Skip to main content

Percutaneous Access to the Urinary Tract

  • Chapter
Advanced Endourology

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

Abstract

Percutaneous access to the kidney is the most important step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy because the site of puncture determines how easily the targeted stone can be treated. Strategies to maximize the use of rigid instruments and allow for the performance of concurrent procedures, such as endopyelotomy, while minimizing patient discomfort and pleural morbidity should be considered when planning the site of access. The ability of the urologist to perform percutaneous access allows for flexibility in the procedure, particularly if multiple accesses are necessary and obviates the need for dependence on a radiologist’s schedule. This chapter reviews the indications for percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the technique of percutaneous access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10(3): 257–259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Consensus conference. Prevention and treatment of kidney stones. JAMA 1988; 260(7): 977–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, et al. Nephrolithiasis clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of staghorn calculi. J Urol 1994; 151(6): 1648–1651.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lam HS, Lingeman JE, Mosbaugh PG, et al. Evolution of the technique of combination therapy for staghorn calculi: a decreasing role for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1992; 148(3 Pt 2): 1058–1062.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong C, Leveillee RJ. Single upper pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5 cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shock wave lithotripsy necessary? J Endourol 2002; 16(7): 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Preminger GM, Segura JW, Lingeman JE. AUA Staghorn Clinical Guidelines Panel Summary Report. J Urol 2004, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghorn calculi. J Urol 1998; 160(2): 346–351.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pittomvils G, Vandeursen H, Wevers M, et al. The influence of internal stone structure upon the fracture behaviour of urinary calculi. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20(8): 803–810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chow GK, Streem SB. Contemporary urological intervention for cystinuric patients: immediate and long-term impact and implications. J Urol 1998; 160(2): 341–344; discussion 4–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klee LW, Brito CG, Lingeman JE. The clinical implications of brushite calculi. J Urol 1991; 145(4): 715–718.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, et al. Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol 1997; 158(5): 1915–1921.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Green DF, Lytton B. Early experience with direct vision electrohydraulic lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. J Urol 1985; 133(5): 767–770.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mugiya S, Nagata M, Un-No T, Takayama T, Suzuki K, Fujita K. Endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones using a small caliber ureteroscope and a laser lithotriptor. J Urol 2000; 164(2): 329–331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Srivastava A, Ahlawat R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M. Management of impacted upper ureteric calculi: results of lithotripsy and percutaneous litholopaxy. Br J Urol 1992; 70(3): 252–257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Preminger GM. Management of ureteral calculi: the debate continues. J Urol 1992; 148(3 Pt 2): 1102–1104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al. Lower Pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis—initial results. J Urol 2001; 166(6): 2072–2080.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Havel D, Saussine C, Fath C, Lang H, Faure F, Jacqmin D. Single stones of the lower pole of the kidney: comparative results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 1998; 33(4): 396–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, Nyhuis AW, Woods JR. Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 1994; 151(3): 663–667.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuo RL, Lingeman JE, Leveillee RJ, et al. Lower Pole II: update results from a treatment comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) vs percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL) for lower pole stones >10mm in diameter. J Endourol 2003; 17(1): A31.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Middleton AW, Jr., Pfister RC. Stone-containing pyelocaliceal diverticulum: embryogenic, anatomic, radiologic and clinical characteristics. J Urol 1974; 111(1): 2–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wulfsohn MA. Pyelocaliceal diverticula. J Urol 1980; 123(1): 1–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams G, Blandy JP, Tresidder GC. Communicating cysts and diverticula of the renal pelvis. Br J Urol 1969; 41(2): 163–170.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yow RM, Bunts RC. Caliceal diverticulum. J Urol 1955; 73(4): 663–670.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Prather GC. Calyceal diverticulum. J Urol 1941; 45: 55.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jones JA, Lingeman JE, Steidle CP. The roles of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in the management of pyelocaliceal diverticula. J Urol 1991; 146(3): 724–727.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Psihramis KE, Dretler SP. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for caliceal diverticula calculi. J Urol 1987; 138(4): 707–711.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Auge BK, Munver R, Kourambas J, Newman GE, Preminger GM. Endoscopic management of symptomatic caliceal diverticula: a retrospective comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ureteroscopy. J Endourol 2002; 16(8): 557–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grasso M, Lang G, Loisides P, Bagley D, Taylor F. Endoscopic management of the symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculus. J Urol 1995; 153(6): 1878–1881.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fuchs GJ, Fuchs AM. Flexible endoscopy of the upper urinary tract: a new minimally invasive method for diagnosis and treatment. Urologe A 1990; 29(6): 313–320.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Batter SJ, Dretler SP. Ureterorenoscopic approach to the symptomatic caliceal diverticulum. J Urol 1997; 158(3 Pt 1): 709–713.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruckle HC, Segura JW. Laparoscopic treatment of a stone-filled caliceal diverticulum: a definitive, minimally invasive therapeutic option. J Urol 1994; 151(1): 122–124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller SD, Ng CS, Streem SB, Gill IS. Laparoscopic management of caliceal diverticular calculi. J Urol 2002; 167(3): 1248–1252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Auge BK, Munver R, Kourambas J, Newman GE, Wu NZ, Preminger GM. Neoinfundibulotomy for the management of symptomatic caliceal diverticula. J Urol 2002; 167(4): 1616–1620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hulbert JC, Reddy PK, Hunter DW, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Amplatz K, Lange PH. Percutaneous techniques for the management of caliceal diverticula containing calculi. J Urol 1986; 135(2): 225–227.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shalhav AL, Soble JJ, Nakada SY, Wolf JS, Jr, McClennan BL, Clayman RV. Long-term outcome of caliceal diverticula following percutaneous endosurgical management. J Urol 1998; 160(5): 1635–1639.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 2002; 167(3): 1253–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Goldfischer ER, Jabbour ME, Stravodimos KG, Klima WJ, Smith AD. Techniques of endopyelotomy. Br J Urol 1998; 82(1): 1–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jones DJ, Wickham JE, Kellett MJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for calculi in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 1991; 145(3): 481–483.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Locke DR, Newman RC, Steinbock GS, Finlayson B. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in horseshoe kidneys. Urology 1990; 35(5): 407–411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith JE, VanArsdalen KN, Hanno PM, Pollack HM. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment of calculi in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 1989; 142(3): 683–686.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Raj GV, Auge BK, Weizer AZ, et al. Percutaneous management of calculi within horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 2003; 170(1): 48–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Al-Otaibi K, Hosking DH. Percutaneous stone removal in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 1999; 162(3 Pt 1): 674–677.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Toth C, Holman E, Pasztor I, Khan AM. Laparoscoipcally controlled and assisted percutaneous transperitoneal nephrolithotomy in a pelvic dystopic kidney. J Endourol 1993; 7(4): 303–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee CK, Smith AD. Percutaneous transperitoneal approach to the pelvic kidney for endourologic removal of calculus: three cases with two successes. J Endourol 1992; 6: 133–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Figge M. Percutaneous transperitoneal nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 1988; 14(5): 414–416.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zafar FS, Lingeman JE. Value of laparoscopy in the management of calculi complicating renal malformations. J Endourol 1996; 10(4): 379–383.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Eshghi AM, Roth JS, Smith AD. Percutaneous transperitoneal approach to a pelvic kidney for endourological removal of staghorn calculus. J Urol 1985; 134(3): 525–527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kim SC, Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Lingeman JE. Laparoscopic assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy: best done tubeless? J Urol 2003; 169(4): S79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lam HS, Lingeman JE, Barron M, et al. Staghorn calculi: analysis of treatment results between initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy with reference to surface area. J Urol 1992; 147(5): 1219–1925.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Grasso M, Chalik Y. Principles and applications of laser lithotripsy: experience with the holmium laser lithotrite. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1998; 16(1): 3–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Streem SB, Yost A. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol 1990; 144(6): 1347–1348.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 1998; 16(6): 371–374.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cooper CS, Hedican SP. Mini-percutaneous ultrasonic nephrolithotripsy for pediatric staghorn calculi. J Urol 2003; 170(4 Pt 1): 1336–1337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lingeman JE, Smith LH, Woods JR, Newman DM. Urinary Calculi: ESWL, Endourology, and Medical Therapy. Lea and Febiger; Philadelphia; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Forsyth MJ, Fuchs EF. The supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 1987; 137(2): 197–198.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fuchs EF, Forsyth MJ. Supracostal approach for percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17(1): 99–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lang EK. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and lithotripsy: a multi-institutional survey of complications. Radiology 1987; 162(1 Pt 1): 25–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lingeman JE, Lifshitz DA, Evan AP. Surgical management of urinary lithiasis. In: Campbell’s Urology, 7th Ed. (Walsh PC, Vaughn ED, Wein AJ, eds.), WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1998, pp. 3361–3451.

    Google Scholar 

  59. LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ, Jr., Bender CE, Segura JW, Patterson DE, Benson RC. Colon perforation following percutaneous nephrostomy and renal calculus removal. Radiology 1985; 155(1): 83–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Davidoff R, Bellman GC. Influence of technique of percutaneous tract creation on incidence of renal hemorrhage. J Urol 1997; 157(4): 1229–1231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kim SC, Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Lingeman JE. Using and choosing a nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large or complex stone disease: a treatment strategy. J Endourol 2005; 19: 348–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ogan K, Corwin TS, Smith T, et al. Sensitivity of chest fluoroscopy compared with chest CT and chest radiography for diagnosing hydropneumothorax in association with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. chest radiography for diagnosing hydropneumothorax in association with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urology 2003; 62(6): 988–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kim SC, Kuo RL, Tinmouth WW, Watkins S, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for caliceal diverticular calculi: a novel single-stage approach. J Urol 2005; 173: 1194–1198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, S.C., Lingeman, J.E. (2006). Percutaneous Access to the Urinary Tract. In: Nakada, S.Y., Pearle, M.S. (eds) Advanced Endourology. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-954-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-954-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-446-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-954-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics