Skip to main content
Log in

The disengagement process: A neglected problem in participant observation research

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Of the various phases or stages of participant observation, the disengagement process has typically been glossed over in methodological discussions of qualitative research. Drawing on the author's fieldwork experience and on the scattered references to disengagement in the ethnographic literature, this paper systematically outlines and examines the problems and issues associated with this neglected phase of the fieldwork process. Three interrelated questions or issues structure the inquiry. The first deals with the problem of informational sufficiency and its relation to closure; the second with the various precipitants of disengagement; and the third with the factors that can function as barriers or impediments to disengagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, Howard S. 1964 “Problems in the publication of field studies.” in A. Vidich, J. Bensman, and M. Stein (eds.), Reflections on Community Studies. New York: Harper and Row, Pp 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Carl, and Bob Woodward 1974 All the President's Men. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, Robert and Steven J. Taylor 1975 Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Kathleen 1978 “Confidentiality and the protection of human subjects in social science research: A report on recent developments.” The American Sociologist 13:144–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, Joan 1978 “Risk and benefit to subjects of fieldwork.” The American Sociologist 13:134–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvard, Richard 1967 “Interaction and identification in reporting field research: A critical reconstruction of protective procedures.” in G. Sjoberg (ed.), Ethics, Politics, and Social Research. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman Publishing, Pp 319–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Nonman K. 1978a The Research Act (Second Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1978b Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook (Second Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Norma 1970 “Fieldwork in a complex society: Taiwan.” in George D. Spindler (ed.), Being An Anthropologist. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Pp 113–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Jack D. 1976 Investigative Social Research. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile 1964 The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, E.E. 1964 Social Anthropology and Other Essays. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichter, Joseph H. and William L. Kolb 1953 “Ethical limitations on sociological reporting.” American Sociological Review, 18:544–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filstead, William J. (ed.) 1970 Qualitative Methodology. Chicago: Markhum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freilich, Morris (ed.) 1977 Marginal Natives at Work: Anthropologists in the Field. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Jurgen, and Harmut Ludtke 1975 Participant Observation: Theory and Practice. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, Herbert J. 1962 The Urban Villagers. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1968 “The participant observer as a human being: Observations on the personal aspects of fieldwork.” in Howard S. Becker, et al. (eds.), Institutions and The Person. Chicago: Aldine, Pp 300–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss 1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving 1963 Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, Nancie L. Solien 1977 “Cakchiqueles and Caribs: The social context of fieldwork.” in M. Freilich (ed.), Marginal Natives at Work. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, Pp 119–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, Joseph 1960 “Fieldwork reciprocities in studying a social movement.” in R. Adams and J. Preiss (eds.), Human Organization Research. Homewood: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulick, John 1977 “Village and city field work in Lebanon.” in M. Freilich (ed.), Marginal Natives at Work. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, Pp 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Irving Louis (ed.) 1967 The Rise and Fall of Project Camelot. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Laud 1975 Tearoom Trade (Enlarged Edition). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janes, Robert W. 1961 “A note on phases of the community role of the participant-observer.” American Sociological Review 26:446–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, John M. 1975 Doing Field Research. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, John 1971 Analyzing Social Settings. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1976 Doing Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, Stanford M., and Marvin B. Scott 1967 “Territoriality: A neglected sociological dimension.” Social Problems 15:236–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, George J. and J.L. Simmons (eds.) 1969 Issues in Participant Observation: A Text and Reader. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.M. 1952 “The participant observer and ‘over-rapport.’” American Sociological Review 17:97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlans, Harold 1967 “Ethical problems in the relations of research sponsors and investigators.” in G. Sjoberg (ed.), Ethics, Politics, and Social Research. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman Publishing, Pp 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powdermaker, Hortense 1966 Stranger and Friend: The Way of an Anthropologist. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, Lee and David J. Pittman 1967 “Ethical problems in studying a politically sensitive and deviant community.” Social Problems 14:357–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Record, Jane Cassles 1967 “The research institute and the pressure group.” in G. Sjoberg (ed.), Ethics, Politics, and Social Research. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman Publishing, Pp 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, Leonard, and Anselm L. Strauss 1973 Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred 1964 Collected Papersll: Studies in Social Theory. Edited by A. Brodersen. The Hague: Martinns Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, William B. 1977 “Comparative field techniques in urban research in Africa.” in M. Freilich (ed.), Marginal Natives at Work. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, Pp 39–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Morris S., and Charlotte G. Schwartz 1955 “Problems in participant observation.” American Journal of Sociology 60: 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, Gideon (ed.) 1967 Ethics, Politics, and Social Research. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, Gideon, and Roger Nett 1968 A Methodology for Social Research. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A. 1976 The Nichiren Shoshu Buddhist Movement in America: A Sociological Examination of its Value Orientation, Recruitment Efforts, and Spread. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, George, and Louise Spindler 1970 “Fieldwork among the Menomini.” in George P. Spindler (ed.), Being An Anthropologist. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Pp 267–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, Richard M. 1978 “The CIA and the professor: A personal account.” The American Sociologist 13:128–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidich, Arthur J., and Joseph Bensman 1964 “The Springdale case: Academic bureaucrats and sensitive townspeople.” in A. Vidich, J. Bensman, and M. Stein (eds.), Reflections on Community Studies. New York: Harper and Row, Pp 313–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wax, Rosalie H. 1971 Doing Fieldwork: Warnings and Advice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Martin S., and Colin J. Williams 1972 “Fieldwork among deviants: Social relations with subjects and others.” in Jack D. Douglas (ed.), Research on Deviance. New York: Random House, Pp 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, William F. 1970 Street Corner Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

For their critical and helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper, I wish to thank Gideon Sjoberg, Sheldon Olson, and Ben Blount.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snow, D.A. The disengagement process: A neglected problem in participant observation research. Qual Sociol 3, 100–122 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987266

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987266

Keywords

Navigation