Skip to main content

Evaluation of Three Sensor Types for Particle Motion Measurement

  • Conference paper
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 875))

Abstract

All fish sense acoustic particle motion; some species also sense pressure. Concern over the effects of anthropogenic sounds is increasing the need to monitor acoustic particle motion. Particle motion can be measured directly using vector sensors or calculated from pressure gradients. This article compares three devices that measure particle motion: a three-axis accelerometer, a three-axis velocity sensor, and two 4-element hydrophone arrays. A series of sounds (constant-wave tones, white noise, and Ricker wavelets) were played from a fixed-position projector. The particle motion of sounds from imploding light bulbs was also measured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beranek LL (1993) Acoustics. American Institute of Physics, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay RR (1984) The goldfish ear codes the axis of acoustic particle motion in three dimensions. Science 225:951–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacGillivray A, Racca R (2006) Sound pressure and particle velocity measurements from marine pile driving with bubble curtain mitigation. Can Acoust 34:58–59

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley RD, Fewtrell J, Popper AN (2003) High intensity anthropogenic sound damages fish ears. J Acoust Soc Am 113:638–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popper AN, Fay RR (1999) The auditory periphery in fishes. In: Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Comparative hearing: fish and amphibians. Springer, New York, pp 43–100

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Popper AN, Hastings MC (2009) The effects of anthropogenic sources of sound on fishes. J Fish Biol 75:455–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, Bouton N, van Opzeeland I, Coers A, ten Cate C, Popper AN (2010) A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends Ecol Evol 25:419–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeddies DG, Fay RR, Gray MD, Alderks PW, Acob A, Sisneros JA (2012) Local acoustic particle motion guides sound-source localization behavior in the plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. J Exp Biol 215:152–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Craig Evans, Bob Trider, and the crew of DCD Rocker for trial support and JASCO’s continuous support of our efforts to improve our acoustic measurement capability.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Zeddies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martin, B., Zeddies, D.G., Gaudet, B., Richard, J. (2016). Evaluation of Three Sensor Types for Particle Motion Measurement. In: Popper, A., Hawkins, A. (eds) The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 875. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_82

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics