Skip to main content

Agroforestry Systems in The Temperate Zone

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Agroforestry

Abstract

The temperate countries/regions considered in this chapter include the USA and Canada, Europe, southern Australia and New Zealand, parts of China, and the southern regions of South America, with the primary focus on North America and Europe where agroforestry has made significant strides. Historically, natural forests and woodlands were used for grazing in England as early as the 1600s. Similar practices were also prevalent elsewhere in Europe, Japan, and the temperate parts of India. The silvopastoral system, known as Dehesa in northern Spain and Montado in Portugal, is as old as the Roman occupation of the Iberian Peninsula. Overall, the agroforestry systems (AFS) are less diverse in the temperate zone than in the tropics in their structure (nature and arrangement of components) and functions (products and services). The Association for Temperate Agroforestry had recognized five AF practices in the United States: alley cropping, forest farming, silvopasture, riparian buffer, and windbreaks; urban food forestry was added as a practice in the 2010s. These practices and their variants and a few others of local relevance are also used to designate the AF practices in Europe into alley cropping or silvoarable (trees + crops), silvopasture, riparian buffer, homegardens or kitchen gradens, and forest farming. With the transformation of agriculture into market-oriented commercial farming in large, family, or corporate farms in the 20th century, the combinations of trees and arable crops became viewed opportunistically as a means to improve economic profitability. Since the turn of the century, however, interest in AFS has increased with the recognition of their ecosystem services, and support to agroforestry on farmlands is increasing. Policymakers in several countries of Europe have become appreciative of the environmental importance of silvopastoral and silvoarable systems that have been experimentally proven valuable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams SN (1975) Sheep and cattle grazing in forests: a review. J Appl Ecol 12:143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar FX, Cernusca MM, Gold MA (2009) A preliminary assessment of consumer preferences for chestnuts (Castanea sp.) using conjoint analysis. HortTechnology 19:216–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar FX, Cernusca MM, Gold MA (2010) Frequency of consumption, familiarity and preferences for chestnuts in Missouri. Agrofor Syst 79:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander F, Brittle S, Ha A, Gleeson T, Riley C (2000) Landcare and farm forestry: providing a basis for better resource management on Australian farms. ABARE report to the National Heritage Trust, Canberra, November

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson GW, Batini FE (1979) Clover and crop production under 13- to 15-year-old Pinus radiata. Austr J Exp Agric Anim Husb 19:362–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson GW, Moore RW, Jenkins PJ (1988) The integration of pasture, livestock, and widely-spaced pine in South-Western Australia. Agrofor Syst 6:195–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer NW (1989) Shelterbelts and windbreaks in the great plains. J For 87(4):32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentrup G, Cernusca I, Gold M (2018) Supporting U.S. Agricultura landscapes under changing conditions with agroforestry: an annotated bibliography. Bibliographies and literature of agriculture 137. USDA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Canqui H, Gantzer CJ, Anderson SH, Alberts EE, Thompson AL (2004) Grass barrier and vegetative filter strip effectiveness in reducing runoff, sediment, nitrogen, and phosphorus loss. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1670–1678

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou X (2004) Windbreaks in sustainable agriculture. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hodges L, Tyndall J, Sudmeyer RA (2009) Chapter 5: Windbreak practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. Am Soc Agron, Madison, pp 104–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown C (2003) Consumers’ preferences for locally produced food: a study in southeast Missouri. Am J Alt Agric 18:213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski C, Munsell J (2018) The community food forest handbook: how to plan, organize, and nurture edible gathering places. Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont, 257p

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess PJ, den Herder M, Dupraz C, Garnett K, Giannitsopoulos M, Graves AR, Hermansen J E, Kanzler M, Liagre F, Mirck J, Moreno G, Mosquera-Losada MR, Palma JHN, Pantera, A, Plieninger T (2018) AGFORWARD PROJECT final report. Cranfield University: AGFORWARD: http://www.agforward.eu/

  • Byington EK (1990) Agroforestry in the temperate zone. In: MacDicken KG, Vergara NT (eds) Agroforestry classification and management. Wiley, New York, pp 228–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain J, Bush R, Hammett AL (1998) Non-timber forest products: the other forest products. For Products J 48:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain JL, Mitchell D, Brigham T, Hobby T, Zabeck L, Davis J (2009) Forest farming practices. In: Garret HE (ed) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 219–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang SX, Wang W, Zhu Z, Wu Y, Peng X (2018) Temperate agroforestry in China. In: Gordon AM, Newman SM, BRW C (eds) Temperate agroforestry systems, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 173–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark KH, Nicholas KA (2013) Introducing urban food forestry: a multifunctional approach to increase food security and provide ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol 28:1649–1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9903-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook BG, Grimes RF (1977) Multiple land-use of open forest in southeastern Queensland for timber and improved pasture: Establishment and early growth. Trop Grassl 11:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Correal E, Erena M, Ríos S, Robledo A, Vicente M (2009) Agroforestry systems in southeastern Spain. In: Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, McAdam J, Mosquera-Losada MR (eds) Agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 183–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangerfield CW Jr, Harwell RL (1990) An analysis of a silvopastoral system for the marginal land in the southeast United States. Agrofor Syst 10:187–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn M, Paris P, Herzog F, Incoll L, Liagre F, Mantzanas K, Mayus M, Moreno G, Papanastasis V, Pilbeam D, Pisanelli A, Dupraz C (2006) Silvoarable systems in Europe: past, present and future prospects. Agrofor Syst 67:29–50

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018) World food and agriculture. Statistical Pocket Book. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford M, Zamora DS, Current D et al (2017) Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA. Agrofor Syst 93:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett HE (ed) (2009) North american agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 379p

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett HE, Harper LS (1999) The science and practice of black walnut agroforestry in Missouri, USA: a temperate zone assessment. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry as a sustainable agricultural system. CRC Press, New York, pp 97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett HE, McGraw RL, Walter WD (2009) Alley cropping. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 133–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett HE, Jose S, Gold MA (eds) (2020) North american agroforestry. 3rd edn. ASA, CSSA, SSSA (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold MA (2019) Tracing 35 years of agroforestry development in the USA: past, present, future. In Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on agroforestry. Agroforestry: strengthening links between science, society and policy. May 22–28, 2019. Montpellier, France, p 865

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold MA, Hanover JW (1987) Agroforestry systems for the temperate zone. Agrofor Syst 5:109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold MA, Godsey LD, Josiah SJ (2004) Market and marketing strategies for agroforestry specialty products in North America. Agrofor Syst 61:371–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold MA, Cernusca MM, Godsey LD (2009) Agroforestry product markets and marketing. In: Garret HE (ed) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society Agronomy, Madison, pp 287–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AW, Newman SM (1997) Temperate agroforestry systems, 1st edn. CABI Wallingford, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AW, Newman SM, Coleman BRW (2018) Temperate agroforestry systems, 2nd edn. CABI Wallingford, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Green C, Dimitri C (2009) Organic agriculture: organic market overview. http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/organic/demand.htm

  • Grünewald H, Brandt BKV, Schneider BU, Bens O, Kendzia G, Hüttl RF (2007) Agroforestry systems for the production of woody biomass for energy transformation purposes. Ecol Eng 29:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog F (1998) Streuobst: a traditional agroforestry system as a model for agroforestry development in temperate Europe. Agrofor Syst 42:61–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog F, Dreier S, Hofer G, Marfurt C, Schüpbach B, Spiess M, Walter T (2005) Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:189–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog F, Szerencsits E, Kay S, Roces-Diaz JV, Jäger M (2018) Agroforestry in Switzerland – a non-CAP European Country. In: Agroforestry as sustainable land use. Conference proceedings, 4th European Agroforestry conference, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp 74–78. http://www.eurafagroforestry.eu/conferences/IVEURAFConference_2018_nijmegen

  • Hong Y, Heerink N, Jin S, Berentsen P, Zhang L, van der Werf W (2017) Intercropping and agroforestry in China – current status and trends. Agric Ecosyst Environ 244:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joffre R, Vacher R, de los Llanos C, Long G (1988) The dehesa: An agrosilvopastoral system of the Mediterranean region with special reference to the Sierra Morena area of Spain. Agrofor Syst 6:71–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2019) Environmental impacts and benefits of agroforestry. In: Oxford encyclopedia of agriculture and environment. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.195

  • Jose S, Holzmueller EJ (2007) Black walnut allelopathy: implications for intercropping. In: Zeng RS, Mallik AU, Luo SM (eds) Allelopathy in sustainable agriculture and forestry. Springer, pp 305–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Gold MJ, Garrett HE (2012) The future of temperate agroforestry in the United States. In: Nair PKR, Garrity DJ (eds) Agroforestry – the future of global land use. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 217–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Walter D, Kumar BM (2019) Ecological considerations in sustainable silvopasture design and management. Agrofor Syst 93(1):317–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0065-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Garrett HE, Gold MA (2020) Agroforestry as an integrated, multifunctional land use management strategy. In: Garrett HE, Jose S, Gold M (eds) North American agroforestry, 3rd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison 

    Google Scholar 

  • Josiah SJ, St. Pierre R, Brot H, Brandle J (2004) Productive conservation: Diversifying farm enterprises by producing specialty woody products in agroforestry systems. J Sustain Agric 23:93–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Junge X, Schüpbach B, Walter T, Schmid B, Lindemann-Matthies P (2015) Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland. Landsc Urban Plan 133:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay S, Crous-Duran J, García de Jalón S, Gaves A, Palma JHN, Roces-Díaz JV, Szerencsits E, Weibel R, Herzog F (2018) Landscape-scale modelling of agroforestry ecosystems services in Swiss orchards: a methodological approach. Landsc Ecol 33:1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0691-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay S, Graves A, Palma JHN, Moreno G, Roces-Diaz JV, Aviron S, Chouvardas D, Crous-Duran J, Ferrreiro-Dominguez N, Garcia de Jalón S, Măcicăşan V, Mosquera-Losada MR, Pantera S, Santiago-Freijanes JJ, Szerecsits E, Torralba M, Burgess PJ, Herzog F (2019) Agroforestry is paying off – economic evaluation of ecosystem services in European landscapes with and without agroforestry systems. Ecosyst Serv 36:100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles RL (1991) New Zealand experience with silvopastoral systems: A review. In: Jarvis PG (ed) Agroforestry: principles and practice. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 251–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles RL, Cutler TR (1980) Integration of forestry and pastures in New Zealand. New Zealand Forest Service, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauri PE, Barkaoui K, Ater M, Rosati A (2019) Agroforestry for fruit trees in the temperate Europe and dry Mediterranean. In: Mosquera-Losada MR, Prabhu R (eds), Agroforestry for sustainable agriculture, Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, pp 385–418. isbn: 978 1 78676 220 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis CE, Pearson HA (1987) Agroforestry using tame pastures under planted pines in the southeastern United States. In: Gholz HL (ed) Agroforestry: realities, possibilities and potentials. Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind L, Hasselquist EAM, Laudon H (2019) Towards ecologically functional riparian zones: A meta-analysis to develop guidelines for protecting ecosystem functions and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. J Environ Manag 249:2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long AJ (1993) Agroforestry in the temperate zone. In: Nair PKR (ed) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer (Springer), Dordrecht, pp 443–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell ST, Garrett HE (2021) Agroforestry: the North American perspective. An annotated bibliography, The environmental science module. Oxford Bibliographies, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199363445-0130. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com

  • McAdam JH (2006) Silvopastoral systems in north-west Europe. In: Mosquera-Losada MR, McAdam J, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (eds) Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno G, Pulido F (2009) The functioning, management and persistence of dehesas. In: Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Mcadam J, Mosquera-Losada MR (eds) Agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 127–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno G, Obrador JJ, García A (2007) Impact of evergreen oaks on soil fertility and crop production in intercropped dehesas. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:270–280

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mori G, Gold M, Jose S (2017) Specialty crops in temperate agroforestry systems: sustainable management, marketing and promotion for the Midwest region of the USA. In: Motagnini F (ed) Integrating landscapes: agroforestry for biodiversity conservation and food sovereignty. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 331–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosquera-Losada MR, Santiago-Freijanes JJ, Pisanelli A et al (2018a) Agroforestry in the European common agricultural policy. Agrofor Syst 92:1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0251-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosquera-Losada MR, Santiago-Freijanes JJ, Rois-Díaz M, Moreno G, den Herder M, Aldrey JA, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Pantera A, Pisanelli A, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2018b) Agroforestry in Europe: a land management policy tool to combat climate change. Land Use policy 78:603–613. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837718303752

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosquero-Losada M-R, Moreno G, Pardini A, McAdam JH, Papanastasis V, Burgess PJ, Lamersdorf N, Castro M, Liagre F, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2012) Past, present, and future of agroforestry systems in Europe. In: Nair PKR, Garrity D (eds) Agroforestry: the future of global land use. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 285–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair VD, Nair PKR, Kalmbacher RS, Ezenwa IV (2007) Reducing nutrient loss from farms through silvopastoral practices in coarse-textured soils of Florida, USA. Ecol Engin 29:192–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Alexander F, Elliston L, Blias A (2004) Natural resource management on Australian Farms, ABARE eReport 04.7 Prepared for the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Orefice J, Carroll J, Conroy D, Ketner L (2017) Silvopastoral practices and perspectives in the Northeastern United States. Agrofor Syst 91:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9916-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palone RS, Todd AH (1997) Chesapeake Bay riparian handbook: a guide for establishing and maintaining riparian forest buffers. NA-TP-02-97. USDA Forest Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasis VP, Mantzanas K, Dini-Papanastasi O, Ispikoudis (2009) Traditional agroforestry systems and their evolution in Greece. In: Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, McAdam J, Mosquera-Losada MR (eds) Agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 89–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson HA (1983) Forest grazing in the U.S. In: Hannaway DB (ed) Proceedings of the international hill lands symposium foothills for food and forests. Corvallis, OR, USA, pp 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival NS, Knowles RL (1983) Combinations of Pinus radiata and pastoral agriculture on New Zealand hill country: Agriculture productivity. In: Hannaway DB (ed) Proceedings of the international hill lands symposium on foothills for food and forests. Corvallis, OR, USA, pp 185–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Peri PL, Dube F, Varella A (eds) (2016) Silvopastoral systems in Southern South America, Advances in Agroforestry, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht, 270p

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlin J (1991) A forest journey. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirog R, Larson A (2007) Consumer perceptions of the safety, health, and environmental impact of various scales and geographic origin of food supply chains. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, 45p

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinkenstein Q, Wöllecke J, Böhm C, Grünewald H, Freese D, Schneider BU, Hüttl RF (2009) Ecological benefits of the alley cropping agroforestry system in sensitive regions of Europe. Environ Sci Policy 12:1112–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinkenstein A, Freese D, Böhm C, Tsonkova P, Hüttl R (2012) Agroforestry for mine-land reclamation in Germany: capitalizing on carbon sequestration and bioenergy production. In: Nair PKR, Garrity D (eds) Agroforestry: the future of global land use. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 313–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeg T (2011) Agroforestry systems as land use alternatives in Germany? A comparison with approaches taken in other countries. Outlook Agric 40:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeg T, Bemmann A, Konold W, Murach D, Spiecker H (2009) Anbau und Nutzung von Bäumen auf Landwirtschaftlichen Flächen. Wile, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid R (2008) Tree change – the Australian master treegrower phenomenon. RIRDC Publication 08/129

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid R (2017a) Heartwood: the art and science of growing trees for conservation and profit. Melbourne Books. www.agroforestry.net.au

  • Reid R (2017b) Developing farmer and community capacity in agroforestry: Is the Australian Master TreeGrower program transferable to other countries? Agrofor Syst 91(5):847–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid R, Deans W (2009) The Australian Master TreeGrower program – providing a sound foundation for Australian agroforestry. JVAP publication no. 09/157

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, McAdam J, Mosquera-Losada MR (2009) Agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert D, Welp M, Spies M, Thevs N (2020) Farmers’ perceptions of tree shelterbelts on agricultural land in rural Kyrgyzstan. Sustainability 12(3):1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago-Freijanes JJ, Mosquera-Losada MR, Rois-Díaz M, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Pantera A, Aldrey JA, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2018a) Global and European policies to foster agricultural sustainability: agroforestry. Agrofor Syst. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-018-0215-9

  • Santiago-Freijanes JJ, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Aldrey JA, Moreno G, den Herder M, Burgess P, Mosquera-Losada MR (2018b) Understanding agroforestry practices in Europe through landscape features policy promotion. Agrofor Syst 92:1105–1115. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10457-018-0212-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago-Freijanes JJ, Pisanelli A, Rois-Díaz M, Aldrey-Vázquez JA, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Pantera A, Vityi A, Lojka B, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Mosquera-Losada MR (2018c) Agroforestry development in Europe: policy issues. Land Use Policy 76:144–156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837717310670

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger MM, Bentrup G, Patel-Weynard T (eds) (2017) Agroforestry: enhancing resiliency in U.S. agricultural landscapes under changing conditions. USDA Forest Science, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz RC, Isenhart TM, Colletti JP, Simpkins WW, Udawatta RP, Schultz PL (2009) Riparian and upland buffer practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American Agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society Agronomy, Madison, pp 163–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira W, Gholz HL (1991) Canopy structure, light penetration, and tree growth in a slash pine (Pinus elliottii) silvopastoral system in different stand configurations in Florida In: Williams PA (ed) Proceedings of the first conference of agroforestry in North America. University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, pp 174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH, Brauer D, Clason TR (2009) Silvopastoral practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American Agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society Agronomy, Madison, pp 105–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholto DJ, de Hart RAJ (1985) Towards a solution to problems of world hunger and conservation. Intermediate Technology Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JR (1929) Tree crops: a permanent agriculture. Harcourt, Brace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JR (1950) Tree crops: a permanent agriculture. 1987 reprint of the 1950 edn. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps WT, Linit MJ (1997) Plant diversity and arthropod communities: implications for temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 39:73–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens N (2001) The contribution of farmers and individual landholders to commercial plantation development in Australia. IUFRO Working Party (S6.06-03) Symposium, Forestry Extension–Assisting Forest Owner, Farmer and Stakeholder Decision-Making, 29 Oct – 2 Nov 2001, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart A, Coble A, Contosta AR, Orefice JN, Smith RG, Asbjornsen (2020) Forest conversion to silvopasture and open pasture: effects on soil hydraulic properties. Agrofor Syst 94:869–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Takács V, Frank N (2009) The tradition, resources, and potential of forest growing and multipurpose shelterbelts in Hungary. In: Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, McAdam J, Mosquera-Losada M-R (eds) Agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 415–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Tejwani KG (1987) Agroforestry practices and research in India. In: Gholz HL (ed) Agroforestry: realities, possibilities and potentials. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 109–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevathasan N, Gordon AM, Bradley B et al (2012) Agroforestry research and development in Canada: The way forward. In: Nair PKR, Garrity DP (eds) Agroforestry – the future of global land use. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 247–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Trozzo KE, Munsell JF, Chamberlain JL, Aust WM (2014) Potential adoption of agroforestry riparian buffers based on landowner and streamside characteristics. J Soil Water Conserv 69:140–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyndall JC, Colletti JP (2007) Mitigating swine odor with strategically designed shelterbelt systems: a review. Agrofor Syst 69:45–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Krstansky GS, Henderson GS, Garrett HE (2002) Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: A paired watershed comparison. J Environ Qual 31:1214–1225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Garrett HE, Kallenbach RL (2011) Agroforestry buffers for non-point source pollution reductions from agricultural watersheds. J Environ Qual 40:800–806

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • USDA National Agroforestry Center (2007) Forest farming: an agroforestry practice. USDA Forest Service, Lincoln. http://www.unl.edu/nac/

    Google Scholar 

  • von Maydell H-J (1990) Agroforestry education and training in European institutions. Agrofor Syst 12:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiuling Y (1991) Mixed cropping with trees in ancient China. In: Zhaohua et al (eds) Agroforestry systems in China. Chinese Academy of Forestry/IDRC, Beijing/Ottawa, pp 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiakoulaki MD, Pantazopoulos CI, Papanastasis VP (2005) Sheep and goat behaviour grazing on stabble in northern Greece. In: Georgoudis A, Rosati A, Mosconi C (eds) Animal production and natural resources utilization in the Mediterranean mountain areas. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 216–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JH, Su ZA, Liu GC (2008) Effects of terracing and agroforestry on soil and water loss in hilly areas of the Sichuan Basin, China. J Mountain Sci 5:241–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhaohua et al. (1991a) Agroforestry systems in China (eds. Zhaohua Z, Mantang C, Shiji W, Youxu J). Chinese Academy of Forestry/International Development Research Centre, Beijing/Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhaohua Z, Maoyi F, Sastry CB (1991b) Agroforestry in China: an overview. In: Zhaohua et al (eds) Agroforestry systems in China. Chinese Academy of Forestry/IDRC, Beijing/Ottawa, pp 2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou et al (2008) Zou X, Sanford Jr. RL (1990) Agroforestry systems in China: a survey and classification. Agrofor Syst 11: 85–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nair, P.K.R., Kumar, B.M., Nair, V.D. (2021). Agroforestry Systems in The Temperate Zone. In: An Introduction to Agroforestry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics