Abstract
Litigation-PR has always existed – just the term is new. Subliminally, Litigation-PR providers work with methods of extortion. Fortunately, the influence on justice is overestimated – even by the president of Federal Court of Justice in Germany. However it is not absolutely inefficient. The media report unilaterally and exaggerate. Some editorial departments have a minor expert knowledge on law and are under a strong (internal and external) competition pressure. A consultant could increase the pile of shards.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Vgl. Jahn, Joachim (2010). Zwischen Erpressung und Dienst an der Gerechtigkeit, in: Boehme-Neßler, Volker (Hrsg.). Die Öffentlichkeit als Richter? Baden-Baden, S.11–19. Einige der folgenden Ausführungen fußen (nunmehr erweitert und aktualisiert) auf diesem (ansonsten andere Aspekte vertiefenden) Aufsatz.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jahn, J. (2012). Litigation-PR als Provokation. In: Rademacher, L., Schmitt-Geiger, A. (eds) Litigation-PR: Alles was Recht ist. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18980-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18980-2_15
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18201-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18980-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)