Skip to main content

Conceptual, Methodological, and Measurement Challenges in Addressing Return to Work in Workers with Musculoskeletal Disorders

  • Chapter
Handbook of Return to Work

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability ((SHHDW,volume 1))

Abstract

Traditionally, the problem of return to work for people with musculoskeletal disorders has been viewed primarily from a biomedical or biomechanical/ergonomic perspective. Research on the outcome of treatment, however, has illustrated the powerful influence of psychosocial factors, both clinical and occupational. There has been a similar broadening in focus from that of the individual worker to the workplace and from primary prevention of injury to secondary prevention of work absence and the adopting of integrated approaches to intervention encompassing both work retention and return to work. This review begins with reflections on the nature of the workplace, on the influence of musculoskeletal symptoms, and on the need for an overall conceptual framework for return to work. The Flags framework is offered as a way of identifying and tackling work absence and the determinants of successful return to work, conceptualized from a framework of obstacles to successful reintegration into work as considered both from a worker-centered and from a workplace or organizational perspective. In designing interventions, it is recommended that special attention be directed to the development of appropriate evaluations, the identification of relevant outcomes, and the establishment of workplace policies and practices likely to assist rather than hinder successful and sustained return to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, H. M., & Bunn, W. B. (2003). Using self-report and adverse event measures to track health’s impact on productivity in known groups. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 973–983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amick, B. C., III, Habeck, R. C., Hunt, A., Fossel, A. H., Chapin, A., Keller, R. B., et al. (2000). Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on word disability prevention and management. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amick, B. C., III, Habeck, R. V., Ossmann, J., Fossel, A. H., Keller, R., & Katz, J. N. (2004). Predictors of successful work role functioning after carpal tunnel release surgery. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, 490–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bockerman, P., & Laukkanen, E. (2010). Predictors of sickness absence and presenteeism: Does the pattern differ by a respondent’s health. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52, 332–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A., Hagen, S. E., Sathyanarayanan, S., Schultz, A. B., & Edington, D. W. (2010). Presenteeism: Critical issues. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52, 1055–1067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, S., Krol, B., Reneman, M. F., Bultmann, U., Franche, R.-L., van der Klink, J. J. L., et al. (2009). Behavioral determinants as predictors of RTW after long-term sickness absence: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19, 166–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, A. K., Battie, M. C., & Main, C. J. (1999). The relative importance of biomechanical and psychosocial factors in low back injuries. In W. Karowoski & W. S. Marras (Eds.), The handbook of industrial ergonomics (pp. 1127–1138). New York, NY: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, W. N., Chen, C. Y., Conti, D. J., Schultz, A. B., Pransky, G., & Edington, D. W. (2005). The association of health risks with on-the-job productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47, 769–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, W. N., Chen, C. Y., Conti, D. J., Schultz, A. B., & Edington, D. W. (2006). The association between health risk change and presenteeism change. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 48, 252–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, W. N., Pransky, G., Conti, D. J., Chen, C. Y., & Edington, D. W. (2004). The association of medical conditions and presenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, S38–S45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. J., Johnson, W. G., & Côté, P. (2007). It pays to be nice: Employer-worker relationships and the management of back pain claims. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 49, 214–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K. B., Nielsen, M. L., Rugulies, R., Smith-Hansen, L., & Kristensen, T. (2005). Workplace levels of psychosocial factors as prospective predictors of registered sickness absence. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47, 933–940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Black, K. M., Durand, M. J., Imbeau, D., Baril, R., & Loisel, P. (2007). Interdisciplinary team discussion on work environment issues related to low back disability: A multiple case study. Work, 28, 249–265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crombez, G., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Heautz, P. H. T. G., & Lysens, R. (1999). Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: Evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain, 80, 329–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J., Milner, R., Schultz, I. Z., & Stringer, B. (2002). Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 12, 277–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dagenais, S., Caro, J., & Haldeman, S. (2008). A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. The Spine Journal, 8(1), 8–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dasinger, L., Krause, N., Deegan, L., Brand, R. J., & Rudolph, L. (1999). Duration of work disability after low back injury: A comparison of administrative and self-reported outcomes. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 35, 619–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, C. E., von Korff, M., Koepsell, T. D., Deyo, R. A., Barlow, W. E., & Checkoway, H. (1999). A comparison of pain, functional status and work indices as outcome measures in back pain research. Spine, 24, 2339–2345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, M. J., Vezina, N., Loisel, P., Baril, R., Richard, M. C., & Diallo, B. (2007). Workplace interventions for workers with musculoskeletal disabilities: A descriptive review of content. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17, 123–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, J. M., & MacEachen, E. (1998). Health and social relations of work: A study of health-related experience of employees in small workplaces. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20, 896–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfering, A. (2006). Work-related outcome assessment instruments. European Spine Journal, 15, S32–S43.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, M. (1991). Multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation and management of work disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 11, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, M. (1996). Editorial: Does the workers’ compensation system think multidimensionality? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 6, 1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franche, R., & Krause, N. (2005). Readiness for return to work following injury or illness. In I. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: early risk identification and prevention (pp. 67–92). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007). The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 581–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goetzel, R. Z., Ozminkowski, R. J., & Long, S. R. (2003). Development and reliability analysis of the Work Productivity Short Inventory (WPSI) instrument measuring employee health and productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 743–762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H., Adefolarin, A. T., & Howe, T. E. (2011). A systematic review of instruments for the assessment of work-related psychosocial factors (Blue Flags) in individuals with non-specific low back pain. Manual Therapy, 16, 531–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habek, R. V., Leahy, M. J., Hunt, H. A., Chan, F., & Welsh, E. M. (1991). Employer factors related to worker’s compensation and disability management. Rehabilitation Council Bulletin, 34, 210–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. D., & Andersen, G. E. (2008). Going ill to work—What personal circumstances, attitudes, and work-related factors are associated with sick presenteeism? Social Science and Medicine, 67(6), 956–964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hensing, G., Alexanderson, K., Allebeck, P., & Bjurulf, P. (1998). How to measure sickness absence? Literature review and suggestion of five basic measures. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 26(2), 133–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iles, R. A., Davidson, M., & Taylor, N. F. (2008). Psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65, 507–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen, J. (2007). The Work Ability Index. Occupational Medicine, 57, 160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Work & Health (IWH). (2007). Seven principles for successful return to work. Retrieved from the Institute of Work & Health website: http://www.iwh.on.ca/seven-principles-for-rtw

  • Katz, J. N., Amick, B. C., III, Keller, R., Fossel, A. H., Ossman, J., Soucie, A., et al. (2005). Determinants of work absence after carpal tunnel surgery. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 47, 120–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, N. A. S., Burton, A. K., Main, C. J., & Watson, P. J. (2009). Musculoskeletal problems, a guide for the clinic and workplace: identifying obstacles using the psychosocial flags framework. London: The Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, N. A. S., Linton, S. L., & Main, C. J. (1997). Guide to assessing psychological Yellow Flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. Wellington: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Ames, M., Hymel, P., Loeppke, R., McKenas, D., Richling, D. E., et al. (2004). Using the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) to evaluate the indirect workplace costs of illness. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, S23–S37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Barber, B., Beck, A., Berglund, P. M., Cleary, D., McKenas, D., et al. (2003). The World Health Organization: Health and work performance questionnaire (HPQ). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 156–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet, H. C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53, 856–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, C., Pelletier, K. R., Murray, J. F., Sharda, C. E., Berger, M. L., Turpin, R. S., et al. (2002). Stanford Presenteeism Scale: Health status and employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44, 14–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, N., & Ragland, D. R. (1994). Occupational disability due to low back pain: A new interdisciplinary classification used in a phase model of disability. Spine, 19, 1011–1020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroenke, K., Spitzer, P. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, E., & McKinsey & Co. (2010). Engaged staff: what do they look like and why might you want them? Retrieved from The Good Work Commission website: http://www.goodworkcommission.co.uk/Assets/Docs/ReportsWithCovers/02.EngagedStaff.pdf/

  • Leeuw, M., Goossens, M. E., Linton, S. J., Crombez, G., Boersma, K., & Vlaeyen, J. W. (2007). The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: Current state of scientific evidence. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 77–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, D., Amick, B. C., III, Lee, J. C., Rooney, T., Rogers, W. H., Chang, H., et al. (2003). Relationship of employee-reported work limitations to work productivity. Medical Care, 41, 649–659.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, D., Amick, B. C., III, Rogers, W. H., Malspeis, S., Bungay, K., & Cynn, D. (2001). The work limitations questionnaire. Medical Care, 39, 72–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, S. J., Gross, D., Schultz, I. Z., Main, C. J., Côté, P., Pransky, G., et al. (2005). Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: Research issues and directions for future research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 459–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. H., Pizzi, L., & Frick, K. D. (2004). A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments. PharmacoEconomics, 22, 165–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loisel, P., & Durand, M. J. (2005). Working with the employer: the Sherbrooke model. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention and prevention (pp. 479–488). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loisel, P., Durand, M. J., Baril, R., Gervais, J., & Falardeau, M. (2005). Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: Perceptions of an interdisciplinary team. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 581–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loisel, P., Durand, M. J., Berthelette, D., Vezina, M., Baril, R., Gagnon, D., et al. (2001). Disability prevention: New paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Disability Management and Health Outcomes, 9, 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, B., Kroenke, K., Herzog, W., & Grafe, K. (2004). Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: Sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Journal of Affective Disorders, 81, 61–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, W., & Riedel, J. (2001). Measuring employee productivity: a guide to self-assessment tools. Scottsdale, AZ: Institute for Health and Productivity Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEachen, E., Clarke, J., Franche, R. L., & Irvin, E. (2006). Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32, 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachen, E., Kosny, A., Ferrier, S., & Chambers, L. (2010). The Toxic dose of system problems: Why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20, 349–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Main, C. J., Phillips, C. J., & Watson, P. J. (2005). Secondary prevention in health care and occupational settings in musculoskeletal conditions focusing on low back pain. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention and prevention (pp. 387–404). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, C. J., Shaw, W. S., & Mitchell, J. (2015). Towards an approach to return to work in work interventions in musculoskeletal disorders. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of return to work: from research to practice. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallen, C. D., Peat, G., Thomas, E., Dunn, K. M., & Croft, P. R. (2007). Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A systematic review. British Journal of General Practice, 57, 655–661.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marhold, C., Linton, S. J., & Melin, L. (2002). Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: Evaluation of a questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 12, 65–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattke, S., Balakrishnan, A., Bergamo, G., & Newberry, S. J. (2007). A review of methods to measure health-related productivity loss. American Journal of Managed Care, 13, 211–217.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M., DiBonaventura, M., Da, C., & Ullman, S. (2011). Musculoskeletal pain in the workforce: The effects of back, arthritis, and fibromyalgia pain on quality of life and work productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53, 765–770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melloh, M., Elfering, A., Egli Presland, C., Roeder, C., Barz, T., Rolli Salathé, C., et al. (2009). Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: A review of screening instruments. International Orthopaedics, 33, 301–313.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mielenz, T. J., Garrett, J. M., & Carey, T. S. (2008). Association of psychosocial work characteristics with low back pain outcomes. Spine, 33, 1270–1275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munir, F., Yarker, J., & Haslam, C. (2008). Sickness absence management: Encouraging attendance or “risk taking” presenteeism in employees with chronic illness? Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 1461–1472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nice, K., & Thornton, P. (2004). Job retention and rehabilitation pilot: employers’ management of long-term sickness absence. Retrieved from the Social Policy Research Unit website: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/pubs/pdf/rrep227.pdf

  • Nicholas, M. K., Watson, P. J., Linton, S. J., & Main, C. J. (2011). The identification and management of psychosocial risk factors (yellow flags) in patients with low back pain. Physical Therapy, 91, 737–753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozminkowski, R. J., Goetzel, R. Z., Chang, S., & Long, S. (2004). The application of two health and productivity instruments at a large employer. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, 635–648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozminkowski, R. J., Goetzel, R. Z., & Long, S. R. (2003). A validity analysis of the Work Productivity Short Inventory (WPSI) instrument measuring employee health and productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 1183–1195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, T., Burton, A. K., Vogel, S., & Field, A. P. (2002). A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine, 27, E109–E120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pransky, G., Benjamin, K., Hill-Fotouhi, C., Fletcher, K. E., Himmelstein, J., & Katz, J. N. (2002). Work-related outcomes in occupational low back pain. Spine, 27, 864–870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pransky, G., Shaw, W. S., Franche, R. L., & Clarke, A. (2004). Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers and insurers-current models and opportunities for improvement. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 625–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, M., Wahlqvist, P., Shikiar, R., & Shih, Y. T. (2004). A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity. PharmacoEconomics, 22, 225–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, M., & Morris, R. (1983). A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine, 8, 141-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, K., Tilse, E., Nicholson, J., Oldenberg, B., & Graves, N. (2007). Which presenteeism measures are more sensitive to depression and anxiety? Journal of Affective Disorders, 101, 65–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, P., & Vainio, H. (2010). Well-being at work – Overview and perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 36, 422–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. B., & Edington, D. W. (2007). Employee health and presenteeism: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17, 547–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., Stowell, A. W., Feuerstein, M., & Gatchel, R. J. (2007). Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17, 327–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. M., & Riedel, J. (2010). Productivity and health: Best practices for better measures of productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52, 865–871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Severens, J., Mulder, L., Laheij, R., & Verbeek, A. (2000). Precision and accuracy in measuring absence from work as a basis for calculating productivity costs in the Netherlands. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, H. S., Robson, L. S., & Sale, J. E. (2001). Creating safer and healthier workplaces: Role of organizational factors and job characteristics. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 40, 319–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, H. S., Walters, V., Lewchuk, W., Richardson, J., Moran, L. A., Haines, T., et al. (1996). Workplace organizational correlates of lost-time accident rates in manufacturing. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29, 258–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. S., Pransky, G., Winters, T., Tveito, T. H., Larson, S. M., & Roter, D. S. (2009a). Does the presence of psychosocial “Yellow Flags” alter patient-provider communication for work-related acute low back pain? Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 51, 1032–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. S., Pransky, P., & Fitzgerald, T. E. (2001). Early prognosis for low back disability: Intervention strategies for health care providers. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 815–828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. S., Pransky, G. S., & Main, C. J. (2012). Work-related risk factors for transition to chronic back pain and disability. In M. I. Hasenbring, A. C. Rusu, & D. C. Turk (Eds.), From acute to chronic back pain: Risk factors, mechanisms and clinical implications (pp. 377–378). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. S., van der Windt, D. A. W., Main, C. J., Loisel, P., & Linton, S. J. (2009b). “Now tell me about your work”: The feasibility of early screening and intervention to address occupational factors (“Blue Flags”) in back disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19, 64–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. (1998). Presenteeism, power and organizational change: Long hours as a career barrier and the impact on working lives of women managers. British Journal of Management, 9, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenstra, I. A., Verbeek, J. H., Heymans, M. W., & Bongers, P. M. (2005). Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 851–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. F., Ricci, J. A., Leotta, C., & Chee, E. (2004). Validation of the work and health interview. PharmacoEconomics, 22, 1127–1140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M., Feuerstein, M., Gatchel, R. J., Linton, S., & Pransky, G. (2005). Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 475–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K., MacDermid, J. C., & Amick, B. C. (2011). The 11-item Workplace Organizational Policies and Practice Questionnaire (OPP-11): Examination of the construct validity, factor structure and predictive validity in injured workers with upper-limb disorders. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 54, 834–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Truchon, M., & Fillion, L. (2000). Biopsychosocial determinants of chronic disability and low-back pain: A review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10, 117–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpin, R. S., Ozminkowski, R. J., Sharda, C. E., Collins, J. J., Berger, M. L., Billotti, G. M., et al. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Stanford presenteeism scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, 1123–1133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Heuvel, S. G., Geuskens, G. A., Hooftman, W. E., Koppes, L. L. J., van den Bockerman, P., & Laukkanen, E. (2010). Predictors of sickness absence and presenteeism: Does the pattern differ by a respondent’s health. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52, 332–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varekamp, I., Verbeek, J. A. M., & van Dijk, F. J. H. (2006). How can we help employees with chronic diseases to stay at work? A review of interventions aimed at job retention and based on an empowerment perspective. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 80, 87–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, G. (1987). 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences: A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine, 12, 632–644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, G., Aylward, M., & Sawney, P. (2002). Back pain, incapacity for work and social security benefits: An international literature review and analysis. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, G., & Burton, A. K. (2006). Is work good for your health and well-being? London: The Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, G., Burton, A. K., & Main, C. J. (2003). Screening of DWP clients for risk of long-term incapacity: A conceptual and scientific review. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenig, C. W., Schmidt, C. O., Kohlmann, T., & Schweikert, B. (2009). Costs of back pain in Germany. European Journal of Pain, 13, 280–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickizer, T. M., Franklin, G., Plaeger-Brockway, R., & Mootz, R. D. (2001). Improving the quality of workers’ compensation healthcare delivery: The Washington state occupational health services provision. Milbank Quarterly, 79, 5–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Jones, G., Buck, R., Varnava, A., Phillips, C., & Main, C. J. (2011). Impacts on work performance: What matters six months on? Occupational Medicine, 61, 205–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Jones, G., & Main, C. J. (2010). The potential for prevention: Occupation. In P. Croft, F. M. Blyth, & D. van der Windt (Eds.), Chronic pain epidemiology: From aetiology to public health (pp. 313–327). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Gignac, M. A. M., Beaton, D., Tang, K., & Anis, A. H. (2010). Productivity loss due to presenteeism among patients with arthritis: Estimates from four instruments. The Journal of Rheumatism, 37, 1805–1814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris J. Main .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Main, C.J., Shaw, W.S. (2016). Conceptual, Methodological, and Measurement Challenges in Addressing Return to Work in Workers with Musculoskeletal Disorders. In: Schultz, I., Gatchel, R. (eds) Handbook of Return to Work. Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7627-7_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics