Skip to main content

Intracorporeal Lithotripsy: Electrohydraulic, Pneumatic, and Ultrasonic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ureteroscopy

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

Abstract

The evolution of ureteroscopy using electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), pneumatic lithotripsy (PL), and ultrasonic lithotripsy (USL) for the treatment of ureteral stones offered a much less invasive alternative to contemporary open ureterolithotomy, and a was major advancement for the fledgling field of endourology. As new energy sources became widely available, studies examining the safety, efficacy, and cost sought to determine the one best modality to treat ureteral stones. EHL, while efficient and safe for treatment of bladder stones proved to be too powerful to use for the treatment of most stones within the ureter. USL and PL were safer and often times more efficient than EHL, but the breadth of their applicability was somewhat limited by the rigid nature of their probes. The advent of shock wave lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy, and their subsequent widespread affordability and availability, eclipsed other energy sources as the first-line treatment for ureteral stones. Contemporaneous and modern clinical studies however prove that the traditional lithotrites, including EHL, PL, and USL, still have utility and can be especially effective when cost constraints dictate equipment choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whitney WD, Smith BE. The century dictionary and cyclopedia, vol. 5. New York: The Century Co; 1911. p. 3483.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raney AM. Electrohydraulic ureterolithotripsy. Urology. 1978 Sep;13(3):284–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reuter HJ, Kern E. Electronic lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1973;110:181–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huffman JL, Bagley D, Schoenberg HW, Lyon ES. Transurethral removal of large ureteral and renal pelvic calculi using ureteroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy. J Urol. 1983 Jul;130:31–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Denstedt JD, Clayman RV. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1990 Jan;143:13–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hofbauer J, Höbarth K, Marberger M. Electrohydraulic versus pneumatic disintergration in the treatment of ureteral stones: a randomized, prospective trial. J Urol. 1995 Mar;153:623–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Strope SA, Wolf JS, Faerber GJ, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK. Changing practice for upper urinary tract stone disease. J Urol. 2009 Sep;182:1005–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Turney BW, Reynard JM, Noble JG, Keoghane SR. Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int. 2012;109(7):1082–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vorreuther R, Engelking R. Impact of voltage and capacity on the electrical and acoutstic output of intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Urol Res. 1992;20:355–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Corleis R, Vorreuther R, Engelmann U, Schaarschmidt U, Morgenstern B. First temporal and spatial quantification of single-shot electrohydraulic lithotripsy in vitro. Urol Res. 1996;24:167–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rouvalis P. Electronic lithotripsy for vesical calculus with URAT-1. Br J Urol. 1970;42:486–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eaton JM, Malin JM, Glenn JF. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Urol. 1972 Dec;108:865–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bülow H, Frohmuller HGW. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with aspiration of the fragments under vision-304 consecutive cases. J Urol. 1981;126:454–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Green DF, Lytton B. Early experience with direct vision electrohydraulic lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1985;133:767–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Green DF, Lytton B. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the ureter. Urol Clin North Am. 1988 Aug;15(3):361–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. See ACH, Ng FC, Ch’ng HC. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy: an effective and economical modality of endoscopic ureteric lithotripsy. ANZ J Surg. 1997;67:551–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leone NT, Garcia-Roig M, Bagley DH. Changing trends in the use of urteroscopic instruments from 1996 to 2008. J Endourol. 2010 Mar;24(3):361–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maghsoudi R, Amjadi M, Norizadeh D, Hassanzadeh H. Treatment of ureteral stones: a prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy. Indian J Urol. 2008 Jul;24(3):352–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schulze H, Haupt G, Piergiovnni M, Wisard M, von Niederhausern W, Senge T. The Swiss Lithoclast: a new device for endocscopic stone disitegration. J Urol. 1993 Jan;149:15–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Haupt G, van Ophoven A, Pannek J, Herde T, Senge T. In vitro comparison of two ballistic systems for stone disintegration. J Endourol. 1996 Oct;10(5):417–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Denstedt JD, Eberwein PM, Singh RR. The Swiss Lithoclast: a new device for intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Urol. 1992 Sep;148:1088–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu S, Kourambas J, Munver R, Preminger GM, Zhong P. Quantification of the tip movement of lithotripsy flexible pneumatic probes. J Urol. 2000 Nov;164:1735–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Auge BK, Sekula JJ, Springhart WP, Zhu S, Zhong P, Preminger GM. In vitro comparison of fragmentation efficiency of flexible pneumatic lithotripsy using 2 flexible uteroscopes. J Urol. 2004 Sep;172:967–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grasso M, Loisides P, Beaghler M, Bagley D. Treatment of urinary calculi in a porcine and canine model using the Browne Pneumatic Impactor. Urology. 1994 Dec;44(6):937–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tawfiek ER, Grasso M, Bagley DH. Initial use of Browne Pneumatic Impactor. J Endourol. 1997 Apr;11(2):121–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun Y, Wang L, Liao G, et al. Pneumatic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy in the endoscoic treatment of ureteral calculi. J Endourol. 2001 Aug;15(5):587–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Delvecchio FC, Kuo RL, Preminger GM. Clinical efficacy of combined Lithoclast and Lithovac stone removal during ureteroscopy. J Urol. 2000 Jul;164:40–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang CY, Chen SS, Chen LK. Cost effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei city hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus Lithoclast. Urol Int. 2009;83:410–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Salvadó JA, Mandujano R, Saez I, et al. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi: comparative evaluation of three different lithotripters. J Endourol. 2012;26(4):343–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson PA, Herrick JF, Krusen FH. Ultrasonics in medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1950 Jan;31(1):6–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Howards SS, Merrill E, Harris S, Cohn J. Ultrasonic lithotripsy. Invest Urol. 1974;11(4):273–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mulvaney WP. Attempted disintergration of calculi by ultrasonic vibrations. J Urol. 1953 Mar;70(5):704–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Suby H. The potential use of vibration for the disintergration of calculi. J Urol. 1957 Mar;77(3):364–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Goodfriend R. Disintergration of ureteral calculi by ultrasound. Urology. 1973 Mar;1(3):260–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fuchs GJ. Ultrasonic lithotripsy in the ureter. Urol Clin North Am. 1988 Aug;15(3):347–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Marberger M, Stackl W, Hruby W. Percutaneous lithalopaxy of renal calculi with ultrasound. Eur Urol. 1982;8:236–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Çetin S, Özgür S, Yazicioglu A, Ünsal K, Ilker Y. Ultrasonic lithotripsy of bladder stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 1988;20(4):361–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chaussy C, Fuchs G, Kahn R, Hunter P, Goodfriend R. Transurethral ultrasonic ureterolithotripsy using a solid-wire probe. Urology. 1987 May;29(5):531–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gur U, Lifshitz D, Lask D, Livne PM. Utereral ultrasonic lithotripsy revisited: a neglected tool? J Endourol. 2004;18(2):137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Auge BK, Lallas CD, Pietrow PK, Zhong P, Preminger GM. In vitro comparision of standard ultrasound and pneumatic lithotrites with a new combination intracorporeal lithotripsy device. Urology. 2002;60:28–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Siqueira T, et al. In vitro comparision of Lithoclast Ultra intracorporial lithotripter. J Endourol. 2004 Mar;18(2):153–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lehman DS, Hruby GW, Phillips C, et al. Prospective randomized comparision of a combined ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotrite with a standard ultrasonic lithotrite for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):285–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vorreuther R, Corleis R, Klotz T, Bernards P, Engelmann U. Impact of shock wave pattern and cavitation bubble size on tissue damage during ureteroscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Urol. 1995 Mar;153:849–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Piergiovanni M, Desgrandchamps F, Cochand-Priollet B, et al. Ureteral and bladder lesions after ballistic, ultrasonic, electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 1994;8(4):293–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Santa-Cruz RW, Leveillee RJ, Krongrad A. Ex vivo comparison of four lithotripters commonly used in the ureter: what does it take to perforate? J Endourol. 1998;12(5):417–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bhatta KM, Rosen DI, Flotte TJ, Dretler SP, Nishioka NS. Effects of shielded or unshielded laser and electrohydraulic lithotripsy on rabbit bladder. J Urol. 1990 Apr;143:857–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Denstedt JD, Razvi HA, Rowe E, Grignon DJ, Eberwein PM. Investigation of the tissue effects of a new device for intracorporeal lithotripsy-the Swiss Lithoclast. J Urol. 1995 Feb;153:535–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Teh CL, Zhong P, Preminger GM. Laboratory and clinical assessment of pneumatically driven intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Endourol. 1998 Apr;12(2):163–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Teigland CM, Clayman RV, Winfield HN, Roeser RJ. Ultrasonic lithotripsy: the risk of hearing loss. J Urol. 1986 Apr;135:728–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Karlsen SJ, Bull-Njaa T, Krokstad A. Measurement of sound emission by endoscopic lithotripters: an in vitro study and theoretical estimation of risk of hearing loss in a fetus. J Endourol. 2001;15(8):821–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Vicente J, Caparrós J, Salvador J, Parra L, Rios G. Electrohydraulic and ultrasonic lithotripsy in 100 consecutive cases of primary ureteral stones. Urol Int. 1991;47:16–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Teichman JMH, Rao RD, Rogenes VJ, Harris JM. Ureteroscopic management of ureteral calculi: electrohydraulic versus holmium:YAG lithotripsy. J Urol. 1997 Oct;158:1357–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Naqvi SAA, Khaliq M, Zafar MN, Sizvi SAH. Treatmetn of ureteric stones. Comparision of laer and pneumatic lithotripsy. Br J Urol. 1994;74:694–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Manohar T, Ganpule A, Desai M. Comparative evaluation of Swiss Lithoclast 2 versus Holmum:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted upper-ureteral stones. J Endourol. 2008 Mar;22(3):443–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Binbay M, Tepeler A, Singh A, et al. Evaluation of pneumatic versus holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43:989–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marshall L. Stoller M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, J., Stoller, M.L. (2013). Intracorporeal Lithotripsy: Electrohydraulic, Pneumatic, and Ultrasonic. In: Monga, M. (eds) Ureteroscopy. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-205-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-206-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics