Skip to main content

Mixed Reality Training in Electrical Equipment Operating Procedures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Manufacturing III (MANUFACTURING 2022)

Abstract

The implementation of Industry 4.0 in the enterprise forces increased digitization, production flexibility, improvement of employees’ competences and the integration of employees and IT systems. For this purpose, cutting-edge IT systems and solutions such as Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (VR/AR/MR) are increasingly used. These technologies can be used, in training processes of ma-chines and equipment operating procedures. The paper is a case study on the possibility of using MR applications in training in the use of electrical devices (ARS 2 Pro switch disconnector). The aim of the work is to compare MR and standard training and evaluate their effectiveness in this type of training. The paper briefly describes developed applications and preliminary test-results.

A group of 20 people in the age group 20 to 40. The participants were divided in-to 2 subgroups in order to properly analyze the effectiveness of individual training tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Semenov, I., Filina-Dawidowicz, L., Trojanowski, P.: Information resources structuring to support decision-making process for organization of sensitive cargo transportation in the COVID-19 crisis. In: Sustainable Economic Development and Advancing Education Excellence in the era of Global Pandemic Proceedings of the 36th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), pp.9881–9890 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kotliar, A., et al.: Ensuring the economic efficiency of enterprises by multi-criteria selection of the optimal manufacturing process. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 11(1), 52–61 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karpus, V.E., Ivanov, V.A.: Choice of optimal configuration of modular reusable fixtures. Russ. Eng. Res. 32(3), 213–219 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marino, E., Barbieri, L., Colacino, B., Fleri, A.K., Bruno, F.: an augmented reality inspection tool to support workers in industry 4.0 environments. Comput. Ind. 127, 103412 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Żywicki, K., Buń, P.: Process of materials picking using augmented reality. IEEE Access 9, 102966–102974 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fast-Berglund, Å., Gong, L., Li, D.: Testing and validating extended reality (xR) technologies in manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 25, 31–38 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bun, P., Trojanowska, J., Ivanov, V., Pavlenko, I.: The use of virtual reality training application to increase the effectiveness of workshops in the field of lean manufacturing. In: 4th International Conference of the Virtual and Augmented Reality in Education, VARE 2018, pp. 65–71 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ivanov, V., Pavlenko, I., Trojanowska, J., Zuban, Y., Samokhvalov, D., Bun, P. Using the augmented reality for training engineering students. In: 4th International Conference of the Virtual and Augmented Reality in Education, VARE 2018, pp. 57–64 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flavián, C., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., Orús, C.: The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. J. Bus. Res. 100, 547–560 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kunnen, S., Adamenko, D., Pluhnau, R., Loibl, A., Nagarajah, A.: System-based concept for a mixed reality supported maintenance phase of an industrial plant. Procedia CIRP 91, 15–20 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Juraschek, M., Büth, L., Posselt, G., Herrmann, C.: Mixed reality in learning factories. Procedia Manuf. 23, 153–158 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gorski, F., Grajewski, D., Bun, P., Zawadzki, P.: Study of interaction methods in virtual electrician training. IEEE Access 9, 118242–118252 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carlson, P., Peters, A., Gilbert, S.B., Vance, J.M., Luse, A.: Virtual training: learning transfer of assembly tasks. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 21(6), 770–782 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan, A.D., Cruit, J., Endsley, M., Beers, S.M., Sawyer, B.D., Hancock, P.A.: The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality as training enhancement methods: a meta-analysis. Hum. Factors 63(4), 706–726 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rehman, U., Cao, S.: Comparative evaluation of augmented reality-based assistance for procedural tasks: a simulated control room study. Behav. Inf. Technol. 39(11), 1225–1245 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Radhakrishnan, U., Chinello, F., Koumaditis, K.: Immersive virtual reality training: three cases from the danish industry. In: 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW), pp. 1–5 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Balani, M.S., Tümler, J.: Usability and user experience of interactions on VR-PC, HoloLens 2, VR cardboard and AR smartphone in a biomedical application. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 12770, pp. 275–287. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77599-5_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao, X., Feng, X., Yu, Y., Wu, Z., Mei, P.: A natural interaction method of multi-sensory channels for virtual assembly system of power transformer control cabinet. IEEE Access 8, 54699–54709 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers, K., Funke, J., Frommel, J., Stamm, S., Weber, M.: Exploring interaction fidelity in virtual reality: object manipulation and whole-body movements. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jung, J., Park, H., Hwang, D., Son, M., Beck, D.: A review on interaction techniques in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bali, Indonesia, 7–9 January 2014

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grajewski, D., Buń, P., Górski, F.: Examination of effectiveness of a performed procedural task using low-cost peripheral devices in VR. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds.) VAMR 2018. LNCS, vol. 10909, pp. 403–415. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91581-4_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. OpenVR documentation. https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/features/steamvr/openvr. Accessed 10 Jan 2022

  23. Microsoft HoloLens specification. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/hololens1-hardware. Accessed 10 Jan 2022

  24. HoloLens 1 usage. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/hololens1-basic-usage. Accessed 26 Oct 2021

  25. Unity3D documentation. https://docs.unity3d.com/2019.3/Documentation/Manual/index.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2022

  26. SteamVR Plugin for Unity3D. https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/tools/integration/steamvr-plugin-32647. Accessed 10 Jan 2022

  27. HTC Vive Pro main page. https://www.vive.com/eu/product/vive-pro/. Accessed 10 Jan 2022

  28. Mixed Reality Toolkit Documentaton. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/design/gaze-and-commit. Access 26 Oct 2021

  29. Autodesk Inventor documentation. https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/inventor/learn. Accessed 10 Jan 2022

  30. Autodesk 3ds Max documentation. https://help.autodesk.com/view/3DSMAX/2020/ENU/. Access 10 Jan 2022

  31. Gapsa, J.: Training of operation procedures of electrical equipment in virtual and mixed reality (in Polish), Master Thesis, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lewis, J.R.: The system usability scale: past, present, and future. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 34(7), 577–590 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Grassini, S., Laumann, K., Rasmussen Skogstad, M.: The use of virtual reality alone does not promote training performance (but sense of presence does). Front. Psychol. 11, 1743 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Abich, J., Parker, J., Murphy, J. S., Eudy, M. A: review of the evidence for training effectiveness with virtual reality technology. Virtual Reality 1–15 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  35. del Amo, I.F., Erkoyuncu, J.A., Roy, R., Palmarini, R., Onoufriou, D.: A systematic review of augmented reality content-related techniques for knowledge transfer in maintenance applications. Comput. Ind. 103, 47–71 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Azimi, E., et al.: Can mixed-reality improve the training of medical procedures?. In: 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 4065–4068. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hu, H.Z., et al.: Application and prospect of mixed reality technology in medical field. Curr. Med. Sci. 39(1), 1–6 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. HoloLens 2 basics. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/hololens2-basic-usage. Accessed 26 Oct 2021

  39. Ababsa, F., He, J., Chardonnet, J.-R.: Combining hololens and leap-motion for free hand-based 3D interaction in MR environments. In: De Paolis, L.T., Bourdot, P. (eds.) AVR 2020. LNCS, vol. 12242, pp. 315–327. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58465-8_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Nguyen, D., Meixner, G.: Gamified augmented reality training for an assembly task: a study about user engagement. In: 2019 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 901–904. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cazzolla, A., Lanzilotti, R., Roselli, T., Rossano, V.: Augmented reality to support education in Industry 4.0. In: 2019 18th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund within the Smart Growth Operational Programme 2020–2024. The project is executed within the priority axis “Support for R&D Activity of Enterprises” of the National Centre for Research and Development under the contract POIR.01.01.01-00-0463/18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paweł Buń .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Buń, P., Gapsa, J., Husár, J., Kaščak, J. (2022). Mixed Reality Training in Electrical Equipment Operating Procedures. In: Trojanowska, J., Kujawińska, A., Machado, J., Pavlenko, I. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing III. MANUFACTURING 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99310-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99310-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99309-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99310-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics