Abstract
This chapter explores data quality in life cycle inventory (LCI) datasets and calculation results, introduces the history, explains the relevance of data quality for life cycle assessment (LCA), and the difficulty to deal with the application-dependency of data quality. Recent data quality systems, introduced by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and in the course of the European “Product Environmental Footprint” (PEF) project, are elaborated in more detail. The application-dependency of data quality has led to a more refined view on data quality in a recent United Nations GLAD (Global Life Cycle Access to Data) project. GLAD distinguishes between data quality when a dataset is created and when it is used. In addition, data quality is broadened by including modeling details that are typically set differently in different application contexts. Outcomes of the GLAD project are therefore introduced in this chapter as well and it is expected that these might lead to a more comprehensive, better management of data quality for differing application contexts, as well as for creating inventory datasets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary (ISO 9000: 2015); German and English version EN ISO 9000:201
- 2.
Global Network of Interoperable LCA Databases – Global LCA Data Access, Brasília meetings. 13–16 March 2016, Summary of decisions by Steering Committee from Brasília meeting, UNEP 2016
- 3.
“Our high-quality LCI datasets are based on industrial data […],” https://www.ecoinvent.org/database/buy-a-licence/why-ecoinvent/why-ecoinvent.html
- 4.
“European Commission: GaBi energy data has the best quality,” http://www.gabi-software.com/news/news-detail/article/european-commission-gabi-energy-data-has-the-best-quality/
- 5.
See Chap. 2 in this book “Principles of Life Cycle Inventory Modeling: The Basic Model, Extensions and Conventions” by Andreas Ciroth, Francesca Recanati, and Rickard Arvidsson for more details about foreground and background systems in LCA.
- 6.
It is not entirely clear, but “uncertainty,” as mentioned in ISO, may include both random uncertainty and variability; it seems intentionally vague and broad (“… the information (e.g., data…)”)
- 7.
Environmental labels and declarations – Type III environmental declarations – Principles and procedures
- 8.
In the EF hotspot analysis, “most relevant” is defined: Processes ordered by their contribution are most relevant up to the 80% percentile, i.e., if the sum of the impacts is equal or higher than 80% of the total impact (i.e., sum of all the impacts after normalization and weighting), see http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/PEFCR _guidance_v6.3.pdf (page 50)
- 9.
In the development of various PEFCRs, some could not be finished since an agreement on the definition of the product category could not be reached; for example, for coffee, it is a question about the size of the cup (Americano vs. espresso) and whether milk should be included or not.
- 10.
- 11.
Who continues: “When the determination of the [items] included in a sample involves personal judgement, one cannot have an objective measure of the reliability of the sample results, because the various [items] may have differing and unknown chances of being drawn.” (Hansen et al. 1953, Vol I p. 9.)
- 12.
The Technical Secretariat is responsible for steering the whole process of PEFCR development for a specific product category.
- 13.
The Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport, http://www.hbefa.net/e/index.html
- 14.
- 15.
Source: Foreign Agricultural Service, Official USDA Estimates, https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/app/index.html#/app/advQuery
- 16.
The United Nations Standard Products and Services Code, https://www.unspsc.org/
References
Bretz R (1998) SETAC LCA Workgroup: data availability and data quality. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:121
Ciroth A (2017) Goal and scope connection to the interpretation phase. Chapter 5 “Goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment” (Curran MA ed). In: LCA compendium – the complete world of life cycle assessment (Klöpffer W, Curran MA, series eds). Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 161–167
Ciroth A, Srocka M (2008) How to obtain a precise and representative estimate for parameters in LCA: a case study for the functional unit. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:265
Ciroth A, Vigon B (2016) Meta-data needs assessment – element 1 WG3 of the International Forum on LCA Cooperation, GLAD, project report
Ciroth A, Fleischer G, Steinbach J (2004) Uncertainty calculation in life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:216
Ciroth A, Muller S, Weidema BP, Lesage P (2012) Refining the pedigree matrix approach in ecoinvent. GreenDelta, Berlin. https://www.greendelta.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Pedigree_report_final_May2012.pdf
Ciroth A, Muller S, Weidema B, Lesage P (2013) Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1327
Ciroth A, Arbuckle P, Cherubini E, et al (2017) Task 3: core meta-data descriptors and guidance on populating descriptors, element 3 of 1 of the working group 3 of the International Forum on LCA Cooperation, GLAD, project report
Curran MA (2017) Overview of goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. Chapter 5 “Goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment” (Curran MA ed). In: LCA compendium – the complete world of life cycle assessment (Klöpffer W, Curran MA, series eds). Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 1–62
Edelen A, Ingwersen W (2016) Guidance on data quality assessment for life cycle inventory data. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
European Commission (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook – review schemes for life cycle assessment. First edition March 2010. Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability
European Commission (2011) Communication from the Commission to the European parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. In: Single market act twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence “Working together to create new growth” (COM/2011/0206). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
European Commission (2016) Product environmental footprint pilot guidance – guidance for the implementation of the EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) during the Environmental Footprint (EF) pilot phase, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/Guidance_products.pdf
European Commission (2018a) Product environmental footprint category rules guidance – version 6.3, https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/permalink/PEFCR_guidance_v6.3-2.pdf
European Commission (2018b) PEFCR – feed for food producing animals. http://fefacfeedpefcr.eu/#p=1. Accessed 21 Feb 2019
Fava J, Denison R, Jones B, et al (1991) Technical framework for life-cycle assessment – Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola
Fava JA, SETAC (Society), Education SF for E (1994) Life-cycle assessment data quality: a conceptual framework: workshop report. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education, Pensacola
Hansen MH, Hurwitz WN, Madow, WG (1953) Sample survey methods and theory, Vols. I and II. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Hauschild M, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen S (eds) (2018) Life cycle assessment: theory and practice. Springer, Cham
Huijbregts MAJ (1998) Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:273
ISO 14040 (2006a) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. ISO, Geneva
ISO 14044 (2006b) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneva
ISO 9000 (2015) Quality management systems – fundamentals and vocabulary; German and English version EN ISO 9000:201. http://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/04/54/45481.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2018
Klöpffer W (2012) The critical review of life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044. Int J LCA 17(9):1087–1093
Kupfer T, Baitz M, Makishi Colodel C et al (2017) GaBi database & modelling principles. Thinkstep AG, Leinfelden-Echterdingen
Masoni P, Porta PL, Tarantini M, Zamagni A, Recchioni M, Mathieux F, Pant R (2014) Evaluation of ILCD data network entry-level and PEF data quality requirements in LCA databases. SETAC Annual Meeting, Basel 11-15 May 2014
Recchioni M, Mathieux F, Goralczyk M, Schau E (2013) ILCD data network and ELCD database: current use and further needs for supporting environmental footprint and life cycle indicator projects. In: EU Science Hub – European Communication. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/ilcd-data-network-and-elcd-database-current-use-and-further-needs-supporting-environmental. Accessed 21 Feb 2019
Sonnemann G, Vigon B (2011) Global guidance principles for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) databases: a basis for greener processes and products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Paris
UNEP/SETAC (2014) Global LCA Data network (GLAD) – life cycle initiative. https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/resources-2/global-lca-data-network-glad/. Accessed 21 Feb 2019
United Nations (2017) The sustainable development goals report 2017. United Nation, New York
Ürge-Vorsatz D, Cabeza LF, Serrano S et al (2015) Heating and cooling energy trends and drivers in buildings. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:85–98
van den Berg H, Manuweera G, Konradsen F (2017) Global trends in the production and use of DDT for control of malaria and other vector-borne diseases. Malar J 16:1–8
Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R et al (2013) Overview and methodology – data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3, Ecoinvent report no.1 (v3). The ecoinvent Centre, St. Gallen
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ciroth, A. (2021). Data Quality in Life Cycle Inventories. In: Ciroth, A., Arvidsson, R. (eds) Life Cycle Inventory Analysis . LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62270-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62270-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62269-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62270-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)