Skip to main content

Example-Generation as Indicator and Catalyst of Mathematical and Pedagogical Understandings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transforming Mathematics Instruction

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

This chapter examines the activities of example-generation and example-verification from both the teaching and learning perspectives. We closely examine how engaging learners in generating and verifying examples of a particular mathematical concept as a group activity serves both as an indicator of learners’ understandings and a catalyst for enhancing their understanding and expanding their example space that is associated with the particular concept. We present two cases that illustrate how the mathematics instruction may look when classroom activities and discussions build on example-generation and example-verification – the first case focuses on the concept of an irrational number and the second on the notion of a periodic function. The learners in these cases are in-service secondary mathematics teachers (MTLs), and the teacher is a mathematics teacher educator (MTE). We show how this kind of learning environment lends itself naturally to genuine opportunities for learners to engage in meaningful mathematics, to share and challenge their thinking, and to sense the need for unpacking mathematical subtleties regarding definitions and ideas. For practicing and prospective mathematics teachers, engaging in such activity and experiencing the potential learning opportunity that it offers is also likely to convince them to implement this approach in their classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bills, L., Dreyfus, T., Mason, J., Tsamir, P., Watson, A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2006). Exemplification in mathematics education. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehliková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 126–154). Prague: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, A. (2013). Authentic argumentation with prospective secondary teachers: The case of 0.999…. Mathematics Teachers Educator, 1(2), 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M., & Brown, A. (2005). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS analysis: Part 2. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, G. (2013). Intellectual need. In K. R. Leatham (Ed.), Vital directions for mathematics education research (pp. 119–151). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hazzan, O., & Zazkis, R. (1999). A perspective on “give and example” tasks as opportunities to construct links among mathematical concepts. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(4), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: A commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 333–357). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Goldenberg, P. (2008). Shedding light on and with example spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Pimm, D. (1984). Generic examples: Seeing the general in the particular. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(3), 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 135–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (1997). Counter-examples that (only) prove and counter-examples that (also) explain. FOCUS on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(3), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissland, E. L. (1978). Understanding understanding mathematics. Cognitive Science, 2(4), 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissland, E. L. (1991). Example-based reasoning. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Parkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning in education (pp. 187–208). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shama, G. (1998). Understanding periodicity as a concept with a Gestalt structure. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(3), 255–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics: Expanded American edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. O. (1977). Cognitive conflict and the learning of mathematics. Paper presented to the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Utrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. O., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dormolen, J., & Zaslavsky, O. (2003). The many facets of a definition: The case of periodicity. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S. (1983). Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 14, 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65–81). London: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Shipman, S. (2008). Using learner generated examples to introduce new concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (1995). Open-ended tasks as a trigger for mathematics teachers’ professional development. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Meeting the challenges of mathematics teacher education through design and use of tasks that facilitate teacher learning. In B. Jaworski, & T. Wood (Eds.), The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional, Vol. 4 of T. Wood (Series Ed.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (pp. 93–114). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O. (2010). The explanatory power of examples in mathematics: Challenges for teaching. In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 107–128). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O., & Peled, I. (1996). Inhibiting factors in generating examples by mathematics teachers and student teachers: The case of binary operation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O., & Shir, K. (2005). Students’ conceptions of a mathematical definition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(4), 317–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, O., & Zodik, I. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ choices of examples that potentially support or impede learning. Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zodik, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2007). Exemplification in the mathematics classroom: What is it like and what does it imply? In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2024–2033). Larnaca: University of Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zodik, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Characteristics of teachers’ choice of examples in and for the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zodik, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2009). Teachers’ treatment of examples as learning opportunities. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & C. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 425–432). Thessaloniki: PME.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orit Zaslavsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zaslavsky, O., Zodik, I. (2014). Example-Generation as Indicator and Catalyst of Mathematical and Pedagogical Understandings. In: Li, Y., Silver, E., Li, S. (eds) Transforming Mathematics Instruction. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics