Abstract
This study investigated the masking of pure tones by anthropogenic noises in humans and birds. Bird experiments were conducted in the laboratory using operant conditioning and psychophysical procedures but with anthropogenic noises rather than white noise. Humans were tested using equivalent psychophysical procedures in the field with ambient background noise. Results show that for both humans and birds published critical ratios can be used to predict the masking thresholds for pure tones by these complex noises. Thus, the species’ critical ratio can be used to estimate the effect of anthropogenic environmental noises on the perception of communication and other biologically relevant sounds.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bee MA, Buschermöhle M, Klump GM (2007) Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (II) Neural thresholds in the songbird forebrain. Eur J Neurosci 26:1979–1994
Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dooling RJ, Blumenrath SH (2013) Avian sound perception in noise. In: Brumm H (ed) Animal communication and noise. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 229–250
Dooling RJ, Fay RR, Popper AN (2000) Comparative hearing: birds and reptiles. Springer, New York
Fay RR (1988) Hearing in vertebrates: a psychophysics databook. Hill-Fay Associates, Winnetka
Lohr B, Wright TF, Dooling RJ (2003) Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space signal. Anim Behav 65:763–777
Okanoya K, Dooling RJ (1987) Hearing in passerine and psittacine birds: a comparative study of absolute and masked auditory thresholds. J Comp Psychol 101:7–15
Slabbekoorn H, Ripmeester AP (2007) Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Mol Ecol 17:72–83
Vélez A, Höbel G, Gordon NM, Bee MA (2007) Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 198:891–904
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by a grant to Robert J. Dooling from the National Park Service. We thank Ed Smith and Ryan Simmons for their help in conducting these experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dooling, R.J., Blumenrath, S.H. (2016). Masking Experiments in Humans and Birds Using Anthropogenic Noises. In: Popper, A., Hawkins, A. (eds) The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 875. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_28
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2980-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2981-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)