Abstract
Research suggests metacognition enhances performance with emerging technologies (e.g., intelligent tutoring systems [ITSs]), where learning goals guide metacognitive processes (e.g., judgments of learning and feelings of knowing). A growing body of evidence has found significant relationships between motivation, metacognitive process use, and performance with ITSs. Yet, most studies do not define metacognition based on its relevance to achieving a learning goal (or multiple learning goals). In this study, we examined 186 undergraduates’ multimodal data captured during learning with an ITS called MetaTutor to analyze whether the stability of change in the proportion of metacognitive judgments initiated on pages containing information relevant to achieving either learning goals 1 or 2. Latent growth curves suggested that the stability of page-irrelevant metacognitive judgments from the first to second learning goal was positively related to performance, but there were no relations between achievement goal orientation. We describe implications for contextualizing metacognition to the model of metamemory and multiple learning goals with an ITSs. Future research utilizing this method could provide insight into designing effective interventions based on what personally motivates learners to engage in metacognition to augment their learning and performance with emerging technologies.
Supported by the National Science Foundation and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
We do not provide more information on the other questionnaires administered to maintain brevity. Readers are encouraged to email the corresponding author to inquire more information.
- 2.
We do not provide details about these data channel since they were not included in our analysis. Readers are encouraged to email the corresponding author for more information.
References
Azevedo, R.: Reflections on the field of metacognition: issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition Learn. 15, 91–98 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x
Azevedo, R., Taub, M., Mudrick, N.-V.: Using multi-channel trace data to infer and foster self-regulated learning between humans and advanced learning technologies. In: Schunk, D.H., Greene, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, 2nd edn, pp. 254–270. Routledge, New York (2018)
Cloude, E.B., Taub, M., Azevedo, R.: Investigating the role of goal orientation: metacognitive and cognitive strategy use and learning with intelligent tutoring systems. In: Nkambou, R., Azevedo, R., Vassileva, J. (eds.) ITS 2018. LNCS, vol. 10858, pp. 44–53. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_5
Cloude, E.B., Taub, M., Lester, J., Azevedo, R.: The role of achievement goal orientation on metacognitive process use in game-based learning. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds.) AIED 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11626, pp. 36–40. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_7
Cromley, J.G., Kunze, A.J.: Metacognition in education: translational research. Transl. Issues Psychol. Sci. 6(1), 15–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000218
Hong, W., Bernacki, M.L., Perera, H.N.: A latent profile analysis of undergraduates’ achievement motivations and metacognitive behaviors, and their relations to achievement in science. J. Educ. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000445
McDowell, L.D.: The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self-regulated learners of college physical science: a review of empirical studies. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 41(17), 2524–2541 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A.: The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2019)
Järvelä, S., Bannert, M.: Temporal and adaptive processes of regulated learning-What can multimodal data tell?. Learn Instr. 72, 101268 (2021)
Koriat, A.: Confidence judgments: the monitoring of object-level and same-level performance. Metacognition Learn. 14(3), 463–478 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09195-7
Nelson, T.O., Narens, L.: Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In: Bower, G.H. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2nd edn., pp. 125–141. Academic Press Inc., Cambridge (1990)
Özcan, Z.Ç.: The relationship between mathematical problem-solving skills and self-regulated learning through homework behaviours, motivation, and metacognition. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 47(3), 408–420 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1080313
Elliot, A.J., Murayama, K., Pekrun, R.: A 3 \(\times \) 2 achievement goal model. J. Educ. Psychol. 103(3), 632–648 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023952
Miele, D.B., Scholer, A.A., Fujita, K.: Metamotivation: emerging research on the regulation of motivational states. In: Elliot, A.J. (ed.) Advances in Motivation Science, pp. 1–42. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2020)
Du Boulay, B., Del Soldato, T.: Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems: 20 years on. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 170–182 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0052-1
Du Boulay, B.: Towards a motivationally intelligent pedagogy: how should an intelligent tutor respond to the unmotivated or the demotivated? In: Calvo, R., D’Mello, S. (eds.) New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies. LSIS, vol. 3, pp. 41–52. Springer, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9625-1_4
McNeish, D., Matta, T.: Differentiating between mixed-effects and latent-curve approaches to growth modeling. Behav. Res. Methods 50, 1398–1414 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0976-5
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68–78 (2000)
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: The darker and brighter sides of human existence: basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychol. Inq. 11(4), 319–338 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI110403
Wickham, H.: Reshaping data with the reshape package. J. Stat. Softw. 21(12), 1–20 (2007)
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K.: dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.0.2 (2020). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
Oliphant, T.E.: A Guide to NumPy, vol. 1, p. 85. Trelgol Publishing (2006)
McKinney, W.: Pandas: a foundational Python library for data analysis and statistics. Python High Perform. Sci. Comput. 14(9), 1–9 (2011)
Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3), 297–334 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Wickham, H.: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2019). www.R-project.org/
Wickham, H., Bryan, J.: readxl: Read Excel Files. R package version 1.3.1 (2019). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl
Rosseel, Y.: Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48(2), 1–36 (2012). www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
Revelle, W.: psych: procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA (2020). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
Taub, M., Azevedo, R., Rajendran, R., Cloude, E.B., Biswas, G., Price, M.J.: How are students’ emotions related to the accuracy of cognitive and metacognitive processes during learning with an intelligent tutoring system? Learn. Instr. 72, 101200 (2021)
Mudrick, N.-V., Azevedo, R., Taub, M.: Integrating metacognitive judgments and eye movements using sequential pattern mining to understand processes underlying multimedia learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 96, 223–234 (2019)
Lajoie, S.-P., Pekrun, R., Azevedo, R., Leighton, J.-P.: Understanding and measuring emotions in technology-rich learning environments. Learn. Instr. 70, 101272 (2020)
Greene, J.-A., Azevedo, R.: A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 34(1), 18–29 (2009)
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.-S.: Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 68–81 (2000)
Deci, E.-L., Ryan, R.-M.: Self-determination theory. In: Van Lange, P.-A.-M., Kruglanski, A.-W., Higgins, E.-T. (eds.) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 416–436. Sage Publications Ltd., London (2012). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21
Kruglanski, A.-W., Shah, J.-Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W.-Y., Sleeth-Keppler, D.: A theory of goal systems, pp. 208–250 (2002)
Schunk, D.-H., DiBenedetto, M.-K.: Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 60, 101832 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cloude, E.B., Wortha, F., Wiedbusch, M.D., Azevedo, R. (2021). Goals Matter: Changes in Metacognitive Judgments and Their Relation to Motivation and Learning with an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies: New Challenges and Learning Experiences. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12784. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77889-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77889-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77888-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77889-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)