Skip to main content

Understanding User Engagement in Information and Communications Technology for Development: An Exploratory Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: User Experience Design and Case Studies (HCII 2020)

Abstract

User engagement is often associated with successful information systems implementation, with this being particularly true in developing countries in the Global South. However, the term remains poorly understood with many seemingly conflicting definitions and the term “user engagement” has come to mean a variety of things in the literature. Also, it is unclear at what stage(s) of the design, development, implementation and use phase(s) that user engagement should apply to. This research examines the meaning of user engagement with the objective of bringing some level of clarity to suit the information communication technology for development (ICT4D) context. To this end, we propose an expanded definition of the term user engagement. The research also suggests what stages of the design, development, implementation and use phase of the technology this expanded definition of user engagement most usefully applies to by drawing lessons on user engagement in a variety of mobile health projects from the Global South. Qualitative methods of data analysis were used in collecting data which show that user engagement as applied to a specific phase of each of the projects was essential for the ongoing success of each project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    An ASHA is an accredited social health activist or CHW usually based in India. The ASHA programme was initiated by the Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare may years ago.

    .

References

  1. Bhatt, P., Ahmad, A.J., Roomi, M.A.: Social innovation with open source software: User engagement and development challenges in India. Technovation 52, 28–39 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heeks, R.: Information systems and developing countries: failure, success, and local improvisations. Info. Soc. 18(2), 101–112 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baccarini, D., Salm, G., Love, P.E.: Management of risks in information technology projects. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 104(4), 286–295 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nawi, H.S.A., Rahman, A.A., Ibrahim, O.: Government’s ICT project failure factors: a revisit. In: 2011 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dada, D.: The failure of E-government in developing countries: a literature review. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 26(1), 1–10 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, C.M., Pan, S.L.: User engagement in e-government systems implementation: a comparative case study of two Singaporean e-government initiatives. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 17(2), 124–139 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maail, A.G.: User participation and the success of development of ICT4D project: a critical review. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Workshop. ICT In Global Development. Pre-ICIS Meeting (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heeks, R.: ICT4D 2.0: the next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer 41(6), 26–33 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. O’Brien, H.L., Toms, E.G.: What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 59(6), 938–955 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Brien, H.: Theoretical perspectives on user engagement. In: O’Brien, H., Cairns, P. (eds.) Why Engagement Matters, pp. 1–26. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27446-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Abusamhadana, G.A., Elias, N.F., Mukhtar, M., Asma’mokhtar, U.: User engagement model in information systems development. J. Theoret. Appl. Inf. Technol. 97(11), 2908–2930 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Brien, H.L., Toms, E.G.: Examining the generalizability of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in exploratory search. Inf. Process. Manag. 49(5), 1092–1107 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kappelman, L.A., McLean, E.R.: User engagement in the development, implementation, and use of information technologies. In: HICSS, no. 4, pp. 512–521 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bailur, S.: Using stakeholder theory to analyze telecenter projects. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 3(3), 61 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Puri, S.K., Sahay, S.: Role of ICTs in participatory development: an Indian experience. Inf. Technol. Dev. 13(2), 133–160 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunton, J.E., Beeler, J.D.: Effects of user participation in systems development: a longitudinal field experiment. Mis Q. 21(4), 359–388 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harris, R.W.: How ICT4D research fails the poor. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22(1), 177–192 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laurel, B.: Computers as Theatre Reading. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Mas (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hutchins, E.L., Hollan, J.D., Norman, D.A.: Direct manipulation interfaces. Human-Comput. Interact. 1(4), 311–338 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Attfield, S., Kazai, G., Lalmas, M., Piwowarski, B.: Towards a science of user engagement (position paper). In: WSDM Workshop on User Modelling for Web Applications, pp. 9–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jacques, R.D.: The nature of engagement and its role in hypermedia evaluation and design. Doctoral dissertation, South Bank University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quesenbery, W.: Dimensions of usability. In: Albers, M., Mazur, B. (eds.) Content and Complexity: Information Design in Technical Communications, pp. 81–102. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saariluoma, P.: Explanatory frameworks for interaction design. In: Pirhonen, A., Saariluoma, P., Isomäki, H., Roast, C. (eds.) Future Interaction Design, pp. 67–83. Springer, London (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-089-3_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Webster, J., Ho, H.: Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. ACM SIGMIS Database: DATABASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 28(2), 63–77 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wright, P., McCarthy, J.: Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lukoff, K., Yu, C., Kientz, J., Hiniker, A.: What makes smartphone use meaningful or meaningless? Proc. ACM Interact. Mobile Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2(1), 1–26 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lalmas, M., O’Brien, H., Yom-Tov, E.: Measuring user engagement. Synth. Lect. Inf. Concepts Retrieval Serv. 6(4), 1–132 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Doherty, K., Doherty, G.: Engagement in HCI: conception, theory and measurement. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 51(5), 1–39 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cavaye, A.L.: User participation in system development revisited. Inf. Manag. 28(5), 311–323 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Markus, M.L., Mao, J.Y.: Participation in development and implementation-updating an old, tired concept for today’s IS contexts. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 5(11), 14 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Robert, J.M., Larouche, A.: The dimensions of user experience with interactive systems. In: IADIS International Conference Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction 2012 (part of MCCSIS 2012), pp. 89–96 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. O’Brien, H.L., Toms, E.G.: The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 61(1), 50–69 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bannon, L.J.: A human-centred perspective on interaction design. In: Pirhonen, A., Saariluoma, P., Isomäki, H., Roast, C. (eds.) Future Interaction Design, pp. 31–51. Springer, London (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-089-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Overbeeke, K., Djajadiningrat, T., Hummels, C., Wensveen, S., Prens, J.: Let’s make things engaging. In: Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology. Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 3, pp. 7–17. Springer, Dordrecht (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Goethe, O., Salehzadeh Niksirat, K., Hirskyj-Douglas, I., Sun, H., Law, E.L.-C., Ren, X.: From UX to engagement: connecting theory and practice, addressing ethics and diversity. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11572, pp. 91–99. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23560-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Sama, P.R., Eapen, Z.J., Weinfurt, K.P., Shah, B.R., Schulman, K.A.: An evaluation of mobile health application tools. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2(2), e19 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bush, J., Barlow, D.E., Echols, J., Wilkerson, J., Bellevin, K.: Impact of a mobile health application on user engagement and pregnancy outcomes among Wyoming Medicaid members. Telemed. e-Health 23(11), 891–898 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Doherty, K., et al.: Engagement with mental health screening on mobile devices: results from an antenatal feasibility study. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Torous, J., Nicholas, J., Larsen, M.E., Firth, J., Christensen, H.: Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements. EVID.-BASED MENTAL Health 21(3), 116–119 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, Y.H., Kim, D.J., Wachter, K.: A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 361–370 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. O’Brien, H.L., Cairns, P., Hall, M.: A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 112, 28–39 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Carter, L., Bélanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf. Syst. J. 15(1), 5–25 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Evans, D., Yen, D.C.: E-Government: evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Gov. Inf. Q. 23(2), 207–235 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tan, C.W., Pan, S.L.: Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 12(4), 269–281 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tan, C.-W., Pan, S.L., Lim, E.T.K.: Managing stakeholder interests in e-government implementation: lessons learned from a Singapore e-government project. J. Glob. Inf. Syst. 13(1), 31–53 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Garrett, J.J.: Customer loyalty and the elements of user experience. Des. Manag. Rev. 17(1), 35–39 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This publication has emanated from research supported in part by a grant from Science Foundation Ireland under grant number 18/CRT/6222.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tochukwu Ikwunne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ikwunne, T., Hederman, L., Wall, P.J. (2020). Understanding User Engagement in Information and Communications Technology for Development: An Exploratory Study. In: Stephanidis, C., Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Rau, PL.P., Moallem, A., Rauterberg, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: User Experience Design and Case Studies. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12423. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60114-0_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60114-0_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60113-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60114-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics