Skip to main content

Models of information flow in ant foraging: the benefits of both attractive and repulsive signals

  • Chapter
Information Processing in Social Insects

Summary

Models of ant foraging and recruitment behaviour have demonstrated how simple algorithms can produce complex foraging patterns. In the absence of hierarchical control, self-organisation enables a colony to establish a foraging strategy, through the interaction of ants using simple signals that indicate success in foraging. In this paper we investigate a model of ant foraging, and demonstrate how the effectiveness of the foraging strategy of a colony can be increased by reducing the persistence of foraging signals. In addition we investigate the theoretical possibility that ants might employ “negative” signals to indicate their failure in foraging. Such behaviour has neither been recorded nor refuted in real ant species and remains an intriguing possibility, since we can demonstrate how this can be overwhelmingly the most effective strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM, Verhaeghe JC (1983) Probabilistic behaviour in ants: a strategy of errors? J Theor Biol 105: 259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deneubourg JL, Aron S, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine Ant. J Insect Behav 3: 159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1987) Self-organisation mechanisms in ant societies (I): trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. In: JM Pasteels, JL Deneubourg (eds): From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, 155–175

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goss S, Aron S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1989) Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine Ant. Naturwissenschaften 76: 579–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insect Soc 37: 258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franks NR, Gomez N, Goss S, Deneubourg JL (1991) The blind leading the blind in army ant raid patterns—a model of self-organization (Hymenoptera, Formi-cidae). J Insect Behav 4: 583–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1992a) Trails and u-turns in the selection of a path by the ant Lasius niger. J Theor Biol 159: 397–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1992b) Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the ant Lasius niger (L). Insect Soc 39: 59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stickland TR, Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) A path choice algorithm for ants. Naturwissenschaften 79: 567–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stickland TR, Tofts C, Franks NR (1993) Algorithms for ant foraging. Naturwissenschaften 80: 427–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stickland TR, Britton NF, Franks NR (1995) Complex trails and simple algorithms in ant foraging. Proc R Soc Lond B 260: 53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Edelstein-Keshet L, Watmough J, Ermentrout GB (1995) Trail following in ants: individual properties determine population behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36: 119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) A model of collective nectar source selection by honey bees: self-organisation through simple rules. J Theor Biol 149: 547–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seeley TD, Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) Collective decision making in honeybees— how colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28: 277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Franks NR, Wilby A, Silverman W, Tofts C (1992) Self-organising nest construction in ants: sophisticated building by blind bulldozing. Anim Behav 44: 357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Franks NR, Sendova-Franks AB (1992) Brood sorting by ants: distributing the workload over the work-surface. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30: 109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hatcher MJ, Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Mutual exclusion as a mechanism for information exchange within ant nests. Naturwissenschaften 79: 32–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Doing the right thing — ants, honeybees and naked mole rats. Trends Ecol Evol 7: 346–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartholdi JJ, Seeley TD, Tovey CA, Vande Vate JH (1993) The pattern and effectiveness of forager allocation among tlower patches by honey bee colonies. J Theor Biol 160: 23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1993) Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: experimental). Bull Math Biol 55: 75–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1994) Social resilience in individual worker ants, and its role in division of labour. Proc R SocLond B. 256: 305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tofts C (1993a) Algorithms for task allocation in ants (a study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull Math Biol 55: 891–918

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tofts C (1993b) The efficiency of ant path finding algorithms. Proc 1st European Conference on Computer Simulation in Biology, Ecology and Medicine

    Google Scholar 

  24. Veena T, Ganeshaiah KN (1991) Non-random search pattern of ants foraging on honeydew of aphids on cashew inflorescences. Anim Behav 41: 7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lopez F, Serrano JM, Acosta FJ (1994) Parallels between the foraging strategies of ants and plants. Trends Ecol Evol 9: 150–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Traniello JFA, Robson SK (1995) Trail and territorial communication in social insects. In: RT Carde, WJ Bell (eds): Chemical ecology of insects 2. Chapman and Hall, 241-286

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hangartner W (1969) Structure and variability of the individual odor trail in Solenopsis geminata Fabr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Z Vergl Physiol 62: 111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hölldobler B (1976) Recruitment behaviour, home range orientation, and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyr-mex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1: 3–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Crawford DL, Rissing SW (1983) Regulation of recruitment by individual scouts in Formica oreas Wheeler (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 30: 177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Breed MD, Fewell JH, Moore AJ, Williams KR (1987) Graded recruitment in a Ponerine ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20: 407–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baroni-Urbani C, Nielsen MG (1990) Energetics and foraging behaviour of the European seed harvesting ant Messor capitatus. II. Do ants optimise their harvesting? Physiol Entomol 15: 449–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee Ecology: A Study of Adaptation in Social Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Becker GS (1991) A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. J. Political Econ. 99: 1109–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kirman A (1993) Ants, rationality and recruitment. Quart J Econ 108: 137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Deneubourg J-L, Goss S, Pasteeis JM, Fresneau D, Lachaud JP (1987) Self-organisation mechanisms in ant societies (II): Learning in foraging and division of labour. In: JM Pasteeis, JL Deneubourg (eds): From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, 177–196

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hasseil MP (1978) The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  39. Price PW (1970) Trail odours: recognition by insects parasitic on cocoons. Science 170: 546–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Giurfa M, Nunez JA (1992) Honeybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers. Oecologia 89: 113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Britton, Stickland TR, Franks NR (1998) Analysis of ant foraging algorithms. J Biol Sys 6: 315–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stickland, T.R., Britton, N.F., Franks, N.R. (1999). Models of information flow in ant foraging: the benefits of both attractive and repulsive signals. In: Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L., Pasteels, J.M. (eds) Information Processing in Social Insects. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9751-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8739-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics