Abstract
After Hurricane Andrew in 1992, the Florida Governor’s Disaster Planning and Response Review Committee published the Lewis Report containing recommendations for state agencies, local governments, and nonprofit and private organizations. Practical and policy recommendations from this focusing event included issues with communications, shelter, evacuation, response and recovery operations, medical care, and coordination of volunteers, donations, and supplies. Twelve years later, Central Florida experienced three major hurricanes within 6 weeks: hurricanes Charley, Frances, and Jeanne. This chapter compares the Lewis Report recommendations with the results of after action reports from three Central Florida counties. This chapter concludes with a discussion of how focusing events provide the context for policy learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A second form of policy learning “entails lessons from the social construction of policy problems, the scope of the policy, or policy goals” (May 1992, p. 350), and includes changes in the scope, goals, and/or objectives of the policy; paradigm shifts; and “new or reaffirmed social construction of a policy by the policy elites in a given policy domain” (May 1992, pp. 350–337).
- 2.
While three hurricanes affecting one area are unusual, it is also important to note there were only four hurricanes affecting central Florida since 1950: King in 1950, Donna in 1960, David in 1979, and Erin in 1995. Although four hurricanes affected Florida during the 2004 hurricane season, this study focuses on the three directly affecting central Florida: Charley, Frances, and Jeanne. These three storms “necessitated the full emergency response and disaster recovery operations from the local jurisdictions” (Volusia County 2005, p. 2). Hurricane Wilma in 2005 is excluded from this analysis because the focus of this chapter is the 2004 hurricane season, which was the first test of the policy and institutional changes created after the implementation of the Lewis Report recommendations.
References
Abell, R. A. (2000). Freshwater ecoregions of North America: A conservation assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Birkland, T. A. (2006). Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Birkland, T., & Waterman, S. (2008). Is federalism the reason for policy failure in Hurricane Katina? Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 38, 692–714.
Birkland, T. A., Burby, R. J., Conrad, D., Cortner, H., & Michener, W. K. (2003). River ecology and flood hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards Review, 4(1), 46–54.
Brody, S. D., & Gunn, J. R. (2012). Examining environmental factors contributing to community resilience along the Gulf of Mexico coast. In N. Kapucu, H. Hawkins, & F. Rivera (Eds.), Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Brody, S. D., Kang, J. E., & Bernhardt, S. (2010). Identifying factors influencing flood mitigation at the local level in Texas and Florida: The role of organizational capacity. Natural Hazards, 52, 167–184.
Burby, R. J. (2005). Have state comprehensive planning mandates reduced insured losses from natural disasters? Natural Hazards Review, 6(2), 67–81.
Burby, R. J. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise Governmental decisions for hazardous areas. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 171–191.
Burby, R. J., & May, P. J. (1998). Intergovernmental environmental planning: Addressing the commitment conundrum. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41(1), 95–110.
Burby, R. J., Berke, P. R., Doyle, R. E., French, S. F., Godschalk, D. R., Kaiser, E. J., Kartez, J. D., May, P. J., Olshansky, R., Paterson, R. G., & Platt, R. H. (1999). Unleashing the power of planning to create disaster-resistant communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(3), 247–258.
Burby, R. J., Deyle, R. E., Godschalk, D. R., & Olshansky, R. B. (2000). Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning. Natural Hazards Review, 1(2), 99–106.
Demiroz, F., Kapucu, N., & Dodson, R. (2012). Community capacity and interorganiozational networks for disaster resiliency: Comparison of rural and urban counties. In N. Kapucu, H. Hawkins, & F. Rivera (Eds.), Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle. Public interest, 28(1), 38–50.
Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3), 136–143.
Godschalk, D. R., Beatley, T., Berke, P., Brower, D. J., & Kaiser, E. J. (1999). Natural hazard mitigation: Recasting disaster policy and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Grant, N. K. (1996). Emergency management training and education for public administration. In R. T. Sylves & W. L. Waugh, Jr. (Eds.), Disaster management in the U.S. and Canada: The politics, policymaking, administration and analysis of emergency management (pp. 313–326). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
Hawkins, C. V. (2012). Networks, collaborative planning, and perceived quality of comprehensive plans. In N. Kapucu, C. Hawkins, & F. Rivera (Eds.), Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social policies in Britain and Sweden: From relief to income maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kapucu, N., Berman, E. M., & Wang, X. H. (2008). Emergency information management and public disaster preparedness: Lessons from the 2004 Florida hurricane season. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 26(3), 169–196.
Kapucu, N., Hawkins, C. V., & Rivera, F. (2012). Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives. In N. Kapucu, C. Hawkins, & F. Rivera (Eds.), Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Kartez, J. D., & Kelley, W. J. (1988). Research-based disaster planning: Conditions and implications. In L. K. Comfort (Ed.), Managing disasters: Strategies and policy perspectives (pp. 126–146). Durham: Duke University Press.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies: Second edition. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Knox, C. C. (2013). Analyzing after action reports from Hurricanes Andrew and Katrina: Repeated, modified, and newly created recommendations. Journal of Emergency Management, 11(2), 160–168.
Kory, D. N. (1998). Coordinating intergovernmental policies on emergency management in a multi-centered metropolis. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 16(1), 45–54.
Larson, L., & Plasencia, D. (2001). No adverse impact: A new direction in floodplain management policy. Natural Hazard Review, 2(A), 167–181.
Lawrence, M. B., & Cobb, H. D. (2005). Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Jeanne. National Hurricane Center. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2004jeanne.shtml. Accessed 1 Aug 2013.
Maher, S. T. (1992). Emergency decision making during the state of Florida’s response to Hurricane Andrew. Nova Law Review, 17, 1009.
Mang, D. A., & Santurri, R. J. (2009). The winds of change: How wind storms changed the course of regulation in Florida. Federation of Regulatory Counsel Journal, 20(4), 1–5.
May, P. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12, 331–54.
May, P. (2012). Public risks and disaster resilience: Rethinking public and private sector roles. In N. Kapucu, C. Hawkins, & F. Rivera (Eds.), Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Mittler, E. (1997). A case study of Florida’s emergency management since Hurricane Andrew. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Institute of Behavior Science, University of Colorado.
Nelson, A., & French, S. (2002). Plan quality and mitigating damage from natural disasters: A case study of the Northridge earthquake with planning policy considerations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(2), 194–207.
Newman, J. W. (January 2006). Law and ordinance coverage. Government Report: Florida Office of Insurance Regulation.
Nohrstedt, D., & Weible, C. (2010). The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy, 1(2), 1–32.
Orange County. (2005). After action report. Orange County Government.
Pasch, R. J., Brown, D. P., & Blake, E. S. (2011). Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Charley. National Hurricane Center. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCRAL032004_Charley.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2013.
Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder: Westview Press.
Sahlin, M. (1992). Paradigm shift. Speech to the Conference of the National Volunteer Organizations Active in Disaster (NVOAD). www.nvoad.org/articles/paradigm.php. Accessed 1 Aug 2013.
Scanlon, J. (1996). The crucial role of the mayor in Canadian emergency management. In R. T. Sylves & W. L. Waugh, Jr. (Eds.), Disaster management in the U.S. and Canada: The politics, policymaking, administration and analysis of emergency management (pp. 294–310). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
Schwab, J., Topping, K. C., Eadie, C. C., Deyle, R. E., & Smith, R. A. (1998). Planning for post disaster recovery and reconstruction. Chicago: American Planning Association Publication.
Seminole County. (2005). After action report. Seminole County Government.
Somers, S., & Svara, J. H. (2009). Assessing and managing environmental risk: Connecting local government management with emergency management. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 181–193.
Stein, J., Moreno, P., Conrad, D., & Ellis, S. (2000). Troubled waters: Congress, corps of engineers, and wasteful water projects. Washington, DC: Taxpayers for Common Sense and National Wildlife Federation.
The Governor’s Disaster. (1993). Planning and Response Review Committee Final Report. Tallahassee, FL. http://www.floridadisaster.org/documents/Lewis%20Report%201992.pdf.
Volusia County. (2005). After action report. Volusia County Government.
Waugh, W. L., Jr., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue), 131–140.
Wilson, J., & Oyola-Yemaiel, A. (2001). The evolution of emergency management and the advancement towards a profession in the United States and Florida. Safety Science, 39(1–2), 117–131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hawkins, C., Knox, C. (2014). Disaster Events and Policy Change in Florida. In: Kapucu, N., Liou, K. (eds) Disaster and Development. Environmental Hazards. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04468-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04468-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04467-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04468-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)