Skip to main content
Log in

Instructional designers as reflective practitioners: developing professional identity through reflection

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the design thinking approach becomes more established in the instructional design (ID) discourse, the field will have to reconsider the professional identity of instructional designers. Rather than passively following models or processes, a professional identity rooted in design thinking calls for instructional designers to be dynamic agents of change who use reflective thinking to navigate the design space and develop solutions to ill-structured problems. Graduate programs in ID will also need to prepare students to manage the complexities they will encounter in their professional practice, including the establishment of design precedents, reflective thinking skills, and the foundations of professional identity. This research explored the use of reflective writing assignments in an introductory ID graduate course, with results indicating that most students are able to engage in meaningful reflection in relation to prompts concerning design concepts, experiences, and identity attributes, although no clear patterns of improvement emerged over time. Future directions for research include the use of feedback and the structure of prompts (including frequency of writing assignments and wording of prompts) to support improved student performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ada, W. W. (2010). Computer supported collaborative learning and critical reflection: a case study of fashion consumerism. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, S., & Murphy, K. (1993). Reflection: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 1188–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M., & Brindley, J. (2011). Establishing a foundation for reflective practice: A case study of learning journal use. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning (EURODL), Special Issue. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/special/2011/Blaschke_Brindley.pdf.

  • Boling, E. (2008). Design is not systematic: Alternative perspectives on design: Designer as human instrument. Panel session presented at the meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Orlando, FL.

  • Bourner, T. (2003). Assessing reflective learning. Education + Training, 45, 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D. (2011). Design thinking. New York, NY: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281–301. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1991). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H., & Davison, B. (2007). Social software as support in hybrid learning environments: the value of the blog as a tool for reflective learning and peer support. Library and Information Science Research, 29, 163–187. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2007.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K., Napan, K., & Monteiro, S. (2004). Encouraging reflective learning: An online challenge. In Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 357–364).

  • Hong, Y., & Choi, I. (2011). Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: A conceptual model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 687–710. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9202-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, M., & Brown, S. (2010). Perceptions of the use of reflective journals in online graduate nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(1), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–839. doi:10.1002/sce20209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luppicini, R. (2003). Reflective Action Instructional Design (RAID): A designer’s aid. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 75–82. doi:10.1023/B:ITDE.0000039569.05754.a8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maor, D. (2003). The teacher’s role in developing interaction and reflection in an online learning community. Educational Media International, 40, 127–137. doi:10.1080/0952398032000092170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., & Weston, C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. Instructional Science, 28(5), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovich, K., Collins, E., & Jones, G. (2009). Developing students’ skills in reflective practice: Design and assessment. Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 37–58. doi:10.1177/1052562907307640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. H. (2000). Belief change towards self-directed learning in student teachers: Immersion in practice or reflection on action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 575–591. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00016-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. W., & Baaki, J. (2014). Design, Designers and Reflection-in-Action. In B. Hokanson & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology: Design thinking, design process, and the design studio (pp. 1–13). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. W., & Boling, E. (2013). Preparing instructional designers and educational technologists: Traditional and emerging perspectives. In M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 653–660). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. W., & Hutchinson, A. (2013). Developing designer identity through reflection. Educational Technology, 53(3), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivekananda-Schmidt, P., Marshall, M., Stark, P., Mckendree, J., Sandars, J., & Smithson, S. (2011). Lessons from medical students’ perceptions of learning reflective skills: A multi-institutional study. Medical Teacher, 33, 846–850. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.577120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, H. S., Borkan, J. M., Taylor, J. S., Anthony, D., & Reis, S. P. (2012). Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education: Developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing. Academic Medicine, 87, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wear, D., Zarconi, J., Garden, R., & Jones, T. (2012). Reflection in/and writing: Pedagogy and practice in medical education. Academic Medicine, 87(5), 603–609. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824d22e9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipp, J. (2003). Scaffolding critical reflection in online discussions: Helping prospective teachers think deeply about field experiences in urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 321–334. doi:10.1177/0022487103255010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica W. Tracey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tracey, M.W., Hutchinson, A. & Grzebyk, T.Q. Instructional designers as reflective practitioners: developing professional identity through reflection. Education Tech Research Dev 62, 315–334 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9334-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9334-9

Keywords

Navigation