Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations: Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten. Eine Einleitung.

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations

Zusammenfassung

This publication was motivated by the Annual conference of the German Communication Association, Public Relations/Organisational Communication division during November 2010 in Leipzig, Germany. Under the thematic guidance of “Organisational communication and communication management“ a wide platform was established for discussion of all aspects of organisational communication and a greater foundation was enabled for communication management within organisational studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Baecker, Dirk 2007. The network synthesis of social action I: Towards a sociological theory of next society. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 14(4): 9-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baerns, Barbara 1995. PR-Erfolgskontrolle: Messen und Bewerten in der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. Verfahren, Strategien, Beispiele. Frankfurt am Main: IMK, Institut für Medienentwicklung und Kommunikation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentele, Günter, Romy Fröhlich, und Peter Szyszka. 2005. Handbuch der Public Relations. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und berufliches Handeln. Mit Lexikon. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, Edward L. 1928. Propaganda. New York: Horace Liveright

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, Edward L. 1952. Public Relations. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, Edward L., und Howard W. Cutler 1956. The engineering of consent. Norman,OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besson, Nanette A. 2008. Strategische PR-Evaluation: Erfassung, Bewertung und Kontrolle von Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. 3. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom, Glen M. 2009. Cutlip & Center‘s Effective public relations. 10. Auflage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, George, Lars Thøger Christensen, Theodore Zorn, und Shiv Ganesh. 2004. Organizational Communication in an age of globalization: Issues, reflections, practices. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, George, und Lars Thøger Christensen. 2001. Public relations as contested terrain: A critical response. In Handbook of Public Relations, eds. Robert L. Heath, und Gabriel Vasquez, 167-181. Thousand Oaks, CF: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crijns, Rogier, und Nina Janich (Hrsg.). 2005. Interne Kommunikation von Unternehmen: psychologische, kommunikationsWissenschaftliche und kulturvergleichende Studien. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, Adam. 2002. The century of the self, Part 1. Documentary. London: BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Lee. 2012. Defi ning the ‘object’ of public relations research: A new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry 1(1): 7-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, Eric M., Harold L. Goodall Jr., und Angela Trethewey. 2010. Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, Terence. 2006. A delicate equilibrium: Balancing theory, practice and outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research 18(2): 191-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making social science matter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, James E. 2006. Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research 18: 151-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, James E., Larissa Grunig, und David Dozier. 2002. Excellent public relations and Effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, James E., und Todd Hunt. 1984. Managing Public Relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Robert L. 2010. The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations. 2. Auflage. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herger, Nikodemus. 2006. Organisationskommunikation: Beobachtung und Steuerung eines organisationalen Risikos. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herger, Nikodemus. 2006. Vertrauen und Organisationskommunikation: Identität – Marke - Image - Reputation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heron, Alexander R. 1942. Sharing information wiThemployees. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, Peggy. 2002. Ansätze und Probleme der PR-Historiographie. Ein Vergleich der PRGeschichtsschreibung in den USA und Deutschland anhand einer systematischen Literaturbestandsaufnahme. Unveröff entlichte Magisterarbeit, Universität Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, Peggy, Oliver Raaz, und Stefan Wehmeier. 2007. From facts to stories or from stories to facts? Analyzing public relations history in public relations textbooks. Public Relations Review 33(1): 191-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundhausen, Carl. 1938. Public Relations. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 15 (1): 48-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihlen, Øvind, Betteke vanRuler, und Magnus Fredriksson (Hrsg.). 2009. Public relations and social theory. Key figures and concepts. New York; London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablin, Fredric M., und Linda L. Putnam. 2005. The new handbook of organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablin, Fredric M., Linda L Putnam, Karlene H Roberts, und Lyman W. Porter. 1987. Handbook of organizational communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, Robert. 1988. Moral mazes. The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, Robert, und Janice M. Hirota 2000. Image makers. Advertising, public relations and the ethos of advocacy. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarren, Otfried, und Ulrike Röttger. 2009. Steuerung, Refl exierung und Interpe-netration: Kernelemente einer strukturationstheoretisch begründeten PR-Theorie. In Theorien der Public Relations. Grundlagen und Perspektiven der PR-Forschung, hrsg. Ulrike Röttger, 29-50. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Robert S. 1994. Management accounting (1984-1994): Development of new practiceand theory. Management Accounting Research (5): 247-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Kathleen S. 2001. Stewardship: The fift h step in the public relations process. In Handbook of Public Relations, eds. Robert L. Heath, und Gabriel Vasquez, 279-290. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, Alfred. 1998. Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Organisation beim Ren.de Industrielle Beziehungen 5 (1): 45-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kussin, Matthias. 2006. Public Relations als Funktion moderner Organisation: soziologische Analysen. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, Walter. 1922. An inquiry into the principles of the good society. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Karen, Karen Golden-Biddle, und Martha S. Feldman. 2008. Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science 19(6):907-918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menz, Florian, und Andreas Müller. 2009. Organisationskommunikation: Grundlagen und Analysen der sprachlichen Inszenierung von Organisation. München/Mering: Hampp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, Vance O. 1957. The hidden persuaders. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S. 1976. The new elements of mathematics. The Hague: Mouton Publishers. Phillips, David. 2002. Super-themes for PR evaluation. Journal of Communication Management 6 (4), 368-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Linda L., und Michael E. Pacanowsky. 1983. Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raupp, Juliana. 2011. Organizational communication in a networked public sphere. Studies in Communication 1: 15-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röttger, Ulrike, Joachim Preusse, und Jana Schmitt. 2011. Grundlagen der Public Relations: Eine kommunikationsWissenschaftliche Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, Ulrike, und Wanda, J. Orlikowski. 2004. A practice perspective on technologymediated network relations: The use of Internet-based self-serve technologies. Information Systems Research 15(1): 87-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacks, Don W. 2002. Primer of public relations research. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, James. R., Andrew S. Flanagin, David, R., und George Cheney. 2000. Organizational communication research: Key moments, central concerns, and future challenges. Communication Yearbook 24: 100-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, James R. 1999. What is “Organizational Communication”? Communication as a dialogic of text and conversation. The Communication Review 3 (1-2): 21-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, James R., und Elizabeth van Every. 2000. The emergent organization: Communication as its Site and Surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, James R., und Elizabeth van Every. 2011. The situated organization. Case studies in the pragmatics of communication research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theis-Berglmair, Anna-Maria. 2008. Organizational communication and public relations: A conceptual framework for a common ground. In Public Relations Research: European and International Perspectives and Innovations, eds. Ansgar Zerfaß, Betteke vanRuler, und Krishnamurthy Sriramesh, 111-123. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, Phillip K. 1984. The functions of communicatin in organizations. In Handbook of rhetorical and communication theory, eds. Caroll C. Arnold, John W. Bowers, 659- 719. New York: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, Phillip K., und W. Charles Redding. 1988. Organizational Communication - past and present tenses. In Handbook of Organizational Communciation, eds. GeraldM. Goldhaber, und George A. Barnett,5-34. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, Phillip K., und Maryanne Wanca-Th ibault. 2001. Organizational Communication: Prelude and prospects. In The new handbook of organizational communicationAdvances in theory, research, and methods, eds. Fredric M. Jablin, und Linda L. Putnam, xvii-xxxi. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Tom. 2001. Integrating planning and evaluation: evaluating the public relations practice and public relations programs. In Handbook of Public Relations, eds. Robert L Heath, und Gabriel Vasquez, 259-268. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Tom. 2008. Public relations research priorities: a Delphi study. Journal of Communication Management 12(2): 104-123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeier, Stefan. 2009. Out of the fog and into the future: Directions of public relations, theory building, research and practice. Canadian Journal of Communication 34: 265- 282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeier, Stefan. 2012. Public Relations: Status und Zukunft eines Forschungsfelds. Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeier, Stefan, und Peter Winkler. Forthcoming. Expanding the bridge, minimizing the gaps: Public relations, organizational communication and the idea of communication constitutes organization. Management Communication Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Laurie J. 2001. Extending strategic planning to communication tactits, in Handbook of Public Relations, eds. Robert L. Heath, und Gabriel Vasquez, 215-222. Thousand Oaks, CF: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfaß, Ansgar. 2010. Unternehmensführung und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. Grundlegung einer Theorie der Unternehmenskommunikation und Public Relations. 3. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, Ansgar, Dejan Vercic, Piet Verhoeven, Angeles Moreno, und Ralph Tench. 2012. European Communication Monitor 2012. Challenges and competencies for strategic communication. Results of an empirical survey in 42 countries. Brüssel: EACD/EUPRERA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Stefan Wehmeier

  2. PR und Kommunikationsmanagement, Macromedia Hochschule für Medien und Kommunikation in München, Belgradstr. 33, München, 80796, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Lars Rademacher PhD

  3. Universität Leipzig, Burgstr. 21, Leipzig, 04109, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Ansgar Zerfaß

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Stefan Wehmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Lars Rademacher PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. Ansgar Zerfaß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Wehmeier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Burgstr. 21, Leipzig, 04109, Germany

    Ansgar Zerfaß

  2. Belgradstr. 33, München, 80796, Germany

    Lars Rademacher

  3. Greifswald, Germany

    Stefan Wehmeier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wehmeier, S., Rademacher, L., Zerfaß, A. (2013). Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations: Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten. Eine Einleitung.. In: Zerfaß, A., Rademacher, L., Wehmeier, S. (eds) Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18961-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18961-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18098-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18961-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation