Skip to main content

Preanalytical Issues in Hemostasis and Thrombosis Testing

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Hemostasis and Thrombosis

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1646))

Abstract

Hemostasis testing is critical to many hemorrhagic and thrombotic disorders, wherein laboratory diagnostics can provide critical information for diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic monitoring. Due to this crucial role in modern medicine, hemostasis tests should be carried out at their highest degree of quality, thus encompassing standardization and monitoring of all phases of the testing process. It is now clearly established that the preanalytical phase is the most critical and vulnerable part of the total testing process, since up to 70% of diagnostic errors are due to highly manual activities encompassing patient preparation and collection of biological samples, as well as handling, transportation, preparation and storage of blood specimens. Due to the peculiar sample matrix required for hemostasis testing (i.e., plasma anticoagulated with buffered sodium citrate), additional critical issues may impair the reliability of these tests. Therefore, this article aims to provide an updated overview of the most important preanalytical variables that may ultimately impair the quality of hemostasis and thrombosis testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plebani M, Favaloro EJ, Lippi G (2012) Patient safety and quality in laboratory and hemostasis testing: a renewed loop? Semin Thromb Hemost 38:553–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, Adcock DM (2008) Preanalytical and postanalytical variables: the leading causes of diagnostic error in hemostasis? Semin Thromb Hemost 34:612–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC, Favaloro EJ (2012) Quality standards for sample collection in coagulation testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 38:565–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adcock Funk DM, Lippi G, Favaloro EJ (2012) Quality standards for sample processing, transportation, and storage in hemostasis testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 38:576–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Guidi GC (2006) Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing. Clin Lab 52:217–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lippi G, Cornes MP, Grankvist K, Nybo M, Simundic AM, Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE); European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) (2016) EFLM WG-Preanalytical phase opinion paper: local validation of blood collection tubes in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 54:755–760

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lima-Oliveira G, Salvagno GL, Lippi G, Danese E, Gelati M, Montagnana M, Picheth G, Guidi GC (2014) Could light meal jeopardize laboratory coagulation tests? Biochem Med (Zagreb) 24:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simundic AM, Cornes M, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M (2014) Standardization of collection requirements for fasting samples: for the Working Group on Preanalytical Phase (WG-PA) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). Clin Chim Acta 432:33–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lippi G, Maffulli N (2009) Biological influence of physical exercise on hemostasis. Semin Thromb Hemost 35:269–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Austin AW, Wirtz PH, Patterson SM, Stutz M, von Känel R (2012) Stress-induced alterations in coagulation: assessment of a new hemoconcentration correction technique. Psychosom Med 74:288–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Picheth G, Guidi GC (2012) Impact of the phlebotomy training based on CLSI/NCCLS H03-a6 - procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 22:342–351

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC, Salvagno GL, Brocco G, Danese E, Lippi G (2016) Estimation of the imprecision on clinical chemistry testing due to fist clenching and maintenance during venipuncture. Clin Biochem 49:1364–1367

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lippi G, Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC (2016) Does fist pumping/clenching during venipuncture activate blood coagulation? Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 27:357–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simundic AM, Church S, Cornes MP, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M, Nikolac N, van Dongen-Lases E, Eker P, Kovalevskaya S, Kristensen GB, Sprongl L, Sumarac Z (2015) Compliance of blood sampling procedures with the CLSI H3-A6 guidelines: an observational study by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 53:1321–1331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lippi G, Ippolito L, Favaloro EJ (2013) Technical evaluation of the novel preanalytical module on instrumentation laboratory ACL TOP: advancing automation in hemostasis testing. J Lab Autom 18:382–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lippi G, Plebani M, Favaloro EJ (2013) Interference in coagulation testing: focus on spurious hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia. Semin Thromb Hemost 39:258–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Simundic AM, Nikolac N, Ivankovic V, Ferenec-Ruzic D, Magdic B, Kvaternik M, Topic E (2009) Comparison of visual vs. automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye? Clin Chem Lab Med 47:1361–1365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Plebani M, Lippi G (2009) Hemolysis index: quality indicator or criterion for sample rejection? Clin Chem Lab Med 47:899–902

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (2007) Procedures for collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture; approved guideline, 6th edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. CLSI document H3-A6

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on drawing blood. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599221_eng.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2016

  21. Lippi G, Caputo M, Banfi G, Buttarello M, Cerotti F, Daves M et al (2008) Recommendations for collection of venous blood. RIMeL/IJLaM 4:249–258

    Google Scholar 

  22. Salvagno GL, Danese E, Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC, Lippi G (2013) Avoidance to wipe alcohol before venipuncture is not a source of spurious hemolysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 23:201–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Guidi GC (2005) Short-term venous stasis influences routine coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 16:453–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lima-Oliveira G, Salvagno GL, Lippi G, Montagnana M, Scartezini M, Picheth G, Guidi GC (2011) Elimination of the venous stasis error for routine coagulation testing by transillumination. Clin Chim Acta 412:1482–1484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ernst DJ, Ernst C (2002) Phlebotomy tools of the trade. Home Healthc Nurse 20:151–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M (2006) Influence of the needle bore size on platelet count and routine coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 17:557–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Guidi GC (2005) No influence of a butterfly device on routine coagulation assays and D-dimer measurement. J Thromb Haemost 3:389–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Guidi GC (2005) Influence of two different buffered sodium citrate concentrations on coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 16:381–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Adcock DM, Hoefner DM, Kottke-Marchant K, Marlar RA, Szamosi DI, Warunek DJ (2008) Collection, transport, and processing of blood specimens for testing plasma-based coagulation assays and molecular hemostasis assays: approved guideline-fifth edition. Clinical laboratory standards Institute, Wayne, PA., CLSI document H21-A5

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Picheth G, Guidi GC (2013) Sodium citrate vacuum tubes validation: preventing preanalytical variability in routine coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 24:252–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, Raijmakers MT, Vader HL, van der Graaf F (2010) Discard tubes are sometimes necessary when drawing samples for hemostasis. Am J Clin Pathol 134:851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lippi G, Plebani M, Favaloro EJ (2015) The changing face of hemostasis testing in modern laboratories: consolidation, automation, and beyond. Semin Thromb Hemost 41:294–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lippi G, Simundic AM (2012) Laboratory networking and sample quality: a still relevant issue for patient safety. Clin Chem Lab Med 50:1703–1705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lippi G, Lima-Oliveira G, Nazer SC, Moreira ML, Souza RF, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Scartezini M, Picheth G, Guidi GC (2011) Suitability of a transport box for blood sample shipment over a long period. Clin Biochem 44:1028–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zaninotto M, Tasinato A, Padoan A, Vecchiato G, Pinato A, Sciacovelli L, Plebani M (2012) Effects of sample transportation on commonly requested laboratory tests. Clin Chem Lab Med 50:1755–1760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Salvagno GL, Lippi G, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Poli G, Guidi GC (2009) Influence of temperature and time before centrifugation of specimens for routine coagulation testing. Int J Lab Hematol 31:462–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lippi G, Banfi G, Buttarello M, Ceriotti F, Daves M, Dolci A, Caputo M, Giavarina D, Montagnana M, Miconi V, Milanesi B, Mosca A, Morandini M, Salvagno GL (2007) Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 45:728–736

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Amukele TK, Sokoll LJ, Pepper D et al (2015) Can unmanned aerial systems (drones) be used for the routine transport of chemistry, hematology, and coagulation laboratory specimens? PLoS One 10:e0134020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C (2016) Biological samples transportation by drones: ready for prime time? Ann Transl Med 4:92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Amann G, Zehntner C, Marti F et al (2012) Effect of acceleration forces during transport through a pneumatic tube system on ROTEM® analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 50:1335–1342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Koçak FE, Yöntem M, Yücel O et al (2013) The effects of transport by pneumatic tube system on blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation and coagulation tests. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 23:206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Manzato F, Guidi GC (2007) Influence of the centrifuge time of primary plasma tubes on routine coagulation testing. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 18:525–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lippi G, Rossi R, Ippolito L, Zobbi V, Azzi D, Pipitone S, Favaloro EJ, Funk DM (2013) Influence of residual platelet count on routine coagulation, factor VIII, and factor IX testing in postfreeze-thaw samples. Semin Thromb Hemost 39:834–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Daves M, Giacomuzzi K, Tagnin E, Jani E, Adcock Funk DM, Favaloro EJ, Lippi G (2014) Influence of centrifuge brake on residual platelet count and routine coagulation tests in citrated plasma. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 25:292–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Favaloro EJ, Funk DMA, Lippi G (2012) Preanalytical variables in coagulation testing associated to diagnostic errors in hemostasis. Lab Med 43:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Adcock DM, Gelati M, Guidi GC, Favaloro EJ (2010) Right or wrong sample received for coagulation testing? tentative algorithms for detection of an incorrect type of sample. Int J Lab Hematol 32:132–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Favaloro EJ, Guidi GC (2009) Survey on the prevalence of hemolytic specimens in an academic hospital according to collection facility: opportunities for quality improvement. Clin Chem Lab Med 47:616–618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Adcock DM, Favaloro EJ, Lippi G (2016) Critical pre-examination variables in the hemostasis laboratory and their quality indicators. Clin Biochem 49:1315–1320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Lippi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Lippi, G., Favaloro, E.J. (2017). Preanalytical Issues in Hemostasis and Thrombosis Testing. In: Favaloro, E., Lippi, G. (eds) Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1646. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7194-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7196-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics