Abstract
The role of law and medicine in controlling applied human genetics has been and continues to be complex in our society. It is not the intention of this discussion to analyze the multifaceted nature of the relationships among law, medicine, and genetics, but rather to select for purposes of discussion a limited facet of this large topic. Since the early 1900’s the institutional base of applied human genetics has changed significantly. With these changes the role of law and medicine has varied in terms of controlling the uses of, or limiting access to human genetics in the solution of a large number of problems. It is the intent of this discussion to examine some of the major changes in the institutional base of applied human genetics, comparing the period from 1900 to 1930 with the period from the late 1950’s up to the present. Our specific interest will be to analyze the manner in which law and medicine have acted as regulatory vehicles over applied human genetics during these two periods. It should be noted that in the following discussion attention is given primarily to control of the application of genetic knowledge and technologies. We are not concerned with the role of law and medicine as regulatory vehicles encouraging or imposing constraints on the discovery of genetic knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Haller, M.H., “Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought,” Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (1963).
Ludmerer, K.M., “Genetics and American Society: A Historical Appraisal,” The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1972)
Allen, G.E., Science and society in the eugenic thought of H.J. Müller, in “Genetics and Society”, J.B. Bressler (ed.), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1973).
Sarason, S. and Dorrs, J., “Psychological Problems in Mental Deficiency,” Harper and Row, New York (1969).
Pickens, D.K., “Eugenics and the Progressives,” Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville (1968).
Farrow, M., Juberg, R., Genetics and laws ‘prohibiting’ marriage in the United States, J.A.M.A. 209: 534 (1969).
Ludmerer, K.M., The American geneticist and the eugenic movement; 1905–1935, J. Hist. Biol. 2: 337 (1969).
Scheinfeld, A., The public and human genetics, Acta Genet. Stat. Med. 7: 487 (1957).
Sorenson, J.R., “Social and Psychological Aspects of Applied Human Genetics: A Bibliography,” Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 73–412 (1973).
Bergsma, D., Zappa, M., Roblin, R. et al (eds.), “Dimensions of Screening for Human Genetic Disease,” Stratton Intercontinental Medical Book Corp., New York (1974).
Milunsky, A., “The Prenatal Diagnosis of Hereditary Disorders,” Charles C. Thomas, Springfield (1973).
Powledge, T., Genetic screening as a political and social development, in Dimensions of Screening for Human Genetic Disease, D. Bergsma, M. Zappa, R. Roblin et al (Eds.), Stratton Intercontinental Medical Book Corp., New York (1974).
Hammonds, H., “Hereditary Counseling” American Eugenics Society, New York (1957).
National Foundation-March of Dimes, International Directory of Genetic ServicesNew York (1974).
Epstein, C., Who should do genetic counseling and under what circumstances, in “Birth Defects Original Article Series,” D. Bergsma (ed.) Vol. IX, p. 39.
Sorenson, J., Biomedical innovation, uncertainty, and doctor-patient interaction, J. Hlth Soc. Behav. 15 (4): 366 (1974).
Motulsky, A., Fräser, G., Felsenstein, J., Public health and long-term genetic implications of intrauterine diagnosis and selective abortion, in Birth Defects: Original Article Series Vol. VII, No. 5, p. 227
Leonard, C., Chase, G. and Childs, B., Genetic counseling: a consumer’s view, New Eng. J. Med. 287: 433 (1972).
Carter, C., Evans, K., Fraser-Roberts, J.A. et al, Genetic clinic: a follow-up, Lancet 1: 281 (1971).
Golbus, M., Conte, F., Schneider, E. et al, Intrauterine diagnosis of genetic defects, Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 118: 897 (1974).
Hilton, B., Callahan, D., Harris, M. et al, “Ethical Issues in Human Genetics,” Plenum Press, New York (1973).
Freidman, J., “Legal Implications of Amniocentesis,” Univ. of Penn. Law Rev. 123: 92 (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sorenson, J.R. (1976). From Social Movement to Clinical Medicine — The Role of Law and the Medical Profession in Regulating Applied Human Genetics. In: Milunsky, A., Annas, G.J. (eds) Genetics and the Law. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2229-0_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2229-0_43
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2231-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2229-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive