Skip to main content

Exploring the Microservice Development Process in Small and Medium-Sized Organizations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2020)

Abstract

Microservice Architecture (MSA) describes an increasingly popular architectural style in which business capabilities are wrapped into autonomously developable and deployable software units known as microservices. Following Conway’s Law, the corresponding microservice development process (MDP) requires a distinct accountable team for each microservice to facilitate service autonomy. Although there are best practices for larger enterprises to take this organizational requirement into account, there is currently a lack of empirically founded understanding, how the adaptation of MSA in smaller organizations that have more constraint resources can be successful. Therefore, we have conducted an interview study comprising six cases of such small to medium-sized development organizations (SMDOs) in which we explore their applied MDP using the Grounded Theory methodology. Among others, we examined team composition, collaboration formats, technology, and central challenges. Our results show that in most of the studied cases, shifts of service ownership occur and most use a code-first approach neglecting documentation. Based on our observations, we assume that SMDOs in particular are threatened to contradict service independence. Overall, our exploratory results provide starting points for further research in the field of microservice development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.netflix.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.spotify.com/.

  3. 3.

    Detailed guideline: https://github.com/SeelabFhdo/PROFES2020/.

  4. 4.

    https://kafka.apache.org/.

  5. 5.

    https://kubernetes.io/.

  6. 6.

    https://www.holacracy.org/.

  7. 7.

    https://gitlab.com/.

  8. 8.

    https://www.jenkins.io/.

  9. 9.

    https://www.swagger.io/.

References

  1. Achieving business agility with safe® 5.0. Technical report, Scaled Agile Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balalaie, A., Heydarnoori, A., Jamshidi, P.: Microservices architecture enables DevOps: migration to a cloud-native architecture. IEEE Softw. 33(3), 42–52 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogner, J., Fritzsch, J., Wagner, S., Zimmermann, A.: Microservices in industry: insights into technologies, characteristics, and software quality. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C), pp. 187–195 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conway, M.E.: How do committees invent. Datamation 14(4), 28–31 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Di Francesco, P., Lago, P., Malavolta, I.: Architecting with microservices: a systematic mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 150, 77–97 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C.: Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 119, 87–108 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fielding, R.: Representational state transfer. In: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architecture, pp. 76–85 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge, Abingdon (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Haselböck, S., Weinreich, R., Buchgeher, G.: An expert interview study on areas of microservice design. In: 2018 IEEE 11th Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA), pp. 137–144 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knoche, H., Hasselbring, W.: Drivers and barriers for microservice adoption - a survey among professionals in Germany. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. (EMISAJ) – Int. J. Concept. Model. 14(1), 1–35 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maxwell, J.: Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harv. Educ. Rev. 62(3), 279–301 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newman, S.: Building Microservices. O’Reilly Media, Newton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rademacher, F., Sorgalla, J., Wizenty, P., Sachweh, S., Zündorf, A.: Graphical and textual model-driven microservice development. In: Bucchiarone, A., et al. (eds.) Microservices, pp. 147–179. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31646-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile Software Development with Scrum, vol. 1. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Singleton, A.: The economics of microservices. IEEE Cloud Comput. 3(5), 16–20 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smite, D., Moe, N.B., Levinta, G., Floryan, M.: Spotify guilds: how to succeed with knowledge sharing in large-scale agile organizations. IEEE Softw. 36(2), 51–57 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutherland, J.: The scrum@scale guide version 2.0. Technical report, Scrum Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V., Pahl, C.: Processes, motivations, and issues for migrating to microservices architectures: an empirical investigation. IEEE Cloud Comput. 4(5), 22–32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Urquhart, C.: Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications, Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Sorgalla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sorgalla, J., Sachweh, S., Zündorf, A. (2020). Exploring the Microservice Development Process in Small and Medium-Sized Organizations. In: Morisio, M., Torchiano, M., Jedlitschka, A. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12562. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64148-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64148-1_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64147-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64148-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics