Abstract
Petrographic analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to examine the various diagenetic controls on reservoir quality of the Fort Member Sandstone (FMS), Jaisalmer Formation in western Rajasthan. Diagenetic processes include mechanical compaction, cementation, pressure solution and dissolution of framework grains. The main diagenetic cements are carbonate, ferruginous, silica cement and authigenic clays. Cements occur as coatings around the detrital grain boundaries, pore fillings and pore linings. Compaction and cementation are common factors responsible for the reduction of porosity and permeability. The dissolution of detrital feldspar grains was the main drive for porosity enhancement in the FMS. The corroded contacts between successive carbonate phases and quartz grains, followed by the dissolution of carbonate cements were also responsible for the secondary porosity. The main porosity preservation in the FMS is due to scattered patches of carbonate cement, which prevented the compactional collapse of the framework. The relationship between the intergranular volume (IGV) and cement volume indicates a minor role of compaction in destroying the primary porosity. The widespread occurrences of carbonate cement suggest that the FMS lost a significant amount of primary porosity at an eodiagenetic stage. In addition to carbonate, authigenic clays like chlorite and kaolinite occur as pore-filling and pore-lining cements. The pore-filling chlorite resulted in a considerable loss of porosity, while the pore-lining chlorite may have helped in retaining the porosity by preventing the precipitation of syntaxial silica overgrowths. Paragenetic sequences are established to understand the pathways of diagenetic evolution and their impact on reservoir quality of the FMS.Please check and confirm if the authors and their respective affiliations have been correctly identified. Amend if necessary.Confirmed the respective authors affiliations and correctly identified.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad F, Ahmad AHM, Quasim MA (2017a) Diagenetic features of Jurassic Fort Member Sandstone, Jaisalmer Formation, Western Rajasthan. J Geol Soc India 90:273–282
Ahmad F, Quasim MA, Ghaznavi AA, Khan Z, Ahmad AHM (2017b) Depositional environment of the Fort Member of the Jurasic Jaisalmer Formation (western Rajasthan, India), as revealed from lithofacies and grain-size analysis. Geol Acta 15:153–167
Ahmad F, Quasim MA, Ahmad AHM, Ghaznavi AA, Khan Z, Albroot M (2019) Factors influencing detrital mineralogy and tectono-provenance of Fort Member Sandstone, Jaisalmer Formation, Western Rajasthan, India. J Geol Soc India 93:392–398
Alaa M, Salem S, Morad S (2000) Diagenesis and reservoir quality-evolution of fluvial sandstones during progressive burial and uplift evidence from the Upper Jurassic Boipeba Member, Reconcavo Basin, Northeast Brazil. AAPG Bull 84:1015–1040
Atkins JE, McBridge EF (1992) Porosity and packing of Holocene river, dune and beach sands. AAPG Bull 76:339–355
Beard DC, Weyl PK (1973) Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand. AAPG Bull 57:349–369
Bhat GM, Ahmad AHM (2013) Temporal facies and diagenetic evolution of the mixed siliciclastic-carbonate Jajiya Member (Callovian–Oxfordian), Jaisalmer Formation, West India. Vol Jurassica 11:147–162
Biswas SK (1982) Rift basins in western margin of India and their hydrocarbon prospects with special reference to Kutch Basin. AAPG Bull 66:1497–1513
Biswas SK, Bhasin AL, Ram J (1993) Classification of Indian sedimentary basin in the framework of Plate tectonics. In: Dave A, Garg P, Pandey J, Maithani A, Thomas NJ, Biswas SK (eds) Proceeding Second seminar on Petroliferous Basins of India. Indian Petroleum Publishers, Dehradun, pp 1–46
Bjørlykke K (2014) Relationships between depositional environments, burial history and rock properties. Some principal aspects of diagenetic process in sedimentary basins. Sediment Geol 301:1–14
Bjorlykke K, Egeberg PK (1993) Quartz cementation in sedimentary basins. AAPG Bull 77:1538–1548
Bjorlykke K, Aagaard P, Dypvik H, Hastings AS, Harper DS (1986) Diagenesis and reservoir properties of Jurassic sandstones from the Haltenbanken area, offshore mid-Norway. In: Spencer AM, Holter E, Cambell CJ, Hanslien PHH, Nysæther E, Ormaasen EG (eds) Habitate of hydrocarbons of the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Graham and Trotman, London, pp 275–276
Bloch S (1994) Effects of detrital mineral composition on reservoir quality. In: Wilson MD (ed) Reservior quality assessment and prediction in clastic rocks, vol 30. SEPM short course, pp 161–182
Burley SD, Kantorowicz JD (1986) Thin section and SEM textural criteria for the recognition of cement-dissolution porosity in sandstones. Sedimentol 33:587–604
Chilingarian G, Wolf K (1988) Diagenesis I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Dickinson WR (1970) Interpreting detrital modes of greywacke and arkose. J Sed Res 40:695–707
Dutton SP, Diggs TN (1990) History of quartz cementation in the Lower Cretaceous Travis Peak Formation, East Texas. J Sed Pet 60:191–202
Ehrenberg SN (1990) Relationship between diagenesis and reservoir quality in sandstones of the Garn Formation, Haltenbanken Mid-Norwegian Continental Shelf. AAPG Bull 74:1538–1558
Fuchtbauer H (1967) Influence of different type of diagenesis on sandstone porosity. Seventh World Petroleum Congress Mexico Proceeding 2:353–369
Ghosh PK (1952) Western Rajputana-its tectonics and minerals including evaporites. Bull Nat Inst Sci Ind 1:101–130
Hawkins PJ (1978) Relationship between diagenesis, porosity reduction and oil replacement in Late Carbonifereous sandstone reservoirs, Bothamsall oil field, E. Midlands. J Geol Soc London 135:7–24
Hoholick JD, Metarko TA, Potter PE (1982) Weight contact packing-improved formula for grain packing of quartz arenites: the Mount Geol 19:79–82
Houseknecht DW (1987) Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones. AAPG Bull 71:633–642
Houseknecht DW (1988) Intergranular pressure solution in four quartzose sandstones. J Sed Pet 58:228–246
Hower J, Eslinger EV, Hower ME, Perry EA (1976) Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediments, 1-mineralogical and chemical evidence. AAPG Bull 87:725–737
Ingersoll RV, Bullard TF, Ford RL, Grimm JP, Pickle JD, Sares SW (1984) The effect of grain size on detrital modes: a test of the Gazzi-Diclcinson point-counting method. J Sed Pet 54:103–116
Jeans CV (2000) Mineral diagenesis and reservoir quality–the way forward: an introduction. Clay Min 35:3–4
Jodhawat RL, Kachhara RP (2000) Modiolus zonation of the Jaisalmer Formation, Rajasthan. ONGC Bull 37:207–211
Kachhara RP, Jodhawat RL (1981) On the age of Jaisalmer formation, Rajasthan, India. In: Proceedings of IX Indian Colloquium on Micropalaeontology and Stratigraphy, pp 235–247
Knauss KG, Wolery TJ (1988) The dissolution kinetics of quartz as a function of pH and time at 70 C. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 52:43–53
Liu JK, Peng J, Shi Y, Bao ZF, Sun YL, Liu XM, Zhang Z (2015) The genesis of the quartz dissolution in tight sand reservoirs and its impact on pore development: a case study of Xujiahe Formation in the transitional zone of Central-Southern Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica 36:1090–1097
Lundegard PD (1992) Sandstone porosity loss. A ‘big picture’ view of the importance of compaction. J Sed Pet 62:250–260
Mahender K, Banerji RK (1989) Textural study and depositional environment of sand grains from rocks of Jaisalmer Formation, Jaisalmer District, Rajasthan, India. J Geol Soc India 33:228–242
Mahendra K, Banerji RK (1990) Petrography, diagenesis and depositional environment of Middle Jurassic Jaisalmer Carbonates, Rajasthan, India. Indian J Earth Sci 17:194–207
McBride EF (1963) A classification of common sandstones. J Sed Res 33:664–669
McBride EF (1989) Quartz cement in sandstones. A review. Earth-Sci Rev 26:69–112
Misra PC, Singh NP, Sharma DC, Upadhyay H, Karoo AK, Saini ML (1993) Western Rajasthan basin: lithostratigraphy of Indian Petroliferous Basins, Document II. KDMIPE, ONGC, Dehradun, pp 1–6
Morad S, Jk Ketzer, De Ros LF (2012) Linking diagenesis to sequence stratigraphy. IAS Spec Publ 45:1–536
Oldham RD (1886) Preliminary note on the geology of northern Jaisalmer. Rec Geol Surv India 19:157–160
Pandey DK, Sha J, Choudhary S (2006a) Depositional environment of Bathonian sediments of the Jaisalmer Basin, Rajasthan, western India. Progress in Natural Science (Special issue of IGCP 506 on the Jurassic Boundary Events). Beijing 16:163–175
Pandey DK, Sha J, Choudhary S (2006b) Depositional history of the early part of the Jurassic succession on the Rajasthan Shelf, western India. In: Progress in Natural Science (Special issue of IGCP 506 on the Jurassic Boundary Events) Beijing, vol 16, pp 176–185
Pandey DK, Fürsich FT, Sha J (2009) Interbasinal mark intervels. A case study from the Jurassic of Kachch and Jaisamer Western India. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci 52:1924–1931
Pandey DK, Sha J, Choudhary S (2010) Sedimentary cycles in the Callovian-Oxfordian of the Jaisalmer Basin, Rajasthan, Western India. Vol Jurassica 8:131–162
Pandey DK, Choudhary S, Bahadur T, Swami N, Sha, J (2012) A review of the Lower lowermost Upper Jurassic lithostratigraphy of the Jaisalmer Basin, western Rajasthan, India-an implication on biostratigraphy. Vol Jurassica 10:61–82
Pareek HS (1984) Pre-quaternary geology and mineral resources of northwestern Rajasthan. Mem Geol Surv India 115:1–99
Paxton ST, Szabo JO, Ajdukiewiez JM, Klimentidis RE (2002) Construction of an intergranular volume compaction curve for evaluating and predicting compaction and porosity loss in rigid grain sandstone reservoirs. AAPG Bull 76:2047–2067
Pettijohn FJ, Potter PE, Siever R (1987) Sand and sandstone. Springer, New York
Prasad S, Jain RL, Srivastava MS (2007) Record of middle Jurassic (Bathonian) ammonite genus Clydoniceras Blake from Jaisalmer Basin. western Rajasthan. J Geol Soc India 69:53–56
Quasim MA, Ghosh SK, Ahmad AHM (2019) Petrography and diagenetic evolution of the Proterozoic Kaimur Group sandstones, Son Valley, India: implication towards reservoir quality. In: Mondal MEA (ed) Geological evolution of the precambrian Indian shield. Springer, pp 515–550
Ramm M (2000) Reservoir quality and its relationship to facies and provenance in Middle to Upper Jurassic sequences, northeastern North Sea. Clay Mineral 35:77–94
Rao VR (1972) Subsurface stratigraphy, tectonic setting and petroleum prospects of the Jaisalmer area, Rajasthan, India. In: Proceedings of the IV symposium of development in petroleum resources of Asia and the far east, vol 41. Camberra, Australia, Series, pp 366–371
Richter-Bernberg G, Schott W (1963) Jurassic and Cretaceous at the western border of Gondwana Shield in India, and the stratigraphy of oil possibilities. Proceedings of the Second Symposium on the Development of Petroleum Resources of Asia and the Far East, Mineral Resource Development Series 1:230–236
Rodrigo DL, Luiz FDR (2002) The role of depositional setting and diagenesis on the reservoir quality of Devonian sandstones from the Solimones Basin, Brazilian Amazonia. Mar Pet Geol 19:1047–1071
Seemann U (1979) Diagenetically formed interstitial clay minerals as a factor in Rotliegand sandstone Reservoir Quality in the Dutch Sector of the North Sea. J Petrol Geol 1:55–62
Shalaby MR, Hakimi MH, Abdullah WH (2014) Diagenesis in the Middle Jurassic Khatatba Formation sandstones in the Shoushan Basin, northern Western Desert, Egypt. Geol Jour 49:239–255
Shepherd RG (1989) Correlations of permeability and grain size. Ground Water 27:633–638
Siever R (1957) Pennsylvanian sandstones of the Eastern Interior coal basin. J Sed Res 27:227–250
Slatt RM (2006) Stratigraphic reservoir characterization for petroleum geologists, geophysicists, and engineers. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Swaminathan J, Krinshnamurthy JG, Verma KK, Chandiak GJ (1959) General geology of Jaisalmer area, Rajasthan. In: Bangkok (ECAFE, UN) Proceedings of the symposium of development in petroleum resources of Asia and the Far East, Mineral Resources Development Series, p 10
Walderhaug O (1994) Temperatures of quartz cementation in Jurassic sandstones from the Norwegian continental shelf—evidence from fluid inclusions. J Sed Res 64:311–323
Wilson MD, Stanton PT (1994) Diagenetic mechanisms of porosity and permeability reduction and enhancement. In: Wilson MD (ed) Reservoir quality assessment and prediction in clastic rocks, vol 30. SEPM Short Course, pp 59–118
Worden RH, Morad S (2003) Clay minerals in sandstones: controls on formation, distribution and evolution. In: Worden RH, Morad S (eds) Clay mineral cements in sandstones, vol 34. IAS Spec Publ, pp 3–41
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Chairperson, Department of Geology, A.M.U., Aligarh, for providing all the necessary facilities during the study. We acknowledge editors for kindly inviting me to submit this paper. We also gratefully acknowledge the critical and constructive suggestions offered by two anonymous referees for improving the original manuscript. Discussions with Dr. Mohammad Adnan Quasim, Department of Geology, AMU, helped in improving the quality of the research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Contact Index (CI) = the average number of contacts per grain irrespective of nature of contacts.
Packing Proximity (Pp) = is expressed as percentage of grain to grain contacts in a traverse:
where q is the number of grain to grain contact and n is total number of grains.
Contact Strength (Cs) = is quantified by following formula:
where a, is the number of point contact and b, is the number of all other contacts including long, concavo-convex and sutured contacts.
Consolidation Factor (Cf) = is expressed as:
where F, T, L, C and S are the percentages of floating, tangential, long, concavo-convex and sutured contacts respectively
Weight Contact Packing (WCP) = \(\frac{{{\text{a}} + 2{\text{b}} + 4{\text{c}} + 8{\text{d}} + 16{\text{e}}}}{{{\textrm{a}} + {\text{b}} + {\text{c}} + {\text{d}} + {\text{e}}}}\)
where is floating contact (a), point contact (b), long contact (c), concave convex contact (d) and sutured contact (e).
Intergranular Volume (IGV) = Sum of remaining primary pore spaces, volume of pore filling cements and depositional matrix (Paxton et al. 2002). This is equivalent to the term “pre-cement primary porosity” and the term minus-cement porosity commonly found in earlier publications.
Compactional Porosity Loss (COPL) = amount of original porosity lost by compactional processes (expressed as a percentage of the original rock volume).
where Pi is the initial depositional porosity (=40%) and IGV is intergranular volume (sum of remaining primary pore spaces, volume of pore filling cements and depositional matrix (Paxton et al. 2002).
Cementational Porosity Loss (CEPL) = amount of original porosity lost by precipitation of intergranular cement (expressed as a percentage of the original rock volume).
where Tc is total cement and IGV is intergranular volume.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahmad, F., Ahmad, A.H.M., Ghosh, S.K. (2021). Diagenetic Controls on the Early to Late Bathonian Fort Member Sandstone of Jaisalmer Formation, Western Rajasthan. In: Banerjee, S., Sarkar, S. (eds) Mesozoic Stratigraphy of India. Society of Earth Scientists Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71370-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71370-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71369-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71370-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)