Abstract
To what extent does collaboration impact complex ill-structured design? This research project focused on design meetings held during the first year of a 5-year, grant-supported effort to develop an innovative, 6-day course that integrates cutting-edge radiation physics and radiobiology content aimed at physicians and researchers working in the field of radiation oncology. The data set included over 568 pages, 208,842 words of written transcripts of a total of 15 two-hour meetings held over 6 months. Results indicate that designers use collaboration to manage constraints throughout the design process, inclusive leadership and decisive leadership are both used to keep the design process moving forward and designers use collaboration to build and rebuild prototypes in order to envision and refine solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Basballe, D. A., & Halskov, K. (2012). Dynamics of research through design. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (DIS, 2012) (pp. 58–67). New York: ACM.
Biskjaer, M. M., & Halskov, K. (2014). Decisive constraints as a creative resource in interaction design. Digital Creativity, 25(1), 27–61.
Boling, E. (2008, October). Design is not systematic: Alternative perspectives on design designer as human instrument. Panel session presented at the meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Orlando, FL.
Brereton, M. F., Cannon, D. M., Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L. J. (1996). Collaboration in design teams: How social interaction shapes the product. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing design activity (pp. 319–341). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. New York: Harper Collins.
Buchanan, R., Cross, N., Durling, D., Nelson, H., Owen, C., Valtonen, A., et al. (2013). Design. Educational Technology, 53(3), 25–41.
Cross, D. (2011). Design thinking. New York: Berg.
Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (Eds.). (1996). Analysing design activity. Chichester, England: Wiley.
Dalsgaard, P. (2010). Research in and through design: An interaction design research approach. In proceedings of conference of the Computer-Human Interaction special interest group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI, 2010) (pp. 200–203). New York: ACM.
Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses unbound: Studies in rationality, precommitment, and constraints. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Halskov, K. (2011). Design research lab (Day in the Lab Series). ACM Interactions, xviii(4), 92–95.
Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Lawson, K., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Siegel, M., & Stolterman, E. (2008). Metamorphosis: Transforming non-designers into designers. In D. Durling, C. Rust, P. Ashton, & K. Friedman (Eds.), Undisciplined! Proceedings of the design research society conference 2008. Sheffield, England: Sheffield Hallam University.
Stokes, P. D. (2006). Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. New York: Springer.
Tracey, M. W., & Baaki, J. (2014). Design, designers and reflection-in-action. In B. Hokanson & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology: Design thinking, design process, and the design studio (pp. 1–13). New York: Springer.
Tracey, M. W., & Boling, E. (2013). Preparing instructional designers and educational technologists: Traditional and emerging perspectives. In M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 653–660). New York: Springer.
Tracey, M. W., & Hutchinson, A. (2013). Developing designer identity through reflection. Educational Technology, 53(3), 28–32.
Tracey, M. W., Hutchinson, A., & Gryzbyk, Q. (2014). Instructional designers as reflective practitioners: Developing professional identity through reflection. Educational Technology Research & Development, 62(3), 315–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tracey, M.W. (2015). Design Team Collaboration with a Complex Design Problem. In: Hokanson, B., Clinton, G., Tracey, M. (eds) The Design of Learning Experience. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16503-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16504-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)