Going to the Source: Why Al Qaeda's Financial Network Is Likely to Withstand the Current War on Terrorist Financing. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 27(3), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassiouni, M. C. (2001). International Terrorism: Multilateral Conventions (1937–2001). Ardsley: Transnational Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensahel, N. (2006). A Coalition of Coalitions: International Cooperation Against Terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 29(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, T. J. (2002). Targeting Terrorist Finances: The New Challenges of Financial Market Globalization. In K. Booth & T. Dunne (Hrsg.), Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order(S. 74–84). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeley, R. (2007). Bringing the State back into Terrorism Studies. European Political Science, 6(3), 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. Q. (2004). Deterrence and Asymmetry: Non-State Actors and Mass Casualty Terrorism. Contemporary Security Policy, 25(1), 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer Bell, J. (1978). A Time of Terror. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen Smyth, M. (2007). A Critical Research Agenda for the Study of Political Terror. European Political Science, 6(3), 260–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy-Baermann, B. & Conybeare, J. A. C. (1994). Retaliating Against Terrorism: Rational Expectations and the Optimality of Rules versus Discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, E. (2007). Politics and the Suboptimal Provision of Counterterror. International Organization, 61(1), 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium des Inneren (1981–1984). Analysen zum Terrorismus. Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C. (1996). Terrorism as Warfare: The Lessons of Military History. World Policy Journal, 13(4), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalk, P. (1995). Liberal Democratic Response to Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 7(4), 10–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalk, P. (1996). West European Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: The Evolving Dynamic. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. K. (2001). Waging the New War – What's next for the U.S. Armed Forces? In J. F. Hoge, & G. Rose (Hrsg.), How Did This Happen? Terrorism and the New War(S. 241–253). New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausewitz, C. von (1990). Vom Kriege, 19. Auflage, Troisdorf: Bildungsverlag EINS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. (2004). Dissuading State Support of Terrorism. Strikes or Sanctions? (An Analysis of Dissuasion Measures Employed Against Libya). Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 27(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crelinsten, R. (1989). Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism and Democracy. The Assessment of National Security Threats. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1(2), 242–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crelinsten R. (2000). Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism in a Multi-Centric World. Challenges and Opportunities. In M. Taylor & J. Horgan (Hrsg.), The Future of Terrorism(S. 170–196). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crelinsten, R. & A. Schmid (1992). Western Responses to Terrorism: A Twenty-Five Year Balance Sheet. Terrorism and Political Violence, 4(4), 307–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, M. (Hrsg.) (1983). Terrorism, Legitimacy, and Power: The Consequences of Political Violence. Middletown: Wesleyan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, M. (1990). The Logic of Terrorism: Terrorist Behavior as a Product of Strategic Choice. In W. Reich (Hrsg.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind(S. 7–24). Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, M. (2001). Counterterrorism Policy and the Political Process. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 24(5), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, M. (2003). Coercive Diplomacy and the Response to Terrorism. In: R. J. Art, & P. M. Cronin (Hrsg.), The United States and Coercive Diplomacy(S. 305–357). Washington: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daase, C. (2001). Terrorismus – Begriffe, Theorien und Gegenstrategien. Friedens-Warte76(1), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daase, C. & Spencer, A. (2010). Terrorismus. In C. Masala, F. Sauer & A. Wilhelm (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Internationalen Politik(S. 403–425). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Cataldo Neuberger, L. & Tiziana, V. (1996). Women and Terrorism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. W. (2005). Terms of Inquiry: On the Theory and Practice of Political Science. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (1995). Left-Wing Terrorism in Italy. In M. Crenshaw (Hrsg.), Terrorism in Context(S. 105–159). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1992). Antidiplomacy. Spies, Terror, Speed and War. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanapala, J. (2005). The United Nations' Response to 9/11. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17(1/2), 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, R. (2003). Funding Evil. How Terrorism Is Financed and How to Stop It. Chicago: Bonus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eland, I. (1998). Does U.S. Intervention overseas Breed Terrorism? The Historical Record. Foreign Policy Briefing Paper, 50, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Qorchi, M. (2002). Hawala. Finance and Development, 39(4), 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., Sandler, T. & Cauley, J. (1990). UN Conventions, Technology and Retaliation in the Fight Against Terrorism. An Econometric Evaluation. Terrorism and Political Violence, 2(1), 83–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria, J. R. (2006). Terrorist Innovation and Anti-Terrorist Policies. Terrorism and Political Violence, 18(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, A. (1991). The Discipline of Terrorology. In A. George (Hrsg.), Western State Terrorism(S. 76–101). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunaratna, R. (2002). Inside Al Qaeda. Global Network of Terror. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, J. (2007a). A Case for Critical Terrorism Studies. Government and Opposition, 43 (3), 363–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, J. (2007b). Babies and Bathwaters: Reflecting on the Pitfalls of Critical Terrorism Studies. European Political Science, 6(3), 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1988). Empirical Research on Political Terrorism: The State of the Art and How it Might be Improved. In R. O. Slater & M. Stohl (Hrsg.), Current Perspectives on International Terrorism(S. 115–154). New York: St. Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. S. & O'Sullivan, G. (1989). The “Terrorism” Industry. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, P. B. (2000). Terrorism and America. A Commonsense Strategy for a Democratic Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, P. B. (2001). Dealing with Terrorism: An Overview. International Security, 26(3), 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, K. von (2002). The Roots of Terrorism: Probing the Myths. The Political Quarterly, 73(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. (1999). Terrorism, Trends and Prospects. In: I. O. Lesser, B. Hoffman, J. Arquila, D. Ronfeldt, & M. Zanini (Hrsg.), Countering the New Terrorism(S. 7–38). Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. (2004). Foreword. In: A. Silke (Hrsg.), Research on Terrorism: Trends Achievements and Failures(S. 17–19). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. (1997). Issues in Terrorism Research. The Police Journal, 70(3), 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. (2004). The Case for Firsthand Research. In A. Silke (Hrsg.), Research on Terrorism – Trends Achievements and Failures(S. 30–56). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsse, R. & Spencer. A. (2008). The Metaphor of Terror: Terrorism Studies and the Constructivist Turn. Security Dialogue, 39(6), 571–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (2001). The Age of Muslim Wars. Newsweek, 17.12.2001, 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2007). The Core Commitments of Critical Terrorism Studies. European Political Science, 6(3), 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, A. (1990). Identity and Morality in the Italian Red Brigades. Terrorism and Political Violence, 2(4), 508–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B. & Maleckova, J. (2002). Education, Poverty, Political Violence and Terrorism. Is There a Causal Connection? N BER Working Paper, No. 9074. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, W. (1977). Terrorism. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, W. (1987). The Age of Terrorism. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, W. (1998). Dawn of Armageddon. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, W. (1999). The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, M. (2002). The Political Economy of Middle East Terrorism. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 6(4), 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, M. (2003). Stemming the Flow of Terrorist Financing: Practical and Conceptual Challenges. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 27(1), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, M. (2002). The Response to 9/11 and the Lessons of History. International Relations, 16(2), 275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lübbe, H. (1987). Politischer Moralismus. Der Triumph der Gesinnung über die Urteilskraft. Berlin: Siedler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchak, P. (1999). God's Assassins. State Terrorism in Argentina in the 1970s. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merari, A. (1991). Academic Research and Government Policy on Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 3(1), 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münkler, H. (1992). Gewalt und Ordnung. Das Bild des Krieges im politischen Denken. Frankfurt a.M: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoleoni, L. (2004). Terror Inc. Tracing the Money Behind Global Terrorism. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navias, M. S. (2002). Finance Warfare as a Response to International Terrorism. In L. Freedman (Hrsg.), Superterrorism: Policy Responses(S. 57–79). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, B. & Silke, A. (2007). Understanding and Ending Persistent Conflict: Bridging Research and Policy. In M. Heiberg, B. O'Leary & J. Tirman (Hrsg.), Terror, Insurgency and the State: Ending Protracted Conflicts(S. 387–426). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, F. E. (1981). Political Concepts. A Reconstruction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape, R. A. (2005). Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlstein, R. M. (1991). The Mind of the Political Terrorist. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, A. W. (2005). Political (In)Justice, Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillar, P. R. (2001). Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy. Washington: Brookings Institutions Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, B. R. (2001/2002). The Struggle against Terrorism: Grand Strategy, Strategy, and Tactics. International Security, 26(3), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. M. (1990). Terrorist Psycho-Logic: Terrorist Behavior as a Product of Psycological Forces. In W. Reich (Hrsg.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind(S. 25–40). Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. (2007). Defending against Terrorist Attacks with Limited Resources. American Political Sciences Review, 101(3), 527–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prunckun, H. W. & Mohr, P. B. (1996). Military Deterrence of International Terrorism: An Evaluation of Operation El Dorado Canyon. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 20(3), 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranstorp, M. (Hrsg.) (2007). Mapping Terrorism Research. State of the Art, Gaps and Future Direction.London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphaeli, N. (2003). Financing of Terrorism. Sources, Methods and Channels. Terrorism and Political Violence, 15(4), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. & Aldrich, R. J. (2005). Contending Cultures of Counterterrorism: Transatlantic Divergence or Convergence? International Affairs, 81(5), 905–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, E. (1993). Terrorism Research and the Diffusion of Ideas. Knowledge and Policy, 6(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (2006). What Terrorists Want. Understanding the Terrorist Threat. London: John Murray Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (2006). Political Terrorism. An Interdisciplinary Approach. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, R. E. (1987). Alchemists of Revolution. Terrorism in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. (2003). Collective Action and Transnational Terrorism. World Economy, 26(6), 779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, A. & Jongman, A. (1988). Political Terrorism. A New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories and Literature. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckener, U. (2006). Transnationaler Terrorismus. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, F. (2004). Breaking the Cycle. Empirical Research and Postgraduate Studies on Terrorism. In A. Silke (Hrsg.), Research on Terrorism. Trends Achievements and Failures(S. 161–185). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sederberg, P. (1989). Terrorist Myths. Illusion, Rhetoric, and Reality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, R. H. & Vogt, A. (2003). The Real Intelligence Failure on 9/11 and the Case for a Doctrine of Striking First. In R. D. Howard & R. L. Sawyer (Hrsg.), Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Understanding the New Security Environment(S. 367–390). Guildford: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silke, A. (1998). Cheshire-Cat Logic. The Recurring Theme of Terrorist Abnormality in Psychological Research. Psychology, Crime and Law, 4(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silke, A. (2001). The Devil You Know. Continuing Problems with Research on Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(4), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silke, A. (Hrsg.) (2004a). Research on Terrorism. Trends Achievements and Failures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silke, A. (2004b). The Road Less Travelled. Recent Trends in Terrorism Research. In A. Silke (Hrsg.), Research on Terrorism. Trends Achievements and Failures(S. 186–213). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. (2010). The Tabloid Terrorist. The Predicative Construction of New Terrorism in the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemplowski, R. (Hrsg.) (2002). Transnational Terrorism in the World System Perspective. Warsaw: Polish Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven, G. C. S. & Gunaratna, R. (2004). Counterterrorism: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, M. (1988) The Politics of Terrorism. New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, C. (2002). Terrorism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulfstein, G. (2003). Terrorism and the Use of Force. Security Dialogue, 34(2), 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann, P. (1998). Terrorismus. Provokation der Macht. München: Gerling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann, P. (2001). Revenge Without Rules: On the Renaissance of an Archaic Motive of Violence. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 24(6), 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, W. F. (2001). Strangling The Hydra: Targeting Al Qaeda's Finances. In J. F. Hoge G. Rose (Hrsg.), How Did This Happen? Terrorism and the New War(S. 129–143). New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, L., Pedahzur, A. & Hirsch-Hoefler, S. (2004). The Challenges of Conceptualizing Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 16(4), 777–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, S. (2002). Disrupting the Financing of Terrorism. The Washington Quarterly, 25(1), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P. (2000). Terrorism Versus Democracy. The Liberal State Response. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, J. M. & Roule, T. J. (2002). Fighting Terrorist Finance. Survival, 44(2), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, R. (2006). Rational Extremists. The Political Economy of Radicalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. (2007). State Terrorism in Latin America: Chile, Argentina and International Human Rights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagare, F. C. (2006) Deterrence is Dead: Long Live Deterrence. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 23(2), 115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Christopher Daase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Spencer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Alexander Spencer Alexander Kocks Kai Harbrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften ist eine Marke von Springer Fachmedien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daase, C., Spencer, A. (2011). Stand und Perspektiven der politikwissenschaftlichen Terrorismusforschung. In: Spencer, A., Kocks, A., Harbrich, K. (eds) Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93040-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93040-4_2

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17729-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-93040-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation