Genetics and the Law

  • Editors
  • Aubrey Milunsky
  • George J. Annas

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages iii-xii
  2. The Fetus and the Newborn

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 1-1
    2. Margery W. Shaw, Catherine Damme
      Pages 3-18
    3. Harold P. Green
      Pages 19-28
    4. Leonard H. Glantz
      Pages 29-43
    5. Aubrey Milunsky, George J. Annas
      Pages 45-52
    6. Aubrey Milunsky, George J. Annas
      Pages 61-62
    7. Alan M. Dershowitz
      Pages 63-71
    8. Aubrey Milunsky, George J. Annas
      Pages 87-101
  3. Genetic Counseling — Mass Population Screening for Homozygotes and Heterozygotes

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 103-103
    2. Kurt Hirschhorn
      Pages 105-110
    3. Aubrey Milunsky, George J. Annas
      Pages 123-132
    4. Aubrey Milunsky, George J. Annas
      Pages 185-194
  4. Genetics and Family Law

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 195-195

About this book

Introduction

Society has historically not taken a benign view of genetic disease. The laws permitting sterilization of the mentally re­ tarded~ and those proscribing consanguineous marriages are but two examples. Indeed as far back as the 5th-10th centuries, B.C.E., consanguineous unions were outlawed (Leviticus XVIII, 6). Case law has traditionally tended toward the conservative. It is reactive rather than directive, exerting its influence only after an individual or group has sustained injury and brought suit. In contrast, state legislatures have not been inhibited in enacting statutes. Many of their products can be characterized as hasty, unnecessary, ill-conceived, and based on the heart rather than the head. Moreover the lack of expert consultation sought has also been remarkable. One state legislature, for example, has advocated immunization for sickle cell anemia! Many others have enacted laws for the screening of inborn errors of metabolism, e.g., phenylketon­ uria, but have poorly defined the lines of responsibility to secure compliance. A spate of specific disease-related bills has emerged in the u.S. Congress, each seeking recognition and appropriations. Sickle cell anemia, hemophilia, Cooley's anemia and Tay-Sachs disease have been among the front-runners for support. Finally, in 1975, Congress has begun to examine an omnibus bill concerning all forms of genetic disease. The bill, termed the National Genetic Diseases Act is, however, still far from being enacted.

Keywords

Nation cognition ethics genetics medical profession profession

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2229-0
  • Copyright Information Springer-Verlag US 1976
  • Publisher Name Springer, Boston, MA
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-1-4684-2231-3
  • Online ISBN 978-1-4684-2229-0
  • About this book