Skip to main content

Diagenetic Controls on the Early to Late Bathonian Fort Member Sandstone of Jaisalmer Formation, Western Rajasthan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mesozoic Stratigraphy of India

Part of the book series: Society of Earth Scientists Series ((SESS))

Abstract

Petrographic analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to examine the various diagenetic controls on reservoir quality of the Fort Member Sandstone (FMS), Jaisalmer Formation in western Rajasthan. Diagenetic processes include mechanical compaction, cementation, pressure solution and dissolution of framework grains. The main diagenetic cements are carbonate, ferruginous, silica cement and authigenic clays. Cements occur as coatings around the detrital grain boundaries, pore fillings and pore linings. Compaction and cementation are common factors responsible for the reduction of porosity and permeability. The dissolution of detrital feldspar grains was the main drive for porosity enhancement in the FMS. The corroded contacts between successive carbonate phases and quartz grains, followed by the dissolution of carbonate cements were also responsible for the secondary porosity. The main porosity preservation in the FMS is due to scattered patches of carbonate cement, which prevented the compactional collapse of the framework. The relationship between the intergranular volume (IGV) and cement volume indicates a minor role of compaction in destroying the primary porosity. The widespread occurrences of carbonate cement suggest that the FMS lost a significant amount of primary porosity at an eodiagenetic stage. In addition to carbonate, authigenic clays like chlorite and kaolinite occur as pore-filling and pore-lining cements. The pore-filling chlorite resulted in a considerable loss of porosity, while the pore-lining chlorite may have helped in retaining the porosity by preventing the precipitation of syntaxial silica overgrowths. Paragenetic sequences are established to understand the pathways of diagenetic evolution and their impact on reservoir quality of the FMS.Please check and confirm if the authors and their respective affiliations have been correctly identified. Amend if necessary.Confirmed the respective authors affiliations and correctly identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad F, Ahmad AHM, Quasim MA (2017a) Diagenetic features of Jurassic Fort Member Sandstone, Jaisalmer Formation, Western Rajasthan. J Geol Soc India 90:273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad F, Quasim MA, Ghaznavi AA, Khan Z, Ahmad AHM (2017b) Depositional environment of the Fort Member of the Jurasic Jaisalmer Formation (western Rajasthan, India), as revealed from lithofacies and grain-size analysis. Geol Acta 15:153–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad F, Quasim MA, Ahmad AHM, Ghaznavi AA, Khan Z, Albroot M (2019) Factors influencing detrital mineralogy and tectono-provenance of Fort Member Sandstone, Jaisalmer Formation, Western Rajasthan, India. J Geol Soc India 93:392–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaa M, Salem S, Morad S (2000) Diagenesis and reservoir quality-evolution of fluvial sandstones during progressive burial and uplift evidence from the Upper Jurassic Boipeba Member, Reconcavo Basin, Northeast Brazil. AAPG Bull 84:1015–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins JE, McBridge EF (1992) Porosity and packing of Holocene river, dune and beach sands. AAPG Bull 76:339–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard DC, Weyl PK (1973) Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand. AAPG Bull 57:349–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat GM, Ahmad AHM (2013) Temporal facies and diagenetic evolution of the mixed siliciclastic-carbonate Jajiya Member (Callovian–Oxfordian), Jaisalmer Formation, West India. Vol Jurassica 11:147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SK (1982) Rift basins in western margin of India and their hydrocarbon prospects with special reference to Kutch Basin. AAPG Bull 66:1497–1513

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SK, Bhasin AL, Ram J (1993) Classification of Indian sedimentary basin in the framework of Plate tectonics. In: Dave A, Garg P, Pandey J, Maithani A, Thomas NJ, Biswas SK (eds) Proceeding Second seminar on Petroliferous Basins of India. Indian Petroleum Publishers, Dehradun, pp 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørlykke K (2014) Relationships between depositional environments, burial history and rock properties. Some principal aspects of diagenetic process in sedimentary basins. Sediment Geol 301:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorlykke K, Egeberg PK (1993) Quartz cementation in sedimentary basins. AAPG Bull 77:1538–1548

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorlykke K, Aagaard P, Dypvik H, Hastings AS, Harper DS (1986) Diagenesis and reservoir properties of Jurassic sandstones from the Haltenbanken area, offshore mid-Norway. In: Spencer AM, Holter E, Cambell CJ, Hanslien PHH, Nysæther E, Ormaasen EG (eds) Habitate of hydrocarbons of the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Graham and Trotman, London, pp 275–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch S (1994) Effects of detrital mineral composition on reservoir quality. In: Wilson MD (ed) Reservior quality assessment and prediction in clastic rocks, vol 30. SEPM short course, pp 161–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley SD, Kantorowicz JD (1986) Thin section and SEM textural criteria for the recognition of cement-dissolution porosity in sandstones. Sedimentol 33:587–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilingarian G, Wolf K (1988) Diagenesis I. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson WR (1970) Interpreting detrital modes of greywacke and arkose. J Sed Res 40:695–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton SP, Diggs TN (1990) History of quartz cementation in the Lower Cretaceous Travis Peak Formation, East Texas. J Sed Pet 60:191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg SN (1990) Relationship between diagenesis and reservoir quality in sandstones of the Garn Formation, Haltenbanken Mid-Norwegian Continental Shelf. AAPG Bull 74:1538–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchtbauer H (1967) Influence of different type of diagenesis on sandstone porosity. Seventh World Petroleum Congress Mexico Proceeding 2:353–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh PK (1952) Western Rajputana-its tectonics and minerals including evaporites. Bull Nat Inst Sci Ind 1:101–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins PJ (1978) Relationship between diagenesis, porosity reduction and oil replacement in Late Carbonifereous sandstone reservoirs, Bothamsall oil field, E. Midlands. J Geol Soc London 135:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoholick JD, Metarko TA, Potter PE (1982) Weight contact packing-improved formula for grain packing of quartz arenites: the Mount Geol 19:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseknecht DW (1987) Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones. AAPG Bull 71:633–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseknecht DW (1988) Intergranular pressure solution in four quartzose sandstones. J Sed Pet 58:228–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Hower J, Eslinger EV, Hower ME, Perry EA (1976) Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediments, 1-mineralogical and chemical evidence. AAPG Bull 87:725–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll RV, Bullard TF, Ford RL, Grimm JP, Pickle JD, Sares SW (1984) The effect of grain size on detrital modes: a test of the Gazzi-Diclcinson point-counting method. J Sed Pet 54:103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeans CV (2000) Mineral diagenesis and reservoir quality–the way forward: an introduction. Clay Min 35:3–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodhawat RL, Kachhara RP (2000) Modiolus zonation of the Jaisalmer Formation, Rajasthan. ONGC Bull 37:207–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachhara RP, Jodhawat RL (1981) On the age of Jaisalmer formation, Rajasthan, India. In: Proceedings of IX Indian Colloquium on Micropalaeontology and Stratigraphy, pp 235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Knauss KG, Wolery TJ (1988) The dissolution kinetics of quartz as a function of pH and time at 70 C. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 52:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JK, Peng J, Shi Y, Bao ZF, Sun YL, Liu XM, Zhang Z (2015) The genesis of the quartz dissolution in tight sand reservoirs and its impact on pore development: a case study of Xujiahe Formation in the transitional zone of Central-Southern Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica 36:1090–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundegard PD (1992) Sandstone porosity loss. A ‘big picture’ view of the importance of compaction. J Sed Pet 62:250–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahender K, Banerji RK (1989) Textural study and depositional environment of sand grains from rocks of Jaisalmer Formation, Jaisalmer District, Rajasthan, India. J Geol Soc India 33:228–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahendra K, Banerji RK (1990) Petrography, diagenesis and depositional environment of Middle Jurassic Jaisalmer Carbonates, Rajasthan, India. Indian J Earth Sci 17:194–207

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride EF (1963) A classification of common sandstones. J Sed Res 33:664–669

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride EF (1989) Quartz cement in sandstones. A review. Earth-Sci Rev 26:69–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra PC, Singh NP, Sharma DC, Upadhyay H, Karoo AK, Saini ML (1993) Western Rajasthan basin: lithostratigraphy of Indian Petroliferous Basins, Document II. KDMIPE, ONGC, Dehradun, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Morad S, Jk Ketzer, De Ros LF (2012) Linking diagenesis to sequence stratigraphy. IAS Spec Publ 45:1–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham RD (1886) Preliminary note on the geology of northern Jaisalmer. Rec Geol Surv India 19:157–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey DK, Sha J, Choudhary S (2006a) Depositional environment of Bathonian sediments of the Jaisalmer Basin, Rajasthan, western India. Progress in Natural Science (Special issue of IGCP 506 on the Jurassic Boundary Events). Beijing 16:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey DK, Sha J, Choudhary S (2006b) Depositional history of the early part of the Jurassic succession on the Rajasthan Shelf, western India. In: Progress in Natural Science (Special issue of IGCP 506 on the Jurassic Boundary Events) Beijing, vol 16, pp 176–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey DK, Fürsich FT, Sha J (2009) Interbasinal mark intervels. A case study from the Jurassic of Kachch and Jaisamer Western India. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci 52:1924–1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey DK, Sha J, Choudhary S (2010) Sedimentary cycles in the Callovian-Oxfordian of the Jaisalmer Basin, Rajasthan, Western India. Vol Jurassica 8:131–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey DK, Choudhary S, Bahadur T, Swami N, Sha, J (2012) A review of the Lower lowermost Upper Jurassic lithostratigraphy of the Jaisalmer Basin, western Rajasthan, India-an implication on biostratigraphy. Vol Jurassica 10:61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareek HS (1984) Pre-quaternary geology and mineral resources of northwestern Rajasthan. Mem Geol Surv India 115:1–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton ST, Szabo JO, Ajdukiewiez JM, Klimentidis RE (2002) Construction of an intergranular volume compaction curve for evaluating and predicting compaction and porosity loss in rigid grain sandstone reservoirs. AAPG Bull 76:2047–2067

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettijohn FJ, Potter PE, Siever R (1987) Sand and sandstone. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad S, Jain RL, Srivastava MS (2007) Record of middle Jurassic (Bathonian) ammonite genus Clydoniceras Blake from Jaisalmer Basin. western Rajasthan. J Geol Soc India 69:53–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Quasim MA, Ghosh SK, Ahmad AHM (2019) Petrography and diagenetic evolution of the Proterozoic Kaimur Group sandstones, Son Valley, India: implication towards reservoir quality. In: Mondal MEA (ed) Geological evolution of the precambrian Indian shield. Springer, pp 515–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramm M (2000) Reservoir quality and its relationship to facies and provenance in Middle to Upper Jurassic sequences, northeastern North Sea. Clay Mineral 35:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao VR (1972) Subsurface stratigraphy, tectonic setting and petroleum prospects of the Jaisalmer area, Rajasthan, India. In: Proceedings of the IV symposium of development in petroleum resources of Asia and the far east, vol 41. Camberra, Australia, Series, pp 366–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter-Bernberg G, Schott W (1963) Jurassic and Cretaceous at the western border of Gondwana Shield in India, and the stratigraphy of oil possibilities. Proceedings of the Second Symposium on the Development of Petroleum Resources of Asia and the Far East, Mineral Resource Development Series 1:230–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo DL, Luiz FDR (2002) The role of depositional setting and diagenesis on the reservoir quality of Devonian sandstones from the Solimones Basin, Brazilian Amazonia. Mar Pet Geol 19:1047–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seemann U (1979) Diagenetically formed interstitial clay minerals as a factor in Rotliegand sandstone Reservoir Quality in the Dutch Sector of the North Sea. J Petrol Geol 1:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalaby MR, Hakimi MH, Abdullah WH (2014) Diagenesis in the Middle Jurassic Khatatba Formation sandstones in the Shoushan Basin, northern Western Desert, Egypt. Geol Jour 49:239–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd RG (1989) Correlations of permeability and grain size. Ground Water 27:633–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siever R (1957) Pennsylvanian sandstones of the Eastern Interior coal basin. J Sed Res 27:227–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatt RM (2006) Stratigraphic reservoir characterization for petroleum geologists, geophysicists, and engineers. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan J, Krinshnamurthy JG, Verma KK, Chandiak GJ (1959) General geology of Jaisalmer area, Rajasthan. In: Bangkok (ECAFE, UN) Proceedings of the symposium of development in petroleum resources of Asia and the Far East, Mineral Resources Development Series, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Walderhaug O (1994) Temperatures of quartz cementation in Jurassic sandstones from the Norwegian continental shelf—evidence from fluid inclusions. J Sed Res 64:311–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MD, Stanton PT (1994) Diagenetic mechanisms of porosity and permeability reduction and enhancement. In: Wilson MD (ed) Reservoir quality assessment and prediction in clastic rocks, vol 30. SEPM Short Course, pp 59–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden RH, Morad S (2003) Clay minerals in sandstones: controls on formation, distribution and evolution. In: Worden RH, Morad S (eds) Clay mineral cements in sandstones, vol 34. IAS Spec Publ, pp 3–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Chairperson, Department of Geology, A.M.U., Aligarh, for providing all the necessary facilities during the study. We acknowledge editors for kindly inviting me to submit this paper. We also gratefully acknowledge the critical and constructive suggestions offered by two anonymous referees for improving the original manuscript. Discussions with Dr. Mohammad Adnan Quasim, Department of Geology, AMU, helped in improving the quality of the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. H. M. Ahmad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Contact Index (CI) = the average number of contacts per grain irrespective of nature of contacts.

Packing Proximity (Pp) = is expressed as percentage of grain to grain contacts in a traverse:

$${\text{Pp}} = \frac{\text{q}}{\textrm{n}} * 100$$

where q is the number of grain to grain contact and n is total number of grains.

Contact Strength (Cs) = is quantified by following formula:

$${\text{Cs}} = \frac{{{\text{a}} + 2{\text{b}}}}{{{\textrm{a}} + {\text{b}}}}$$

where a, is the number of point contact and b, is the number of all other contacts including long, concavo-convex and sutured contacts.

Consolidation Factor (Cf) = is expressed as:

$${\text{Cf}} = \frac{{{\text{F}} + 2{\text{T}} + 3{\text{L}} + 4{\text{C}} + 5{\text{S}}}}{500} * 100$$

where F, T, L, C and S are the percentages of floating, tangential, long, concavo-convex and sutured contacts respectively

Weight Contact Packing (WCP) = \(\frac{{{\text{a}} + 2{\text{b}} + 4{\text{c}} + 8{\text{d}} + 16{\text{e}}}}{{{\textrm{a}} + {\text{b}} + {\text{c}} + {\text{d}} + {\text{e}}}}\)

where is floating contact (a), point contact (b), long contact (c), concave convex contact (d) and sutured contact (e).

Intergranular Volume (IGV)  = Sum of remaining primary pore spaces, volume of pore filling cements and depositional matrix (Paxton et al. 2002). This is equivalent to the term “pre-cement primary porosity” and the term minus-cement porosity commonly found in earlier publications.

Compactional Porosity Loss (COPL) = amount of original porosity lost by compactional processes (expressed as a percentage of the original rock volume).

$$({\text{COPL}}) = {\text{Pi}}\left\{ {\frac{{(100 - {\text{Pi}}) * {\text{IGV}}}}{{100 - {\text{IGV}}}}} \right\}$$

where Pi is the initial depositional porosity (=40%) and IGV is intergranular volume (sum of remaining primary pore spaces, volume of pore filling cements and depositional matrix (Paxton et al. 2002).

Cementational Porosity Loss (CEPL)  = amount of original porosity lost by precipitation of intergranular cement (expressed as a percentage of the original rock volume).

$$({\text{CEPL}}) = ({\text{Pi}} - {\text{COPL}}) \times \frac{\text{Tc}}{\textrm{IGV}}$$

where Tc is total cement and IGV is intergranular volume.

$${\text{Icompact}} = \frac{\text{COPL}}{{{\textrm{COPL}} + {\text{CEPL}}}}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ahmad, F., Ahmad, A.H.M., Ghosh, S.K. (2021). Diagenetic Controls on the Early to Late Bathonian Fort Member Sandstone of Jaisalmer Formation, Western Rajasthan. In: Banerjee, S., Sarkar, S. (eds) Mesozoic Stratigraphy of India. Society of Earth Scientists Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71370-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics