Skip to main content

Gross and Microscopic Lesions Produced by Phenol Neurolytic Procedures

  • Chapter
Techniques of Neurolysis

Part of the book series: Current Management of Pain ((CUMP,volume 4))

Abstract

The primary purpose of this brief discourse is to show, in pictorial form, the morphological changes that occur when phenol is applied to neural structures. According to Katz and Joseph [1], most studies on morphologic changes caused by neurolytic agents have been done with phenol. It generally is accepted that the primary neurolytic effect is a result of protein denaturation. When concentrations of 5% or more in water are applied directly to tissue, protein coagulation and necrosis occur. However, phenol has been suggested to have a greater affinity for vascular tissue than for neuronal tissue, thereby tending to cause neural lesions via interference with blood flow [2, 3]. When we [4] compared morphological changes that occurred following epidural and subarachnoid injection of phenol, no spinal cord damage was noted in the former case (see figure 12–3). In contrast, massive neural tissue damage occurred following subarachnoid injection. Blood vessels with normal morphology were present in areas of spinal cord destruction (see figure 12–4), illustrating a direct neurotoxic effect of phenol rather than an effect secondary to vascular destruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katz J, Joseph JW. 1972. Neuropathology of neurolytic and semidestructive agents, In Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh B (eds): Neural Blockade. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott Co. 122–132.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nour-Eldin F. 1970. Uptake of phenol by vascular and brain tissue. Microvasc Res 2. 224–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Totoki T, et al. 1979. Anterior spinal artery syndrome—a complication of cervical intrathecal phenol injection. Pain 6. 99–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Racz GB, Heavner J, Haynsworth R. 1985. Repeat epidural phenol injections in chronic pain and spasticity, In Lipton S, Miles J (eds): Persistent Pain, Vol 5. London, Grune and Stratton. 157–179.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wood KM. 1978. The use of phenol as a neurolytic agent: a review. Pain 5. 205–229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moller JE, Helweg-Larson J, Jacobsen E. 1969. Histopathological lesions in the sciatic nerve of the rat following perineural application of phenol and alcohol solutions. Dan Med Bull 16. 116–119.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burkel WE, McPhee M. 1970. Effect of phenol injection into peripheral nerve of rat: electron microscope studies. Arch Phys Med Rehab 51. 391–397.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Gabor B. Racz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heavner, J.E., Racz, G.B. (1989). Gross and Microscopic Lesions Produced by Phenol Neurolytic Procedures. In: Racz, G.B. (eds) Techniques of Neurolysis. Current Management of Pain, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6721-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6721-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-6723-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6721-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics