Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assistive Technology: An Instructional Tool to Assist College Students with Written Language Disabilities

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alliance for Technology Access, ATA. (2000). Current laws and legislation. In Alliance for Technology Access (Eds). Computer and web resources for people with disabilities: A guide to exploring today’s Assistive Technology. Alameda, CA: Hunter House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankfield, S., & Williams, S. (2003). Dyslexia, ‘Inspiration’ and academic writing. Cognitive Processing, 4, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2002). Assistive technology for people with disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catkins, L. M. (1991). Living between the lines. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. (1990). The impact of micro-computer word processing on the performance of learning disabled students in a required first year writing course. Computers and Compositions, 8, 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, S. L., & Edwards, B. J. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(5), 486–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley-Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disability Services in Higher Education. (2006). Scribes. Retrieved June 26, 2006, from http://www.disabilityresource.uic.edu/viewer.asp?tab=4&label=Scribes

  • Frank, A. R., & Sitlington, P. L. (2000). Young adults with mental disabilities: Does transition planning make a difference? Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35(2), 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, N., Hoy, C., McAlexander, P., & Hayes, C. (1991). Written sentence production error patterns of college writers with learning disabilities. Reading and Writing, 3(2), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design? In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. L., & Zvi, J. C. (1996). Assistive Technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: From research to practice. Annuals of Dyslexia, 45, 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (1995). Compensatory effectiveness of speech recognition on the written composition performance of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inspiration Software Inc. (2006). Inspiration. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.inspiration.com/

  • Lauffer, K. A. (2000). Accommodating students with specific writing disabilities. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 54(4), 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • LD Online. (2001). Adults with learning disabilities. Retrieved March 4, 2006, from http://ldonline.org/ld_indepth/adult/eric189.html

  • Li, H., & Hamel, C. M. (2003). Writing issues of college students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature from 1990 to 2000. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C. A. (1996). Using technology to enhance the writing processes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(4), 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Male, M. (2003). Technology for inclusion: Meeting the special needs of all students. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, G. A., Pollock, F., Morabito, S. M., & Jackson, K. (2002). Assistive and instructional technology for college students with disabilities: A national snapshot of postsecondary service providers. Journal of Special education Technology, 17, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mull, C. A., & Sitlington, P. L. (2003). The role of technology in the transition to postsecondary education of students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute For Literacy (NIFL). (2002). Adults with learning disabilities: Definitions and issues. Retrieved March 9, 2006, from http://www.nifl.gov/nifl/ld/archive/definiti.htm

  • Newcomer, P. L., & Barenbaum, E. M. (1991). The writing composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980 to 1990. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 578–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, S. (1992). Postsecondary learning disabled students. Do their study habits differ from those of their non disabled peers? Community/Junior College Quarterly, 16, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premier Assistive Technology. (2006). Talking Word Processor. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.premier-programming.com/home.htm

  • Reiser, R. A. (2002). Getting an instructional design position: Lessons from a personal history. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, D., & Smith, D. D. (1997). Teaching students with learning and behavior problems (3rd ed). Boston, MA: Allyn Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2003). Assistive technology “low-tech” to “hi-tech” considerations. Retrieved April 16, 2006, from http://www.nsnet.org/atc/tools/lowtohightech.html

  • ScanSoft (2006). Dragon naturally speaking. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.nuance.com/

  • Sills, C. K. (1995). Success for learning disabled writers across the curriculum. College Teaching, 43, 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitlington, P. L. (2003). Postsecondary education: The other transition. Exceptionality, 11(2), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). The condition of education 2003 (NCES 2003-067).

  • Ulman, J. G. (2005). Making technology work for learners with special needs. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland, N. (2003). Assistive technology. Southeastern Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center. Retrieved April 16, 2006, from http://www.seo-serrc.org/AT.htm

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Assistive Technology: An Instructional Tool to Assist College Students with Written Language Disabilities. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 52, 56–62 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0113-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0113-5

Keywords

Navigation