Abstract
This chapter reviews research involving the use of assistive technology (AT) to support and empower postsecondary students with disabilities. Three areas of research related to AT for postsecondary students are reviewed, specifically: (a) survey research aimed at identifying the types of AT options available, (b) intervention studies designed to evaluate the potential benefits of AT, and (c) research aimed at identifying obstacles to the provision or continued use of AT. The chapter concludes that a wide array of AT options for students with varying disabilities exists. However, intervention research evaluating the potential benefits of the various forms of AT is sparse, precluding firm conclusions regarding the effects of any specific form of AT on postsecondary students’ educational outcomes. Furthermore, students with disabilities may struggle to obtain AT support from their institution of higher education, and even when AT is readily available, some students stop using it over time. Recommendations regarding AT for postsecondary students with disabilities are presented and directions for future research are offered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abreu-Ellis, C., & Ellis, J. B. (2006). The challenge of accommodation in higher education: A survey of adaptive technology use in Ontario universities. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4, 31–41.
Alper, S., & Raharinirina, S. (2006). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21, 47–64.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 104 STAT. 327. http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.html. Accessed 15 June 2013
Ari, I. A., & Inan, F. A. (2010). Assistive technologies for students with disabilities: A survey of access and use in Turkish universities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 40–45.
Bryant, B. R., Bryant, D. P., Shih, M., & Seok, S. (2010). Assistive technology and supports provision: A selective review of the literature and proposed areas of application. Exceptionality, 18, 203–213.
Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2003). Assistive technology for people with disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Burgstahler, S. (2003). The role of technology in preparing youth with disabilities for postsecondary education and employment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 1–24.
Campbell, D. M. (2004). Assistive technology and universal instructional design: A postsecondary perspective. Equity and Excellence in Education, 37, 167–173.
Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18.
Day, S. L., & Edwards, B. J. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 486–492.
Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 33–41.
Floyd, K. K., & Judge, S. L. (2012). The efficacy of assistive technology on reading comprehension for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8, 48–64.
Foley, A. (2011). Exploring the design, development and use of websites through accessibility and usability studies. Journal of Educational and Hypermedia, 20, 361–385.
Garrison-Wade, D. F. (2012). Listening to their voices: Factors that inhibit or enhance postsecondary outcomes for students’ with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 27, 113–125.
Gobbo, K., & Shmulsky, S. (2012). Classroom needs of community college students with Asperger’s disorder and autism spectrum disorders. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36, 40–46.
Goodman, G., Tiene, D., & Luft, P. (2002). Adoption of assistive technology for computer access among college students with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 80–92.
Graves, L., Asunda, P. A., Plant, S. J., & Goad, C. (2011). Asychronous online access as an accommodation on students with learning disabilities and/or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders in postsecondary STEM courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24, 317–330.
Green, R. A. (2009). Empowering library patrons with disabilities. Journal of Access Services, 6, 59–71.
Guyer, C., & Uzeta, M. (2009). Assistive technology obligations for postsecondary education institutions. Journal of Access Services, 6, 12–35.
Hadley, W. M. (2011). College students with disabilities: A student development perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 154, 77–83.
Harpur, P., & Loudon, R. (2011). The barrier of the written word: analyzing universities’ polices to students with print disabilities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33, 153–167.
Heiman, T., & Shemesh, D. O. (2012). Students with learning disabilities in higher education: Use and contribution of assistive technology and website courses and their correlation to students’ hope and well-being. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 308–318.
Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (1997). The compensatory effectiveness of optical character recognition/speech synthesis on reading comprehension of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 8, 75–86.
Holmes, A., & Silvestri, R. (2012). Assistive technology use by students with LD in postsecondary education: A case of application before investigation? Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 81–97.
Hutcheon, E. J., & Wolbring, G. (2012). Voices of “disabled” post secondary students: Examining higher education “disability” policy using an ableism lens. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(1), 39–49.
International Business Machines (IBM). (1991). Technology and persons with disabilities. Atlanta: IBM Corporate Support Programs.
King-Spears, M. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 199–201.
Klemes, J., Epstein, A., Zuker, M., Grinberg, N., & Ilovitch, T. (2006). An assistive computerized learning environment for distance learning students with disabilities. Open Learning, 21, 19–32.
Lartz, M. N., Stoner, J. B., & Stout, L. (2008). Perspectives of assistive technology from deaf students at a hearing university. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 5(1), 72–91.
MacLeod, A. (2010). Welcome to my first rant! Report on a participatory pilot project to develop the AS portal an online peer support network for higher education students on the autism spectrum. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 4, 14–24.
Martinez-Marrero, I., & Estrada-Hernandez, N. (2008). Assistive technology: An instructional tool to assist college students with written language disabilities. TechTrends, 52, 56–62.
Moh, C. (2012). Student support services for post-secondary students with visual disabilities. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(22), 483–486.
Mull, C. A., & Sitlington, P. L. (2003). The role of technology in the transition to postsecondary education of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 26–32.
Neely, M. B. (2007). Using technology and other assistive strategies to aid students with disabilities in performing chemistry lab tasks. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 1697–1701.
Obringer, S. J., Coffey, K., McFadden, G., Etheridge, J., & Pounder, R. (2007). Keyboarding accuracy for a student with physical disabilities: A synergistic approach. Physical Disabilities Education and Related Services, 25, 59–66.
Ofiesh, N. S., Rice, C. J., Long, E. M., Merchant, D. C., & Gajar, A. H. (2002). Service delivery for postsecondary students with disabilities: A survey of technology use across disabilities. College Student Journal, 36, 94–108.
O’Niell, L. P., Markwood, M. J., & French, J. P. (2011). Predictors of graduation among college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25, 21–36.
Parker, D. R., & Banerjee, M. (2007). Leveling the digital playing field: Assessing the learning technology needs of college-bound students with LD and/or ADHD. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 5–14.
Quinlan, M. M., Bates, B. R., & Angell, M. E. (2012). ‘What can I do to help?’: Postsecondary students with learning disabilities’ perceptions of instructors’ classroom accommodations. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 12, 224–233.
Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. L. (1995). Effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 18, 141–158.
Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. L. (1998). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 27–40.
Rath, K. A., & Royer, J. M. (2002). The nature and effectiveness of learning disability services for college students. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 353–381.
Roberts, K. D., & Stodden, R. A. (2005). The use of voice recognition software as a compensatory strategy for postsecondary education students receiving services under the category of learning disabled. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 49–64.
Rothstein, L. (2006). Disability law and higher education: A road map for where we have been and where we may be heading. Maryland Law Review, 63(122), 101–138.
Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., Hennessey, J., Lovelace, T., & Hawkins, R. O. (2012). Use of a reading pen assistive technology to accommodate postsecondary students with reading disabilities. Assistive Technology, 24, 229–239.
Sharpe, M. N., Johnson, D. R., Izzo, M., & Murray, A. (2005). An analysis of instructional accommodations and assistive technologies used by postsecondary graduates with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 3–11.
Stodden, R. A., Conway, M. A., & Chang, K. B. T. (2003). Findings from the study of transition, technology, and postsecondary supports for youth with disabilities: Implications for secondary school educators. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 29–43.
Stodden, R. A., Whelley, T., Chang, C., & Harding, T. (2001). Current status of educational support provisions to students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16, 189–198.
Tagayuna, A., Stodden, R. A., Chang, C., Zeleznik, M. E., & Whelley, T. A. (2005). A two-year comparison of support provision for persons with disabilities in postsecondary education. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 13–21.
Thompson, T., Burgstahler, S., & Moore, E. J. (2010). Web accessibility: A longitudinal study of college and university home pages in the northwestern United States. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5, 108–114.
Webb, K. W., Patterson, K. B., Syverud, S. M., & Seabrooks-Blackmore, J. J. (2008). Evidenced based practices that promote transition to postsecondary education: Listening to a decade of expert voices. Exceptionality, 16, 192–206.
Wessel, R. D., Wentz, J., & Markle, L. L. (2011). Power soccer: Experiences of students using power wheelchairs in a collegiate athletic club. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24, 147–159.
White, S. W., Ollendick, T. H., & Bray, B. C. (2011). College students on the autism spectrum: Prevalence and associated problems. Journal of Research and Practice, 15, 683–701.
Yelin, E., & Katz, P. (1994a). Labor force trends of persons with and without disabilities. Monthly Labor Review, 117, 36–42.
Yelin, E., & Katz, P. (1994b). Making work more central to disability policy. Milbank Quarterly, 72, 593–620.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lang, R. et al. (2014). Assistive Technology for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities. In: Lancioni, G., Singh, N. (eds) Assistive Technologies for People with Diverse Abilities. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8029-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8029-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-8028-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-8029-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)