Skip to main content

Digital Ethnography in Cybercrime Research: Some Notes from the Virtual Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Researching Cybercrimes

Abstract

Ethnographers must now confront the multi-sited, digital and mobile nature of social, cultural and economic life. As a result, the use of digital ethnography, traditional ethnographic methods modified to interact with online communities and environments, has steadily increased in anthropology and the social sciences. Criminologists are beginning to make use of the approach in response to the increasing need to account for the complex digital features of contemporary forms of criminality, victimization, policing and punishment. In this chapter, we outline some selected details of our experiences as ethnographers conducting criminological research in virtual worlds. We cover key issues that range from practical challenges and ethical quandaries through analytical capabilities to epistemological issues in the hope our reflections go some way in helping budding digital ethnographers in criminology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This term refers to Instagram users tagging their posts to a certain location, for example a landmark or business premises.

References

  • Abidin, C., & de Seta, G. (2020). Private messages from the field: Confessions on digital ethnography and its discomforts. Journal of Digital Social Research,2(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alim, S. (2014). An initial exploration of ethical research practices regarding automated data extraction from online social media user profiles. First Monday,19(7), 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancrum, C. (2013). Stalking the margins of legality: Ethnography, participant observation and the post-modern underworld. In S. Winlow & R. Atkinson (Eds.), New directions in crime and deviancy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonopoulos, G. A., & Hall, A. (2016). “Gain with no pain”: Anabolic-androgenic steroids trafficking in the UK. European Journal of Criminology,13(6), 696–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AoIR. (2019). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0 Association of Internet Researchers. Available at: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf. Last accessed 4 Jan 2021.

  • Beninger, K., Fry, A., Jago, N., Lepps, H., Nass, L., & Silvester, H. (2014). Research using social media; users’ views. Available at: http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/282288/p0639-research-using-social-media-report-final-190214.pdf.

  • Boellstorf, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C., Ahmed, O., Hind, M., Thomas, B., & Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2013). The conceptual and practical ethical dilemmas of using health discussion board posts as research data. Journal of Medical Internet Research,15(6), E112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication and Society, 15(5), 662–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S., & Durington, M. (2015). Networked anthropology: A primer for ethnographers. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsgaard, S. (2016). The ethnographic use of Facebook in everyday life. Anthropological Forum,26(1), 96–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demant, J., Bakken, S. A., & Hall, A. (2020). Social media markets for prescription drugs: Platforms as virtual mortars for drug types and dealers. Drugs and Alcohol Today,20(1), 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denecke, K. (2014). Ethical aspects of using medical social media in healthcare applications. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,198, 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, A. S. (2020). Digital pirates: Policing intellectual property in Brazil. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Enghoff, O., & Aldridge, J. (2019). The value of unsolicited online data in drug policy research. International Journal of Drug Policy,73, 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J., & Hamm, M. (1998). Ethnography at the edge: Crime, deviance and field research. Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleetwood, J., & Potter, G. R. (2017). Ethnographic research on crime and control: Editors’ introduction. Methodological Innovations,10(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, S. (2020). Ballad of the bullet: Gangs, drill music, and the power of online infamy. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. (1967). The levittowners: Ways of life and politics in a new suburban community. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatson, N. (2011). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 513–527). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R., Ribes, D. (2011). Trace ethnography: Following coordination through documentary practices. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, N. (forthcoming). Insta-muscle: Examining the performance enhancing substance trade and male gym culture. PhD thesis, University of Northumbria, Newcastle Upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobo, G. (2008). Doing ethnography. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greengard, S. (2015). The internet of things. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2016). Fake meds online: The internet and the transnational market in illicit pharmaceuticals. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2015). Revitalizing criminological theory: Towards a new ultra-realism. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, D. (1993). Peers, careers and academic fears. In D. Hobbs & T. May (Eds.), Interpreting the field: Accounts of ethnography (pp. 45–68). Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, A., & Miller, D. (2012). Digital anthropology. Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin-Rogers, K. (2019). Illicit drug markets, consumer capitalism and the rise of social media: A toxic trap for young people. Critical Criminology,27, 591–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, R. (2009). “Getting out” in ethnography: A seldom-told story. Qualitative Social Work,8(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janetzko, D. (2008). Nonreactive data collection on the internet. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), Online research methods (pp. 161–174). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y. (2011). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: Doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry,18(1), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lageson, S. E. (2020). Digital punishment privacy, stigma, and the harms of data-driven criminal justice. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K., & McKim, K. (2003). Tracing the everyday “sitings” of adolescents on the internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication, Information,3(2), 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2001). Whose side are we on: Theory, practices and allegiances in prison research. British Journal of Criminology,41(3), 472–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingel, J. (2012, May 5–10). Ethics and dilemmas of online ethnography. Presentation at CHI 2012, Austin, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M. (2008). Researching street criminals: A neglected art? In R. King & E. Wincup (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Munksgaard, R., Coomber, R., Demant, J., & Barratt, M. (2020). Selling drugs on darkweb cryptomarkets: Differentiated pathways, risks and rewards. The British Journal of Criminology,60(3), 559–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, R. (2013). Ethical issues in using social media for health and health care purposes. Health Policy,110, 298–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckinney, J. (1966). Constructive typology and social theory. Meredith Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelidou, N., Moraes, C., & Micevski, M. (2016). A scale for measuring consumers? Ethical perceptions of social media research. In M. Obal, N. Kray, & C. Bushardt (Eds.), Let’s get engaged! Crossing the threshold of marketing’s engagement era (pp. 97–100). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford Law Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, K. (2009). Key concepts in ethnography. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia,12(145), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., Stratton, G., & Cameron, R. (2018). Digital criminology: Crime and justice in digital society. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, S. (2019). (Re)Tracing the Everyday ‘Sitings’: A Conceptual Review of Internet Research 15 Years Later. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology,7(1), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O. (2014). Contemporary adulthood and the night-time economy. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. (1980). The disengagement process: A neglected problem in participant observation research. Qualitative Sociology,3, 100–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunden, J. (2002). Cyberbodies: Writing gender in digital self-presentations. In J. Fornas, K. Klein, M. Ladendorf, J. Sunden, & M. Sveningsson (Eds.), Digital borderlands: Cultural studies of identity and interactivity on the internet. Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. (1999). Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities, and other online research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist,43(3), 436–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickle, S. (2017). Ethnographic research with young people: Methods and rapport. Qualitative Research Journal,17(2), 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social media research: A guide to ethics. Available at: www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_487729_en.pdf. Last accessed 23 June 2020.

  • Treadwell, J. (2012). From the car boot to booting it up? eBay, online counterfeit crime and the transformation of the criminal marketplace. Criminology & Criminal Justice,12(2), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treadwell, J. (2020). Criminological ethnography. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Voorde, C. (2012). Ethnographic photography in criminological research. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt & S. Messner (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Criminological Research Methods (pp. 203–217). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, D. (2007). Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Su, M., & Wang, J. (2020). Organized crime in cyberspace: How traditional organized criminal groups exploit the online peer-to-peer lending market in China. The British Journal of Criminology (online first).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R., Gosling, S., & Graham, L. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science,7(3), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winlow, S. (2001). Badfellas: Crime, tradition and new masculinities. Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield, K., & Iphofen, R. (2018). Introduction to Volume 2: The ethics of online research. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The ethics of online research (pp. 1–12). Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yar, M. (2012). Crime, media and the will-to-representation: Reconsidering relationships in the new media age. Crime, Media, Culture,8(3), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yardley, E., & Wilson, D. (2014). Making sense of “Facebook Murder”? Social networking sites and contemporary homicide. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice,52(2), 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Hall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gibbs, N., Hall, A. (2021). Digital Ethnography in Cybercrime Research: Some Notes from the Virtual Field. In: Lavorgna, A., Holt, T.J. (eds) Researching Cybercrimes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74837-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74837-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74836-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74837-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics