Abstract
The paper outlines landslide mapping and change-detection monitoring protocols based on the successes of ICL-IPL Project 202 in southwestern British Columbia, Canada. In this region, ice sheets, glaciers, permafrost, rivers and oceans, high relief, and biogeoclimatic characteristics contribute to produce distinctive landslide assemblages. Bedrock and drift-covered slopes along the transportation corridors are prone to mass-wasting when favourable conditions exist. In high-relief mountainous areas, rapidly moving landslides include rock and debris avalanches, rock and debris falls, debris flows and torrents, and lahars. In areas with moderate to low relief, rapid to slow mass movements include rockslides and slumps, debris or earth slides and slumps, and earth flows. Slow-moving landslides include rock glaciers, rock and soil creep, solifluction, and lateral spreads in bedrock and surficial deposits. Research in the Thompson River Valley aims to gain a better understanding of how geological conditions, extreme weather events and climate change influence landslide activity along the national railway corridor. Remote sensing datasets, consolidated in a geographic information system, capture the spatial relationships between landslide distribution and specific terrain features, at-risk infrastructure, and the environmental conditions expected to correlate with landslide incidence and magnitude. Reliable real-time monitoring solutions for critical railway infrastructure (e.g., ballast, tracks, retaining walls, tunnels and bridges) able to withstand the harsh environmental conditions of Canada are highlighted. The provision of fundamental geoscience and baseline geospatial monitoring allows stakeholders to develop robust risk tolerance, remediation, and mitigation strategies to maintain the resilience and accessibility of critical transportation infrastructure, while also protecting the natural environment, community stakeholders, and the Canadian economy. We conclude by proposing a best-practice solution involving three levels of investigation to describe the form and function of the wide range of rapid and slow-moving landslides occurring across Canada, which is also applicable elsewhere.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- National railway infrastructure
- Landslide change-detection monitoring
- Satellite InSAR analysis
- UAV photogrammetry
- RTK-GNSS surveys
- Continuous ERT
1 Introduction
Canada’s national railway network is the dominant mode for exporting natural resources (e.g., coal, oil, grain, potash, forest products) to deep-water marine terminals; and for intermodal goods entering continental North America from global markets. Unfortunately, across much of the continent (Fig. 1), railway infrastructure and operations are confined to transportation corridors with slopes susceptible to a broad range of landslide processes (Geertsema et al. 2009a, b; Bobrowsky and Dominguez 2012). Landslide form and function are dependent upon regional physiographic setting (montane belts, high plateaus, prairies, lowlands), environmental conditions (past and present), and local geology (solid and drift). Regionally, the diverse bedrock geology, wide range of surficial deposits, along with high relief in mountains, plateaus and deeply incised valleys (Fig. 1) favours a broad range of rapid- to slow-moving landslides (Table 1).
Where transportation corridors traverse unstable slopes, varying degrees of damage to vulnerable infrastructure, or service delays caused by landslides have potential local and national economic, social, and environmental consequences. A landslide-resilient national transportation railway network requires sustainable, cost-effective management of service operations to meet future socioeconomic needs while protecting the natural environment and public. In a scenario of future extreme weather events and climate change, railway infrastructure and operations are expected to face unique challenges in design, monitoring, adaptation, mitigation, reclamation and restoration. An understanding of the geographic distribution and temporal range of earth materials and geological hazards is fundamental to effective hazard management and risk reduction safety (cf. Jespersen-Groth et al. 2009; Laimer 2017).
Here, we present a monitoring framework for railway disaster risk-reduction that incorporates: (1) fundamental spatial and temporal information on geological, geophysical, and geotechnical properties of landslides at national, regional and local scales; with (2) site-specific benchmark monitoring acquired using an array of remote sensing platforms; and (3) in-situ change-detection monitoring technologies and methodologies.
2 Study Area
Because of its socioeconomic primacy, the focus of attention is on landslide processes adversely affecting the national railway corridors connecting the deep-water ports of Vancouver and Squamish in southwestern British Columbia (BC) to the rest of Canada (Fig. 1). From these coastal ports, the Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific (CP) railway corridors traverse mountainous and rolling plateau terrain, running through deeply incised valleys and along the steep shorelines of fjords and lakes (Fig. 2a–c). Gentle to steep bedrock slopes along these transportation corridors are mantled by surficial deposits susceptible to a range of rapid- to slow-moving landslides (Table 1).
CN and CP railway transportation corridors are usually <1 km from river channels, fjord coastlines, and lakeshores to maintain an optimal grade (Fig. 2d–f). Located so, railway tracks and infrastructure are prone to damage by landslides, floods, wildfires, and other geological hazards. Local physiography, weather conditions, geological hazards, and land-use activities present local and national economic, social, and environmental challenges (cf. Schuster and Fleming 1986; Haque et al. 2016; Blais-Stevens 2020).
The strategic importance of these vital corridors, along with the need to understand and manage the safety risks related to landslides, make on-site investigations a strategic priority for governments, academia, and the rail industry (Bunce and Chadwick 2012; Hendry et al. 2015). Combining field-based landslide investigation with multi-year geospatial and in-situ time-series monitoring leads to a more resilient railway national transportation network able to meet Canada’s future socioeconomic needs, while ensuring protection of the environment and resource-based communities from landslides related to extreme weather events and climate change.
2.1 ICL Project 202 Landslide Laboratory
Thompson River with its several slides and history afford a study of known slides that, with certainty, experience dynamic behaviour during monitoring efforts. Landslides along a ten-kilometre stretch of the Thompson River valley between the communities of Ashcroft and Spences Bridge (Fig. 3) have negatively impacted critical railway infrastructure, arable land, fisheries, and other natural resources since the 1880s (Stanton 1898; Evans 1984).
In the late nineteenth century, terraces were intensively irrigated for agricultural land use and toe slopes were incised and over-steepened during railway construction (Stanton 1898; Evans 1984; Clague and Evans 2003). Prehistoric mass movements were consequently reactivated as sudden onset, rapid retrogressive flow-slides during the fall and winter months. The economic importance of this transportation corridor, along with the need to understand and manage the safety risk related to the landslides that threaten the route, mandate the Thompson River valley a monitoring priority for Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN) and the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC).
3 Methods and Results
Monitoring unstable slopes and infrastructure at risk is a cost-effective hazard management practice in southwestern BC that also provides important geoscience information to help develop appropriate stakeholder mitigation and adaptation measures (Bunce and Chadwick 2012; Huntley et al. 2021a). Here, we outline landslide mapping and change-detection monitoring protocols based on the successes of ICL-IPL Project 202 in the Thompson River valley railway transportation corridor that incorporate diverse historical time-series and near real-time geoscience datasets.
3.1 Monitoring to Understand Landslide Form
Descriptions of local topographic, bathymetric, surficial and bedrock geological conditions, including earth materials and landforms, and their hydrological properties are essential for understanding landslide compositions, structures, and behaviours. Geospatial relationships between landslide distribution and specific terrain features, and the environmental conditions triggering instability are determined from field-based, on-site geological and geophysical studies, combined with geotechnical, petrophysical, and geochemical laboratory analysis, which are then codified and quantified in geographic information systems (GIS).
3.2 Remote Sensing and Field Surveys
Understanding form and function begins with terrain analysis and landslide inventory. Terrain polygons and features characteristic of landslide activity are delimited on optical satellite imagery (e.g., Landsat, WorldView), conventional air photographs, and unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry. Terrain and landslide classifications are benchmarked by ground observations of slope gradient, surficial materials, material texture, material thickness, slope morphology, moisture conditions, ongoing geomorphic processes, and land cover (Figs. 4b, 5; Huntley and Bobrowsky 2014; Huntley et al. 2017a, 2019a, 2020a; b, c; Holmes et al. 2018, 2020). Terrain and landslides are codified following British Columbia (Howes and Kenk 1997) and GSC mapping standards (Deblonde et al. 2018).
For the Thompson River valley, landslide distribution is influenced by the distribution of forests, shrub lands, grasslands, wetlands, water, croplands, and railway infrastructure. Vegetation cover generally contributes to increased slope stability through the action of binding roots and water absorption in soils. However, extensive, deep-penetrating roots on steep slopes also contributes to the mechanical and chemical weathering of soils and parent materials by providing additional materials for remobilization if triggered by other factors (e.g., seismic shaking and precipitation events). Lying leeward of the Coast Mountains, the valley experiences semi-arid conditions with annual precipitation as rainfall and snow <2700 mm (Dominguez-Cuesta and Bobrowsky 2011). Greater cyclic and seasonal ground moisture changes due to evapotranspiration varying strongly between winter and summer will also drive deterioration.
Nine surficial material classes are recognized; distinguished by genetic origin, material texture and thickness, slope gradient and morphology, moisture conditions, and active geomorphic processes (Fig. 2b and Table 1). Bedrock influences slope hazards where surficial cover is thin, for example on terrain with slopes >35°. Elsewhere, drift cover is thicker and surficial materials have a greater influence on slope instability. Large retrogressive rotational-translational earth-debris slides were initially triggered by deep incision of Pleistocene fill in the Thompson River valley during the early Holocene (Clague and Evans 2003).
Subsequently, the river has influenced slope stability and landslide susceptibility by changing (a) the pore water pressure in the slope mass, and along rupture surfaces; (b) the supporting force on landslide toes; and (c) through cut-bank erosion, thereby affecting the geometry of the landslide. Back-tilted blocks and rapid debris slumps move over weak, curvilinear rupture zones in glaciolacustrine clay-silt units confined between overlying till and underlying bedrock (Porter et al. 2002; Eshraghian et al. 2007, 2008; Huntley et al. 2020a).
3.3 Geophysical Surveys and In-Situ Monitoring
Geophysical surveys, borehole logging, and laboratory analysis of geotechnical and geochemical properties of earth materials, including stratigraphic layers and structures (e.g., joints, faults, shear planes and tension cracks) provide additional information on internal geological structures and failure mechanisms, as well as how and where groundwater flows through landslide bodies and surrounding bedrock (cf. Whiteley et al. 2019).
Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), frequency modulated electromagnetic conductivity (FEM), ground-penetrating radar (GPR), seismic primary wave refraction (PWR), and multichannel analysis of shear waves (MASW) surveys provide the most useful information on the distribution earth materials, in addition to the distribution and quantity of groundwater (Figs. 4c, d, 5 and 6; Huntley et al. 2017a, 2019a). Geophysical methods adopted for hydrogeological logging of observation wells include down-hole measurement of natural gamma radiation (GR), induction conductivity (IC) and magnetic susceptibility (MS) (Fig. 5). Subsurface borehole monitoring (Fig. 4e), combining ShapeAccelArray inclinometry with piezometer head levels, indicate that the landslides studied in the Thompson River valley are failing along sub-horizontal, weak, basal shear surfaces in highly plastic clay beds that extend under the river (Porter et al. 2002; Eshraghian et al. 2007, 2008).
At Ripley Landslide, detailed borehole logging shows that the central and northern parts are translating sub-horizontally (2.1 \(^\circ \)–2.5 \(^\circ \)), whereas the southern portion near a lock-block retaining wall has a steeper (28°) slide surface (Fig. 5; Macciotta et al. 2014; Hendry et al. 2015; Schafer et al. 2015).
3.4 Aerial and Bathymetric Surveys
UAVs allow flexible, inexpensive acquisition of low-altitude aerial images, while various off-the-shelf photogrammetric Structure from Motion (SfM) software packages enable production of high-resolution digital surface models (DSM), digital elevation models (DEM) and orthophoto mosaics from such images. These UAV surveys help characterize landslide surface morphology and the spatial extent of displacement (Fig. 4f).
DSMs and corresponding orthophoto mosaics provide very high spatial resolution datasets (2 cm) enabling detailed topographical and textural information (cf. Huntley et al. 2020a, 2021a). UAVs, when equipped with a LiDAR sensor, penetrate the vegetation cover and provide elevation data in areas where the photogrammetry based on SfM method is not likely to produce a representative ground surface. Merged mosaics and DSMs capture the surface condition of landslides, and the extent of bare earth and vegetation growth (e.g., grasses, shrubs, and trees). Metre-scale anthropogenic features (e.g., train tracks, lock-block retaining walls, culverts) are resolvable in high-resolution raster imagery.
Bathymetric surveys better characterize the geometry of submerged landslide toe slopes and identify reaches with channel incision and erosion. GPR, ERT, and acoustic single-beam and multi-beam river surveys (Fig. 4g) reveal variations in channel bed composition ranging from sand and silt draping bedrock to coarse gravel and boulders overlying clay-rich valley fill (Huntley et al. 2019a, b, c, 2021a). Shallow waters (riffles) with rapids lie adjacent to stable terrain, separated by deep scour pools (up to 5 m below river level) adjacent active slide toes.
3.5 Monitoring to Determine Landslide Function
Although some landslides in the Thompson River valley failed and moved rapidly in the past, today all are slow-moving compound features within Pleistocene valley fill (Porter et al. 2002; Eshraghian et al. 2007, 2008; Bunce and Chadwick 2012; Huntley et al. 2020a, b; Fig. 4a). Temporal relationships between landslides and the environmental conditions triggering instability are determined from time-series monitoring and GIS analyses of satellite Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR), UAV photograms, and ground-based real-time kinematic ground-based global navigation satellite system (RTK-GNSS) surveys (Eshraghian et al. 2008; Bunce and Chadwick 2012; Huntley et al. 2020a, b; Fig. 4a).
3.6 InSAR Change-Detection Monitoring
Satellite remote sensing is an effective first approach for determining the risks posed from ground hazards than other site investigation (Fig. 4a). InSAR provides the best opportunity to determine the extent of landslide activity in the Thompson River valley (Journault et al. 2016, 2018; Huntley et al. 2017b). Slope deformation is monitored using persistent scatterer InSAR techniques, with landslide mapping, modelling, back-analysis of deformation velocities, and long-term deformation trends derived from datasets (e.g., Macciotta et al. 2014; Journault et al. 2016, 2018; Huntley et al. 2017c). Trihedral aluminium corner reflectors, permanent coherent artificial InSAR targets, improves the precision and accuracy of subsequent image processing of images (Fig. 4h). Different line-of-sight (LoS) viewing geometries allow for the projection of vertical and horizontal displacement. Ground movement measured by space-borne InSAR produces results with precision comparable to RTK-GNSS measurements, but with the advantage of monitoring displacement over large areas (Huntley et al. 2017c; Journault et al. 2018).
InSAR monitoring indicates at least five large volume rotational-translational landslides remain active and have potential to adversely impact CN and CP railway infrastructure and services (Fig. 4a; Journault et al. 2016, 2018; Huntley et al. 2017b, 2021a, b, c). Satellite InSAR platforms with repeat visit times of weeks (e.g., RADARSAT-2 [RS2] and SENTINEL-1 [S1]) to days (e.g., RADARSAT Constellation Mission [RCM]) provide rapid monitoring capability with cm-scale precision and accuracy when periodically benchmarked with ground-based RTK-GNSS measurements and UAV photogrammetry. The combination of relatively high spatial and temporal resolution offered by RCM resolves rapid movement over small areas that would otherwise be aliased by the coarser spatial and temporal resolution of RS2 and S1 (Huntley et al. 2021b, c, d). Ground movement is shown to be generally concentrated within the main body of most sliding masses (Fig. 4a). Rates of displacement detected by InSAR vary seasonally, with slower displacement rates occurring during the May to August interval, and higher values from September to April.
3.7 UAV Change-Detection Monitoring
Rigorous change detection requires an accurate and precise elevation model to serve as a reference base topographic map. Repeat UAV surveys have aimed to better characterize the spatial extent, magnitude and direction of landslide movement in the Thompson River valley (Huntley et al. 2021a, d). Planimetric displacement of landslides are first mapped using image co-correlation analysis processing of time-sequenced hill-shaded UAV DSMs. Parameters during hill-shading that align the orientation of the landslide with the simulated sun are used to draw out features for displacement detection. Areas of vegetation and recent track ballast work on hill-shaded images are masked prior to processing to reduce the areas with substantial change not related to slide movement. Two images are created for E/W (X) and N/S (Y) displacement, while elevation changes (Z) are derived from the DSM. These values are added, and then squared to produce a single raster containing 3D displacement values that are all positive, with larger values representing more displacement (Fig. 4i; Huntley et al. 2021a, d).
3.8 RTK-GNSS Change-Detection Monitoring
Repeat RTK-GNSS ground surveys aim to better characterize the magnitude and direction of landslide movement over time (Fig. 4j). GNSS techniques have been successfully employed to determine the three-dimensional coordinates of moving points on landslides (Macciotta et al. 2014; Rodriguez et al. 2018). Ground control points (GCP) are established across the slope using stable boulders and anthropogenic features on, and adjacent to the landslide. A reference base station was established on a stable post-glacial terrace near Black Canyon, 3 km north of the Ripley Landslide (B, Fig. 3). GNSS monuments (Bunce and Chadwick 2012; Macciotta et al. 2014) provide continuous, near real-time monitoring of surface displacement, but only at three trackside locations.
Repeat RTK-GNSS surveys provide point position data across much of the slide body. However, this method generates limited information on the seasonal variation in displacement rates and amounts. Moreover, periodic and continuous monitoring of GCPs and railway infrastructure with small and slow annual displacements (<10 cm year−1) is particularly challenging in an environment with a semi-arid intermontane climate, and an extreme temperature range of −30 to +40 °C. A Geocube (GeoKylia)™ continuous differential (D)GNSS network installed at the Ripley Landslide addresses both issues of spatial and temporal coverage (Fig. 4k). Two areas of maximum displacement recorded by the DGNSS network coincide with maximum displacement indicated by InSAR and UAV analysis. The larger northern zone spans the CN and CP tracks, while a smaller zone at the south end of the landslide near the lock-block retaining wall (Macciotta et al. 2014; Rodriguez et al. 2018; Huntley et al. 2020b, 2021a).
3.9 In-Situ Instrumental Change-Detection Monitoring
Elevated soil moisture was recognized as a driver of slope failure in the Thompson River valley since the first slope stability study in the area (Stanton 1898). Regional and local groundwater conditions contribute to high pore pressures and slope instability along the transportation corridor. Since clay impedes groundwater flow, pore pressure increases along the surface of clay layers, resulting in reduced material strength and decreased slope stability (Porter et al. 2002; Clague and Evans 2003). Piezometers on active landslides record upward hydraulic gradients and elevated pore pressures, confirming toe slopes are in a discharge zone of a regional groundwater flow system (Eshraghian et al. 2008; Hendry et al. 2015).
A strong correlation between river stage and pore pressures suggests Thompson River controls the distribution of groundwater in the slide mass by acting as a lower hydraulic boundary for the regional groundwater regime within the fractured bedrock; and by allowing horizontal connectivity through higher conductivity layers of fluvial cobbles, gravels and sands (Hendry et al. 2015; Schafer et al. 2015).
Proactive infrastructure monitoring and evaluation (PRIME) with continuous ERT and soil moisture acquisitions capture subsurface responses in interannual and seasonal variations in precipitation, in addition to temperature, surface runoff, and snowmelt (Fig. 6a–g; Sattler et al. 2018, 2020; Holmes et al. 2018, 2020; Huntley et al. 2019b, c). Noticeable increases in rate of movement occur when high, prolonged flows of Thompson River sustained by snowmelt are followed by low flows through the autumn and winter months (Macciotta et al. 2014; Schafer et al. 2015; Tappenden 2016). The greatest displacement rates occur from November to March when transitional ground conditions allow snowmelt and rainfall to penetrate deep into the still frozen (or thawing) slide body by way of tension cracks, planar fractures, and bedding surfaces (Fig. 6c, e, g). Resistivity and soil suction show similar seasonal trends, responding cyclically to changing weather conditions from December to March (Fig. 6d, f, h).
Fibre Bragg grating (FBG) and Brillouin optical time domain reflectometry (BOTDR) indicate peak strain rates in the lock-block retaining wall at the south end of the Ripley Landslide also occur in the fall and winter months (Fig. 4l; Huntley et al. 2017c).
In the Thompson River valley, InSAR interferometry, UAV photogrammetry, RTK-GNSS, piezometers, ERT monitoring, and fibre optic reflectometry all show peak movement occurs through winter to spring, indicating factors other than changes in river and groundwater levels influence landslide activity. To understand climatic controls, local weather conditions, including wind speed and direction, rainfall and snow depth, air temperature, ground temperature, and soil matric suction are monitored (W, Figs. 3 and 4m). Weather station data confirm that major precipitation events occur mostly between fall and spring when landslide activity increases (Fig. 6b). Fluctuations in temperature over the winter months also contribute to intervals of landslide activity with thawing soil moisture recharging groundwater (Holmes et al. 2018, 2020; Huntley et al. 2019a, b, c; Sattler et al. 2020, 2021).
4 Discussion and Synthesis
4.1 Landslides and Consequences
Across Canada, relief, slope, aspect, distance from hydrological features, environmental conditions, surficial geology, and land cover conspire to produce a wide range of rapid and slow-moving landslides (Table 1) with the potential to impact railway infrastructure and operations. Landslides have been responsible for numerous casualties, injuries and deaths, costly damage to transportation infrastructure and property, socioeconomic losses, and environmental degradation since the late eighteenth century (Blais-Stevens 2020). Since the late 1800s, the operational and economic consequences of slope failure along the national railway transportation corridors have depended on the scale and rate of movement, and temporal relationship between landslide activity and train timetables.
In the Thompson River valley transportation corridor (Fig. 3), small (<10 cm year−1), incremental surface displacements detected by InSAR, UAVs and periodic RTK-GNSS surveys contribute to minor track misalignment, requiring short-term (seasonal) reorganization of train schedules to allow the safe addition of ballast and realignment of tracks, and to avoid significant time-tabling impacts (i.e., intrinsic consequences). In contrast, frequent, rapid, large and widespread ground movements are a concern for railway companies, government agencies and local communities. Greater surface displacement will damage bridges, culverts, retaining walls and access roads, and cause major track misalignment with the potential for train derailments and service disruption. Potential accompanying negative environmental impacts (i.e., extrinsic consequences) include the loss of natural resources, including fish, wildfowl, game animals, cattle and crops, and potable water for communities.
Global climate change is anticipated to lead to more extreme regional weather events across Canada, along with an increase in the frequency and magnitude of landslides, floods, wildfires and other geological hazards in all provinces and territories (Sauchyn and Nelson 1999; Couture and Evans 2006; St. George 2007). For example, increasing precipitation and higher sustained river flows will change groundwater pressures on slide rupture surfaces extending below rivers and lakes, contributing to increased instability of slopes along the national railway transportation corridors. Climate-driven geological hazards can potentially compromise the safe and secure transport of rural resources and intermodal goods across the continent. A cascade of resulting negative intrinsic and extrinsic consequences for transportation and energy infrastructure, supply chains for goods and services, as well as the environment, will challenge the integrity and resilience of national transportation infrastructure and local communities (Evans and Clague 1997; Geertsema et al. 2006a, b; Blais-Stevens 2020).
The extreme storm system of November 14, 2021, in southwestern BC and its aftermath illustrates such a cascade of events. Following a dryer-than-normal summer and wetter-than-normal fall along all major transportation corridors through the Cascades and Coast Mountains (Fig. 2), wildfire-disturbed slopes received >100 mm of rain in 24 h (and up to 300 mm over 48 h) during an extreme “atmospheric river event” (https://weather.gc.ca/ [URL 2021]). Along with the loss of life (human and livestock), railways, highways, pipelines, power transmission networks, light industrial, and rural–urban infrastructure (e.g., potable water conduits and sewage treatment plants) sustained significant damage because of widespread storm-driven landslides and flooding. The costly relocation of whole communities and reorganization of transportation and shipping schedules led to national socioeconomic losses through service disruption and broken supply chains extending well beyond the winter of 2021–2022. Long-term negative environmental consequences include widespread contamination of agricultural lands and damage to natural fish and wildlife habitats.
4.2 Landslide Mitigation and Monitoring Best Practices
Geotechnical mitigation solutions for landslides can carry significant economic costs and environmental consequences, especially when measures fail to stabilize the slopes of concern (Bunce and Chadwick 2012). In closing, we propose a best-practice solution incorporating three levels of investigation to describe the form and function of the wide range of rapid and slow-moving landslides occurring across Canada in a range of physiographic settings (Fig. 7). Geospatial and temporal change-detection monitoring of active landslides and at-risk infrastructure is a cost-effective hazard management practice that provides important geoscience information to help develop appropriate early warning, mitigation, and adaptation measures in response to extreme weather events driven by climate change.
4.3 Level I Investigation (Fundamental Geoscience)
All landslide studies begin with the acquisition of fundamental geoscience information on earth materials, landforms, and their behaviours. GIS landslide inventories are based on the interpretation of high-resolution optical and hyperspectral satellite imagery, air photos, and UAV photogrammetry (Fig. 7). On-site investigations of slope and drainage, bedrock and structures, surficial geology and geomorphology, and vegetation and land cover, when combined with borehole logging, geophysical surveys, petrological and geochemical analyses, and geotechnical studies provide fundamental geoscience information on terrain units and landforms susceptible to mass-movement landslides (Fig. 7).
Landslide inventories and susceptibility maps (e.g., Fig. 2c) allow stakeholders to recognize slopes of concern for further investigation and identify the most suitable geological indicators for level II and III monitoring (Fig. 7). GIS and derivative maps that delimit unstable and potentially unstable terrain are invaluable tools for landslide monitoring and risk management since they can be applied to calculate spatial relationships between landslide distribution, specific terrain features, and environmental conditions expected to correlate with landslide incidence.
Although non-systematic datasets have unequal reliability, accuracy and precision, they nevertheless provide useful insight into landslide distribution at various scales and help focus attention on areas of interest where rigorous qualitative analyses are warranted (Fig. 7).
4.4 Level II Investigation (Geospatial Benchmarks)
For landslides of concern and terrain susceptible to mass-wasting identified in a Level I investigation, ground-based RTK-GNSS measurements with cm-scale precision and accuracy periodically benchmark displacement values determined from satellite InSAR and UAV change-detection datasets (Fig. 7).
As highlighted by the case study in the Thompson River valley, slow-moving mass movements (e.g., rock slumps, debris slides and earth flows) are most effectively monitored by combining InSAR, UAV and RTK-GNSS monitoring. Shallow geophysical and bathymetric surveys also contribute an understanding of the composition and behaviour of a range of slow-moving landslides. Like other parts of Canada, the landscape and harsh environment of southwestern BC presents logistical challenges for installation, and instrumentation of geophysical and continuous GNSS measurements. Permanent GNSS stations and GCPs are less appropriate for monitoring rapid mass movements in steep, mountainous areas with rock avalanches, debris flows and lahars, or in low relief permafrost terrain with active layer detachments and thaw flows where they are prone to damage and loss of data.
4.5 Level III Investigation (Time-Series Monitoring)
Steep, mountainous terrain also presents logistical challenges for installation and in-situ time-series monitoring of rapid-moving rock avalanches, debris flows and lahars in steep, are prone to damage and loss of data. In a Level III investigation, lithological, geophysical, geochemical and geotechnical properties, and other environmental conditions (e.g., river and groundwater levels, soil moisture, weather variables), recognized as drivers of landslide activity and benchmarked during levels I-II, are selected for in-situ time-series monitoring.
Level III investigations are most suitable for slower moving landslides where boreholes can be drilled for monitoring and unstable slopes instrumented safely. In the Thompson valley transportation corridor, Level III InSAR, UAV and RTK-GNSS change-detection datasets conclusively show that geotechnical solutions to stabilize slopes based on current physical models are only partly successful (Journault et al. 2016, 2018; Huntley et al. 2017b, 2021c, e). To better understand the impacts of climate, landslide behaviour is further investigated though time-series monitoring of slopes and infrastructure (e.g., fibre optic reflectometry), boreholes (e.g., piezometers, inclinometers, and acoustic emissions), and weather variables (e.g., rain gauges, snow sensors, thermistors, anemometers, soil moisture meters).
The key goal of geological indicator time-series monitoring is the derivation of thresholds for driving factors that influence landslide dimensions and displacement values (Fig. 7).
4.6 Stakeholder Actions (Climate-Resilient Infrastructure)
The severity of damage to vulnerable railway infrastructure (e.g., tracks, ballast, tunnels, bridges and retaining walls) is a consequence of the areal extent and volume of the landslide(s), temporal changes in landslide activity, and the magnitude of displacement detected during level I–III investigations (Fig. 7). In addition, climate-driven mass-wasting will affect, to varying degrees, sensitive ecosystems, fish, wildlife and water resources, agricultural lands and livestock, communities and people living in proximity to railway infrastructure, and ultimately, supply chains and the national economy (Fig. 7).
Environmental thresholds derived from multi-year datasets capturing spatial and temporal changes in landslide activity in proximity to critical transportation infrastructure enable stakeholders to build robust monitoring and early warning systems, cost-effective mitigation measures, and reliable risk management strategies (Fig. 7). Geospatial and in-situ time-series datasets improve the safety, security and resilience of transportation infrastructure to climate-driven geological hazards, reducing risks to the economy, environment, natural resources and public safety.
References
Blais-Stevens A (2020) Historical landslides that have resulted in fatalities in Canada (1771–2019). Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8392, 1 sheet. https://doi.org/10.4095/326167
Blais-Stevens A, Couture R, Page A, Koch J, Clague J, Lipovsky P (2010) Landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk assessments along pipeline corridors in Canada. In: Proceedings of the 63rd Canadian geotechnical conference and 6th Canadian permafrost conference, pp 878–885
Bobrowsky PT, Dominguez MJ (2012) Landslide susceptibility map of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 7228, 1:6 million-scale map: 1 sheet. https://doi.org/10.4095/291902
Bostock HS (2014) Geology, physiographic regions of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Map 1254A, 2nd ed, scale 1:5 million-scale map, 3 sheets. https://doi.org/10.4095/293408
Bunce C, Chadwick I (2012) GPS monitoring of a landslide for railways. In: Landslides and engineered slopes—protecting society through improved understanding, pp 1373–1379
Clague J, Evans S (2003) Geologic framework for large historic landslides in Thompson River valley, British Columbia. Environ Eng Geosci 9:201–212
Couture R, Evans S (2006) Slow-moving disintegrating rockslides on mountain slopes. In: Evans S et al (eds) Landslides from massive rock slope failure: proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on massive rock slope failure: new models for hazard assessment, NATO science series, sub-series IV: earth and environmental sciences, vol 49, pp 377–393
Deblonde C, Cocking R, Kerr D, Campbell J, Eagles S, Everett D, Huntley D, Inglis E, Parent M, Plouffe A, Robertson L, Smith I, Weatherston A (2018) Science language for an integrated Geological Survey of Canada data model for surficial geology maps (Version 2.3.14). Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8236: 50 p, 2 sheets
Dominguez-Cuesta M, Bobrowsky P (2011) Proposed landslide susceptibility map of Canada based on GIS. In: Proceedings of the second world landslide forum, 8 p
Eshraghian A, Martin C, Cruden D (2007) Complex earth slides in the Thompson River Valley, Ashcroft, British Columbia. Environ Eng Geosci XIII:161–181
Eshraghian A, Martin C, Morgenstern N (2008) Movement triggers and mechanisms of two earth slides in the Thompson River Valley, British Columbia, Canada. Can Geotech J 45:1189–1209
Evans S (1984) The 1880 landslide dam on Thompson River, near Ashcroft, British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada. Current Res Part A Paper 84-1A:655–658
Evans S, Clague J (1997) The impact of climate change on catastrophic geomorphic processes in the mountains of British Columbia, Yukon, and Alberta. In: Taylor E, Taylor B (eds) Responding to global climate change in British Columbia and Yukon, Vol I of the Canada Country Study: climate impacts and adaptation, Chap 7, 16 p
Fulton R (Compiler) (1995) Surficial materials of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Map 1880A, scale 1:5,000,000
Geertsema M, Clague J, Schwab J, Evans S (2006a) An overview of recent large catastrophic landslides in northern British Columbia, Canada. Eng Geol 83:120–143
Geertsema M, Schwab J, Blais-Stevens A (2006b) Landslides impacting linear infrastructure in west-central British Columbia. In: Proceedings of the 1st specialty conference on disaster mitigation, pp DM 1–10
Geertsema M, Highland L, Vaugeouis L (2009a) Environmental impact of landslides. In: Landslides—disaster risk reduction, pp 589–607
Geertsema M, Schwab J, Blais-Stevens A, Sakals M (2009b) Landslides impacting linear infrastructure in west central British Columbia. Nat Hazards 48:59–72
Haque U, Blum P, da Silva P, Andersen P, Pilz J, Chalov S, Malet J-P, Auflič M, Andres N, Poyiadji P, Lamas P, Zhang W, Peshevski I, Pétursson H, Kurt T, Dobrev N, Garcí-Davalillo J, Halkia M, Ferri S, Gaprindashvili G, Engström J, Keellings D (2016) Fatal landslides in Europe. Landslides 13:1545–1554
Hendry M, Macciotta R, Martin D (2015) Effect of Thompson River elevation on velocity and instability of Ripley Slide. Can Geotech J 52(3):257–267
Hervás J, Bobrowsky P (2009) Mapping: inventories, susceptibility. Hazard and risk. In: Landslides—disaster risk reduction, pp 321–349
Highland L, Bobrowsky P (2008) The landslide handbook—a guide to understanding landslides. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1325, 129 p
Holmes J, Chambers J, Donohue S., Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Meldrum P, Uhlemann S, Wilkinson P, Swift R (2018) The use of near surface geophysical methods for assessing the condition of transport infrastructure. Civil Engineering Research Association, Special Issue on Structural Integrity of Civil Engineering Infrastructure. J Struct Integrity Maintenance, 6
Holmes J, Chambers J, Meldrum P, Wilkinson B, Williamson P, Huntley D, Sattler K, Elwood D, Sivakumar V, Reeves H, Donohue S (2020) 4-Dimensional electrical resistivity tomography for continuous, near-real time monitoring of a landslide affecting transport infrastructure in British Columbia, Canada. Near Surface Geophys 15. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12102
Howes D, Kenk E (1997) Terrain classification system for British Columbia. Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Crown Lands, 102 p
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P (2014) Surficial geology and monitoring of the Ripley Slide, near Ashcroft, British Columbia, Canada; Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 7531, 21 p
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Parry N, Bauman P, Candy C, Best M (2017a) Ripley landslide: the geophysical structure of a slow-moving landslide near Ashcroft, British Columbia, Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8062, 59 p
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Charbonneau F, Journault J, Hendry M (2017b) Innovative landslide change detection monitoring: application of spaceborne InSAR techniques in the Thompson River valley, British Columbia, Canada. In: Landslide research and risk reduction for advancing culture and living with natural hazards, vol 3, 4th world landslide forum (ICL-IPL), Ljubljana, Slovenia 29-May–2 June 2017b. Springer Nature, 13 p
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Lv Z. (2017c) Fibre Bragg grating and brillouin optical time domain reflectometry monitoring manual for the Ripley landslide, near Ashcroft, British Columbia. GSC Open File 8258, 66 p
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Hendry M, Macciotta R, Best M (2019a) Multi-technique geophysical investigation of a very slow-moving landslide near Ashcroft, British Columbia, Canada. J Environ Eng Geophys 24(1):85–108. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG24.1.87
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Sattler K, Elwood D, Holmes J, Chambers J, Meldrum P, Holmes J, Wilkinson P, Hendry, M., Macciotta R (2019b) PRIME installation in Canada: protecting national railway infrastructure by monitoring moisture in an active landslide near Ashcroft, British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8548, 1 sheet. https://doi.org/10.4095/314548
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Hendry M, Macciotta R, Elwood D, Sattler K, Chambers J, Meldrum P (2019c) Application of multi-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography datasets to investigate a very slow-moving landslide near Ashcroft, British Columbia, Canada. Landslides 16:1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01147-1
Huntley D, Holmes J, Bobrowsky P, Chambers J, Meldrum P, Wilkinson P, Elwood D, Sattler K, Hendry M, Macciotta R (2020a) Hydrogeological and geophysical properties of the very slow-moving Ripley Landslide, Thompson River valley, British Columbia. Can J Earth Sci 57:1371–1391. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2019-0187
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Cocking R, Joseph J, Neelands N, MacLeod R, Rotheram-Clarke D, Usquin R, Verluise F (2020b) Installation, operation and evaluation of an innovative global navigation satellite system monitoring technology at Ripley Landslide and South Slide, near Ashcroft, British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8742, 36 p
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, MacLeod R, Cocking R, Joseph J, Rotheram-Clarke D (2021a) Ensuring resilient socio-economic infrastructure: field testing innovative differential GNSS-InSAR-UAV monitoring technologies in mountainous terrain near Ashcroft, British Columbia, Canada. J Mountain Sci 18(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6552-y
Huntley D, Rotheram-Clarke D, Cocking R, Joseph J (2021b) Landslide change detection monitoring with a benchmarked RADARSAT CONSTELLATION MISSION high temporal resolution dataset. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. In: International geoscience and remote sensing symposium, Special Volume, 4 p
Huntley D, Rotheram-Clarke D, Pon A, Tomaszewicz A, Leighton J, Cocking R, Joseph J (2021c) Benchmarked RADARSAT-2, SENTINEL-1 and RADARSAT CONSTELLATION MISSION change detection monitoring at North Slide, Thompson River valley, British Columbia: implications for a landslide-resilient national railway network. Canadian J Remote Sens 23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2021.1937968
Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Rotheram-Clarke D, MacLeod R, Cocking R, Joseph J, Holmes J, Donohue S, Chambers, J., Meldrum P, Wilkinson P, Hendry M, Macciotta R (2021d) Protecting Canada’s railway network using remote sensing technologies. In: Advances in remote sensing for infrastructure, Springer International Publishing, 26 p. https://doi.org/10.36487/AGC_repo/2025_09
Huntley D, Rotheram-Clarke D, Cocking R, Joseph J, Bobrowsky P (2021e) Understanding Plateau and Prairie Landslides: annual report on landslide research in the Thompson River valley, British Columbia, and the Assiniboine River valley, Manitoba-Saskatchewan (2020–2021e to 2021e–2022). Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8838, 73 p
Jespersen-Groth P, Potthoff D, Clausen J, Huisman D, Kroon L, Marotí G, Nielsen M (2009) Disruption management in passenger railway transportation. In: Robust and online large-scale optimization. Springer, pp 399–421
Journault J, Macciotta R, Hendry M, Charbonneau F, Bobrowsky P, Huntley D, Bunce C, Edwards T (2016) Identification and quantification of concentrated movement zones within the Thompson River valley using satellite borne InSAR. Canadian Geotechnical Society. In: Proceedings volume of geoVancouver 2016 annual meeting, 13 p
Journault J, Macciotta R, Hendry M, Charbonneau F, Huntley D, Bobrowsky P (2018) Measuring displacements of the Thompson River valley landslides, south of Ashcroft, B.C., Canada, using satellite InSAR. Landslides 15(4):621–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0900-1
Laimer H (2017) Anthropogenically-induced landslides—a challenge for railway infrastructure in mountainous regions. Eng Geol 222:92–101
Macciotta R, Hendry M, Martin D, Elwood D, Lan H, Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Sladen W, Bunce C, Choi E, Edwards T (2014) Monitoring of the Ripley Slide in the Thompson River Valley, B.C. Geohazards 6. In: Symposium, proceedings volume, Kingston, Ontario, 1 p
Porter M, Savigny K, Keegan T, Bunce C, MacKay C (2002) Controls on stability of the Thompson River landslides. In: Canadian geotechnical society, ground and water—theory to practice, proceedings of the 55th Canadian geotechnical conference, pp 1393–1400
Rodriguez J, Hendry M, Macciotta R, Evans T (2018) Cost-effective landslide monitoring GPS: characteristics, implementation and results. Geohazards 7, Proceedings Paper, 8 p
Sassa K (2004) The international consortium on landslides. Landslides 1:91–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-004-0012-6
Sattler K, Elwood D, Hendry M, Macciotta R, Huntley D, Bobrowsky P, Meldrum P (2018) Real-time monitoring of soil water content and suction in slow-moving landslide. In: GeoEdmonton 2018, proceedings paper, 8 p
Sattler K, Elwood D, Hendry M, Huntley D, Holmes J, Wilkinson P (2020) Effect of pore-pressure dynamics on progressive failure in clay shale landslides. Landslides 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60706-7_45
Sattler K, Elwood D, Hendry M, Berscheid B, Marcotte B, Abdulrazagh P, Huntley D (2021) Field collection of geotechnical measurements for remote or low-cost data-logging requirements. Geotech Test J 45(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20200323
Sauchyn D, Nelson H (1999) Origin and erosion of the police point landslide, Cypress Hills, Alberta. In Holocene climate and environmental change in the Palliser Triangle: a geoscientific context for evaluation the impacts of climate change on the southern Canadian prairies. Geol Survey Canada Bulletin 534:257–265
Schafer M, Macciotta R, Hendry M, Martin D, Bobrowsky P, Huntley D, Bunce C, Edwards T (2015) Instrumenting and monitoring a slow moving landslide. GeoQuebec 2015 Paper, 7 p
Schuster R, Fleming R (1986) Economic losses and fatalities due to landslides. Bulletin Assoc Eng Geol XXIII 1:11–28
Stanton R (1898) The great land-slides on the Canadian Pacific Railway in British Columbia. Proc Civil Eng 132:1–48
St. George S (2007) Stream flow in the Winnipeg River basin, Canada: trends, extremes and climate linkages. J Hydrol 332:396–411
Tappenden K (2016) Impact of climate variability on landslide activity in the Thompson River Valley Near Ashcroft, B.C. In: Proceedings of the 69th Canadian geotechnical conference, October 2–5, 2016. Vancouver, 10 p
Whiteley J, Chambers J, Uhlemann S, Wilkinson P, Kendall J (2019) Geophysical monitoring of moisture-induced landslides: A review. Rev Geophys 57:106–145. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000603
Acknowledgements
The Government of Canada, through the Ministry of Transport and Ministry of Natural Resources, is funding field-based landslide research in the Thompson River valley, BC, and elsewhere across Canada. The authors wish to acknowledge the support of Danny Wong (Canadian Pacific Railways, Calgary, Alberta) and Trevor Evans (Canadian National Railways, Kamloops, British Columbia). University partners include Michael Hendry, Renato Macciotta, and Sohrab Sharifi (University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta). Bathymetric surveys were completed with the assistance of Tim Funk (Funktional, Kamloops, British Columbia), Paul Bauman, Graham Young and team (Advisian-Worley Parsons Group, Calgary, Alberta), and Jacques Gagne (Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Sidney, British Columbia). Andy Pon and colleagues (3vGeomatics, Vancouver, British Columbia), Pano Skrivanos (Pacific UAV, Sidney, British Columbia), Bill Lakeland and Alec Wilson (Spexi Geospatial Inc.) provided technical assistance with InSAR and UAV analyses. Remi Usquin and Frédéric Verluise, Ophelia Sensors (Paris, France), provided tireless GeocubeTM support. Philip LeSueur provided an internal Geological Survey of Canada critical peer review of the draft manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huntley, D. et al. (2023). IPL Project 202: Landslide Monitoring Best Practices for Climate-Resilient Railway Transportation Corridors in Southwestern British Columbia, Canada. In: Sassa, K., Konagai, K., Tiwari, B., Arbanas, Ž., Sassa, S. (eds) Progress in Landslide Research and Technology, Volume 1 Issue 1, 2022. Progress in Landslide Research and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16898-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16898-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16897-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16898-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)