Skip to main content

Bricolaging Knowledge and Practices in Spatial Strategy-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Making Strategies in Spatial Planning

Part of the book series: Urban and Landscape Perspectives ((URBANLAND,volume 9))

Abstract

This chapter looks at strategy-making by abandoning the vision of strategy as an end-product and considering that the future is changing along the path from present to future. The attempt to re-conceptualise strategy-making starts from considering modes for complex organisations to develop a strategy by using, producing and appropriating knowledge and practices while composing knowledge and practices in a coherent whole towards the needed change.

In the first part this chapter explores the connection between knowledge and action in strategy-making, recognising that knowledge and action are linked together by a mutual framing dependency. Strategy is seen as a dynamic entity evolving together with the organisational structure and is described as the dynamic product of a bricolage activity: resources for the bricolage are knowledge and practices explored and internalised by the organisation with respect to a needed change within strategic episodes. In the second part, the ‘story of a strategy’ is described and analysed: it refers to the planning experience carried out in Torre Guaceto, a Natural Reserve in southern Italy. Finally the chapter considers the possibility to look at strategic episodes as spaces for the micro-foundation of strategy and opens a small perspective for further research towards other micro-foundational aspects or spaces in strategy-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, S. M., & Flynn, P. M. (2005). Actionable knowledge: Consulting to promote women on boards. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(5), 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B, 31(5), 743–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrechts, L. (2006). Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A, 38(6), 1149–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angehrn, A. A. (2005). Learning-by-playing: Bridging the knowing-doing gap in urban communities. In A. Bounfour & L. Edvinsson (Eds.), Intellectual Capital for Communities: Nations, Regions, Cities (pp. 299–316). Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: a guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1996). Actionable knowledge: design causality in the service of consequential theory. Journal of applied behavioural science, 32(4), 390–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbanente, A., Borri, D., & Pace, F. (1993). Micro-problems and micro-decisions in planning by artificial reasoners. In R. Klosterman & S. P. French (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International conference on computers in urban planning and urban management (pp. 17–33). Atlanta: City Planning Program Georgia Tech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1993). Macroeconomics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, N. -I., van Baalen, P. J., & Kumar, K. (2002) The importance of sociality for understanding knowledge sharing processes in organizational contexts. Report Series Research in Management [http://publishing.eur.nl/ir/repub/asset/179/erimrs20020308162214.pdf; accessed June 2008].

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona M. (Ed.). (2009). Planning through projects: moving from master planning to strategic planning – 30 Cities. Amsterdam: Techne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., Clegg, S. R., & Kornberger, M. (2008). Strategy as practice? Strategic Organization, 6(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celino, A., & Concilio, G. (2006). Managing open contents for collaborative deliberation in environmental planning. In F. Malpica, A. Oropeza, J. Carrasquero, & P. Howell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international conference on politics and information systems: technologies and applications (PISTA 2006) (pp. 155–160). Orlando: International Institute of Informatics and Systemics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celino, A., Concilio, G., & De Liddo, A. (2008). Managing knowledge in urban planning: Can memory support systems help? In M. S. Ackerman, R. Dieng-Kuntz, C. Simone, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Knowledge management in action (pp. 51–65). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. (2004). Strategy-as-practice: Reflections on the research agenda. European Management Review, 1(1), 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R., & Marvin, S. (2006). Researching the sustainable city: Three models of interdisciplinarity. Environment and Planning A, 38(6), 1009–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1994). Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 756–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J., & Michailova, S. (Eds.). (2009). Knowledge governance. Themes and questions. In N. J. Foss & S. Michailova (Eds.), Knowledge governance: Processes and perspectives (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2002). Knowledge management foundations. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2007). Planning as urban therapeutic. Environment and Planning A, 39(2), 467–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2008). Knowledge flows, spatial strategy-making, and the roles of academics. Environment and Planning C, 26(5), 861–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey P., Khakee A., Motte A., Needham B. (Eds.). (1997). Making strategic spatial plans. Innovation in Europe. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendon, J. A. (2000). Having and holding: Storage, memory, knowledge, and social relations. American Anthropologist, 102(1), 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J., & Seidl, D. (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, J. (2007). Stretching beyond the horizon. A multiplanar theory of spatial planning and governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubik, M. (2007). Exploring the knowledge landscape: Four emerging views of knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic perspectives: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 23–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursive, adaptive and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Wilson, D. (2006). Actionable strategy knowledge: A practice perspective. European Management Journal, 24(5), 348–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy as practice: research directions and resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittngton, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzara, G. F. (1999). Between transient constructs and persistent structures: Designing systems in action. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(4), 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Anfang und Ende: Probleme einer Unterscheidung. In N. Luhmann & K. Schorr (Eds.), Zwischen Anfang und Ende: Fragen an die Pädagogik. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maisseu, A. (2006). Gestalteconomy: The economic bases of knowledge management. International Journal of Nuclear Knowledge Management, 2(2), 174–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap. How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese T., Spaziante A. (Eds.). (2003). Pianificazione Strategica per le Città: Riflessioni dalle Pratiche. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnér, P. (2003). Strategy creation in the periphery: Inductive versus deductive strategy-making. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnér, P. (2008). Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy. Human Relations, 61(4), 565–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning theory, 6(1), 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1996). The construction of social reality. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2008) The microfoundations of governance: Why psychology rather than economics could be the key to better intergovernmental relations. Paper presented at Zhejiang University [http://www.soton.ac.uk/ccd/people/stokerg.html, accessed June 2008].

  • Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002). The planning polity: Planning, government and the policy process. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Organizational change and development. American Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (2003). The work of strategizing and organizing: For a practice perspective. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (2004). Strategy after modernism: Recovering practice. European Management Review, 1(1), 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. C., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Thinking and acting strategically: New challenges for interrogating strategy. European Management Review, 1(1), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. (1987). Management support systems: Towards integrated knowledge management. Human Systems Management, 7(1), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. (2002). Knowledge of enterprise: Knowledge management or knowledge technology? International Journal on Information Technology & Decision making, 1(2), 181–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. (2008). Strategy and strategic action in the global era: Overcoming the knowing-doing gap. International Journal of Technology Management, 43(1–3), 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I sincerely thank Adele Celino, my best friend and colleague: this chapter refers to many reflections and ideas developed in our collaborative work. I also thank Valeria Monno who supported the writing of this chapter by offering insightful criticism.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grazia Concilio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Concilio, G. (2010). Bricolaging Knowledge and Practices in Spatial Strategy-Making. In: Cerreta, M., Concilio, G., Monno, V. (eds) Making Strategies in Spatial Planning. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3106-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics