Skip to main content

Potential

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Abstract

In this entry, the notion of potential is first introduced in its general meaning and then discussed for its role in creativity studies. In particular, by introducing the dynamic definition of creativity (Corazza, Creat Res J 28:258–267, 2016), which foresees that creativity is a context-embedded phenomenon requiring potential originality and effectiveness, this term becomes a central actor in the understanding of the complex creativity phenomenon in all its multiple nuances. In order to cover all the important dimensions in creativity studies, three classification frameworks are used: the 4P’s by Rhodes (Phi Delta Kappan 42:305–310, 1961), the 5A’s by Glăveanu (Rev Gen Psychol 17:69, 2013), and the 4C’s by Kaufman and Beghetto (Rev Gen Psychol 13:1, 2009). Exploiting these perspectives, 16 different forms of creative potential are introduced and discussed: individual creative potential, embedded individual creative potential, mini-c creative potential, little-c creative potential, Pro-c creative potential, Big-C creative potential, systemic process potential, embedded process potential, universal process potential, instantaneous product potential, experiential product potential, condensation potential, cultural evolution potential, sociocultural context potential, action potential, and virtual world potential. These relevant forms of potential in the creative process interact in various ways to determine the overall level of potential originality and effectiveness in a creativity episode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, R. S. (1983). Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement. In International series in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5). Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2019). Unfreezing creativity: A dynamic micro-longitudinal approach. In R. A. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic perspectives on creativity (pp. 7–25). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cattani, G. (2006). Technological pre-adaptation, speciation, and emergence of new technologies: How corning invented and developed fiber optics. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(2), 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E. (2017a). Creativity and anticipation. In R. Poli (Ed.), Handbook of anticipation. Theoretical and applied aspects of the use of future in decision making. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E. (2017b). Organic creativity for well-being in the post-information society. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E. (2019). The dynamic universal creativity process. In R. A. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic perspectives on creativity: New directions for theory, research, and practice in education. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E., & Agnoli, S. (2015). On the path towards the science of creative thinking. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking (pp. 3–20). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). Potential in creativity: Individual, social, material perspectives, and a dynamic integrative framework. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E., & Lubart, T. (2020). The big bang of originality and effectiveness: A dynamic creativity framework and its application to scientific missions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E., & Lubart, T. (2021). Intelligence and creativity: Mapping constructs on the space-time continuum. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E., Pedone, R., & Vanelli-Coralli, A. (2010). Technology as a need: Trends in the evolving information society. Advances in Electronics and Telecommunications, 1, 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Happiness and creativity. The Futurist, 31(5), S8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity (Vol. 12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, J. (2013). The information society: A study of continuity and change. London, UK: Facet Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. New York: Appleton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guegan, J., Nelson, J., & Lubart, T. (2017). The relationship between contextual cues in virtual environments and creative processes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(3), 202–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. (1964). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. 1. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1964(2), i-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier, M., & Walton, A. P. (2016). Creativity in men and women: Threat, other-interest, and self-assessment. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal of Talent Development and Creativity, 1(2), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastria, S., Agnoli, S., Zanon, M., Lubart, T., & Corazza, G. E. (2018). Creative brain, creative mind, creative person. In Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences (pp. 3–29). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2011). Steps toward an explicit ontology of the future. Journal of Futures Studies, 16(1), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Emanuele Corazza .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Corazza, G.E. (2021). Potential. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_163-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_163-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics