Skip to main content

Working Together with Conversational Agents: The Relationship of Perceived Cooperation with Service Performance Evaluations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chatbot Research and Design (CONVERSATIONS 2019)

Abstract

Conversational agents are gradually being deployed by organizations in service settings to communicate with and solve problems together with consumers. The current study investigates how consumers’ perceptions of cooperation with conversational agents in a service context are associated with their perceptions about agents’ anthropomorphism, social presence, the quality of the information provided by an agent, and the agent service performance. An online experiment was conducted in which participants performed a service-oriented task with the assistance of conversational agents developed specifically for the study and evaluated the performance and attributes of the agents. The results suggest a direct positive link between perceiving a conversational agent as cooperative and perceiving it to be more anthropomorphic, with higher levels of social presence and providing better information quality. Moreover, the results also show that the link between perceiving an agent as cooperative and the agent’s service performance is mediated by perceptions of the agent’s anthropomorphic cues and the quality of the information provided by the agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Araujo, T.: Conversational Agent Research Toolkit: An alternative for creating and managing chatbots for experimental research. Computational Communication Research, Working Paper (2019). https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/9ukyf

  2. Araujo, T.: Living up to the chatbot hype: the influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 85, 183–189 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atwell, E., Shawar, B.A.: Chatbots: are they really useful? LDV Forum 22, 29–49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(1), 71–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry, L.L.: Relationship marketing of services perspectives from 1983 and 2000. J. Relationship Market. 1(1), 59–77 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1300/J366v01n01_05

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bratman, M.E.: Shared cooperative activity. Philos. Rev. 101(2), 327–341 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/2185537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Breazeal, C.L.: Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bunge, M.: A general black box theory. Philos. Sci. 30(4), 346–358 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1086/287954

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E.: The need for cognition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 42(1), 116–131 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chai, J., Budzikowska, M., Horvath, V., Nicolov, N., Kambhatla, N., Zadrozny, W.: Natural language sales assistant - a web-based dialog system for online sales. In: Proceedings of the 13th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2001, Seattle, WA, pp. 19–26 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cloninger, C., Svrakic, D.M., Przybeck, T.R.: A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 50(12), 975–990 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Persistence, intention, and commitment. In: Proceedings of the 1986 Workshop on Reasoning about Actions and Plans, p. 297 (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Teamwork. Nous 25, 487–512 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cyr, D., Hassanein, K., Head, M., Ivanov, A.: The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-service environments. Interact. Comput. 19(1), 43–56 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Visser, E.J., et al.: Almost human: anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 22(3), 331–349 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Edison, S.W., Geissler, G.L.: Measuring attitudes towards general technology: antecedents, hypotheses and scale development. J. Target. Measur. Anal. Market. 12(2), 137–156 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farooq, U., Grudin, J.: Human-computer integration. Interactions 23(6), 27–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3001896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42(3), 143–166 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega 32(6), 407–424 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Go, E., Sundar, S.S.: Humanizing chatbots: the effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 97, 304–316 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Griol, D., Carbó, J., Molina, J.M.: An automatic dialog simulation technique to develop and evaluate interactive conversational agents. Appl. Artif. Intell. 27(9), 759–780 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2013.835230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grosz, B.J.: Collaborative systems (AAAI-94 presidential address). AI Mag. 17(2), 67 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayes, A.F.: Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heeter, C.: Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1(2), 262e271 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoffman, G., Breazeal, C.: Collaboration in human-robot teams. In: AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference, p. 6434 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-6434

  26. Hoffman, G.: Evaluating fluency in human-robot collaboration. In: International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Workshop on Human Robot Collaboration, vol. 381, pp. 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kang, Y.J., Lee, W.J.: Effects of sense of control and social presence on customer experience and e-service quality. Inf. Dev. 34(3), 242–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916686820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kerlyl, A., Hall, P., Bull, S.: Bringing chatbots into education: towards natural language negotiation of open learner models. In: Ellis, R., Allen, T., Tuson, A. (eds.) SGAI 2006, pp. 179–192. Springer London (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-666-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, Y., Sundar, S.S.: Anthropomorphism of computers: is it mindful or mindless? Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(1), 241–250 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuligowska, K., Lasek, M.: Virtual assistants support customer relations and business processes. In: The 10th International Conference on Information Management, Gdańsk (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lasek, M., Jessa, S.: Chatbots for customer service on hotels’websites. Inf. Syst. Manag. 2(2), 146–158 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lee, K.M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., Kim, S.R.: Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: the effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64(10), 962–973 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Levesque, H.J., Cohen, P.R., Nunes, J.H.: On acting together. In: Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-90, Boston, MA, pp. 94–99 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Morgan, R.M., Hunt, S.D.: The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Market. 58(3), 20–38 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/1252308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Murphy, B., Maguiness, P., Pescott, C., Wislang, S., Ma, J., Wang, R.: Stakeholder perceptions presage holistic stakeholder relationship marketing performance. Eur. J. Market. 39(9), 1049–1059 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510610716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nass, C., Lee, K.M.: Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 7(3), 171–181 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 56(1), 81–103 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R.: Computers are social actors. In: Adelson, B., Dumais, S., Olson, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1994, pp. 72–78. ACM, New York (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191703

  39. Oh, C.S., Bailenson, J.N., Welch, G.F.: A systematic review of social presence: definition, antecedents, and implications. Front. Robot. AI 5, 114 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Paluch, S.: Remote Service Technology Perception and its Impact on Customer-Provider Relationships An Empirical Exploratory Study in a B-to-B-setting. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6936-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Preacher, K.J., Hayes, A.F.: SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36(4), 717–731 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Suh, M., Greene, H., Israilov, B., Rho, T.: The impact of customer education on customer loyalty through service quality. Serv. Market. Q. 36(3), 261–280 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2015.1046776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Verhagen, T., Van Nes, J., Feldberg, F., Van Dolen, W.: Virtual customer service agents: using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 19(3), 529–545 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wood, R.E.: Task complexity: definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37(1), 60–82 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang, T., Zhu, B., Lee, L., Kaber, D.: Service robot anthropomorphism and interface design for emotion in human-robot interaction. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, pp. 674–679 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/coase.2008.4626532

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy Laban .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Laban, G., Araujo, T. (2020). Working Together with Conversational Agents: The Relationship of Perceived Cooperation with Service Performance Evaluations. In: Følstad, A., et al. Chatbot Research and Design. CONVERSATIONS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11970. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39539-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39540-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics