Skip to main content

Quality Assessment of Recombinant Proteins Produced in Plants

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Recombinant Gene Expression

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 824))

Abstract

Plant-based expression technologies for recombinant proteins have begun to receive acceptance for pharmaceuticals and other commercial markets. Protein products derived from plants offer safer, more cost-effective, and less capital-intensive alternatives to traditional manufacturing systems using microbial fermentation or animal cell culture bioreactors. Moreover, plants are now known to be capable of expressing bioactive proteins from a diverse array of species including animals and humans. Methods development to assess the quality and performance of proteins manufactured in plants are essential to support the QA/QC demands as plant-produced protein products transition to the commercial marketplace. Within the pharmaceutical arena, process validation and acceptance criteria for biological products must comply with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and ICH Q6B guidelines in order to initiate the regulatory approval process. Detailed product specifications will also need to be developed and validated for plant-made proteins for the bioenergy, food, chemical synthesis, or research reagent markets.

We have, therefore, developed assessment methods for important qualitative and quantitative parameters of the products and the manufacturing methods utilized in plant-based production systems. In this chapter, we describe a number of procedures to validate product identity and characteristics including mass analyses, antibody cross-reactivity, N-terminal sequencing, and bioactivity. We also address methods for routine assessment of yield, recovery, and purity. The methods presented are those developed for the synthesis and recovery of the avian cytokine, chicken interleukin-12 (ChIL-12), produced in the leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana. The ChIL-12 protein used as a model for this chapter includes a C-terminal histidine epitope (HIS-tag) and, thus, these methods may be directly applicable to other HIS-tagged proteins produced in plants. However, the overall strategy presented using the ChIL-12HIS example should provide the basis of standard procedures for assessing the quality of other plant-based protein products and manufacturing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liu C, Towler M, Medrano G, et al (2009) Production of mouse interleukin-12 is greater in tobacco hairy roots grown in a mist reactor than in an airlift reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102, 1074–1086.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Medrano G, Reidy M, Liu J, et al (2009) Rapid system for evaluating bioproduction capacity of complex pharmaceutical proteins in plants. In: Faye L, and Gomord V (eds). Methods Mol Biol Humana Press, Totowa, NJ 483, 51–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Medrano G, Dolan MC, Stephens NT, et al (2010) Efficient plant-based production of chicken interleukin-12 yields a strong immunostimulatory cytokine. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 30, 143–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Condori J, Medrano G, Sivakumar G, et al (2009) Functional characterization of a stilbene synthase gene using a transient expression system in planta. Plant Cell Rep. 28, 589–599.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cramer CL, Boothe JG, Oishi KK (1999) Transgenic plants for therapeutic proteins: linking upstream and downstream strategies. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 240, 95–118.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cramer CL, Weissenborn DL, Oishi KK, et al (1996) Bioproduction of human enzymes in transgenic tobacco. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 792, 62–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu J, Dolan MC, Reidy M, et al (2008) Expression of bioactive single-chain murine IL-12 in transgenic plants. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 28, 381–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Daniell H, Singh ND, Mason H, et al (2009) Plant-made vaccine antigens and biopharmaceuticals. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 669–679.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tremblay R, Wang D, Jevnikar AM, et al (2010) Tobacco, a highly efficient green bioreactor for production of therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol. Adv. 28, 214–221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang DJ, Brandsma M, Yin Z, et al (2008) A novel platform for biologically active recombinant human interleukin-13 production. Plant Biotechnol. J. 6, 504–515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matoba N, Kajiura H, Cherni I, et al (2009) Biochemical and immunological characterization of the plant-derived candidate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mucosal vaccine CTB-MPR. Plant Biotechnol. J. 7, 129–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Conley AJ, Joensuu JJ, Menassa R, et al (2009) Induction of protein body formation in plant leaves by elastin-like polypeptide fusions. BMC Biol. 7, 48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alvarez ML, Topal E, Martin F, et al (2010) Higher accumulation of F1-V fusion recombinant protein in plants after induction of protein body formation. Plant Mol. Biol. 72, 75–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hood EE, Bailey MR, Beifuss K, et al (2003) Criteria for high-level expression of a fungal laccase gene in transgenic maize. Plant Biotechnol. J. 1, 129–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Torrent M, Llompart B, Lasserre-Ramassamy S, et al (2009) Eukaryotic protein production in designed storage organelles. BMC Biol. 7, 5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schillberg S, Twyman RM, Fischer R (2005) Opportunities for recombinant antigen and antibody expression in transgenic plants – technology assessment. Vaccine 23, 1764–1769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reed DG, Nopo-Olazabal LH, Funk V, et al (2005) Expression of functional hexahistidine-tagged ricin B in tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 24, 15–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hood E, Cramer CL, Medrano G, et al (2012) Protein targeting: strategic planning for optimizing protein products through plant biotechnology. In: Altman A, Hasegawa PM (eds). Plant Biotechnology and Agriculture: Prospects for the 21st Century. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-381466-1.00003-1.

  19. Lambrecht B, Gonze M, Meulemans G, et al (2000) Production of antibodies against chicken interferon-gamma: demonstration of neutralizing activity and development of a quantitative ELISA. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 74, 137–144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaaltiel Y, Bartfeld D, Hashmueli S, et al (2007) Production of glucocerebrosidase with terminal mannose glycans for enzyme replacement therapy of Gaucher’s disease using a plant cell system. Plant Biotechnol. J. 5, 579–590.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeoh T, Michener W, Himmel ME, et al (2008) Implications of cellobiohydrolase glycosylation for use in biomass conversion. Biotechnol. Biofuels 1, 10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by USDA SBIR Grant Phase I (2007-33610-17978) and Phase II (2008-33610-19482) to BioStrategies LC and a subaward to Arkansas Biosciences Institute (ABI) at Arkansas State University. Thanks to Nora Rubio, Jorge Ayala, and Nathan Stephens for technical support and help in standardization of direct ELISA, protein preparation for N-terminal sequencing, and endotoxin removal protocols, as part of BioStrategies LC projects. Thanks go as well to Drs. Brett Savary and Prasanna Vasu (ABI) for help in developing the MALDI-ToF procedures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carole L. Cramer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Medrano, G., Dolan, M.C., Condori, J., Radin, D.N., Cramer, C.L. (2012). Quality Assessment of Recombinant Proteins Produced in Plants. In: Lorence, A. (eds) Recombinant Gene Expression. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 824. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-433-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-433-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-432-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-433-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics