Abstract
Ethnographers must now confront the multi-sited, digital and mobile nature of social, cultural and economic life. As a result, the use of digital ethnography, traditional ethnographic methods modified to interact with online communities and environments, has steadily increased in anthropology and the social sciences. Criminologists are beginning to make use of the approach in response to the increasing need to account for the complex digital features of contemporary forms of criminality, victimization, policing and punishment. In this chapter, we outline some selected details of our experiences as ethnographers conducting criminological research in virtual worlds. We cover key issues that range from practical challenges and ethical quandaries through analytical capabilities to epistemological issues in the hope our reflections go some way in helping budding digital ethnographers in criminology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This term refers to Instagram users tagging their posts to a certain location, for example a landmark or business premises.
References
Abidin, C., & de Seta, G. (2020). Private messages from the field: Confessions on digital ethnography and its discomforts. Journal of Digital Social Research,2(1), 1–19.
Alim, S. (2014). An initial exploration of ethical research practices regarding automated data extraction from online social media user profiles. First Monday,19(7), 105–127.
Ancrum, C. (2013). Stalking the margins of legality: Ethnography, participant observation and the post-modern underworld. In S. Winlow & R. Atkinson (Eds.), New directions in crime and deviancy. Routledge.
Antonopoulos, G. A., & Hall, A. (2016). “Gain with no pain”: Anabolic-androgenic steroids trafficking in the UK. European Journal of Criminology,13(6), 696–713.
AoIR. (2019). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0 Association of Internet Researchers. Available at: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf. Last accessed 4 Jan 2021.
Beninger, K., Fry, A., Jago, N., Lepps, H., Nass, L., & Silvester, H. (2014). Research using social media; users’ views. Available at: http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/282288/p0639-research-using-social-media-report-final-190214.pdf.
Boellstorf, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds. Princeton University Press.
Bond, C., Ahmed, O., Hind, M., Thomas, B., & Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2013). The conceptual and practical ethical dilemmas of using health discussion board posts as research data. Journal of Medical Internet Research,15(6), E112.
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication and Society, 15(5), 662–679.
Collins, S., & Durington, M. (2015). Networked anthropology: A primer for ethnographers. Routledge.
Dalsgaard, S. (2016). The ethnographic use of Facebook in everyday life. Anthropological Forum,26(1), 96–114.
Demant, J., Bakken, S. A., & Hall, A. (2020). Social media markets for prescription drugs: Platforms as virtual mortars for drug types and dealers. Drugs and Alcohol Today,20(1), 36–49.
Denecke, K. (2014). Ethical aspects of using medical social media in healthcare applications. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,198, 55–62.
Dent, A. S. (2020). Digital pirates: Policing intellectual property in Brazil. Stanford University Press.
Enghoff, O., & Aldridge, J. (2019). The value of unsolicited online data in drug policy research. International Journal of Drug Policy,73, 210–218.
Ferrell, J., & Hamm, M. (1998). Ethnography at the edge: Crime, deviance and field research. Northeastern University Press.
Fleetwood, J., & Potter, G. R. (2017). Ethnographic research on crime and control: Editors’ introduction. Methodological Innovations,10(1), 1–4.
Forrest, S. (2020). Ballad of the bullet: Gangs, drill music, and the power of online infamy. Princeton University Press.
Gans, H. (1967). The levittowners: Ways of life and politics in a new suburban community. Columbia University Press.
Gatson, N. (2011). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 513–527). Sage.
Geiger, R., Ribes, D. (2011). Trace ethnography: Following coordination through documentary practices. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
Gibbs, N. (forthcoming). Insta-muscle: Examining the performance enhancing substance trade and male gym culture. PhD thesis, University of Northumbria, Newcastle Upon Tyne.
Gobo, G. (2008). Doing ethnography. Sage.
Greengard, S. (2015). The internet of things. MIT Press.
Hall, A., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2016). Fake meds online: The internet and the transnational market in illicit pharmaceuticals. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2015). Revitalizing criminological theory: Towards a new ultra-realism. Routledge.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage.
Hobbs, D. (1993). Peers, careers and academic fears. In D. Hobbs & T. May (Eds.), Interpreting the field: Accounts of ethnography (pp. 45–68). Clarendon Press.
Horst, A., & Miller, D. (2012). Digital anthropology. Berg Publishers.
Irwin-Rogers, K. (2019). Illicit drug markets, consumer capitalism and the rise of social media: A toxic trap for young people. Critical Criminology,27, 591–610.
Iversen, R. (2009). “Getting out” in ethnography: A seldom-told story. Qualitative Social Work,8(1), 9–26.
Janetzko, D. (2008). Nonreactive data collection on the internet. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), Online research methods (pp. 161–174). Sage.
Jewkes, Y. (2011). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: Doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry,18(1), 63–75.
Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.
Lageson, S. E. (2020). Digital punishment privacy, stigma, and the harms of data-driven criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
Leander, K., & McKim, K. (2003). Tracing the everyday “sitings” of adolescents on the internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication, Information,3(2), 211–240.
Liebling, A. (2001). Whose side are we on: Theory, practices and allegiances in prison research. British Journal of Criminology,41(3), 472–484.
Lingel, J. (2012, May 5–10). Ethics and dilemmas of online ethnography. Presentation at CHI 2012, Austin, Texas, USA.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Maguire, M. (2008). Researching street criminals: A neglected art? In R. King & E. Wincup (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Martin, J., Munksgaard, R., Coomber, R., Demant, J., & Barratt, M. (2020). Selling drugs on darkweb cryptomarkets: Differentiated pathways, risks and rewards. The British Journal of Criminology,60(3), 559–578.
McKee, R. (2013). Ethical issues in using social media for health and health care purposes. Health Policy,110, 298–301.
Mckinney, J. (1966). Constructive typology and social theory. Meredith Publishing Company.
Michaelidou, N., Moraes, C., & Micevski, M. (2016). A scale for measuring consumers? Ethical perceptions of social media research. In M. Obal, N. Kray, & C. Bushardt (Eds.), Let’s get engaged! Crossing the threshold of marketing’s engagement era (pp. 97–100). Springer.
Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford Law Books.
O’Reilly, K. (2009). Key concepts in ethnography. Sage.
Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia,12(145), 123–134.
Powell, A., Stratton, G., & Cameron, R. (2018). Digital criminology: Crime and justice in digital society. Routledge.
Prince, S. (2019). (Re)Tracing the Everyday ‘Sitings’: A Conceptual Review of Internet Research 15 Years Later. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology,7(1), 45–60.
Smith, O. (2014). Contemporary adulthood and the night-time economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Snow, D. (1980). The disengagement process: A neglected problem in participant observation research. Qualitative Sociology,3, 100–122.
Sunden, J. (2002). Cyberbodies: Writing gender in digital self-presentations. In J. Fornas, K. Klein, M. Ladendorf, J. Sunden, & M. Sveningsson (Eds.), Digital borderlands: Cultural studies of identity and interactivity on the internet. Peter Lang.
Taylor, T. (1999). Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities, and other online research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist,43(3), 436–449.
Tickle, S. (2017). Ethnographic research with young people: Methods and rapport. Qualitative Research Journal,17(2), 66–76.
Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social media research: A guide to ethics. Available at: www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_487729_en.pdf. Last accessed 23 June 2020.
Treadwell, J. (2012). From the car boot to booting it up? eBay, online counterfeit crime and the transformation of the criminal marketplace. Criminology & Criminal Justice,12(2), 175–191.
Treadwell, J. (2020). Criminological ethnography. Sage.
Van de Voorde, C. (2012). Ethnographic photography in criminological research. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt & S. Messner (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Criminological Research Methods (pp. 203–217). Sage.
Wall, D. (2007). Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age. Polity Press.
Wang, P., Su, M., & Wang, J. (2020). Organized crime in cyberspace: How traditional organized criminal groups exploit the online peer-to-peer lending market in China. The British Journal of Criminology (online first).
Wilson, R., Gosling, S., & Graham, L. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science,7(3), 203–220.
Winlow, S. (2001). Badfellas: Crime, tradition and new masculinities. Berg Publishers.
Woodfield, K., & Iphofen, R. (2018). Introduction to Volume 2: The ethics of online research. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The ethics of online research (pp. 1–12). Emerald Group Publishing.
Yar, M. (2012). Crime, media and the will-to-representation: Reconsidering relationships in the new media age. Crime, Media, Culture,8(3), 245–260.
Yardley, E., & Wilson, D. (2014). Making sense of “Facebook Murder”? Social networking sites and contemporary homicide. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice,52(2), 109–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gibbs, N., Hall, A. (2021). Digital Ethnography in Cybercrime Research: Some Notes from the Virtual Field. In: Lavorgna, A., Holt, T.J. (eds) Researching Cybercrimes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74837-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74837-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74836-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74837-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)