Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Customer-Related Uncertainties in Facility Location Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty in Facility Location Problems

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 347))

Abstract

In many situations, customers choose the facilities they want to interact with. One possible objective of the facility managers is to maximize the number of customers who use their facilities. In order to achieve this objective, they will need to make decisions regarding the features of their facilities, such as product variety, parking space, ambiance, prices, and, not least, the location of these facilities, particularly relative to the location of customers and possible competitors. To make their facilities attract as many customers as possible, the firms need to know what makes customers behave the way they do. Unfortunately for the firms, customer behavior is uncertain. This chapter examines the sources of customer-related uncertainty. These include the occurrence of unplanned purchases, the taste for variety—given product heterogeneity, imperfect information available to the customers about product and store features, and imperfect information on customers available to decision-makers. The effects of these uncertainties on customers’ behavior are also described: purchases distributed among all competitors, comparison shopping, multipurpose trips, and price and feature search. This behavior results in facility locations different from those obtained using models that do not consider uncertainty. In particular, we do see more agglomeration. The chapter then describes some models that include customer probabilistic choice rules and demonstrates how these rules can be integrated into facility location models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hotelling explicitly refers to product heterogeneity when firms “locate” in a space of customer preferences. However, when addressing geographical location, he uses homogeneous products.

  2. 2.

    Actually, the gathering of information can be more permanent, which result in search behavior.

References

  • Altekin, F. T., Dasci, A., & Karatas, M. (2021). Linear and conic reformulations for the maximum capture location problem under multinomial logit choice. Optimization Letters, 15(8), 2611–2637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amos, C., Holmes, G. R., & Keneson, W. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of customer impulse buying. Journal of Retailing and Customer Services, 21(2), 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anas, A. (1983). Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Transportation Research Part B, 17(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(83)90023-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. P., & Renault, R. (1999). Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: A Bertrand–Chamberlin–Diamond model. RAND Journal of Economics, 30, 719–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. P., De Palma, A., & Thisse, J.-F. (1992). Discrete choice theory of product differentiation. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aros-Vera, F., Marianov, V., & Mitchell, J. E. (2013). P-hub approach for the optimal park-and-ride facility location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2), 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attri, R., & Jain, V. (2018). A study of factors affecting customer shopping behavior. IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 17(1), 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. R., Corsten, D., & Knox, G. (2013). Unplanned category purchase incidence: Who does it, how often, and why. https://repository.upenn.edu/marketing_papers/301. Last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Benati, S., & Hansen, P. (2002). The maximum capture problem with random utilities: Problem formulation and algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 518–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierlaire, M., Hurtubia, R., & Flötteröd, G. (2009). A comparative analysis of implicit and explicit methods to model choice set generation. 9th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Switzerland. http://www.strc.ch/2009/Bierlaire.pdf. Last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Business Insider. (2021). The pandemic might have saved brick-and-mortar shopping as restrictions lift and customers head back to stores. https://www.businessinsider.com/pandemic-saved-brick-and-mortar-stores-walmart-and-target-2021-5. Last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Chamberlin, E. H. (1933). Theory of monopolistic competition. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia, I., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2019). Facility location under uncertainty. In G. Laporte, S. Nickel, & F. Saldanha da Gama (Eds.), Location science (pp. 185–213). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coto-Millán, P. (2003). Theory of utility and customer behaviour: A comprehensive review of concepts, properties and the most significant theorems. In Utility and production. Contributions to economics. Physica.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. S. (2002). The origins of logistic regression. Tinbergen Institute Working Paper No. 2002-119/4, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=360300 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.360300. Both last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Daly, A., & Zachary, S. (1978). Improved multiple choice models. In D. Hensher & Q. Dalvi (Eds.), Identifying and measuring the determinants of mode choice. Teakfields.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dam, T. T., Ta, T. A., & Mai, T. (2022). Submodularity and local search approaches for maximum capture problems under generalized extreme value models. European Journal of Operational Research, 300(3), 953–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Palma, A., Ginsburgh, V., Papageorgiu, Y., & Thisse, J.-F. (1985). Heterogeneity and taste dispersion: The principle of minimum differentiation holds under sufficient heterogeneity. Econometrica, 53, 767–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, T. (2019). Gravity models in competitive facility location. In H. A. Eiselt & V. Marianov (Eds.), Contributions to location analysis. International series in operations research and management science (pp. 253–275). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B. C., & Lipsey, R. G. (1979). Comparison shopping and the clustering of homogeneous firms. Journal of Regional Science, 19, 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B. C., & Lipsey, R. G. (1982). An economic theory of central places. The Economic Journal, 92, 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiselt, H. A., Marianov, V., & Drezner, T. (2019). Competitive location models, Chapter 14. In G. Laporte, S. Nickel, & F. Saldanha da Gama (Eds.), Location science (2nd ed., p. 644p). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, P., Pelegrín, B., Lančinskas, A., & Žilinskas, J. (2017). New heuristic algorithms for discrete competitive location problems with binary and partially binary customer behavior. Computers and Operations Research, 79, 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. H., & Harrington, J. E., Jr. (1996). Product variety and firm agglomeration. The Rand Journal of Economics, 281–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, G. J., Hutchinson, J. W., Williams, P., Alba, J. W., Chartrand, T. L., Huber, J., Kardes, F. R., Menon, G., Raghubir, P., Russo, J., Shiv, B., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2002). Non-conscious influences on customer choice. Marketing Letters, 13(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020313710388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S., & O’Kelly, M. E. (1989). Spatial interactions: Formulations and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. J., Montgomery, A. L., & Lodish, L. M. (2004). Customer shopping and spending across retail formats. The Journal of Business, 77(S2), S25–S60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/381518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. (2005). Understanding customer choice. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, A. S., Moreno, E., & Yushimito, W. F. (2016). A branch-and-bound algorithm for the maximum capture problem with random utilities. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(1), 204–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauri, D. K., Jindal, R. P., Ratchford, B., Fox, E., Bhatnagar, A., Pandey, A., Navallo, J. R., Fogarty, J., Carr, S., & Howerton, E. (2021). Evolution of retail formats: Past, present, and future. Journal of Retailing, 97(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, K., & Müller, S. (2014). A comparison of linear reformulations for multinomial logit choice probabilities in facility location models. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), 689–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi, S. (1990). Locations with spatial interactions: Competitive locations and games. In P. B. Mirchandani & R. L. Francis (Eds.), Discrete location theory (pp. 439–478). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A., & Newey, W. K. (2016). Individual heterogeneity and average welfare. Econometrica, 84(3), 1225–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, M. J. (1981). A location–allocation model maximizing customers’ welfare. Regional Studies, 15(6), 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoo, F. S. (2018). The one-stop shopping area for all your ‘Brooklyn bride’ needs. Available online at https://fashionista.com/2018/08/brooklyn-brides-bridal-shops-third-avenue. Last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübner, A., Hense, J., & Dethlefs, C. (2022). The revival of retail stores via omnichannel operations: A literature review and research framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 302, 799–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.12.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, D. L. (1963). A probabilistic analysis of shopping center trade areas. Land Economics, 39(1), 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, B. (2021). Bricks and mortar retailing far from dead – but now it’s just part of the mix. The Irish Timeshttps://www.irishtimes.com/special-reports/future-of-retail/bricks-and-mortar-retailing-far-from-dead-but-now-it-s-just-part-of-the-mix-1.4645578. Last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Jamal, M., & Lodhi, S. (2015). Customer shopping behavior in relation to factors influencing impulse buying: A case of superstores in Karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(12), 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khapugin, S., & Melnikov, A. (2019). Local search approach for the medianoid problem with multi-purpose shopping trips. In M. Khachay, Y. Kochetov, & P. Pardalos (Eds.), Mathematical optimization theory and operations research (MOTOR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 11548). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22629-9_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, H. (2005). Concentration of competing retail stores. Journal of Urban Economics, 58(3), 488–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, D., & Pesch, E. (2016). Competitive location and pricing on networks with random utilities. Networks and Spatial Economics, 16(3), 837–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krider, R. E., & Putler, D. S. (2013). Which birds of a feather flock together? Clustering and avoidance patterns, of similar retail outlets. Geographical Analysis, 45, 123–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to customer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. (2015). Convenience and online consumer shopping behavior: A business anthropological case study based on the contingent valuation method. Anthropologist, 21(1,2), 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. H., & Tian, Q. (2021). Branch-and-cut approach based on generalized benders decomposition for facility location with limited choice rule. European Journal of Operational Research, 293(1), 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljubić, I., & Moreno, E. (2018). Outer approximation and submodular cuts for maximum capture facility location problems with random utilities. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(1), 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., Orr, S., & Sugden, R. (2009). Taste uncertainty and status quo effects in customer choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-009-9076-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1957). A theory of individual choice behavior. Defense Technical Information Center Report. May 1957. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0130718.pdf. Last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Luce, R. D. (1977). The choice axiom after twenty years. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüer-Villagra, A., Marianov, V., Eiselt, H. A., & Méndez-Vogel, G. (2022). The leader multipurpose shopping location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 302(2), 470–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, T., & Lodi, A. (2020). A multicut outer-approximation approach for competitive facility location under random utilities. European Journal of Operational Research, 284(3), 874–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov, V., & Eiselt, H. A. (2016). On agglomeration in competitive location models. Annals of Operations Research, 246, 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1704-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov, V., Eiselt, H. A., & Lüer-Villagra, A. (2018). Effects of multipurpose shopping trips on retail store location in a duopoly. European Journal of Operational Research, 269, 782–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov, V., Eiselt, H. A., & Lüer-Villagra, A. (2020). The follower competitive location problem with comparison-shopping. Networks and Spatial Economics, 20(2), 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-019-09481-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, F., Aguila, F., & Hurtubia, R. (2009). The constrained multinomial logit: Asemi-compensatory choice model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massara, F., Melara, R. D., & Liu, S. S. (2014). Impulse versus opportunistic purchasing during a grocery shopping experience. Marketing Letters, 25, 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D., & Train, K. (2000). Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(5), 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez-Vogel, G., Marianov, V., Lüer-Villagra, A., & Eiselt, H. A. (2022). Store location with multipurpose shopping trips and a new random utility customers’ choice model. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.06.008

  • Mongin, P. (1998). Expected utility theory. In J. B. Davis, D. W. Hands, & M. Uskali (Eds.), The handbook of economic methodology. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi, M., & Cooper, L. G. (1974). Parameter estimation for a multiplicative competitive interaction model: Least squares approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(3), 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly, M. E. (1981). A model of the demand of retail facilities, incorporating multistop, multipurpose trips. Geographical Analysis, 13, 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortúzar, J. D., & Willumsen, L. G. (2022). Modelling transport (5th ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou, Y. Y., & Thisse, J.-F. (1985). Agglomeration as spatial interdependence between firms and households. Journal of Economic Theory, 37, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radu, V. (2022). Customer behavior in marketing – patterns, types, segmentation. Available online at https://www.omniconvert.com/blog/customer-behavior-in-marketing-patterns-types-segmentation/. Last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Reilly, W. J. (1929). Methods for the Study of Retail Relationships (Vol. 4). Bureau of Business Research Studies in Marketing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnure, C. (2021). Brick-and-mortar retail is bouncing back. Forbes. Available online at https://www.forbes.com/sites/calvinschnure/2021/03/18/brick-and-mortar-retail-is-bouncing-back/?sh=30a76841d0f4. Last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Sheth, J. N. (2021). Future of brick-and-mortar retailing: how will it survive and thrive? Journal of Strategic Marketing, 29(7), 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2021.1891128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiu, E., Walsh, G., Hassan, L., & Shaw, D. (2011). Customer uncertainty revisited. Psychology and Marketing, 28(6), 584–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1980). Experiments on decisions under risk: The expected utility hypothesis. Martinus Nijho.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, L. V. (2006). Facility location under uncertainty: A review. IIE Transactions, 38(7), 547–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. R. (2017). Customer behavior: Buying, having and being (12th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, K. (1982). Differentiate products, customer search, and locational oligopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics, 31, 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. W W Norton & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronier, R. M. (2022). America’s love for impulse spending is going strong in 2022. https://money.slickdeals.net/surveys/slickdeals-impulse-spending-survey-2022/. Last accessed on 01/30/2023.

  • Urbany, J. E., Dickson, P. R., & Wilkie, W. L. (1989). Buyer uncertainty and information search. Journal of Customer Research, 16, 208–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. G. (1967). A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research, 1, 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. C. (1977). On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning A, 9, 285–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolinsky, A. (1983). Retail trade concentration due to customers’ imperfect information. Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support by grants FONDECYT 1220047, ANID PIA/PUENTE AFB220003, and Ph.D. scholarship from CONICYT-PFCHA/Doctorado Nacional/2019-21190765.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Vladimir Marianov

  2. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Gonzalo Méndez-Vogel

Authors
  1. Vladimir Marianov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gonzalo Méndez-Vogel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Marianov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada

    H. A. Eiselt

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI), Santiago, Chile

    Vladimir Marianov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marianov, V., Méndez-Vogel, G. (2023). Customer-Related Uncertainties in Facility Location Problems. In: Eiselt, H.A., Marianov, V. (eds) Uncertainty in Facility Location Problems. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 347. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32338-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation