Abstract
In silico prediction methods have increasingly been valuable and popular in molecular biology, especially in human genetics, for deleteriousness prediction to filter and prioritize huge amounts of DNA variation identified by sequencing human genomes. There is a rich collection of available methods developed upon different levels/aspects of knowledge about how DNA variations affect gene expression. Given the fact that their predictions are not always consistent or even opposite of what was expected, using consensus prediction or majority vote among these methods is preferred to trusting any single one. Because querying different databases for different methods is both tedious and time-consuming for such big data sets, one database integrating predictions from multiple databases can facilitate the process. In this chapter, we describe the general steps of obtaining comprehensive predictions and annotations for large numbers of variants from dbNSFP, the first and probably the most widely used database of its kind.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Liu X, Jian X, Boerwinkle E (2011) dbNSFP: a lightweight database of human nonsynonymous SNPs and their functional predictions. Hum Mutat 32(8):894–899
Liu X, Jian X, Boerwinkle E (2013) dbNSFP v2.0: a database of human non-synonymous SNVs and their functional predictions and annotations. Hum Mutat 34(9):E2393–E2402
Liu X, Wu C, Li C, Boerwinkle E (2015) dbNSFP v3.0: a one-stop database of functional predictions and annotations for human non-synonymous and splice site SNVs. Hum Mutat 37(3):235–241. doi:10.1002/humu.22932
Jian X, Boerwinkle E, Liu X (2014) In silico prediction of splice-altering single nucleotide variants in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 42:13534–13544
Ng PC, Henikoff S (2001) Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res 11:863–874
Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7:248–249
Chun S, Fay JC (2009) Identification of deleterious mutations within three human genomes. Genome Res 19:1553–1561
Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D (2014) MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods 11:361–362
Reva B, Antipin Y, Sander C (2011) Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 39(17):e118
Shihab HA, Gough J, Cooper DN, Stenson PD, Barker GL, Edwards KJ, Day IN, Gaunt TR (2013) Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models. Hum Mutat 34:57–65
Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP (2012) Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS One 7(10):e46688
Carter H, Douville C, Stenson PD, Cooper DN, Karchin R (2013) Identifying Mendelian disease genes with the variant effect scoring tool. BMC Genomics 14(Suppl 3):3
Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, O'Roak BJ, Cooper GM, Shendure J (2014) A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat Genet 46:310–315
Quang D, Chen Y, Xie X (2015) DANN: a deep learning approach for annotating the pathogenicity of genetic variants. Bioinformatics 31:761–763
Shihab HA, Rogers MF, Gough J, Mort M, Cooper DN, Day IN, Gaunt TR, Campbell C (2015) An integrative approach to predicting the functional effects of non-coding and coding sequence variation. Bioinformatics 31:1536–1543
Dong C, Wei P, Jian X, Gibbs R, Boerwinkle E, Wang K, Liu X (2015) Comparison and integration of deleteriousness prediction methods for nonsynonymous SNVs in whole exome sequencing studies. Hum Mol Gene 24:2125–2137
Gulko B, Hubisz MJ, Gronau I, Siepel A (2015) A method for calculating probabilities of fitness consequences for point mutations across the human genome. Nat Genet 47:276–283
Davydov EV, Goode DL, Sirota M, Cooper GM, Sidow A, Batzoglou S (2010) Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++. PLoS Comput Biol 6(12):e1001025
Pollard KS, Hubisz MJ, Rosenbloom KR, Siepel A (2010) Detection of non-neutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res 20:110–121
Siepel A, Bejerano G, Pedersen JS, Hinrichs AS, Hou M, Rosenbloom K, Clawson H, Spieth J, Hillier LW, Richards S, Weinstock GM, Wilson RK, Gibbs RA, Kent WJ, Miller W, Haussler D (2005) Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res 15:1034–1050
Garber M, Guttman M, Clamp M, Zody MC, Friedman N, Xie X (2009) Identifying novel constrained elements by exploiting biased substitution patterns. Bioinformatics 25(12):i54–i62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Jian, X., Liu, X. (2017). In Silico Prediction of Deleteriousness for Nonsynonymous and Splice-Altering Single Nucleotide Variants in the Human Genome. In: Reeves, A. (eds) In Vitro Mutagenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1498. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6472-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6472-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6470-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6472-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols