Abstract
When prospective teachers learn to teach mathematics, they develop an understanding of content and pedagogy, which also includes strategies that encourage all children to participate in their learning. There is research that shows that issues of status and inequitable participation can hinder children’s access to learning mathematics and can give children the impression that only some students can do mathematics. The following book chapter presents the experiences of three Mexican-American immigrant prospective teachers as they learn how to teach elementary mathematics and to notice issues of status and participation in their fieldwork. Data sources include coursework artifacts from the methods classroom, observations in the field and semi-structured individual interviews with the participants. Using the professional noticing framework, the findings suggest that the prospective teachers attended to, interpreted, and acted upon moments of unequal status and participation with children in the field over the course of the semester. Implications for teacher education and future research will be discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All names have been changed to maintain the confidentiality of the participants.
- 2.
This particular mathematics method course was a part of a larger research project, TEACH Math (Teachers Empowered for Advancing Change in Mathematics) that was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants No. 0736964 and 1228034. For more information about how TEACH Math research team conceptualized the assignments described in this chapter, please see Aguirre et al. (2013), Roth McDuffie et al. (2014), and Turner et al., (2012).
- 3.
For more details on the lenses that focus PTs’ attention to different aspects of classroom instruction while watching video clips, please see Roth McDuffie et al., (2014).
- 4.
Some of the PTs’ quotes were edited in order to provide more clarity and context based on extended interviews.
References
Achinstein, B., & Aguirre, J. (2008). Cultural match or culturally suspect: How new teachers of color negotiate sociocultural challenges in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 110(8), 1505–1540.
Aguirre, J., Turner, E., Bartell, T. G., Kalinec-Craig, C., Foote, M. Q., & Roth McDuffie, A. (2013). Making connections in practice: How prospective elementary teachers connect to children’s mathematical thinking and community funds of knowledge in mathematics instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 178–192.
Atweh, B., Forgasz, H., & Nebres, B. (2001). Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ball, D. L. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 40–48. doi:10.2307/40248141
Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 241–255.
Berk, D., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Improving the mathematics preparation of elementary teachers, one lesson at a time. Teachers and Teaching, 15(3), 337–356.
Boaler, J. (2006). How a detracked mathematics approach promoted respect, responsibility, and high achievement. Theory into Practice, 45(1), 40–46.
Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Loef Franke, M., Levi, L., & Empson, S. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Cavazos, A. G. (2009). Reflections of a Latina student-teacher: Refusing low expectation for Latina/o students. American Secondary Education. 37(3), 70–79.
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 99–120.
Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A., & Catanzarite, L. (1988). Can expectations for competence be altered in the classroom? In M. Webster & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 27–54). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A., Scarloss, B. A., & Arellano, A. R. (1999). Complex Instruction: Equity in cooperative learning classrooms. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 80–86.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Drake, C., Spillane, J. P., & Hufferd-Ackles, K. (2001). Storied identities: Teacher learning and subject-matter context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 1–23.
Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L. M., Oslund, J. A., Parks, A. N., & Wood, M. (2011). Smarter together!: Collaboration and equity in elementary math classroom. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Fisher, M. H., Schack, E. O., Thomas, J. N., Jong, C., Eisenhardt, S., & Tassell, J. (2014). Examining the relationship between preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes toward mathematics and professional noticing capacities. In J.-J. Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research Trends in Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 219–237). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Foddy, M. (1988). Paths of relevance and evaluative competence. In M. Webster & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status Generalization (pp. 232–247). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106(111).
Gomez, M. L., Rodriguez, T. L., & Agosto, V. (2008). Life histories of Latino/a teacher candidates. Teachers College Record, 110(8), 1639–1676.
Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of US fourth-and eighth-grade students in an international context. NCES 2009-001. National Center for Education Statistics.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
Grossman, P., Schoenfeld, A., & Lee, C. D. (2005). Teaching subject matter. In L. Darling-Hammond, J. Bransford, K. Hammerness, H. Duffy, & P. LePage (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 201–231). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., & McDonald, M. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond, J. Bransford, K. Hammerness, H. Duffy, & P. LePage (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
He, Y., & Cooper, J. (2009). The ABCs for pre-service teacher cultural competency development. Teaching Education, 20(3), 305–322.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., & Murray, H. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Plymouth, NH: Heinemann.
Horn, I. (2014). Seeing status in the classroom. Teaching/Math/Culture. Retrieved from http://teachingmathculture.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/seeing-status-in-the-classroom/
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.
Kena, G., Musu-Gillette, L., Robinson, J., Wang, X., Rathbun, A., Zhang, J., … Dunlop Velez, E. (2015). The Condition of Education 2015 (NCES 2015-144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of Knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
Moschkovich, J. (2013). Equitable practices in mathematics classrooms: Research-based recommendations. Teaching for Excellence and Equity in Mathematics., 5(1), 26–33.
Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. V. (2008). U.S. population projections: 2005–2050. Pew Research Hispanic Trends Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2008/02/11/us-population-projections-2005-2050/
Rodríguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Roth McDuffie, A., Foote, M. Q., Bolson, C., Turner, E., Aguirre, J., & Bartell, T. G. (2014). Using video analysis to support prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of students’ multiple mathematical knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(3), 245–270. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9257-0
Sherin, M., Jacobs, V., & Philipp, R. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 3–13). New York: Routledge.
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 10(4), 313–340.
Turner, E., Drake, C., Roth McDuffie, A., Aguirre, J., Bartell, T. G., & Foote, M. Q. (2012). Promoting equity in mathematics teacher preparation: A framework for advancing teacher learning of children’s multiple mathematics knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 67–82.
van Es, E., & Sherin, M. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571–595.
Vomvoridi-Ivanovic, E. (2012). Using culture as a resource in mathematics: The case of four Mexican-American prospective teachers in a bilingual after-school program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 53–66.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Webster, M., & Foschi, M. (1988). Status generalization: New theory and research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalinec-Craig, C. (2017). “Everything Matters”: Mexican-American Prospective Elementary Teachers Noticing Issues of Status and Participation While Learning to Teach Mathematics. In: Schack, E., Fisher, M., Wilhelm, J. (eds) Teacher Noticing: Bridging and Broadening Perspectives, Contexts, and Frameworks. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46753-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46753-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46752-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46753-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)