Skip to main content

An Ontological Analysis of Cities, Smart Cities and Their Components

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology and the City

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 36))

Abstract

The arising of smart cities has shown the limitations of the traditional attempts to understand and characterize cities. The smart city marks a relevant step in the evolution of urban systems which is expected to have disruptive impacts in the near future. Indeed, the ‘smartness’ qualification of cities (and perhaps territories) points to relevant changes in the possibilities these complex systems offer mainly due to changes in the information which is made available. This chapter studies the notion of city from an ontological viewpoint, and provides the first elements of a general framework aimed to characterize and unify how to understand the city and its evolution. It starts from historical considerations to isolate the factors that drove the changes from ancient to modern cities, and the complexity that characterizes the nature of cities. Our analysis departs from the traditional views and leads to distinguish three ontological components in the city: the modified physical place, the distributed agentivity, and the knowledge present in the system. The analysis of these components and their interactions, we argue, provides a coherent reading of the city across its evolution steps, and may be used to establish the maturity of today’s smart cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti, M. (2005). The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017605275160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, 41, S3–S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arentze, T., Dellaert, B. G. C., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2008). Modeling and measuring individuals’ mental representations of complex spatio-temporal decision problems. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 843–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507309994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arentze, T., & Timmermans, H. (2006). Multi-agent models of spatial cognition, Learning and complex choice behavior in urban environments. In J. Portugali (Ed.), Complex artificial environments. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, X., McAllister, R. R. J., Beaty, R. M., & Taylor, B. (2010). Urban policy and governance in a global environment: Complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 129–135. http://periodici.caspur.it/cgi-bin/sciserv.pl?collection=journals&journal=18773435&issue=v02i0003&article=129_upagiassmapp.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballatore, A. (2016). Prolegomena for an ontology of place. In H. Onsrud & W. Kuhn (Eds.), Advancing geographic information science (pp. 91–103). Needham: GSDI Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2007). Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencardino, M., & Greco, I. (2014). Smart communities. Social innovation at the service of the smart cities. TeMa - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2533.

  • Bennett, J. W. (1996). Human ecology as human behavior: Essays in environmental and development anthropology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgo, S. (2019). An ontological view of components and interactions in behaviorally adaptive systems. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 23, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borri, D., Camarda, D., Grassini, L., & Patano, M. (2016). Technological change and innovation for sustainable cities: A multiagent-based ontological approach. In R. Papa & R. Fistola (Eds.), Smart energy in the smart city: Urban planning for a sustainable future (pp. 61–82). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31157-9_4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. M., Dunn, R. A., & Kasdan, D. O. (2010). What is “urban studies”? Context, internal structure, and content. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 199–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvino, I. (1974). Invisible cities. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R. (1995). The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions. Papers in Regional Science, 74(4), 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2005). ICTs and territorial competitiveness in the era of internet. The Annals of Regional Science, 39(3), 421–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camarda, D. (2010). Beyond citizen participation in planning: Multi-agent systems for complex decision making. In C. Nunes Silva (Ed.), Handbook of research on e-planning: ICTs for urban development and monitoring (pp. 195–217). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Camarda, D. (2012). Multiagent systems for the governance of spatial environments: Some modelling approaches. In B. Murgante, O. Gervasi, S. Misra, N. Nedjah, A. Rocha, D. Taniar, et al. (Eds.), Computational science and its applications (pp. 425–438). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31075-1_32.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R., Darling, L., & Darling, L. (1962). Silent spring. Boston/Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin/Riverside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban regional process. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Sabri, S., Rajabifard, A., & Agunbiade, M. E. (2018). An ontology-based spatial data harmonisation for urban analytics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 72, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.06.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1933). Die Zentralen Orte in Suddeutschland. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F., & Toner, A. (2006). The evolution of community water governance in Uchira, Tanzania: The implications for equality of access, sustainability and effectiveness. Natural Resources Forum, 30(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2006.00115.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and digital city: A systematic literature review. In R. P. Dameri & C. Rosenthal-Sabroux (Eds.), Smart city (pp. 13–43). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle: Nature, man, and technology. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (2014). Place: An introduction. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Roo, PG., & Silva, EA. (2010). A Planner’s Encounter with Complexity. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, M., & De Lange, M. (2017). Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. In K. Etingoff (Ed.), Urban land use (pp. 108–129). Oakville, ON: Apple Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deslatte, A. (2015). Reassessing “city limits” in urban public policy. The Policy Studies Journal, 43(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12102.

  • Faludi, A. (1987). A decision-centred view of environmental planning. In Oxford [Oxfordshire]. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, F., & Vesco, A. (2015). Handbook of research on social, economic, and environmental sustainability in the development of smart cities. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D. J. (2010). Sustainability as a conceptual focus for public administration. Public Administration Review, 70, s78–s88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378006000379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W., Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report to the club of Rome. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromhold-Eisebith, M. (2017). Cyber-physical systems in smart cities: Mastering technological, economic, and social challenges. In H. Song, R. Srinivasan, T. Sookoor, & S. Jeschke (Eds.), Smart cities: Foundations, principles, and applications (pp. 1–18). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbacz, P., Lawrynowicz, A., & Szady, B. (2018). Identity criteria for localities. In Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, FOIS 2018 (pp. 47–54). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in evolution. Edinburgh: Williams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertman, S., Ferreira, J., Goodspeed, R., & Stillwell, J. (2015). Planning support systems and smart cities. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., & Berry, C. R. (2006). Why are smart places getting smarter. In Rappaport Institute/Taubman Center Policy Brief (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorban, A. N., & Roose, D. (2010). Coping with complexity: Model reduction and data analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruner, S. (2010). Mobile agent systems and cellular automata. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 20(2), 198–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N. (1998). Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the First International Conference, FOIS 1998, 6–8 June 1998, Trento. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N., & Welty, C. (2009). An overview on ontoclean. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), Handbook on ontologies (2nd ed., pp. 201–220). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E., Bowerman, B., Braverman, J., Taylor, J., Todosow, H., & Von Wimmersperg, U. (2000). The vision of a smart city. Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (2012). The city as a socio-technical system: A spatial reformulation in the light of the levels problem and the parallel problem. In S. M. Arisona, G. Aschwanden, J. Halatsch, & P. Wonka (Eds.), Digital urban modeling and simulation (pp. 24–48). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29758-8_3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirtz, J., Stone, R. B., McAdams, D. A., Szykman, S., & Wood, K. L. (2002). A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in Engineering Design, 13(2), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39(4), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, I., & Gerritsen, B. H. (2012). Cyber-physical systems: Concepts, technologies and implementation principles. In Proceedings of TMCE, 1 (pp. 7–11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, C., Cornish, F., & Gillespie, A. (2015). Making community: Diversity, movement and interdependence. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, & G. Gaskell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (p. 179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, L., & Zhang, L. (2017). Information innovation technology in smart cities. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justinian. (530). Corpus Iuris Civilis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitano, H. (2002). Systems biology: A brief overview. Science, 295(5560), 1662–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz, N., & Forester, J. (1990). Making equity planning work: Leadership in the public sector. New York: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy Strauss, C. (1955). Tristes tropiques. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Lathrop, R. G. (2002). Urban change detection based on an artificial neural network. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(12), 2513–2518. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110097240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losch, A. (1940). Die Raumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T. (1901). The Buddenbrooks. Berlin: S. Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1861). Das Kapital. Kritik der Politischen Oekonomie. Hamburg: Otto Meissner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matt, D. T., Spath, D., Braun, S., Schlund, S., & Krause, D. (2014). Morgenstadt: Urban production in the city of the future. In M. F. Zaeh (Ed.), Enabling manufacturing competitiveness and economic sustainability (pp. 13–16). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, S., Jimenez, J. A., & Koutitas, G. (2017). Smart cities: Applications, technologies, standards, and driving factors. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. L. (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3(4), 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & de Roo, G. (1997). Urban environmental planning: Policies, instruments, and methods in an international perspective. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilization. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1961). The city in history. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgante, B., & Borruso, G. (2015). Smart cities in a smart world. In T. R. Stamatina & M. P. Panos (Eds.), Future city architecture for optimal living (pp. 13–35). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., & Jennings, J. (2008). Cities as sustainable ecosystems. Melbourne: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okner, T., & Preston, R. (2017). Smart cities and the symbiotic relationship between smart governance and citizen engagement. In H. Song, R. Srinivasan, T. Sookoor, & S. Jeschke (Eds.), Smart cities: Foundations, principles, and applications (pp. 343–372). London: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007). Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(1), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, G., Prada, R., & Santos, P. A. (2016). Integrating social power into the decision-making of cognitive agents. Artificial Intelligence, 241, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picon, A. (2015). Smart cities: A spatialised intelligence. London: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (380 BC). Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portugali, J. (2011). Complexity, cognition and the city. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rabino, G., & Caglioni, M. (2007). Theoretical approach to urban ontology: A contribution from urban system analysis. In J. Teller, J. Lee, & C. Roussey (Eds.), Ontologies for urban development (pp. 109–119). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71976-2_10.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01405730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2011). Keynote paper: Who needs to become ‘smart’ in tomorrow’s cities. In LIFT Conference: The Future of Smart Cities, Geneva, 2–4 February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflexive practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A., & Argyris, C. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (2006). Social ontology: Some basic principles. Anthropological Theory, 6(1), 12–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severino, E. (2016). The essence of nihilism. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakun, M. F. (1999). Consciousness, spirituality and right decision/negotiation in purposeful complex adaptive systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008620409745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1945). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stufano Melone, M. R., Borri, D., Camarda, D., & Borgo, S. (2017). Knowledge of places: An ontological analysis of places and their semantic stratifications (Plurimondi) (Vol. 17). Bari: Plurimondi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufano Melone, M. R., Borri, D., Camarda, D., & Borgo, S. (2018). Knowledge of places: An ontological analysis of the social level in the city. In R. Papa, R. Fistola, & L. Gargiulo (Eds.), Smart planning: Sustainability and mobility in the age of change (pp. 3–14). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77682-8_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. (2016). Interpretivism and public policy research. In N. Turnbull (Ed.), Interpreting governance, high politics, and public policy (pp. 184–204). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacitus. (98 BC). De origine et Situ Germanorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thucydides. (430 BC). History of the Peloponnesian War.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torregrosa, M. L., Vera, J., Kloster, K., & Torres, B. (2017). Water access technologies based on traditional knowledge in Mexico: Obstacles and strengths (Plurimondi) (Vol. 7). Bari: Plurimondi Press. http://plurimondi.poliba.it/index.php/Plurimondi/article/view/17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E., & Emery, F. (2005). Socio-technical systems theory. In J. B. Miner (Ed.), Organizational behavior 2: Essential theories of process and structure (pp. 169–195). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varzi, A. C. (2019). What is a city? Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09647-4.

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. (1963). Collected works. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, H., & Hajer, M. A. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: governance in the network society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1986). The city. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenophon. (370 BC). Anabasis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zins, C. (2007). Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4), 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of the least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Borgo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borgo, S., Borri, D., Camarda, D., Stufano Melone, M.R. (2021). An Ontological Analysis of Cities, Smart Cities and Their Components. In: Nagenborg, M., Stone, T., González Woge, M., Vermaas, P.E. (eds) Technology and the City. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52313-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics