Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Have Robots Supported STEM Teaching?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics in STEM Education

Abstract

Context: Robotics has assisted teachers to combine technology and engineering topics to concretize science and mathematics concepts in real-world applications. As a result, benefits in different concepts and skills, as well as positive long-term effects, have been observed. Objective: This work aims to identify state-of-the-art robotics applications to support STEM teaching. To do so, we intend to answer six research questions: (1) What concepts are considered and how are they explored? (2) What skills are expected to be developed? (3) How is educational robotics associated with school curriculum? (4) What types of robots are used? (5) What age groups/educational levels are considered? (6) How is educational robotics evaluated? Method: We carried out a systematic literature review to identify, assess, and synthesize relevant papers published from 2013. A protocol developed by us guided the review conduction and enhanced its repeatability with reduced subjectivity. Results: 60 publications able to answer the research questions were summarized. We found that: (1) several STEM concepts have been explored in all educational levels; (2) educational robotics is still frequently associated with teamwork and problem-solving development, extracurricular activities, and LEGO robots; (3) only 25% of the 60 papers quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated learning. Conclusion: Robots support for STEM education has been successful in different scenarios. The inherent flexibility, coupled with the experiences reported by a significant piece of the literature, can inspire new applications of educational robotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abaid, N., Kopman, V., & Porfiri, M. (2013). An attraction toward engineering careers: The story of a Brooklyn outreach program for KuFFFD12 students. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 20(2), 31–39. doi:10.1109/MRA.2012.2184672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akiva, T., Povis, K. T., & Martinez, A. (2015). Bringing in the tech: using outside expertise to enhance technology learning in youth programs. Afterschool Matters, 22, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayar M. C. (2015). First-hand experience with engineering design and career interest in engineering: An informal STEM education case study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6), 1655–1675. doi:10.12738/estp.2015.6.0134

  • Barger, M., & Boyette, M. A. (2015). Do k-12 robotics activities lead to engineering and technology career choices? In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–9). doi:10.18260/p.23895

  • Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58, 978–988. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani, M., Gardner, M., & Hickmott, J. (2009). Assessment methods in the book: Demonstrating student success, a practical guide to outcomes-based assessment of learning and development in student affairs. United States: Stylus Publishing, LLC, Sterling

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. N., & Howard, A. M. (2014). The positive effects of verbal encouragement in mathematics education using a social robot. In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 1–5). doi:10.1109/ISECon.2014.6891009

  • Bussi, M. G. B., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2015). Geometry in early years: Sowing seeds for a mathematical definition of squares and rectangles. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 391–405. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0636-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cateté, V., Wassell, K., & Barnes, T. (2014). Use and development of entertainment technologies in after school STEM program. In ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 163–168). doi:10.1145/2538862.2538952

  • Chen, Y. K., Chang, C. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2015). The instructional design of integrative STEM curriculum: A pilot study in a robotics summer camp. In: International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (pp. 871–875).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898–909. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. J. C. J. (2014). Integrated STEAM education through global robotics art festival (GRAF). In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 1–6). doi:10.1109/ISECon.2014.6891011

  • Chung, C. J. C. J., Cartwright, C., & Chung, C. (2014a). Robot music camp 2013: An experiment to promote STEM and computer science. In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 1–7). doi:10.1109/ISECon.2014.6891012

  • Chung, C. J. C. J., Cartwright, C., & Cole, M. (2014b). Assessing the impact of an autonomous robotics competition for STEM education. Journal of STEM education, 15(2), 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among fivetraditions. Thousand Oaks, United States: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Cristóforis, P., Pedre, S., Nitsche, M. A., Fischer, T., Pessacg, F., & Pietro, C. D. (2013). A behavior-based approach for educational robotics activities. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56, 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, I. K. (1996). The pocket guide to appraisal. London, United Kingdom: BMJ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deken, B., Koch, D., & Dudley, J. (2013). Establishing a robotics competition in an underserved region: Initial impacts on interest in technology and engineering. Journal of Technology, Management & Applied Engineering, 29(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Delden, S., & Yang, K. P. (2014). Robotics summer camps as a recruiting tool: A case study. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 29(5), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2014). Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & International Conference Robotics in Education (pp. 27–34).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2016). RoboCupjunior for promoting STEM education, 21st century skills, and technological advancement through robotics competition. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 692–699. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2015.05.013

  • Erickson-Ludwig, A. (2015). A college lead informal learning engineering education program for school aged youth. In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 83–87). doi:10.1109/ISECon.2015.7119951

  • Flannery, L. P., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Let’s dance the “robot hokey-pokey!”: Children’s programming approaches and achievement throughout early cognitive development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galley, D., Martin, G. S., Stone, J. C., Hunt, B., Laswell, J., Mortensen, L., et al. (2015). A view from the high school/two year college partnership interface: Our best practices employed in engineering and technology education. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–27)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. M., Kuleshov, Y. A., & Lumkes, J. H. (2014). Using fluid power workshops to increase STEM interest in k-12 students. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T. (2000). How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine. London, United Kingdom: BMJ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gucwa, K. J., & Cheng, H. H. (2014). Robosim for integrated computing and STEM education. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamner, E., & Cross, J. (2013). Arts & Bots: Techniques for distributing a steam robotics program through k-12 classrooms. In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 1–5). doi:10.1109/ISECon.2013.6525207

  • He, S., Maldonado J, Uquillas A, & Cetoute T. (2014) Teaching k-12 students robotics programming in collaboration with the robotics club. In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • He, S., Zubarriain, J., & Kumia, N. (2015). Integrating robotics education in pre-college engineering program. In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 183–188).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (2013). An engineering mentor’s take on: “first” robotics. Tech Directions, 72, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, M., FakhrHosseini, M., Barnes, J., Duford, Z., Zhang, R., & Ryan, J., et al. (2016) Making live theatre with multiple robots as actors bringing robots to rural schools to promote steam education for underserved students. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 445–446). doi:10.1109/HRI.2016.7451798

  • Kaloti-Hallak, F., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. M. (2015a). The effectiveness of robotics competitions on students’ learning of computer science. Olympiads in Informatics, 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaloti-Hallak, F., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari M. M. (2015b). Students’ attitudes and motivation during robotics activities. In Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 102–110). doi:10.1145/2818314.2818317

  • Karim, M., Lemaignan, S., & Mondada, F. (2015). A review: Can robots reshape k-12 STEM education? In International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, T., & Maloney, P. (2013). Exciting young students in grades k-8 about STEM through an afterschool robotics challenge. American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 39–54. doi:10.19030/ajee.v4i1.7857

  • Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early child-hood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245–255. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5

  • Khanlari A. (2013). Effects of educational robots on learning STEM and on students’ attitude toward stem. In Conference on Engineering Education (pp. 62–66). doi:10.1109/ICEED.2013.6908304

  • Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14–31. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, B. A., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Evidence-based Software Engineering, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkins, D. B., Moore, J. C., Rubbo, L. J., & Covington, L. R. (2013). Application of the cognitive apprenticeship framework to a middle school robotics camp. In ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 89–94). doi:10.1145/2445196.2445226

  • Laut, J., Bartolini, T., & Porfiri, M. (2015). Bioinspiring an interest in STEM. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(1), 48–55. doi:10.1109/TE.2014.2324533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A., Newsom, J., Schunn, C., & Shoop, R. (2013). Students learn programming faster through robotic simulation. Tech Directions, 72(8), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T., Berland, M., Benton, T., & Smith, C. P. (2013). Learning programming with IPRO: The effects of a mobile, social programming environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 24(3), 301–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M. M., Lowes, S., Tirhali, D., McGrath, E. W., Sayres, K., & Peterson, K. A. D. (2013). Transforming a middle and high school robotics curriculum. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–21)

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M. M., Lowes, S., Tirhali, D., & Camins, A. H. (2015) Student learning of STEM concepts using a challenge-based robotics curriculum. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, United States: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modekurty, S., Fong, J., & Cheng, H. H. (2014). C-STEM girls computing and robotics leadership camp. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–14)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montironi, M. A., Eliahu, D. S., & Cheng, H. H. (2015). A robotics-based 3d modeling curriculum for k-12 education. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–14). doi:10.18260/p.23443

  • Mubin, O., Stevens, C., Shahid, S., & Al Mahmud, A. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology for Education and Learning, 1, 1–7. doi:10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015

  • Nag, S., Katz, J. G., & Saenz-Otero, A. (2013). Collaborative gaming and competition for CS-STEM education using SPHERES zero robotics. Acta Astronautica, 83, 145–174. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemiro, J., Larriva, C., & Jawaharlal, M. (2015). Developing creative behavior in elementary school students with robotics. The Journal of Creative Behavior 1–28. doi:10.1002/jocb.87

  • Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Welch, G. (2016). Robotics camps, clubs, and competitions: Results from a US robotics project. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75(Part B) 686–691. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2015.07.011

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, United States: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2005). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phamduy, P., Milne, C., Leou, M., & Porfiri, M. (2015). Interactive robotic fish: A tool for informal science learning and environmental awareness. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 22(4), 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). The Child’s conception of space. New York, United States: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinzon, G. J., & Huerta, J. R. (2014). Introduction to STEM fields through robotics: A synergetic learning experience for students and their parents. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callagha, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., & Petrovi, V. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prayaga, L., Prayaga, C., Wade, A., & Whiteside, A. (2013). The design and implementation of tele-robotics in education (TRE) to engage students in STEM disciplines: Including computer science and physics. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 29(2), 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qidwai, U., Riley, R., & El-Sayed, S. (2013). Attracting students to the computing disciplines: A case study of a robotics contest. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 520–531. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A. (2015). The application of LeJOS, LEGO Mindstorms robotics, in an LMS environment to teach children java programming and technology at an early age. In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 121–122). doi:10.1109/ISECon.2015.7119902

  • Rubenstein, M., Cimino, B., Nagpal, R., & Werfel, J. (2015). Aerobot: An affordable one-robot-per-student system for early robotics education. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 6107–6113).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala, A. L., Sitaram, P., & Spendlove, T. (2014). Stimulating an interest in engineering through an “explore engineering and technology” summer camp for high school students. In American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleiro, M., Carmo, B., Rodrigues, J. M. F., & du Buf, J. M. H. (2013). A low-cost classroom-oriented educational robotics system. In G. Herrmann, M. J. Pearson, A. Lenz, P. Bremner, A. Spiers, & U. Leonards (Eds.), International Conference on social robotics (pp. 74–83). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6

  • Sallee, J., & Peek, G. G. (2014). Fitting the framework: The STEM institute and the 4-H essential elements. Journal of extension, 52(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senaratne, H., Gunatilaka, P., Gunaratna, U., Vithana, Y., de Silva, C., & Fernando, P. (2014). SiFEB—A simple, interactive and extensible robot playmate for kids. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence with Applications in Engineering and Technology (pp. 143–148).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suescun-Florez, E., Iskander, M., Kapila, V., & Cain, R. (2013). Geotechnical engineering in us elementary schools. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(3), 300–315. doi:10.1080/03043797.2013.800019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Gender differences in kindergarteners’ robotics and programming achievement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 691–702. doi:10.1007/s10798-012-9210-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 3–20. doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9304-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, F., & Heffernan, J. (2016). Robotic construction kits as computational manipulatives for learning in the STEM disciplines. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 105–128. doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1146563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talley, A. B., Crawford, R. H., & White, C. K. (2013). Curriculum exchange: Middle school students go beyond blackboards to solve the grand challenges. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewolde, G., & Kwon, J. (2014). Robots and smartphones for attracting students to engineering education. In Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (pp. 1–6). doi:10.1109/ASEE.2014.6820652

  • Toh, L., Causo, A., Tzuo, P., & Chen, I. (2016). A review on the use of robots in education and young children. Educational Technology & Society, 19, 148–163. doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1146563

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuluri, F. (2015). Using robotics educational module as an interactive STEM learning platform. In IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 16–20). doi:10.1109/ISECon.2015.7119916

  • Ucgul, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2014). Design and development issues for educational robotics training camps. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(2), 203–222. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9253-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, T. T., Boecking, M., Stone, J., Tiger, E. P., Gomez, A., Guillen, A., et al. (2014). Group tasks, activities, dynamics, and interactions in collaborative robotics projects with elementary and middle school children. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Reznick, J. S., & Frye, D. (1997). Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 198–226. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics and Statistics, Federal University of Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil

    Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti

  2. Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Western Paraná State University, Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brazil

    Newton Spolaôr

Authors
  1. Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Newton Spolaôr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Myint Swe Khine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benitti, F.B.V., Spolaôr, N. (2017). How Have Robots Supported STEM Teaching?. In: Khine, M. (eds) Robotics in STEM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57785-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57786-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation