Skip to main content

Design Team Collaboration with a Complex Design Problem

  • Chapter
The Design of Learning Experience

Abstract

To what extent does collaboration impact complex ill-structured design? This research project focused on design meetings held during the first year of a 5-year, grant-supported effort to develop an innovative, 6-day course that integrates cutting-edge radiation physics and radiobiology content aimed at physicians and researchers working in the field of radiation oncology. The data set included over 568 pages, 208,842 words of written transcripts of a total of 15 two-hour meetings held over 6 months. Results indicate that designers use collaboration to manage constraints throughout the design process, inclusive leadership and decisive leadership are both used to keep the design process moving forward and designers use collaboration to build and rebuild prototypes in order to envision and refine solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Basballe, D. A., & Halskov, K. (2012). Dynamics of research through design. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (DIS, 2012) (pp. 58–67). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biskjaer, M. M., & Halskov, K. (2014). Decisive constraints as a creative resource in interaction design. Digital Creativity, 25(1), 27–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boling, E. (2008, October). Design is not systematic: Alternative perspectives on design designer as human instrument. Panel session presented at the meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton, M. F., Cannon, D. M., Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L. J. (1996). Collaboration in design teams: How social interaction shapes the product. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing design activity (pp. 319–341). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R., Cross, N., Durling, D., Nelson, H., Owen, C., Valtonen, A., et al. (2013). Design. Educational Technology, 53(3), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D. (2011). Design thinking. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (Eds.). (1996). Analysing design activity. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsgaard, P. (2010). Research in and through design: An interaction design research approach. In proceedings of conference of the Computer-Human Interaction special interest group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI, 2010) (pp. 200–203). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses unbound: Studies in rationality, precommitment, and constraints. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halskov, K. (2011). Design research lab (Day in the Lab Series). ACM Interactions, xviii(4), 92–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. Oxford, England: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, K., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Oxford, England: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M., & Stolterman, E. (2008). Metamorphosis: Transforming non-designers into designers. In D. Durling, C. Rust, P. Ashton, & K. Friedman (Eds.), Undisciplined! Proceedings of the design research society conference 2008. Sheffield, England: Sheffield Hallam University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, P. D. (2006). Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. W., & Baaki, J. (2014). Design, designers and reflection-in-action. In B. Hokanson & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology: Design thinking, design process, and the design studio (pp. 1–13). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. W., & Boling, E. (2013). Preparing instructional designers and educational technologists: Traditional and emerging perspectives. In M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 653–660). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. W., & Hutchinson, A. (2013). Developing designer identity through reflection. Educational Technology, 53(3), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. W., Hutchinson, A., & Gryzbyk, Q. (2014). Instructional designers as reflective practitioners: Developing professional identity through reflection. Educational Technology Research & Development, 62(3), 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica W. Tracey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tracey, M.W. (2015). Design Team Collaboration with a Complex Design Problem. In: Hokanson, B., Clinton, G., Tracey, M. (eds) The Design of Learning Experience. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics