Skip to main content

Evolution of Social-Ecological Research in the LTER Network and the Baltimore Ecosystem Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Challenges of Long Term Ecological Research: A Historical Analysis

Part of the book series: Archimedes ((ARIM,volume 59))

Abstract

The addition of two urban sites, based in Baltimore, Maryland, and Phoenix, Arizona, to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) program in 1997, posed challenges for creating a truly integrated social-ecological framework. Proposals to include social “core areas” to sites with social science agendas were developed in concert with national environmental priorities being set within the scientific community. Although the National Science Foundation rejected these proposals for LTER as a whole, researchers at the urban sites pursued their goals of developing more sophisticated multi-disciplinary frameworks for the study of urban patterns and processes. The Baltimore Ecosystem Study (BES) illustrates how the conceptual basis of urban ecology evolved over 20 years, developing new strategies to manage cross-disciplinary interactions and relationships. Researchers drew especially on the concept of “boundary objects” as articulated by S. L. Star and J. Griesemer, and on General Stanley A. McChrystal’s conception of the “team of teams” as a way to engage with complex problems. Looking forward, BES is positioned now to expand to a long-term, transdisciplinary science platform which we call the Baltimore Ecosystem Alliance. Its goals include developing an authentic urban ecology on local and regional levels, while also serving as a national and international leader in urban ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    During this time, a 1991 Cary Conference on humans as components of ecosystems was held to examine the state of the science and the needs and opportunities for examining the role of humans in ecosystems. This conference was funded largely by NSF and led to a 1993 book by the same name (McDonnell and Pickett 1993). NSF program officers from the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Directorate and the Division of Environmental Biology attended the conference.

  2. 2.

    As of April 2020, the LTER Network website notes: “Two additional themes emerged with the addition of urban LTER sites, but it has become clear that they are also relevant for the rest of the Network.” https://lternet.edu/core-research-areas/

  3. 3.

    Charles Redman (CAP) and Morgan Grove (BES) led the workshop. Many of the workshop participants were recommended by Tom Baerwald and were internationally-recognized leaders in their fields. Workshop participants and their affiliations included Charles L. Redman, Nancy Grimm, Ann Kinzig, Lauren H. Kuby, and Ed Hackett (Central Arizona–Phoenix LTER); J. Morgan Grove, Bill Burch, and Steward Pickett (Baltimore Ecosystem Study); Steve Carpenter and Peter Nowak (North Temperate Lakes LTER); F. Stuart Chapin (Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest); Ted Gragson (Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory); Craig Harris (Kellogg Biological Station); Bob Waide (LTER Network); Tom Baerwald (NSF/Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences); Anthony de Souza (National Research Council); Grant Heiken (Los Alamos National Laboratories); Peter Kareiva (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration); Emilio Moran and Elinor Ostrom (Indiana University); Sander van der Leeuw (Sorbonne); Tom Wilbanks (Oak Ridge National Laboratory); and Brent Yarnal (Penn State).

  4. 4.

    https://lternet.edu/wp-content/themes/ndic/library/pdf/reports/ISSE_complete_30April.pdf

  5. 5.

    Not all institutions or disciplines that have been or are part of BES are listed in these examples. See https://baltimoreecosystemstudy.org/people/ for more information.

  6. 6.

    Previously in this chapter, co-produced has been used to refer to transdisciplinary production of actionable scientific knowledge jointly by researchers and other stakeholders. Here, we use the same term for a distinct idea that urban systems are themselves co-produced by the interaction of biophysical and social processes.

  7. 7.

    For example: Social-Environmental Immersion Program for Post-Graduate Fellows, https://www.sesync.org/for-you/educator/programs/immersion; National Science Foundation, 2018, Dear Colleague letter: Growing convergence research, https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18058/nsf18058.jsp; Belmont Forum, Transdisciplinary science funding opportunities, http://www.belmontforum.org/opportunities/. Accessed 4 January 2019.

References

  • Adler, Frederick R., and Colby J. Tanner. 2013. Urban ecosystems: Ecological principles for the built environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H., P. Austin, M. Giampietro, Z. Kovacic, E. Ramly, and J. Tainter. 2018. Mapping degrees of complexity, complicatedness, and emergent complexity. Ecological Complexity 35: 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A., G. Born, and G. Weszkalnys. 2008. Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 37 (1): 20–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. 2009. Cities as complex systems: Scaling, interaction, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies. In Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science, ed. R.A. Meyers, 1041–1071. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C.G., M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, K. Schwarz, and G.L. Buckley. 2009. Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: Why the 60s matter. Urban Ecosystems 13: 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0118-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börner, Katy, N. Contractor, H.J. Falk-Krzesinski, S.M. Fiore, K.L. Hall, J. Keyton, B. Spring, D. Stokols, W. Trochim, and B. Uzzi. 2010. A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Science Translational Medicine 2 (49): 49cm24. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso, M.L., and S.T.A. Pickett. 2013. Three tides: The development and state of the art of urban ecological science. In Resilience in ecology and urban design: Linking theory and practice for sustainable cities, ed. S.T.A. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, and B. McGrath, 29–46. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso, M.L., S.T.A. Pickett, and J.M. Grove. 2006. Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: Heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecological Complexity 3: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso, M.L., S.T.A. Pickett, and K. Schwarz. 2007. Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: Reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso, M.L., S.T.A. Pickett, B. McGrath, and V. Marshall. 2013. Ecological heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: Reconceptualized land cover models as a bridge to urban design. In Resilience in ecology and urban design: Linking theory and practice for sustainable cities, ed. S.T.A. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, and B. McGrath, 107–129. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D.W., W.C. Clark, F. Alcock, N.M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D.H. Guston, J. Jäger, and R.B. Mitchell. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (14): 8086–8091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F.S., III, M.E. Power, S.T.A. Pickett, A. Freitag, J.A. Reynolds, R.B. Jackson, D.M. Lodge, et al. 2011. Earth stewardship: Science for action to sustain the human-Earth system. Ecosphere 2: 89. https://doi.org/10.1891/ESA11-00166.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childers, Daniel L., S.T.A. Pickett, J. Morgan Grove, Laura Ogden, and Alison Whitmer. 2014. Advancing urban sustainability theory and action: Challenges and opportunities. Landscape and Urban Planning 125: 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childers, D.L., M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, V. Marshall, B. McGrath, and S.T.A. Pickett. 2015. An ecology for cities: A transformational nexus of design and ecology to advance climate change resilience and urban sustainability. Sustainability 7 (4): 3774–3791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J.P., A. Kinzig, N.B. Grimm, W.F. Fagan, D. Hope, J.G. Wu, and E.T. Borer. 2000. A new urban ecology. American Scientist 88: 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S., S.M. Swinton, C.W. Anderson, B.J. Benson, J. Brunt, T.L. Gragson, N. Grimm, J.M. Grove, D. Henshaw, G. Kofinas, J.J. Magnuson, W. McDowell, J. Melack, J.C. Moore, L. Ogden, L. Porter, J. Reichman, G.P. Robertson, M.D. Smith, J. Vande Castle, and A.C. Whitmer. 2007. Integrated Science for Society and the Environment: A strategic research initiative. Albuquerque, New Mexico: LTER Network Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S.L., S.R. Carpenter, S.M. Swinton, D.E. Orenstein, D.L. Childers, T.L. Gragson, N.B. Grimm, J.M. Grove, S.L. Harlan, J.P. Kaye, A.K. Knapp, G.P. Kofinas, J.J. Magnuson, W.H. McDowell, J.M. Melack, L.A. Ogden, G.P. Robertson, M.D. Smith, and A.C. Whitmer. 2011. An integrated conceptual framework for social-ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9 (6): 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S.L. 2019. Foreword. In Science for the sustainable city: Empirical insights from the Baltimore School of Urban Ecology, ed. S.T.A. Pickett, J.M. Grove, E.G. Irwin, E.J. Rosi, and C.M. Swan, xi–xiii. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. 2015. Ecologists embrace their urban side. Nature 524: 399–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Ian, and Philip James. 2015. Urban ecology: An introduction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckett, D., D. Feliciano, J. Martin-Ortega, and J. Munoz-Rojas. 2016. Tackling wicked environmental problems: The discourse and its influence on praxis in Scotland. Landscape and Urban Planning 154: 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, W. 1951. Requiem for a nun. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Leonie K., Moritz von der Lippe, and Ingo Kowarik. 2013. Urban land use types contribute to grassland conservation: The example of Berlin. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12: 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.03.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, Kevin, et al. 2010. Urban ecology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, D.A. 1989. Urban nature conservation in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 859–873. https://doi.org/10.2307/2403697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I.J., K. Bawa, G. Bammer, C. Boone, J. Dunne, D. Hart, J. Hellmann, A. Miller, M. New, J. Ometto, S. Pickett, G. Wendorf, A. Agrawal, P. Bertsch, C.D. Campbell, P. Dodd, A. Janetos, H. Mallee, and K. Taylor. 2019. Forging future organizational leaders for sustainability science. Nature Sustainability 2: 647–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottdiener, Mark, and Ray Hutchison. 2000. The new urban sociology. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gragson, T.L., and J.M. Grove. 2006. Social science in the context of the long term ecological research program. Society and Natural Resources 19 (2): 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, N.B., J.M. Grove, S.T.A. Pickett, and C.L. Redman. 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50 (7): 571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman, Peter M., Daniel J. Bain, Lawrence E. Band, Kenneth T. Belt, Grace S. Brush, J. Morgan Grove, Richard V. Pouyat, Ian C. Yesilonis, and Wayne C. Zipperer. 2003. Down by the riverside: Urban riparian ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J.M., and J. Carrera. 2019. Lessons learned from the origin and design of long-term socio-ecological research. In Science for the sustainable city: Empirical insights from the Baltimore school of urban ecology, ed. S.T.A. Pickett, J.M. Grove, E.G. Irwin, E.J. Rosi, and C.M. Swan, 289–306. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J.M., and S.T.A. Pickett. 2019. From transdisciplinary projects to platforms: Expanding capacity and impact of land systems knowledge and decision making. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 38: 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J.M., R. Chowdhury, and D. Childers. 2015a. Co-design, co-production, and dissemination of social-ecological knowledge to promote sustainability and resilience: Urban experiences from the U.S. long term ecological research (LTER) network. Global Land Project News 11 (April): 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J.M., M.L. Cadenasso, S.T. Pickett, G.E. Machlis, and W.R. Burch, eds. 2015b. The Baltimore school of urban ecology: Space, scale, and time for the study of cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J.M., D.L. Childers, M. Galvin, S. Hines, T. Muñoz-Erickson, and E.S. Svendsen. 2016. Linking science and decision making to promote an ecology for the city: Practices and opportunities. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 2 (9): e01239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hager, G.W., K.T. Belt, W. Stack, K. Burgess, J.M. Grove, B. Caplan, M. Hardcastle, D. Shelley, S.T.A. Pickett, and P.M. Groffman. 2013. Socioecological revitalization of an urban watershed. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, J.M., M.C. Adamescu, R. Díaz-Delgado, J. Dick, J.M. Grove, R. Rozzi, and D.E. Orenstein. 2018. Negotiating local vs. global needs in the International Long Term Ecological Research (ILTER) Network’s socio-ecological research agenda. Environmental Research Letters 13 (10): 105003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Nicholas B., H. Allen Klaiber, and Elena G. Irwin. 2017. Do stormwater basins generate co-benefits? Evidence from Baltimore County, Maryland. Ecological Economics 141: 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamarainen, A.M., and T.A. Grotzer. 2019. Constructing causal understanding in complex systems: Epistemic strategies used by ecosystem scientists. Bioscience 69: 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland, S.E. 2005. The evolution of American ecology, 1890–2000. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Urban ecological science in America: The long march to cross-disciplinary research. In Science for the sustainable city: Empirical insights from the Baltimore school of urban ecology, ed. S.T.A. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, E.G. Irwin, E.J. Rosi, and C.M. Swan, 24–44. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, Ingo. 2020. Herbert Sukopp – an inspiring pioneer in the field of urban ecology. Urban Ecosystems 23 (3): 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmund, Jens. 2013. Greening Berlin. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Iris, Juliane Mathey, Stefanie Roessler, Anne Braeuer, and Valeri Goldberg. 2014. Urban vegetation structure types as a methodological approach for identifying ecosystem services - Application to the analysis of micro-climatic effects. Ecological Indicators 42: 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, J.S. 2009. The nature of cities: Ecological visions and the American urban professions, 1920–1960. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G.E. 1989. Long-term studies in ecology: Approaches and alternatives. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., T. Dietz, S.R. Carpenter, M. Alberti, C. Folke, E. Moran, and E. Ostrom. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317 (5844): 1513–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Dexter H., J. Morgan Grove, Michael Galvin, Jarlath P.M. O’Neil-Dunne, and Charles Murphy. 2013. Applications of urban tree canopy assessment and prioritization tools: Supporting collaborative decision making to achieve urban sustainability goals. Cities and the Environment 6. http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1132.

  • Machlis, G.E., and M.K. McNutt. 2010. Scenario-building for the deepwater horizon oil spill. Science 329 (5995): 1018–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, G.E., J.E. Force, and W.R. Burch. 1997. The human ecosystem 1. The human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Society & Natural Resources 10: 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929709381034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McChrystal, G.S., T. Collins, D. Silverman, and C. Fussell. 2015. Team of teams: New rules of engagement for a complex world. London: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J. 2011. The history of urban ecology: An ecologist’s perspective. In Urban ecology: Patterns, processes, and applications, ed. J. Niemela, 5–13. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J., and A.K. Hahs. 2008. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: Current status and future directions. Landscape Ecology 23: 1143–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J., and S.T.A. Pickett, eds. 1993. Humans as components of ecosystems. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHale, M.R., S.T.A. Pickett, O. Barbosa, D.N. Bunn, M.L. Cadenasso, D.L. Childers, M. Gartin, G.R. Hess, D.M. Iwaniec, T. McPhearson, M.N. Peterson, A.K. Poole, L. Rivers, S.T. Shutters, and W. Zhou. 2015. The new global urban realm: Complex, connected, diffuse, and diverse social-ecological systems. Sustainability 7: 5211–5240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhearson, Timon, Steward T.A. Pickett, Nancy B. Grimm, Jari Niemelä, Marina Alberti, Thomas Elmqvist, Christiane Weber, Dagmar Haase, Jürgen Breuste, and Salman Qureshi. 2016. Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience 66: 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt, P., R. Roy Chowdhury, A. de Bremond, E.C. Ellis, K.-H. Erb, T. Filatova, R.D. Garrett, J.M. Grove, A. Heinimann, T. Kuemmerle, C.A. Kull, E.F. Lambin, Y. Landon, Y. le Polain de Waroux, P. Messerli, D. Müller, J.Ø. Nielsen, G.D. Peterson, V. Rodriguez García, M. Schlüter, B.L. Turner, and P.H. Verburg. 2018. Middle-range theories of land system change. Global Environmental Change 53: 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1999. Human dimensions of global environmental change: Research pathways for the next decade. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Grand challenges in environmental sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numata, M., et al. 1977. Tokyo project: Interdisciplinary studies of urban ecosystems in the metropolis of Tokyo. Chiba: Chiba University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, B., C. Adler, L. Senn, P. Kruthi, M. Stauffacher, and C. Pohl. 2018. Making the link between transdisciplinary learning and research. In Transdisciplinary theory, practice and education: The art of collaborative research and collective learning, ed. D. Fam, L. Neuhauser, and P. Gibbs, 167–183. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A. 1999. The culture of synthesis: Habits of mind in novel ecological integration. Oikos 87: 479–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, Steward T. A., W. R. Burch Jr., Shawn E. Dalton, and Timothy W. Foresman. 1997. Integrated urban ecosystem research. Urban Ecosystems 1: 183-184. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018579628818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., W.R. Burch, and J.M. Grove. 1999. Interdisciplinary research: Maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2: 302–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., J. Kolasa, and C.G. Jones. 2007. Ecological understanding: The nature of theory and the theory of nature. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, D.L. Childers, M.J. McDonnell, and W. Zhou. 2016. Evolution and future of urban ecological science: Ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 2 (7): e01229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., J.M. Grove, E.G. Irwin, E.J. Rosi, and C.M. Swan, eds. 2019. Science for the sustainable city: Empirical insights from the Baltimore school of urban ecology. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., J.M. Grove, S.L. LaDeau, and E.J. Rosi. 2020. Urban ecology as an integrative science and practice. In Urban ecology-its nature and challenges, ed. Pedro Barbosa. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rademacher, A., M.L. Cadenasso, and S.T.A. Pickett. 2019. From feedbacks to coproduction: Toward an integrated conceptual framework for urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosystem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0751-0.

  • Ramaswami, A., L. Bettencourt, A. Clarens, S. Das, G. Fitzgerald, E. Irwin, D. Pataki, S. Pincetl, K. Seto, and P. Waddell. 2018. Sustainable urban systems: Articulating a long-term convergence research agenda. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/ere/ereweb/ac-ere/sustainable-urban-systems.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C.L., J.M. Grove, and L.H. Kuby. 2004. Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: Social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7 (2): 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risser, Paul G., Jane Lubchenco, Norman L. Christensen, Philip L. Johnson, Peter J. Dillon, Pamela Matson, Luis Diego Gomez, Nancy A. Moran, Daniel J. Jacob, Thomas Rosswall, and Michael Wright. 1993. Ten-year review of the National Science Foundation’s Long-Term Ecological Research program. https://lternet.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ten-year-review-of-LTER.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. 1980. Succession of paradigms in ecology - essentialism to materialism and probabilism. Synthese 43: 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D., and F. Schiemer. 2015. Crossing boundaries: Complex systems, transdisciplinarity and applied impact agendas. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 12: 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, E.W.B. 2019. People and the land through time: Linking ecology and history. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spirn, A.W. 1984. The granite garden: Urban nature and human design. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. 1988. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Distributed artificial intelligence, ed. M. Huhns, vol. 2, 37–54. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. 1989. Regions of the mind: Brain research and the quest for scientific certainty. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology and Human Values 35 (5): 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L., and J.R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternlieb, F., R.P. Bixler, and H.H. Huber-Stearns. 2013. A question of fit: Reflections on boundaries, organizations and social–ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management 130: 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp, H. 2008. On the early history of urban ecology in Europe. In Urban ecology: An international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature, ed. E. John Marzluff, W. Shulenberger, M. Endlicher, G. Alberti, C. ZumBrunne Bradley, and U. Simon, 79–97. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vajjhala, S., A. Krupnick, E. McCormick, M. Grove, P. McDowell, C. Redman, L. Shabman, and M. Small. 2007. Rising to the challenge: Integrating social science into NSF environmental observatories. Resources for the Future Report. https://media.rff.org/documents/NSFFinalReport.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2020.

  • Vitousek, P.M., H.A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J.M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Rusong, and Lu. YongLong. 1994. Urban ecological development: Research and application. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Jianguo, Wei-Ning Xiang, and Jingzhu Zhao. 2014. Urban ecology in China: Historical developments and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning 125: 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, W., S.T.A. Pickett, and M.L. Cadenasso. 2017. Shifting concepts of urban spatial heterogeneity and their implications for sustainability. Landscape Ecology 32: 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J.K., F.N. Scatena, L.C. Schneider, T. Gragson, C. Boone, and J.M. Grove. 2009. Challenges for the implementation of the decadal plan for long-term ecological research: Land and water use change. Available at LTER Network Documents Archive, 2009 Working Groups: http://lternet.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Workshop Report Zimmerman_Land and Water Use Change_ implementation of decadel plan (ISSE).pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zscheischler, J., and S. Rogga. 2015. Transdisciplinarity in land use science – a review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices. Futures 65: 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.005.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants # DEB-1637661, DBI-1052875, DBI-1639145, the USDA Forest Service, and the University of Maryland. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the USDA Forest Service, or the University of Maryland. We thank Miriam Avins for her thoughtful review and suggestions. We thank Scott Collins and remember the late Henry Gholz for visionary leadership and support for social-ecological research in the LTER network. None of this would have been possible without them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Morgan Grove .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grove, J.M., Pickett, S.T.A. (2021). Evolution of Social-Ecological Research in the LTER Network and the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. In: Waide, R.B., Kingsland, S.E. (eds) The Challenges of Long Term Ecological Research: A Historical Analysis. Archimedes, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66933-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66933-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66932-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66933-1

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics