Skip to main content

Prognosis in Disorders of Consciousness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coma and Disorders of Consciousness

Abstract

In patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC), clinical evolution is determined by several factors closely interacting with each other: etiology, patient’s age (likely influencing the physiological process of recovery, e.g., brain plasticity), the duration of DOC (likely related to the severity of brain damage), the structural and functional integrity of neuronal populations (as assessed by neurophysiological and neuroimaging methods), and the presence of clinical complications that could impact care strategies.

In the present chapter, we will offer a brief review of the most recent studies on clinical evolution of patients with prolonged DOC and of the longitudinal studies searching for robust prognostic markers in such patients. We will argue that some prognostic indicators for patients in vegetative state can be gathered in the rehabilitative phase, whereas reliable markers to characterize DOC patients who will present late recovery of responsiveness and consciousness have not been identified. Moreover, long-term evolution of patients in minimally conscious state has not been clearly established, and definite prognostic information is not available for these patients. For these reasons, prospective longitudinal systematic investigations of outcome in large groups of individual with prolonged DOC are needed to better clarify the natural recovery of DOC and to define prognostic markers useful to update current positions on medical, ethical, and legal issues connected with management and care of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, Lavrijsen J, León-Carrión J, Sannita WG, et al.; European Task Force on Disorders of Consciousness. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med. 2010;8:68. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-68.

  2. Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58:349–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Moonen G, Laureys S. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. J Neurol. 2011;258:1373–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pisa FE, Biasutti E, Drigo D, Barbone F. The prevalence of vegetative and minimally conscious states: a systematic review and methodological appraisal. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(4):E23–30. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182a4469f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernat JL. Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet. 2006;367:1181–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Whyte J. Treatments to enhance recovery from the vegetative and minimally conscious states: ethical issues surrounding efficacy studies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:86–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet. 1972;1:734–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruno MA, Ledoux D, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Gosseries O, Thibaut A, Laureys S. Prognosis of patients with altered state of consciousness. In: Schnakers C, Laureys S, editors. Coma and disorders of consciousness. London: Springer; 2012. p. 11–23.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Childs NL, Mercer WN. Late improvement in consciousness after post-traumatic vegetative state. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:24–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:549–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thibaut A, Di Perri C, Chatelle C, Bruno MA, Bahri MA, Wannez S, et al. Clinical response to tdcs depends on residual brain metabolism and grey matter integrity in patients with minimally conscious state. Brain Stimul. 2015;8:1116–23. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.07.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giacino JT, Khademi A, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:819–26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1102609.

  14. Estraneo A, Pascarella A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Trojano L. Clinical and electroencephalographic on-off effect of amantadine in chronic non-traumatic minimally conscious state. J Neurol. 2015;262:1584–6. doi:10.1007/s00415-015-7771-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lanzillo B, Loreto V, Calabrese C, Estraneo A, Moretta P, Trojano L. Does pain relief influence recovery of consciousness? A case report of a patient treated with ziconotide. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52:263–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations in consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:205–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Faran S, Vatine JJ, Lazary A, Ohry A, Birbaumer N, Kotchoubey B. Late recovery from permanent vegetative state heralded by event-related potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:998–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sancisi E, Battistini A, Di Stefano C, Simoncini L, Simoncini L, Montagna P, et al. Late recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state. Brain Inj. 2009;23:163–6. doi:10.1080/02699050802660446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Avesani R, Gambini MG, Albertini G. The vegetative state: a report of two cases with a long-term follow-up. Brain Inj. 2006;20:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakase-Richardson R, Whyte J, Giacino JT, et al. Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI Model Systems Programs. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, et al. Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology. 2010;75:239–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steppacher I, Kaps M, Kissler J. Will time heal? A long-term follow-up of severe disorders of consciousness. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2014;1:401–8. doi:10.1002/acn3.63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Santoro L, Trojano L. Clinical and neuropsychological long-term outcomes after late recovery of responsiveness: a case series. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:711–6. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seel RT, Douglas J, Dennison AC, Heaner S, Farris K, Rogers C. Specialized early treatment for persons with disorders of consciousness: program components and outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1908–23. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moretta P, Estraneo A, De Lucia L, Cardinale V, Loreto V, Trojano L. A study of the psychological distress in family caregivers of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness during in-hospital rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:717–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:2020–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, Ventura M, Boly M, Majerus S, Moonen G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Trojano L, Moretta P, Loreto V, Santoro L, Estraneo A. Affective saliency modifies visual tracking behavior in disorders of consciousness: a quantitative analysis. J Neurol. 2013;260:306–8. doi:10.1007/s00415-012-6717-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eilander HJ, Wijnen VJ, Scheirs JG, de Kort PL, Prevo AJ. Children and young adults in a prolonged unconscious state due to severe brain injury: outcome after an early intensive neurorehabilitation programme. Brain Inj. 2005;19:425–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lammi MH, Smith VH, Tate RL, Taylor CM. The minimally conscious state and recovery potential: a follow-up study 2 to 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:746–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Katz DI, Polyak M, Coughlan D, Nichols M, Roche A. Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1–4 year follow-up. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Luauté J, Maucort-Boulch D, Tell L, Quelard F, Sarraf T, Iwaz J, et al. Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states. Neurology. 2010;75:246–52. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e8e8df.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Demertzi A, Antonopoulos G, Heine L, Voss HU, Crone JS, de Los AC, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients. Brain. 2015;138:2619–31. doi:10.1093/brain/awv169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Estraneo A, Moretta P, De Tanti A, Gatta G, Giacino JT, Trojano L, Italian CRS-R Multicentre Validation Group. An Italian multicentre validation study of the coma recovery scale-revised. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51:627–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Voss HU, Uluğ AM, Dyke JP, Watts R, Kobylarz EJ, McCandliss BD, et al. Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:2005–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hirschberg R, Giacino JT. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Neurol Clin. 2011;29:773–86. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2011.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Estraneo A, Pascarella A, Moretta P, Masotta O, Fiorenza S, Chirico G, et al. Repeated transcranial direct current stimulation in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a double-blind cross-over study. J Neurol Sci. 2017;375:464–70. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2017.02.036.

  38. Wijdicks EF, Hijdra A, Young GB, et al; Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2006;67:203–10.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Carter BG, Butt W. Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:765–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Amantini A, Grippo A, Fossi S, Cesaretti C, Piccioli A, Peris A, et al. Prediction of ‘awakening’ and outcome in prolonged acute coma from severe traumatic head injury: evidence for validity of short latency SEPs. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:229–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Houlden DA, Taylor AB, Feinstein A, Midha R, Bethune AJ, Stewart CP, et al. Early somatosensory evoked potential grades in comatose traumatic brain injury patients predict cognitive and functional outcome. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:167–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Daltrozzo J, Wioland N, Mutschler V, Kotchoubey B. Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event related brain potentials: a meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:606–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fischer C, Luauté J, Némoz C, Morlet D, Kirkorian G, Mauguière F. Improved prediction of awakening or nonawakening from severe anoxic coma using tree-based classification analysis. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1520–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Luauté J, Fischer C, Adeleine P, Morlet D, Tell L, Boisson D. Late auditory and event-related potentials can be useful to predict good functional outcome after coma. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:917–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Whyte J, Katz D, Long D, DiPasquale MC, Polansky M, Kalmar K, et al. Predictors of outcome in prolonged posttraumatic disorders of consciousness and assessment of medication effects: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:453–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu W, Jiang G, Chen Y, Wang X, Jiang X. Prediction of minimally conscious state with somatosensory evoked potentials in long-term unconscious patients after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1024–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cavinato M, Freo U, Ori C, Zorzi M, Tonin P, Piccione F, Merico A. Post-acute P300 predicts recovery of consciousness from traumatic vegetative state. Brain Inj. 2009;23:973–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Qin P, Wu X, Huang Z, Duncan NW, Tang W, Wolff A, et al. How are different neural networks related to consciousness? Ann Neurol. 2015;78:594–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Boccagni C, Bagnato S, Sant’Angelo A, Prestandrea C, Galardi G. Usefulness of standard EEG in predicting the outcome of patients with disorders of consciousness after anoxic coma. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;28:489–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Lanzillo B, Cozzolino A, Saltalamacchia A, et al. Predictors of recovery of responsiveness in prolonged anoxic vegetative state. Neurology. 2013;80:464–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hildebrandt H, Happe S, Deutschmann A, Basar-Eroglu C, Eling P, Brunhöber J. Brain perfusion and VEP reactivity in occipital and parietal areas are associated to recovery from hypoxic vegetative state. J Neurol Sci. 2007;260:150–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dolce G, Quintieri M, Serra S, Lagani V, Pignolo L. Clinical signs and early prognosis in vegetative state: a decisional tree, data-mining study. Brain Inj. 2008;22:617–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Whyte J, Gosseries O, Chervoneva I, DiPasquale MC, Giacino J, Kalmar K, et al. Predictors of short-term outcome in brain-injured patients with disorders of consciousness. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:63–72. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17706-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Weiss N, Tadie JM, Faugeras F, Diehl JL, Fagon JY, Guerot E. Can fast-component of nystagmus on caloric vestibulo-ocular responses predict emergence from vegetative state in ICU? J Neurol. 2012;259:70–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Babiloni C, Sarà M, Vecchio F, Pistoia F, Sebastiano F, Onorati P, et al. Cortical sources of resting-state alpha rhythms are abnormal in persistent vegetative state patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:719–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Prestandrea C, Sant’Angelo A, Castiglione A, Galardi G. Prognostic value of standard EEG in traumatic and non-traumatic disorders of consciousness following coma. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:274–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Logi F, Pasqualetti P, Tomaiuolo F. Predict recovery of consciousness in post-acute severe brain injury: the role of EEG reactivity. Brain Inj. 2011;25(10):972–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sarà M, Pistoia F, Pasqualetti P, Sebastiano F, Onorati P, Rossini PM. Functional isolation within the cerebral cortex in the vegetative state: a nonlinear method to predict clinical outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:35–42. doi:10.1177/1545968310378508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fingelkurts AA, Fingelkurts AA, Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Galardi G. Prognostic value of resting-state electroencephalography structure in disentangling vegetative and minimally conscious states: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:345–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rosanova M, Gosseries O, Casarotto S, Boly M, Casali AG, Bruno MA, et al. Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients. Brain. 2012;135:1308–20. doi:10.1093/brain/awr340.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Kang XG, Li L, Wei D, Xu XX, Zhao R, Jing YY, et al. Development of a simple score to predict outcome for unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Crit Care. 2014;18:R37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Sant’Angelo A, Prestandrea C, Mazzilli R, Galardi G. EEG predictors of outcome in patients with disorders of consciousness admitted for intensive rehabilitation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126:959–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Schorr B, Schlee W, Arndt M, Bender A. Coherence in resting-state EEG as a predictor for the recovery from unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. J Neurol. 2016;263:937–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kotchoubey B, Lang S, Mezger G, Schmalohr D, Schneck M, Semmler A, et al. Information processing in severe disorders of consciousness: vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2441–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Wijnen VJ, van Boxtel GJ, Eilander HJ, de Gelder B. Mismatch negativity predicts recovery from the vegetative state. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:597–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Qin P, Di H, Yan X, Yu S, Yu D, Laureys S, et al. Mismatch negativity to the patient’s own name in chronic disorders of consciousness. Neurosci Lett. 2008;448:24–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Steppacher I, Eickhoff S, Jordanov T, Kaps M, Witzke W, Kissler J. N400 predicts recovery from disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol. 2013;73:594–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Rohaut B, Faugeras F, Chausson N, King JR, Karoui IE, Cohen L, et al. Probing ERP correlates of verbal semantic processing in patients with impaired consciousness. Neuropsychologia. 2015;66:279–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Li R, Song WQ, Du JB, Huo S, Shan GX. Connecting the P300 to the diagnosis and prognosis of unconscious patients. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10:473–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Di H, Boly M, Weng X, Ledoux D, Laureys S. Neuroimaging activation studies in the vegetative state: predictors of recovery? Clin Med. 2008;8:502–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Coleman MR, Davis MH, Rodd JM, Robson T, Ali A, Owen AM, et al. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain. 2009;132:2541–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Vogel D, Markl A, Yu T, Kotchoubey B, Lang S, Müller F. Can mental imagery functional magnetic resonance imaging predict recovery in patients with disorders of consciousness? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1891–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Stender J, Gosseries O, Bruno MA, Charland-Verville V, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A, et al. Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study. Lancet. 2014;384:514–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Li L, Kang XG, Qi S, Xu XX, Xiong LZ, Zhao G, et al. Brain response to thermal stimulation predicts outcome of patients with chronic disorders of consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126:1539–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang F, Di H, Hu X, Jing S, Thibaut A, Di Perri C, et al. Cerebral response to subject’s own name showed high prognostic value in traumatic vegetative state. BMC Med. 2015;13:83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wu X, Zou Q, Hu J, Tang W, Mao Y, Gao L, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity patterns predict consciousness level and recovery outcome in acquired brain injury. J Neurosci. 2015;35:12932–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Gouvier WD, Blanton PD, LaPorte KK, Nepomuceno C. Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:94–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the GOS and the GOS-E: guidelines for daily use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Boly M, Faymonville ME, Peigneux P, Lambermont B, Damas P, Del Fiore G, et al. Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:233–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Azabou E, Fischer C, Mauguiere F, Vaugier I, Annane D, Sharshar T, et al. Prospective Cohort Study evaluating the prognostic value of simple EEG parameters in Postanoxic Coma. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2016;47:75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Kang XG, Yang F, Li W, Ma C, Li L, Jiang W. Predictive value of EEG-awakening for behavioral awakening from coma. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Synek VM. Prognostically important EEG coma patterns in diffuse anoxic and traumatic encephalopathies in adults. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;5:161–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Edlow BL, Giacino JT, Wu O. Functional MRI and outcome in traumatic coma. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013;13:375. doi:10.1007/s11910-013-0375-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:676–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Whyte J, Nordenbo AM, Kalmar K, Merges B, Bagiella E, Chang H, et al. Medical complications during inpatient rehabilitation among patients with traumatic disorders of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1877–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Ganesh S, Guernon A, Chalcraft L, Harton B, Smith B, Louise-Bender PT. Medical comorbidities in disorders of consciousness patients and their association with functional outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1899–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Pistoia F, Sacco S, Franceschini M, Sarà M, Pistarini C, Cazzulani B, Simonelli I, Pasqualetti P, Carolei A. Comorbidities: a key issue in patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32:682–8. doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Pascarella A, Trojano L, Loreto V, Bilo L, Moretta P, Estraneo A. Long-term outcome of patients with disorders of consciousness with and without epileptiform activity and seizures: a prospective single centre cohort study. J Neurol. 2016;263:2048–56. doi:10.1007/s00415-016-8232-y.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Estraneo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Estraneo, A., Trojano, L. (2018). Prognosis in Disorders of Consciousness. In: Schnakers, C., Laureys, S. (eds) Coma and Disorders of Consciousness. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55964-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55964-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55963-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55964-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics