Skip to main content

An Affinity Pull-Down Approach to Identify the Plant Cyclic Nucleotide Interactome

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Cyclic Nucleotide Signaling in Plants

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1016))

Abstract

Cyclic nucleotides (CNs) are intracellular second messengers that play an important role in mediating physiological responses to environmental and developmental signals, in species ranging from bacteria to humans. In response to these signals, CNs are synthesized by nucleotidyl cyclases and then act by binding to and altering the activity of downstream target proteins known as cyclic nucleotide-binding proteins (CNBPs). A number of CNBPs have been identified across kingdoms including transcription factors, protein kinases, phosphodiesterases, and channels, all of which harbor conserved CN-binding domains. In plants however, few CNBPs have been identified as homology searches fail to return plant sequences with significant matches to known CNBPs. Recently, affinity pull-down techniques have been successfully used to identify CNBPs in animals and have provided new insights into CN signaling. The application of these techniques to plants has not yet been extensively explored and offers an alternative approach toward the unbiased discovery of novel CNBP candidates in plants. Here, an affinity pull-down technique for the identification of the plant CN interactome is presented. In summary, the method involves an extraction of plant proteins which is incubated with a CN-bait, followed by a series of increasingly stringent elutions that eliminates proteins in a sequential manner according to their affinity to the bait. The eluted and bait-bound proteins are separated by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis, excised, and digested with trypsin after which the resultant peptides are identified by mass spectrometry—techniques that are commonplace in proteomics experiments. The discovery of plant CNBPs promises to provide valuable insight into the mechanism of CN signal transduction in plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Newton RP, Roef LUC, Witters E, Van Onckelen H (1999) Tansley review no. 106. New Phytol 143:427–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Martinez-Atienza J, Van Ingelgem C, Roef L, Maathuis FJ (2007) Plant cyclic nucleotide signalling: facts and fiction. Plant Signal Behav 2:540–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Newton RP, Smith CJ (2004) Cyclic nucleotides. Phytochemistry 65:2423–2437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Visser NF, Scholten A, van den Heuvel RH, Heck AJ (2007) Surface-plasmon-resonance-based chemical proteomics: efficient specific extraction and semiquantitative identification of cyclic nucleotide-binding proteins from cellular lysates by using a combination of surface plasmon resonance, sequential elution and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Chembiochem 8:298–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim E, Park JM (2003) Identification of novel target proteins of cyclic GMP signaling pathways using chemical proteomics. J Biochem Mol Biol 36:299–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Scholten A, Poh MK, van Veen TA, van Breukelen B, Vos MA, Heck AJ (2006) Analysis of the cGMP/cAMP interactome using a chemical proteomics approach in mammalian heart tissue validates sphingosine kinase type 1-interacting protein as a genuine and highly abundant AKAP. J Prot Res 5:1435–1447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scholten A, van Veen TA, Vos MA, Heck AJ (2007) Diversity of cAMP-dependent protein kinase isoforms and their anchoring proteins in mouse ventricular tissue. J Proteome Res 6:1705–1717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolb A, Busby S, Buc H, Garges S, Adhya S (1993) Transcriptional regulation by cAMP and its receptor protein. Annu Rev Biochem 62:749–795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Francis SH, Corbin JD (1999) Cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases: intracellular receptors for cAMP and cGMP action. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 36:275–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Francis SH, Corbin JD (1994) Structure and function of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases. Annu Rev Physiol 56:237–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Conti M, Beavo J (2007) Biochemistry and physiology of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: essential components in cyclic nucleotide signaling. Annu Rev Biochem 76:481–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook NJ, Hanke W, Kaupp UB (1987) Identification, purification, and functional reconstitution of the cyclic GMP-dependent channel from rod photoreceptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:585–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura T, Gold GH (1987) A cyclic nucleotide-gated conductance in olfactory receptor cilia. Nature 325:442–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Craven KB, Zagotta WN (2006) CNG and HCN channels: two peas, one pod. Annu Rev Physiol 68:375–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bos JL (2003) Epac: a new cAMP target and new avenues in cAMP research. Nat Rev 4:733–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldberg JM, Bosgraaf L, Van Haastert PJ, Smith JL (2002) Identification of four candidate cGMP targets in Dictyostelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6749–6754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shabb JB, Corbin JD (1992) Cyclic nucleotide-binding domains in proteins having diverse functions. J Biol Chem 267:5723–5726

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kannan N, Wu J, Anand GS, Yooseph S, Neuwald AF et al (2007) Evolution of allostery in the cyclic nucleotide binding module. Genome Biol 8:R264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zoraghi R, Corbin JD, Francis SH (2004) Properties and functions of GAF domains in cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases and other proteins. Mol Pharmacol 65:267–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Leng Q, Mercier RW, Yao W, Berkowitz GA (1999) Cloning and first functional characterization of a plant cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel. Plant Physiol 121:753–761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoshi T (1995) Regulation of voltage dependence of the KAT1 channel by intracellular factors. J Gen Physiol 105:309–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bridges D, Fraser ME, Moorhead GB (2005) Cyclic nucleotide binding proteins in the Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa genomes. BMC Bioinf 6:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson JL, Leroux MR (2010) cAMP and cGMP signaling: sensory systems with prokaryotic roots adopted by eukaryotic cilia. Trends Cell Biol 20:435–444

    Google Scholar 

  24. Talke IN, Blaudez D, Maathuis FJ, Sanders D (2003) CNGCs: prime targets of plant cyclic nucleotide signalling? Trends Plant Sci 8:286–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Isner JC, Nuhse T, Maathuis FJ (2012) The cyclic nucleotide cGMP is involved in plant hormone signalling and alters phosphorylation of Arabidopsis thaliana root proteins. J Exp Bot 63:3199–3205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dubovskaya LV, Volotovsky ID (2004) Affinity chromatography isolation and characterization of soluble cGMP binding proteins from Avena sativa L. seedlings. Bulg J Plant Physiol 30:14–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dubovskaya LV, Bakakina YS, Kolesneva EV, Sodel DL, McAinsh MR et al (2011) cGMP-dependent ABA-induced stomatal closure in the ABA-insensitive Arabidopsis mutant abi1-1. New Phytol 191:57–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Laukens K, Roef L, Witters E, Slegers H, Van Onckelen H (2001) Cyclic AMP affinity purification and ESI-QTOF MS-MS identification of cytosolic glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and two nucleoside diphosphate kinase isoforms from tobacco BY-2 cells. FEBS Lett 508:75–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rose JK, Bashir S, Giovannoni JJ, Jahn MM, Saravanan RS (2004) Tackling the plant proteome: practical approaches, hurdles and experimental tools. Plant J 39:715–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Baerenfaller K, Grossmann J, Grobei MA, Hull R, Hirsch-Hoffmann M et al (2008) Genome-scale proteomics reveals Arabidopsis thaliana gene models and proteome dynamics. Science 320:938–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Peckham GD, Bugos RC, Su WW (2006) Purification of GFP fusion proteins from transgenic plant cell cultures. Protein Expr Purif 49:183–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Charmont S, Jamet E, Pont-Lezica R, Canut H (2005) Proteomic analysis of secreted proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings: improved recovery following removal of phenolic compounds. Phytochemistry 66:453–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Luo Y, Blex C, Baessler O, Glinski M, Dreger M et al (2009) The cAMP capture compound mass spectrometry as a novel tool for targeting cAMP-binding proteins: from protein kinase A to potassium/sodium hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. Mol Cell Prot 8:2843–2856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Aye TT, Mohammed S, van den Toorn HW, van Veen TA, van der Heyden MA et al (2009) Selectivity in enrichment of cAMP-dependent protein kinase regulatory subunits type I and type II and their interactors using modified cAMP affinity resins. Mol Cell Prot 8:1016–1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dubovskaya LV, Molchan OV, Volotovsky ID (2002) Cyclic GMP-binding activity in Avena sativa seedlings. Russ J Plant Physiol 49:216–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J, Olsen JV, Mann M (2006) In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc 1:2856–2860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Donaldson, L., Meier, S. (2013). An Affinity Pull-Down Approach to Identify the Plant Cyclic Nucleotide Interactome. In: Gehring, C. (eds) Cyclic Nucleotide Signaling in Plants. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1016. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-441-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-441-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-440-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-441-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics