Skip to main content

Too Informal? How a Chatbot’s Communication Style Affects Brand Attitude and Quality of Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chatbot Research and Design (CONVERSATIONS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12604))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of (in)formal chatbot responses and brand familiarity on social presence, appropriateness, brand attitude, and quality of interaction. An online experiment using a 2 (Communication Style: Informal vs. Formal) by 2 (Brand: Familiar vs. Unfamiliar) between subject design was conducted in which participants performed customer service tasks with the assistance of chatbots developed for the study. Subsequently, they filled out an online questionnaire. An indirect effect of communication style on brand attitude and quality of interaction through social presence was found. Thus, a chatbot’s informal communication style induced a higher perceived social presence which in turn positively influenced quality of the interaction and brand attitude. However, brand familiarity did not enhance perceptions of appropriateness, indicating participants do not assign different roles to chatbots as communication partner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Brand name for purpose of publication.

References

  • Følstad, A., Skjuve, M.: Chatbots for customer service: user experience and motivation. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces – CUI 209. ACM, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laban, G., Araujo, T.: Working together with conversational agents: the relationship of perceived cooperation with service performance evaluations. In: Følstad, A. (ed.) CONVERSATIONS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11970, pp. 215–228. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shawar, B., Atwell, E.: Chatbots: are they really useful? LDV Forum 22, 29–49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, T.: Living up to the chatbot hype: the influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 85, 183–189 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, J.: Service leaders expect use of AI and virtual customer assistants to gain importance in the future (2019). https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/bots-gain-importance-in-gartner-service-technologies-bullseye/. Accessed 24 Aug 2020

  • Elsner, N.: KAYAK mobile travel report: Chatbots in the UK (2017). https://www.kayak.co.uk/news/mobile-travel-report-2017/. Accessed 09 Nov 2020

  • Drift, SurveyMonkey Audience, Salesforce, Myclever: The 2018 State of Chatbots Report. How chatbots are reshaping online experiences (2018). https://www.drift.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2018-state-of-chatbots-report.pdf. Accessed 01 Sept 2019

  • Gretry, A., Horváth, C., Belei, N., van Riel, A.: “Don’t pretend to be my friend!” when an informal brand communication style backfires on social media. J. Bus. Res. 74, 77–89 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnewuch, U., Morana, S. Maedche, A.: Towards designing cooperative and social conversational agents for customer service. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovic, D.: The Future is Now – 37 Fascinating Chatbot Statistics. Smallbizgenius, 13 August 2020. https://www.smallbizgenius.net/by-the-numbers/chatbot-statistics/#gref

  • Brandtzaeg, P.B., Følstad, A.: Why people use chatbots. In: Kompatsiaris, I. (ed.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 377–392. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Go, E., Sundar, S.S.: Humanizing chatbots: the effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 97, 304–316 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebrecht, C., van der Weegen, E.: Menselijke chatbots: een zegen voor online klantcontact? Het effect van conversational human voice door chatbots op social presence en merkattitude. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap 47, 217–238 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, T., van Nes, J., Feldberg, F., van Dolen, W.: Virtual customer service agents: using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 19(3), 529–545 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paluch, S.: Remote service technology perception and its impact on customer-provider relationships: an empirical exploratory study in a B-to-B-setting. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liebrecht, C., van Hooijdonk, C.: Creating humanlike chatbots: what chatbot developers could learn from webcare employees in adopting a conversational human voice. In: Følstad, A. (ed.) CONVERSATIONS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11970, pp. 51–64. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R.: Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 72–78. ACM (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 56, 81–103 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley, Londen (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, M., Ditton, T.: At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 3(2), JCMC321 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, D., Wohl, R.: Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19(3), 215–229 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noort, G., Willemsen, L., Kerkhof, P., Verhoeven, J.: Webcare as an integrative tool for customer care, reputation management, and online marketing: a literature review. In: Kitchen, P.J., Uzunoglu, E. (eds.) Integrated Communications in the Post-Modern Era, pp. 77–99. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, T.: The Oxford companion to the English language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakic, A., Wagner, M.O., Meyer, A.: The impact of language style accommodation during social media interactions on brand trust. J. Serv. Manag. 28(3), 418–441 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T., Allen, V.: Role Theory. Addison-Wesley, Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, E., Liberman, N., Trope, Y.: Politeness and psychological distance: a construal level perspective. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98, 268–280 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pricilla, C., Lestari, D.P., Dharma, D.: Designing interaction for chatbot-based conversational commerce with user-centered design. In: 5th International Conference on Advanced Informatics: Concept Theory and Applications (ICAICTA), pp. 244–249 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebrecht, C., Tsaousi, C., van Hooijdonk, C.: Linguistic elements of conversational human voice in online brand communication: manipulations and perceptions. J. Bus. Res. (under review)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A.: Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., Lee, H.: Show us you are real: the effect of human-versus-organizational presence on online relationship building through social networking sites. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 16(4), 265–271 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, T.: Conversational style, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. J. Commun. 59, 172–188 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M.K., Cronin, J.J., Jr.: Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: a hierarchical approach. J. Mark. 65(3), 34–49 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehir, C., Şahin, A., Kitapçı, H., Özşahin, M.: The effects of brand communication and service quality in building brand loyalty through brand trust; the empirical research on global brands. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 24, 1218–1231 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Walters, R.: Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hooijdonk, C., Liebrecht, C.: “Wat vervelend dat de fiets niet is opgeruimd! Heb je een zaaknummer voor mij? ^EK”. Conversational human voice in webcare van Nederlandse gemeenten. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 40(1), 45–82 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, T., Miller, B.: Organizational blogs and the human voice: relational strategies and relational outcomes. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 11, 395–414 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Liebrecht .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liebrecht, C., Sander, L., van Hooijdonk, C. (2021). Too Informal? How a Chatbot’s Communication Style Affects Brand Attitude and Quality of Interaction. In: Følstad, A., et al. Chatbot Research and Design. CONVERSATIONS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12604. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68288-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68288-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68287-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68288-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics