Skip to main content

Assistive Technology for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assistive Technologies for People with Diverse Abilities

Abstract

This chapter reviews research involving the use of assistive technology (AT) to support and empower postsecondary students with disabilities. Three areas of research related to AT for postsecondary students are reviewed, specifically: (a) survey research aimed at identifying the types of AT options available, (b) intervention studies designed to evaluate the potential benefits of AT, and (c) research aimed at identifying obstacles to the provision or continued use of AT. The chapter concludes that a wide array of AT options for students with varying disabilities exists. However, intervention research evaluating the potential benefits of the various forms of AT is sparse, precluding firm conclusions regarding the effects of any specific form of AT on postsecondary students’ educational outcomes. Furthermore, students with disabilities may struggle to obtain AT support from their institution of higher education, and even when AT is readily available, some students stop using it over time. Recommendations regarding AT for postsecondary students with disabilities are presented and directions for future research are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abreu-Ellis, C., & Ellis, J. B. (2006). The challenge of accommodation in higher education: A survey of adaptive technology use in Ontario universities. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, S., & Raharinirina, S. (2006). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21, 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 104 STAT. 327. http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.html. Accessed 15 June 2013

  • Ari, I. A., & Inan, F. A. (2010). Assistive technologies for students with disabilities: A survey of access and use in Turkish universities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B. R., Bryant, D. P., Shih, M., & Seok, S. (2010). Assistive technology and supports provision: A selective review of the literature and proposed areas of application. Exceptionality, 18, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2003). Assistive technology for people with disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgstahler, S. (2003). The role of technology in preparing youth with disabilities for postsecondary education and employment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. M. (2004). Assistive technology and universal instructional design: A postsecondary perspective. Equity and Excellence in Education, 37, 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day, S. L., & Edwards, B. J. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 486–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, K. K., & Judge, S. L. (2012). The efficacy of assistive technology on reading comprehension for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8, 48–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, A. (2011). Exploring the design, development and use of websites through accessibility and usability studies. Journal of Educational and Hypermedia, 20, 361–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison-Wade, D. F. (2012). Listening to their voices: Factors that inhibit or enhance postsecondary outcomes for students’ with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 27, 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobbo, K., & Shmulsky, S. (2012). Classroom needs of community college students with Asperger’s disorder and autism spectrum disorders. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36, 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G., Tiene, D., & Luft, P. (2002). Adoption of assistive technology for computer access among college students with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 80–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L., Asunda, P. A., Plant, S. J., & Goad, C. (2011). Asychronous online access as an accommodation on students with learning disabilities and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders in postsecondary STEM courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24, 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. A. (2009). Empowering library patrons with disabilities. Journal of Access Services, 6, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, C., & Uzeta, M. (2009). Assistive technology obligations for postsecondary education institutions. Journal of Access Services, 6, 12–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, W. M. (2011). College students with disabilities: A student development perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 154, 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpur, P., & Loudon, R. (2011). The barrier of the written word: analyzing universities’ polices to students with print disabilities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, T., & Shemesh, D. O. (2012). Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Use and contribution of assistive technology and website courses and their correlation to students’ hope and well-being. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 308–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (1997). The compensatory effectiveness of optical character recognition/speech synthesis on reading comprehension of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 8, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, A., & Silvestri, R. (2012). Assistive technology use by students with LD in postsecondary education: A case of application before investigation? Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, E. J., & Wolbring, G. (2012). Voices of “disabled” post secondary students: Examining higher education “disability” policy using an ableism lens. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Business Machines (IBM). (1991). Technology and persons with disabilities. Atlanta: IBM Corporate Support Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • King-Spears, M. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemes, J., Epstein, A., Zuker, M., Grinberg, N., & Ilovitch, T. (2006). An assistive computerized learning environment for distance learning students with disabilities. Open Learning, 21, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lartz, M. N., Stoner, J. B., & Stout, L. (2008). Perspectives of assistive technology from deaf students at a hearing university. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 5(1), 72–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, A. (2010). Welcome to my first rant! Report on a participatory pilot project to develop the AS portal an online peer support network for higher education students on the autism spectrum. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 4, 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Marrero, I., & Estrada-Hernandez, N. (2008). Assistive technology: An instructional tool to assist college students with written language disabilities. TechTrends, 52, 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moh, C. (2012). Student support services for post-secondary students with visual disabilities. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(22), 483–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mull, C. A., & Sitlington, P. L. (2003). The role of technology in the transition to postsecondary education of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, M. B. (2007). Using technology and other assistive strategies to aid students with disabilities in performing chemistry lab tasks. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 1697–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obringer, S. J., Coffey, K., McFadden, G., Etheridge, J., & Pounder, R. (2007). Keyboarding accuracy for a student with physical disabilities: A synergistic approach. Physical Disabilities Education and Related Services, 25, 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofiesh, N. S., Rice, C. J., Long, E. M., Merchant, D. C., & Gajar, A. H. (2002). Service delivery for postsecondary students with disabilities: A survey of technology use across disabilities. College Student Journal, 36, 94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Niell, L. P., Markwood, M. J., & French, J. P. (2011). Predictors of graduation among college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. R., & Banerjee, M. (2007). Leveling the digital playing field: Assessing the learning technology needs of college-bound students with LD and/or ADHD. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, M. M., Bates, B. R., & Angell, M. E. (2012). ‘What can I do to help?’: Postsecondary students with learning disabilities’ perceptions of instructors’ classroom accommodations. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 12, 224–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. L. (1995). Effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 18, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. L. (1998). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 27–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rath, K. A., & Royer, J. M. (2002). The nature and effectiveness of learning disability services for college students. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 353–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. D., & Stodden, R. A. (2005). The use of voice recognition software as a compensatory strategy for postsecondary education students receiving services under the category of learning disabled. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, L. (2006). Disability law and higher education: A road map for where we have been and where we may be heading. Maryland Law Review, 63(122), 101–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., Hennessey, J., Lovelace, T., & Hawkins, R. O. (2012). Use of a reading pen assistive technology to accommodate postsecondary students with reading disabilities. Assistive Technology, 24, 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, M. N., Johnson, D. R., Izzo, M., & Murray, A. (2005). An analysis of instructional accommodations and assistive technologies used by postsecondary graduates with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stodden, R. A., Conway, M. A., & Chang, K. B. T. (2003). Findings from the study of transition, technology, and postsecondary supports for youth with disabilities: Implications for secondary school educators. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stodden, R. A., Whelley, T., Chang, C., & Harding, T. (2001). Current status of educational support provisions to students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16, 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagayuna, A., Stodden, R. A., Chang, C., Zeleznik, M. E., & Whelley, T. A. (2005). A two-year comparison of support provision for persons with disabilities in postsecondary education. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T., Burgstahler, S., & Moore, E. J. (2010). Web accessibility: A longitudinal study of college and university home pages in the northwestern United States. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5, 108–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, K. W., Patterson, K. B., Syverud, S. M., & Seabrooks-Blackmore, J. J. (2008). Evidenced based practices that promote transition to postsecondary education: Listening to a decade of expert voices. Exceptionality, 16, 192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel, R. D., Wentz, J., & Markle, L. L. (2011). Power soccer: Experiences of students using power wheelchairs in a collegiate athletic club. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24, 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. W., Ollendick, T. H., & Bray, B. C. (2011). College students on the autism spectrum: Prevalence and associated problems. Journal of Research and Practice, 15, 683–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yelin, E., & Katz, P. (1994a). Labor force trends of persons with and without disabilities. Monthly Labor Review, 117, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yelin, E., & Katz, P. (1994b). Making work more central to disability policy. Milbank Quarterly, 72, 593–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell Lang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lang, R. et al. (2014). Assistive Technology for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities. In: Lancioni, G., Singh, N. (eds) Assistive Technologies for People with Diverse Abilities. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8029-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics