Abstract
The paper shows the setting up of an integrated evaluation process to identify a sustainable enhancement strategy for a particularly significant territory in southern Italy that expresses the concept of Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) proposed by the UNESCO. The evaluation process is flexible to adapt to the specificity of complex contexts, to enable interaction with heterogeneous knowledge and to capture local values associated with the particular dimensions of a multi-scalar system. The evaluation is defined as a multidimensional, dynamic, incremental and cyclical learning process, which combines evaluation techniques integrated with public-participation techniques in order to delineate shared and transparent intervention strategies. Through a shared observation process of the context have been identified the values and resources, the key stakeholder categories and their preferences. Selecting context-aware actions enables us to reduce the conflicts by transforming them into synergies, recognizing as essential the components of a constantly evolving, multidimensional and complex landscape in which various systems of values and relationships interact. A ‘tailor-made’ multi-methodological approach that is enables the combination of the approaches of the Soft-System Methodology, Multi-Criteria Analysis and Multi-Group Analysis with the purpose of identifying the components of the perceived scenario and developing a strategic map able to put in network a system of micro actions, material and immaterial, sensitive to context specificities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackoff, R. L. (2010). Systems thinking for curious managers. Gillingham: Triarchy Press.
Bánáthy, B. H. (2000). Guided evolution of society: A systems view (contemporary systems thinking). Berlin: Springer.
Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., & Sturiale L. (2013). Cultural planning: A model of governance of the landscape and cultural resources in development strategies in rural contexts. In Proceedings of the XVII—IPSAPA Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference (Vol. 5, pp. 177–188). Lettonia: Rezekne Higher Educ Inst-Rezeknes Augstskola.
Calabrò, F., & Della Spina, L. (2014). Innovative tools for the effectiveness and efficiency of administrative action of the metropolitan cities: The strategic operational programme. In Advanced engineering forum (Vol. 11, pp 3–10). Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.
Calabrò F., Della Spina, L., & Tramontana, C. (2015). Il mosaico paesistico-culturale: la dieta mediterranea per il rinascimento di un’area interna della Calabria. In 29th International Interdisciplinary Conference. The Turning Point of the Landscape-cultural Mosaic: Renaissance Revelation Resilience. Napoli, Italy.
Calabrò, F. (2017). Local Communities and management of cultural heritage of the inner areas. An application of break-even analysis. In O. Gervasi et al. (Eds.), Computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 10406). Springer, Cham.
Checkland, P. (1981). System thinking, system practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action. Chichester: Wiley.
Concilio, G. (2010). Bricolaging knowledge and practices in spatial strategy-making. In M. Cerreta, G. Concilio & V. Monno (Eds.), Making strategies in spatial planning. Knowledge and values (pp. 281–303). Dordrecht: Springer.
Della Spina, L., & Calabrò, F. (2008). La valutazione a supporto della fattibilità dei programmi di sviluppo urbano sostenibile, LaborEst (Vol. 1, pp. 5–10). Reggio Calabria: Laruffa editore.
Della Spina, L., Scrivo, R., Ventura, C., & Viglianisi, A. (2015). Urban renewal: Negotiation procedures and evaluation models. In Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2015—15th International Conference, Banff, AB, Canada, June 22–25, 2015, Proceedings, Part III (Vol. 9157, pp. 88–103). Switzerland: Springer.
Della Spina, L., Ventura, C., & Viglianisi A. (2016). A multicriteria assessment model for selecting strategic projects in urban areas. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (Vol. 9788, pp. 414–427). Switzerland: Springer.
De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, S. O., Lo Cascio, S., & Munda, G. (2000). Combining participative and institutional approaches with multi-criteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issue in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics, 34(2), 267–282.
Eden, C., & Simpson, P. (1989). SODA and cognitive mapping in practice. In J. Rosenhead (Ed.), Rational analysis for a problematic world (pp. 43–70). Chichester: Wiley.
Funtowicz, S. O., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & Ravetz, J. (2002). Multicriteria-based environmental policy. In H. Abaza & A. Baranzini (Eds.), Implementing sustainable development (pp. 53–77). Cheltenham: UNEP/Edward Elgar.
Fusco Girard, L. (2010). Creative evaluations for a human sustainable planning. In Making strategies in spatial planning (pp. 305–327). Springer Netherlands.
Fusco Girard, L. (2012). Per uno sviluppo umano sostenibile nel Mezzogiorno: Come gestire la transizione verso una nuova base economica urbana. In AA.VV., Nord e Sud a 150 anni dall’Unità d’Italia (pp. 759–779). Roma: Svimez.
Gupta, K., Sleezer, C. M., & Russ-Eft, D. F. (2007). A practical guide to needs assessment. San Francisco: Wiley.
Jackson, M. (2003). Systems thinking: Creating holisms for managers. Chichester: Wiley.
Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., & Voogd, H. (1990). Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Nijkamp, P., & Fusco Girard, L. (1997). Le valutazioni per lo sviluppo sostenibile della città e del territorio. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: Wiley.
Roy, B. (1985). Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la décision. Paris: Economica.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, planning, piority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. A., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic process. New York: Springer.
UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the historic urban landscape. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Wittwer, J. W. (2009). Fishbone diagram/cause and effect diagram. In Excel, from Vertex42.com. Accessed at http://www.vertex42.com/ExcelTemplates/fishbone-diagram.html. 27 June 2016.
Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Della Spina, L. (2018). The Integrated Evaluation as a Driving Tool for Cultural-Heritage Enhancement Strategies. In: Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Laconte, P., Costa, S. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2017. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75773-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75774-2
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)