Skip to main content

Machine Learning the TV Consumption: A Basis for a Recommendation System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications and Usability of Interactive Television (jAUTI 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 813))

Abstract

With the continuous growth of channels and content available in a typical interactive TV service, viewers have become increasingly frustrated, struggling to select which programs to watch. Content recommendation systems have been pointed out as a possible tool to mitigate this problem, especially when applied to on-demand content. However, in linear content, its success has been limited, either due to the specificities of this type of content or due to the little integration with normal consumption behaviors. Despite that, recommendation algorithms have undergone a set of enhancements in order to improve their effectiveness, particularly when applied to the world of linear content. These improvements, focused on the use of the visualization context, paired with machine learning techniques, can represent a big advantage in the quality of the suggestions to be proposed to the viewer. The area of user experience (UX) evaluation, in interactive TV, has been also a subject of ongoing research, extending beyond the traditional usability evaluation, pursuing other dimensions of analysis such as identification, emotion, stimulation, and aesthetics, as well as distinct moments of evaluation. This paper presents the proposal for the development of a recommendation system, based on the viewing context, and a methodology for evaluating the way this system influences the UX of the viewers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abreu, J., Nogueira, J., Becker, V., Cardoso, B.: Survey of Catch-up TV and other time-shift services: a comprehensive analysis and taxonomy of linear and nonlinear television. Telecommun. Syst. 64, 57–74 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0157-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz, B.: The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. HarperCollins, New York City (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vanattenhoven, J., Geerts, D.: Contextual aspects of typical viewing situations: a new perspective for recommending television and video content. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 19, 761–779 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-015-0861-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernhaupt, R., Obrist, M., Weiss, A., et al.: Trends in the living room and beyond: results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing. Comput. Entertain. 6, 5:1–5:23 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1350843.1350848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Digitalsmiths: Q4 2015 Video Trends Report - Consumer Behavior Across Pay-TV, VOD, PPV, OTT, TVE, Connected Devices, and Content Discovery (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Turrin, R., Condorelli, A., Cremonesi, P., Pagano, R.: Time-based TV programs prediction. In: 1st Workshop on Recommender Systems for Television and Online Video at ACM RecSys (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Churchill, E.F.: Putting the person back into personalization. Interactions 20, 12–15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2504847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aharon, M., Hillel, E., Kagian, A., Lempel, R., Makabee, H., Nissim, R.: Watch-it-next: a contextual TV recommendation system. In: Bifet, A., May, M., Zadrozny, B., Gavalda, R., Pedreschi, D., Bonchi, F., Cardoso, J., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9286, pp. 180–195. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23461-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonçalves, D., Costa, M., Couto, F.M.: A flexible recommendation system for cable TV. In: 3rd Workshop on Recommendation Systems for Television and online Video, RecSysTV 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Portugal, I., Alencar, P., Cowan, D.: The use of machine learning algorithms in recommender systems: a systematic review. Expert Syst. Appl. 97, 205–227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Context-aware recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 191–226. Springer, Boston (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_6

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, T., Iyengar, V.S.: Recommender systems using linear classifiers. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 313–334 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1, 81–106 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022643204877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ericsson AB Mediaroom—Ericsson Media Solutions. https://mediasolutions.ericsson.com/products/mediaroom/. Accessed 8 Jan 2018

  15. Zibriczky, D., Petres, Z., Waszlavik, M., Tikk, D.: EPG content recommendation in large scale: a case study on interactive TV platform. In: 2013 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, pp. 315–320 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buczak, A.L., Zimmerman, J., Kurapati, K.: Personalization: improving ease-of-use, trust and accuracy of a TV show recommender. In: Proceedings of AH 2002 Workshop on Personalization in Future TV (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chang, N., Irvan, M., Terano, T.: A TV program recommender framework. Proc. Comput. Sci. 22, 561–570 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Swearingen, K., Sinha, R.: Interaction design for recommender systems. Des. Interact. Syst. 6, 312–334 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9241-210: ergonomics of human–system interaction - human-centred design for interactive systems. Int. Organ. Stand. 2010, 32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0dt90114h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jenner, M.: Binge-watching: video-on-demand, quality TV and mainstreaming fandom. Int. J. Cult. Stud. 20, 304–320 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877915606485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Silva, T.: A UX evaluation approach for second-screen applications. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 605, 105–120 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38907-3_9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernhaupt, R., Pirker, M.: Evaluating user experience for interactive television: towards the development of a domain-specific user experience questionnaire. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8118, pp. 642–659. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40480-1_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Drouet, D., Bernhaupt, R.: User experience evaluation methods: lessons learned from an interactive TV case-study. In: Bogdan, C., et al. (eds.) HCSE/HESSD -2016. LNCS, vol. 9856, pp. 351–358. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44902-9_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Brooke, J.: SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189, 4–7 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Szwillus, G., Ziegler, J. (eds.) 2003 Interaktion Bewegung Mensch & Computer, pp. 187–196. Vieweg + Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hassenzahl, M.: The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19, 319–349 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25, 49–59 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., Hoonhout, J.: User experience white paper. Bringing clarity to concept user experience, pp. 1–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ferraz de Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Beça, P.: InApp questions – an approach for contextual evaluation of applications. In: Abásolo, M.J., Almeida, P., Pina Amargós, J. (eds.) jAUTI 2016. CCIS, vol. 689, pp. 163–175. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63321-3_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernardo Cardoso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cardoso, B., Abreu, J. (2018). Machine Learning the TV Consumption: A Basis for a Recommendation System. In: Abásolo, M., Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Silva, T. (eds) Applications and Usability of Interactive Television. jAUTI 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 813. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90170-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90170-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90169-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90170-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics