Abstract
Assessing and measuring students’ social background characteristics and relating their background data to achievement is pervasive in international large-scale assessments (ILSAs). Our review focuses on two strains of research: the use of socio-economic status (SES) on the one hand, and the use of cultural and social capital on the other. With regard to SES, we provide a brief overview of theoretical concepts, contrasting unidimensional and multidimensional views. We discuss the variety of measures of SES that researchers use in their studies, highlighting the lack of consensus on their conceptual meaning and measurement. We then outline how key indicators of SES (e.g., parental occupation, parental education, parental income) are assessed in ILSAs. This is followed by a section on the quality of students’ reports of parent’s SES characteristics. With regard to cultural and social capital we discuss the mechanisms that underlie the relationship between social background and students’ achievement. In addition, we give a brief overview of research applying the theory of cultural and social capital in the context of ILSAs. Finally, practical implications for the assessment of social background characteristics in ILSA are discussed, and recommendations are offered. Some of these background characteristics were tested in the PISA 2015 field trial.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barone, C. (2006). Cultural capital, ambition and the explanation of inequalities in learning outcomes: A comparative perspective. Sociology, 40, 1039–1058.
Bauer, A., Langenheim, H., & Schork, B. (1984). Kinder als Informanten: Eine empirische Untersuchung über die Zuverlässigkeit der Schichteinstufung der Eltern durch Schüler aus der 4. Klasse [Children as informants: An empirical study on the reliability of parents’ social class by students in 4th grade]. In H. Meulemann & K.-H. Reuband (Eds.), Soziale Realität im Interview: empirische Analysen methodischer Probleme (pp. 241–250). Frankfurt a.M./New York: Campus.
Baumert, J., & Schümer, G. (2001). Familiäre Lebensverhältnisse, Bildungsbeteiligung und Kompetenzerwerb [Family living conditions, participation in education and skills acquisition]. In J. Baumert, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, P. Stanat, K.-J. Tillmann, & M. Weiß (Eds.), PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 323–407). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Baumert, J., Stanat, P., & Watermann, R. (Eds.). (2006). Herkunftsbedingte Disparitäten im Bildungswesen [Family background and inequalities within the educational system]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996a). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
Beaton, A. E., Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1996b). Science achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
Bollen, K., Glanville, J., & Stecklov, G. (2001). The role of socioeconomic status and class in health and fertility studies. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 153–185.
Bos, W., Tarelli, I., Bremerich-Vos, A., & Schwippert, K. (Eds.). (2012). IGLU 2011. Lesekompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich [IGLU 2011. Reading achievement in elementary students in Germany in international comparison]. Münster/New York/München/Berlin: Waxmann.
Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in western society. New York: Wiley.
Bourdieu, P. (1983). Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital [Economical capital, cultural capital, social capital]. In R. Kreckel (Ed.), Soziale Ungleichheiten (Soziale Welt Sonderband 2) (pp. 183–198).
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1971). Die Illusion der Chancengleichheit: Untersuchungen zur Soziologie des Bildungswesens am Beispiel Frankreichs [The illusion of equal opportunity: Investigations on the sociology of the educational system in the case of France]. Stuttgart: Klett.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.568.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Theoretical models of human development 6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 793–828). Hoboken: Wiley.
Cohen, R. S., & Orum, A. M. (1972). Parent-child consensus on socio-economic data obtained from sample surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 95–98.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), 95–120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap of Harvard University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1996). Der Verlust sozialen Kapitals und seine Auswirkungen auf die Schule [The loss of social capital and its impact on schooling]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft, 34, 99–105.
Dika, S. L., & Singh, K. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72, 31–60. doi:10.3102/00346543072001031.
Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (Eds.). (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., & Duncan, B. (1972). Socio-economic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press.
Ehmke, T. (2008). Welche Bedeutung haben lernförderliche und naturwissenschaftsbezogene Einstellungen und Prozesse im Elternhaus für die Erklärung sozialer Disparitäten in der naturwissenschaftlichen Kompetenz? [How do Processes Conducive to Learning and Science-Related Attitudes in the Home Contribute to Explaining Social Disparities in Scientific Literacy?]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 10, 129–148.
Ehmke, T., & Siegle, T. (2005). ISEI, ISCED, HOMEPOS, ESCS. Indikatoren der sozialen Herkunft bei der Quantifizierung von sozialen Disparitäten [ISEI, ISCED, HOMEPOS, ESCS – Indicators of social background for quantifying social disparity]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 521–540.
Ehmke, T., Hohensee, F., Heidemeier, H., & Prenzel, M. (2004). Familiäre Lebensverhältnisse, Bildungsbeteiligung und Kompetenzerwerb [Family living conditions, participation in education and skills acquisition]. In M. Prenzel et al. (Eds.), PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs (pp. 225–254). Münster: Waxmann.
Ensminger, M., Forrest, C. B., Riley, A. W., Kang, M., Green, B. F., Starfield, B., & Ryan, S. (2000). The validity of measures of socioeconomic status of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 392–419.
Entwisle, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth’s race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65, 1521–1540.
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies. British Journal of Sociology, 30, 415–441.
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research, 25, 201–239.
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (2003). Three internationally standardised measures for comparative research on occupational status. In J. H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & C. Wolf (Eds.), Advances in cross-national comparison: A European working book for demographic and socio-economic variables (pp. 159–193). New York: Kluwer Academic Press.
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., de Graaf, P. M., Treiman, D. J., & de Leeuw, J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Tilburg University: Work and Organization Research Centre. https://pure.uvt.nl/portal/files/4548667/GPMTDJLJ5621362.pdf. Accessed 2 Jul 2016.
Goldthorpe, J. H., Payne, C., & Llewellyn, C. (1978). Trends in class mobility. Sociology, 12,441–468.
Gottfried, A. (1985). Measures of socioeconomic status in child development research: Data and recommendations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 31, 85–92.
Hauser, R. M. (1994). Measuring socioeconomic status in studies of child development. Child Development, 65, 1541–1545.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67, 3–42.
Husén, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries (Vol. 1–2). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
International Labour Office. (1969). International standard classification of occupations: Revised edition 1968. Geneva: International Labour Office.
International Labour Office. (1990). International standard classification of occupations: ISCO-88. Geneva: International Labour Office.
International Labour Office. (2012). International Standard Classification of Occupations: ISCO-08 (Volume I: Structure, group definitions and correspondence tables). Geneva: International Labour Office.
Jæger, M. M., & Breen, R. (2016). A dynamic model of cultural reproduction. American Journal of Sociology, 121, 1079–1115.
Jungbauer-Gans, M. (2004). Einfluss des sozialen und kulturellen Kapitalsauf die Lesekompetenz. Ein Vergleich der PISA 2000-Daten aus Deutschland, Frankreich und der Schweiz [The influence of social and cultural capital on reading achievement. A comparison of Germany, France, and Switzerland using PISA 2000 data]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 33, 375–397.
Kalmijn, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (1996). Race, cultural capital and schooling: An analysis of trends in the United States. Sociology of Education, 69, 22–34.
Kayser, B. D., & Summers, G. G. (1973). The adequacy of student reports of parental SES characteristics. Sociological Methods and Research, 1, 303–315.
Kerckhoff, A. C., Mason, W. M., & Poss, S. S. (1973). On the accuracy of children’s reports of family social status. Sociology of Education, 46, 219–247.
Kreuter, F., Eckman, S., Maaz, K., & Watermann, R. (2010). Children’s reports of parents’ education level: Does it matter whom you ask and what you ask about? Survey Research Methods, 4(3), 127–138.
Lien, N., Friestad, C., & Klepp, K.-I. (2001). Adolescents’ proxy reports of parents’ socioeconomic status: How valid are they? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 731–737.
Looker, E. D. (1989). Accuracy of proxy reports of parental status characteristics. Sociology of Education, 62, 257–276.
Maaz, K., & Watermann, R. (2004). Die Erfassung sozialer Hintergrundmerkmale bei Schülern und Hinweise zu ihrer Validität [On the validity of student reports on social background indicators]. In W. Bos, E.-M. Lankes, N. Plaßmeier, & K. Schwippert (Eds.), Heterogenität: Eine Herausforderung an die empirische Bildungsforschung (pp. 209–229). Münster: Waxmann.
Mare, R. D., & Mason, W. M. (1980). Children’s report of parental socioeconomic status. Sociological Methods and Research, 9, 178–198.
Marks, G. N. (2005). Cross-national differences and accounting for social class inequalities in education. International Sociology, 20, 483–505.
Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade: implications for early learning. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1997). Science achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Manifesto of the communist party, 2nd edition. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), (1978). The Marx-Engels reader. New York: Norton.
Mason, W. M., Hauser, R. M., Kerckhoff, A. C., Poss, S. S., & Manton, K. (1976). Models of response-error in student reports of parental socio-economic characteristics. In W. R. Sewell, R. M. Hauser, & D. L. Featherman (Eds.), Schooling and achievement in American society (pp. 443–494). New York: Academic.
Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality: The contribution of interpretive studies. The Sociology of Education, 65, 1–20.
Meulemann, H., & Wieken-Mayser, M. (1984). Kategorien der Sozialstatistik und Alltag der Familie: Die Übereinstimmung von Gymnasiasten des 10. Schuljahres mit ihren Eltern in Angaben und Struktur zur sozialen Position der Familie [Categories of social statistics and everday lives of family: Agreement between 10th grade students from Gymnasium and their parents on information and structure concerning the families’ social status]. In H. Meulemann & K.-H. Reuband (Eds.), Soziale Realität im Interview: empirische Analysen methodischer Probleme (pp. 251–280). Frankfurt a.M./New York: Campus.
Mueller, C. W., & Parcel, T. L. (1981). Measures of socioeconomic status: Alternatives and recommendations. Child Development, 52, 13–30.
Müller, W., Wirth, H., Bauer, G., Pollak, R., & Weiss, F. (2006). ESeC-Kurzbericht zur Validierung und Operationalisierung einer europäischen sozioökonomischen Klassifikation [ESeC short paper on the validation and operationalization of a european socioeconomic classification scheme]. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 30(59), 111–119.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1998). Mathematics and science achievement in the final year of secondary school: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (1999). Classifying educational programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Knowledge skills for the world of tomorrow: Further results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Learning for tomorrows world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning trends: Changes in student performance since 2000 (Volume V). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091580-en
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Volume II), PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201132-en
Prenzel, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Lehmann, R., Leutner, D., Neubrand, M., et al. (2004). PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs [PISA 2003: Students’s educational attainment in Germany-Results of the second international comparison]. Münster: Waxmann.
Roscigno, V. J., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W. (1999). Race, cultural capital and educational resources: Persistent inequalities and achievement returns. Sociology of Education, 72, 158–178. doi:10.2307/2673227.
Harrison, E., & Rose, D. (2006). ESeC user guide. UK: Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex Colchester. https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/esec/guide/docs/UserGuide.pdf
Harrison, E., & Rose, D. (2007). The European socio-economic classification: A new social class schema for comparative European research. European Societies, 9(3), 459–490.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.
Schiepe-Tiska, A., Roczen, N., Müller, K., Prenzel, M., & Osborne, J. (2016). Science-related outcomes: Attitudes, motivation, value beliefs, strategies. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.
St. John, N. (1970). The validity of children’s reports of their parents’ educational level: A methodological note. Sociology of Education, 43, 255–269.
Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (2001). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43, 1066–1109. doi:10.1177/0044118X10382877.
Sullivan, A. (2002). Bourdieu and Education: How useful is Bourdieu’s theory for researchers? Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 144–166.
Tijdens, K. (2010). Measuring occupations in web-surveys: The WISCO database of occupations. Amsterdam: AIAS.
Tramonte, L., & Willms, J. D. (2010). Cultural capital and its effects on education outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 29, 200–213.
Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Academic.
Turmo, A. (2004). Scientific literacy and socio-economic background among 15-year-olds: A Nordic perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 287–305.
Van Ewijk, R., & Sleegers, P. (2010). The effect of peer socioeconomic status on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 5, 134–150.
Vieluf, S. (2016). Ethnicity and migration. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Watermann, R., & Baumert, J. (2006). Entwicklung eines Strukturmodells zum Zusammenhang zwischen sozialer Herkunft und fachlichen und überfachlichen Kompetenzen: Befunde national und international vergleichender Analysen [Relationship between social background and domain-specific and domain-general competencies: Development of a structural model and results from national international comparative analyses]. In J. Baumert, P. Stanat, & R. Watermann (Eds.), Herkunftsbedingte Disparitäten im Bildungswesen: Differenzielle Bildungsprozesse und Probleme der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit. Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 (pp. 61–94). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für.
Weber, M., Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York/London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wegener, B. (1988). Kritik des Prestiges [Critique of Prestige]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
West, P., Sweeting, H., & Speed, E. (2001). We really do know what you do: A comparison of reports from 11 year olds and their parents in respect of parental economic activity and occupation. Sociology, 35, 539–559.
White, K. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.
Wolf, C. (1995). Sozio-ökonomischer Status und berufliches Prestige. Ein kleines Kompendium sozialwissenschaftlicher Skalen auf Basis der beruflichen Stellung und Tätigkeit [Socioeconomic status and occupational prestige. A small compendium of socio-scientific scales on the basis of occupational status and activity]. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 19(37), 102–136.
Xu, J., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2012). Cultural reproduction, cultural mobility, cultural resources, or trivial effect? A comparative approach to cultural capital and educational performance. Comparative Education Review, 56, 98–124.
Youngblood, R. L. (1977). Student-parent agreement on socioeconomic indicators: A research note from Manila. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 396–399.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watermann, R., Maaz, K., Bayer, S., Roczen, N. (2016). Social Background. In: Kuger, S., Klieme, E., Jude, N., Kaplan, D. (eds) Assessing Contexts of Learning. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45357-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45357-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45356-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45357-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)