Abstract
In the United States, mitigating the adverse impacts of flooding has increasingly become the responsibility of local decision makers. Despite the importance of understanding why flood mitigation techniques are implemented at the local level, few empirical studies have been conducted over the last decade. Our study addresses this lack of research by examining the factors influencing local communities to adopt both structural and non-structural flood mitigation strategies. We use statistical models to predict multiple flood mitigation techniques implemented by cities and counties based on a survey of floodplain administrators and planning officials across Texas and Florida. Particular attention is paid to the role of organizational capacity to address floods in addition to various local geophysical and socioeconomic characteristics. Results indicate that organizational capacity is a significant factor contributing to the implementation of both structural and non-structural flood mitigation techniques, even when controlling for contextual characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While past studies have analyzed capacity and commitment as separate variables, we combine these two concepts into one measure for two reasons. First, the modern organizational design literature often considers commitment a component of capacity. Second, the two variables are so highly correlated statistically, that we could not analyze them in the same equation due to very high levels of multicollinearity.
References
Abell RA (1999) Freshwater ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington
Alexander D (1993) Natural disasters. Chapman & Hall, New York
Berke P, Roenigk D, Kaiser EJ, Burby RJ (1996) Enhancing plan quality: evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. J Environ Plan Manag 39:79–96
Birkland TA, Burby RJ, Conrad D, Cortner H, Michener WK (2003) River ecology and flood hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards Rev 4(1):46–54
Brody SD (2003a) Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. J Plan Educ Res 23(2):191–201
Brody SD (2003b) Examining the effects of biodiversity on the ability of local plans to manage ecological systems. J Environ Plan Manag 46(6):733–754
Brody SD (2003c) Implementing the principles for ecosystem management through land use planning. Popul Environ 24(6):511–540
Brody SD (2008) Ecosystem planning in Florida: solving regional problems through local decision making. Ashgate Press, Aldershot
Brody SD, Highfield WE (2005) Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida. J Am Plan Assoc 71(2):159–175
Brody SD, Zahran S, Highfield WE, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2007) Identifying the impact of the built environment on flood damage in Texas. Disasters 32(1):1–18
Burby RJ (1998) Cooperating with nature: confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. National Academies Press, Washington
Burby RJ, French SP (1981) Coping with floods: the land use management paradox. J Am Plan Assoc 47(3):289–300
Burby RJ, May PJ (1998) Intergovernmental environmental planning: addressing the commitment conundrum. J Environ Plan Manage 41(1):95–110
Burby RJ, French SP, Cigler BA, Kaiser EJ, Moreau D (1985) Flood plain land use management: a national assessment. Westview, Boulder
Burby RJ, May PJ, Berke PR, Dalton LC, French SP, Kaiser EJ (1997) Making governments plan: state experiments in managing land use. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Burby RJ, Beatley T, Berke PR, Deyle RE, French SP, Godschalk DR, Kaiser EJ, Kartez JD, May PJ, Olshansky R, Paterson RG, Platt RH (1999) Unleashing the power of planning to create disaster-resistant communities. J Am Plan Assoc 65(3):247–258
Chapin T, Connerly C, Higgins H (2007) Growth management in Florida: planning for paradise. Ashgate Press, Aldershot
Correia FN, Fordam M, Saraiva M, Bernardo F (1998) Flood hazard assessment and management: interface with the public. Water Resour Manag 12:209–227
Dalton LC, Burby RJ (1994) Mandates, plans and planners: building local commitment to development management. J Am Plan Assoc 60(4):444–461
Deyel RE, Chapin T, Baker E (2008) The proof of the planning is in the platting: an evaluation of Florida’s hurricane exposure mitigation planning mandate. J Am Plan Assoc 74(3):349–370
Deyle RE, Smith RA (1998) Local government compliance with state planning mandates: the effects of state implementation in Florida. J Am Plan Assoc 64(4):457–469
Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet survey: the tailored design method. Wiley, New York
FEMA (1997) Multi-hazard identification and risk assessment. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington
Few R (2003) Flooding, vulnerability and coping strategies: local responses to a global threat. Prog Dev Stud 3(1):43–58
Godschalk DR, Brower DJ, Beatley T (1989) Catastrophic coastal storms: hazard mitigation and development management. Duke University Press, Durham
Godschalk DR, Beathley T, Berke P, Brower DJ, Kaiser EJ, Bohl CC, Goebel RM (1999) Natural hazard mitigation: recasting disaster policy and planning. Island Press, Washington
Grindle MS, Hilderbrand ME (1995) Building sustainable capacity in the public sector: what can be done? Public Adm Dev 15:441–463
Handmer J (1996) Policy design and local attributes for flood hazard management. J Conting Crisis Manag 4(4):189–197
Haque E (2000) Risk assessment, emergency preparedness, and response to hazards: the case of the 1997 Red River Valley flood, Canada. Nat Hazards 21:225–245
Hartig JH, Law NL, Epstein D, Fuller K, Letterhos J, Krantzberg G (1995) Capacity building for restoring degraded areas in the Great Lakes. Int J Sustain Dev World 2:1–10
Hartvelt F, Okun DA (1991) Capacity building for water resources management. Water Int 16:176–183
Holling C (1996) Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems, and incentives for people. Ecol Appl 6(3):733–735
Honadle BW (1981) A capacity-building framework: a search for concept and purpose. Public Adm Rev 43(5):575–580
Innes J (1996) Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. J Am Plan Assoc 62:460–472
Ivey JL, Loe RC, Kreutzwiser RD (2002) Groundwater management by watershed agencies: an evaluation of the capacity of Ontario’s conservation authorities. J Environ Manag 64:311–331
Kartez J, Faupel C (1995) Factors promoting comprehensive local government hazards management. Paper presented at the nineteenth annual conference of the association of state floodplain managers, Portland, Maine
Larson L, Pasencia D (2001) No adverse impact: new direction in floodplain management policy. Nat Hazards Rev 2(4):167–181
Laurian L, Day M, Backhurst M, Berke P, Ericksen N, Crawford J, Dixon J, Chapman S (2004) What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers. J Environ Plan Manag 47(4):555–577
National Flood Insurance Program (2007) Policy & claim statistics for flood insurance. http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/statistics/pcstat.shtm. Accessed 9 June 2008
Olshansky RB, Kartez JD (1998) Managing land use to build resilience. In: Burby R (ed) Cooperating with nature: confronting natural hazards with land use planning for sustainable communities. Joseph Henry Press, Washington
Platt RH (1999) Disasters and democracy: the politics of extreme natural events. Island Press, Washington
Simonovic SP, Ahmad S (2005) Computer-based model for flood evacuation emergency planning. Nat Hazards 34:25–51
Smith K (1996) Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge, London
Stein J, Moreno P, Conrad D, Ellis S (2000) Troubled waters: congress, the corps of engineers, and wasteful water projects. Taxpayers for Common Sense and National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC
Texas State Data Center (2008) Population growth of Texas. http://txsdc.utsa.edu/. Cited 5 Dec 2008
Thampapillai DJ, Musgrave WF (1985) Flood damage and mitigation: a review of structural and non-structural measures and alternative decision frameworks. Water Resour Res 21:411–424
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2006) Services for the publics. http://www.usace.army.mil/public.html. Retrieved 13 Jan 2007
Westley F (1995) Governing design: the management of social systems and ecosystems management. In: Gunderson L et al (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York
Whipple W (1998) Water resources: a new era for coordination. ASCE Press, Reston, VA
White GF (1936) Notes on flood protection and land use planning. Plan J 3(3):57–61
White GF (1945) Human adjustment to floods: a geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. Research Paper No. 29. Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Chicago
White GF (1975) Flood hazard in the United States: a research assessment. Institute of Behavioral Sciences. University of Colorado, Boulder
Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington
Zahran S, Brody SD, Peacock WG, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: a model of flood casualties in Texas, 1997–2001. Disasters (4). doi:10.1111/j.0361-3666.2008.01054.x
Acknowledgments
This article is based on research supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation Grant No. CMS-0346673. The findings and opinions reported are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the funding organizations or those who provided assistance with various aspects of the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
See Table 5
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brody, S.D., Kang, J.E. & Bernhardt, S. Identifying factors influencing flood mitigation at the local level in Texas and Florida: the role of organizational capacity. Nat Hazards 52, 167–184 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9364-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9364-5