Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Scent Marks as Competitive Signals of Mate Quality

  • Chapter
Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates

Abstract

Much attention has focused on whether particular qualities of an individual’s odor are used in mate choice, to maximise offspring fitness. Odors can provide genetic information directly, thus allowing animals to avoid mating with close relatives or with those carrying deleterious alleles. Odor quality can also reflect the physical status of potential mates such as their parasite burdens, social and hormonal status or the quality of their food resources. Under competitive pressure, subordinates may suppress the production of odors attractive to mates if these provoke aggressive competition from dominant animals. In addition to such information inherent in an individual’s odor, scent marks deposited in the environment advertise the size and quality of an individual’s territory, while counter-marking competitors’ marks is an important behavior for advertising social dominance. In this paper we discuss how the pattern of scent marks deposited by competing individuals provides a reliable signal not only of territory ownership or social dominance but also of the current competitive ability of territory owners or animals advertising dominance. Since scent marks remain in the environment, they provide continuous proof of the challenges that have occurred between individuals. We use data from experiments manipulating marks in the territories of male house mice to show how females use this when choosing a mate. Competitive counter-marking appears to be an important signal of a mate’s quality which may help to explain the prevalence of counter-marking between neighbours even when they are highly familiar with each other and their respective territory borders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bacchini A., Gaetani E. & Cavaggioni, A. 1992. Pheromone binding proteins of the house mouse Mus musculus. Experientia, 48, 419–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C.J., Hurst, J.L. & Aldhous, P. 1991. Of mice and kin: the functional significance of kin bias in social behaviour. Biol. Rev., 66, 379–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, G.K., Yamazaki K., Duncan H., Bard J. & Boyse, E.A. 1990. Genetic determination of individual mouse odor. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5 (Ed. by D.W. Macdonald, D. Muller-Schwarze & S.E. Natynczuk), pp 244–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bel, M.C., Porteret C. & Coulton, J. 1995. Scent deposition by cheek rubbing in the alpine marmot (Marmota marmota) in the French alps. Can. J. Zool., 73, 2065–2071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M.J. & Chevins, P.F.D. 1987. Urine odors and marking patterns in territorial laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Behav. Process., 15, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.E. 1995. What is the role of the immune system in determining individually distinct body odors. Int. J. Pharmacol., 17, 655–661.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.E. & Macdonald, D.W. 1985. Social Odors in Mammals Vols 1 & 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M.M. & Galef, B.G. 1994. A male gerbil’s intrauterine position affects female response to his scent marks. Physiol. Behav., 55, 1137–1139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins C., Maruniak, J.A. & Bronson, F.H. 1973. Social rank in the house mouse: differentiation revealed by ultraviolet of urinary marking patterns. Science, 182, 939–941.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drickamer, L.C. 1992. Oestrous female house mice discriminate dominant from subordinate males and sons of dominant from sons of subordinate males by odor cues. Anim. Behav., 43, 868–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Udine B. & Alleva, E. 1983. Early experience and sexual preferences in rodents. In: Mate Choice (Ed. by P. Bateson), pp. 311–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert F., Holler C., Luszyk D., Muller-Ruchholtz W. & Ferstl, R. 1996. MHC-associated and MHC-independent urinary chemosignals in mice. Physiol. Behav, 59, 57–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge S., Sandell M. & Brinck, C. 1982. Scent-marking and its territorial significance in stoats, Mustela erminea Anim. Behav, 30, 811–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklund A., Egid K. & Brown, J.L. 1992. Sex differences in the use of the major histocompatability complex for mate selection in congenic strains of mice. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 6 (Ed. by R.L. Doty & D. Muller-Schwarze), pp. 213–217. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, C.R. 1990. Scent marking, residency and female choice in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). In Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5 (eds D.W. Macdonald, D. Muller-Schwarze & S.E. Natynczuk), pp. 329–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferkin, M.H., Burda J., O’Connor, M.P. & Lee, C.J. 1995. Persistence of the attractiveness of two sex-specific scents in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ethology, 101, 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferkin, M.H., Sorokin, E.S., Johnston, R.E. & Lee, C.J. 1997. Attractiveness of scents varies with protein content of the diet in meadow voles. Anim. Behav, 53, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galef, B.G. & Wigmore, S.W. 1983. Transfer of information concerning distant food sites: a laboratory investigation of the’ information-center’ hypothesis. Anim. Behav, 31, 748–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M.L. 1984. Scent marking and territoriality. Acta Zool. Fennica, 171, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M.L. 1990. Scent marking strategies in mammals. Rev. suisse Zool., 97, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L.M. 1972. The construction of antorbital gland marking sites by male oribi (Ourebia ourebia, Zimmermann, 1983). Z. Tierpsychol, 30, 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L.M. 1982. A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Z.Tierpsychol., 60, 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L.M. 1985. The even-toed ungulates: order Artiodactyla. In: Social Odors in Mammals Vol.2 (Ed. by R.E. Brown & D.W. Macdonald), pp. 550–618. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, L.M. 1990. Scent marking by resource holders: alternative mechanisms for advertising the costs of competition. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5 (ed. D.W. Macdonald, D. Muller-Schwarze & S.E. Natynczuk) pp. 315–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling L.M. & McKay H.V. 1990. Competitor assessment by scent-matching: an experimental test. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, 26, 415–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey S., Jemiolo B. & Novotny, M. 1989. Pattern of volatile compounds in dominant and subordinate male mouse urine. J. Chem. Ecol., 75, 2061–2072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, J.L. 1987. The functions of urine marking in a free-living population of house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty. Anim. Behav, 35, 1433–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, J.L. 1990a. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. I. Communication between males. Anim. Behav, 40, 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, J.L. 1990b. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. III. Communication between the sexes. Anim. Behav, 40, 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, J.L. 1993. The priming effects of urine substrate marks on interactions between male house mice, Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz & Schwarz. Anim. Behav, 45, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, J.L., Robertson, D.H.L., Tolladay U. & Beynon, R.J. 1998. Proteins in urine scent marks of male house mice extend the longevity of olfactory signals. Anim. Behav., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jemiolo B., Alberts J., Sochinski-Wiggins S. & Harvey, S. 1985. Behavioural and endocrine responses of female mice to synthetic analogs of volatile compounds in male urine. Anim. Behav., 33, 1114–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemiolo B., Harvey S. & Novotny, M.1986. Promotion of the Whitten effect in female mice by synthetic analogs of male urinary constituents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 8, 4576–4579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemiolo R., Xie, T.-M. & Novotny, M. 1991. Socio-sexual olfactory preference in female mice: attractiveness of synthetic chemosignals. Physiol. Behav, 50, 1119–1122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jemiolo B., Xie, T.-M. & Novotny, M.1992. Urine marking in male mice: responses to natural and synthetic chemosignals. Physiol. Behav., 52, 521–526.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.P. 1973. Scent marking in mammals. Anim. Behav, 21, 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E. 1995. Responses to individual signatures in scent counter-marks: a striking new phenomenon. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 7 (Ed. by R. Apfelbach, D. Muller-Schwarze, K. Reutter & E. Weiler), pp. 361–369. Oxford: Elsevier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E., Chiang G. & Tung, C. 1994. The information in scent over-marks of golden hamsters. Anim. Behav, 48, 323–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E., Munver R. & Tung, C. 1995. Scent counter marks: selective memory for the top scent by golden hamsters. Anim. Behav, 49, 1435–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E. & Schmidt, 1979. Responses of hamsters to scent marks of different ages. Behav. neural. Biol, 26, 64–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E., Sorokin, E.S. & Ferkin, M.H.1997a. Scent counter-marking by male meadow voles: females prefer the top-scent male. Ethology, 103, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.E., Sorokin, E.S. & Ferkin, M.H. 1997b. Female voles discriminate males’ over-marks and prefer topscent males. Anim. Behav, 54, 679–690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, A. 1966. Lemur Behaviour: A Madagascar Field Study. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.B. & Nowell, N.W. 1973. Aversive and aggression-promoting properties of urine from dominant and subordinate male mice. Anim. Learn. Behav., 1, 207–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.B. & Nowell, N.W. 1974. A comparison of the aversive and female attractant properties of urine from dominant and subordinate male mice. Anim. Learn. Behav., 2, 141–144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.B. & Nowell, N.W. 1975. Effects of clean and soiled sawdust substrates and of different urine types upon aggressive behaviour in male mice. Aggress. Behav, 1, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.B. & Nowell, N.W. 1989. Aversive potency of urine from dominant and subordinate male laboratory mice (Mus musculus): resolution of a conflict. Aggress. Behav, 15, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavaliers M. & Colwell, D.D. 1995a. Odors of parasitized males induce aversive responses in female mice. Anim. Behav, 50, 1161–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavaliers M. & Colwell, D.D. 1995b. Discrimination by female mice between the odors of parasitized and non-parasitized males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 261, 31–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lennington, S. 1983. Social preferences for partners carrying’ good genes’ in wild house mice. Anim. Behav, 31, 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenington S. & Egid, K. 1985. Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the T locus: a response to T locus or H-2 locus variability? Behav Genet., 15, 53–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, D.W. 1980. Patterns of scent marking with urine and faeces amongst carnivore communities. Symp. zoo. Soc. Lond., 45, 107–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugford, & Nowell, N.W. 1970. Pheromones and their effect on aggression in mice. Nature, Lond., 226, 967–968.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Schwarze D. & Heckman, S.1980. The social role of scent marking in beaver (Castor canadensis). J. Chem. Ecol, 6, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mykytowycz, R. 1965. Further observations on the territorial function and histology of the submandibular cutaneous (chin) glands in the rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.). Anim. Behav, 13, 400–412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mykytowycz R., Gambale S. & Dudzinski, M.L. 1976. A comparison of the effectiveness of the odors of rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus in ehancing territorial confidence. J. Chem Ecol., 2, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ninomiya K. & Kimura, T.1990. Female-attracting properties of urinary compounds in male mice. Naturwissenschaften, 77, 586–588.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny M., Schwende, F.J., Wiesler D., Jorgenson, J.W. & Carmack, M.1984. Identification of a testosteronedependent unique volatile constituent of male mouse urine: 7-exo-ethyl-5-methyl-6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]-3-octene. Experientia, 40, 217–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny M., Harvey S., Jemiolo B. & Alberts, J. 1985. Synthetic pheromones that promote inter-male aggression in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 82, 2059–2061.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny M., Harvey S. & Jemiolo, B. 1990. Chemistry of male dominance in the house mouse Mus domesticus. Experientia, 46, 109–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, W.K., Manning, C.J. & Wakeland, E.K. 1991. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature, 352, 619–621.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, W.K., Manning, C.J. & Wakeland, E.K. 1992. MHC-based preferences in Mus operate through both settlement patterns and female controlled extra-territorial matings. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 6 (Ed. by R.L. Doty & D. Muller-Schwarze), pp. 183–187. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralls, K. 1971. Mammalian scent marking. Science, 171, 443–449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, T.J. & Hurst, J.L. (1998). Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of mates. Anim. Behav., in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. H. L., Beynon, R. J. & Evershed, R. P. 1993. Extraction, characterization, and binding analysis of two pheromonally active ligands associated with major urinary protein of house mouse (Mus musculus). J. Chem. Ecol., 19, 1405–1416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, T.J., Conradt L., Butler J., Christian, S.E., Ostler J. & Schmid, T.K. 1993. Territorial marking with faeces in badgers (Meles meles): a comparison of boundary and hinterland latrine use. Behaviour, 127, 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozenfeld, F.M. & Rasmont, R. 1991. Odor cue recognition by dominant male bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Anim. Behav, 41, 839–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, T.F. 1978. Aversive odors of male mice: experiential and castration effects, and the predictability of the outcomes of agonistic encounters. Aggress. Behav, 4, 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellinck, H.M., Slotnick, B.M. & Brown, R.E. 1997. Odors of individuality originating from the major histocompatibility complex are masked by diet cues in the urine of rats. Anim. Learn. Behav., 25, 193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwende, F.J., Wiesler D., Jorgenson, J.W., Carmack M. & Novotny, M. 1986. Urinary volatile constituents of the house mouse, Mus musculus, and their endocrine dependency. J. Chem. Ecol., 12, 277–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skeen, J.T. & Thiessen, D.D. 1977. Scent of gerbil cuisine. Physiol. Behav, 19, 11–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Somers M., Rasa, O.A.E. & Apps, P.J. 1990. Marking behaviour and dominance in Suni antelope Neotragus moschatus. A. Saeugetierkd., 55, 340–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, C.H. 1955. Regulatory mechanisms of house mouse populations: social behaviour affecting litter survival. Ecology, 36, 627–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, D.M. 1994. Olfactory biology, social behaviour and ecophysiology: an integrated marsupial study. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 7 (Ed. by R. Apfelbach, D. Muller-Schwarze, K. Reutter & E. Weiler), pp. 201–210. Oxford: Elsevier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun L. & Muller-Schwarze, D. 1997. Beaver response to recurrent alien scents: scent fence or scent match. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, D.D. & Rice, M. 1976. Mammalian scent gland marking and social behavior. Psychol. Bull, 83, 505–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind, C., Seebeck T., Bettens F. & Paepke, A.J. 1995. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 260, 245–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R.M. & Johnston, R.E. 1995. Scent counter-marks: specialized mechanisms of perception and response to individual odors in golden hamsters, Mesocricetus auratus. Anim. Behav, 109, 349–356.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, R.J. 1985. Mating behaviour and female choice their relation to social structure in wild caught house mice Mus musculus housed in a semi-natural environment. J. Zool. Lond., 207, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, M., Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G.K, Bard, J., Thomas, L. & Boyse, E.A.1981. Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78, 5817–5820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K., Boyse, E.A., Mike, V., Thaler, H.T., Matheison, B.J., Abbott, J., Boyse J., Zayas, Z.A. & Thomas, L. 1976. Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J. exp. Med., 144, 1324–1335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K., Beauchamp, G.K., Matsuzaki, O., Kupniewski D., Bard J., Thomas L. & Boyse, E.A. 1986a. Influence of genetic difference confined to mutation of H-2K on the incidence of pregnancy block in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 740–741.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K., Beauchamp, G.K., Matsuzaki, O., Bard, J., Thomas, L. & Boyse, E.A. 1986b. Participation of the murine X and Y chromosomes in genetically determined chemosensory identity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 4438–4440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K., Beauchamp, G.K., Bard, J. & Boyse, E.A. 1989. Sex-chromosomal odor types influence the maintenance of early pregnancy in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 9399–9401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jane L. Hurst

    Present address: Division of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston, South Wirral, L64 7TE, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Behaviour and Ecology Research Group, School of Biology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

    Jane L. Hurst & Tracey J. Rich

Authors
  1. Jane L. Hurst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tracey J. Rich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

    Robert E. Johnston

  2. College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York—Syracuse, Syracuse, New York, USA

    Dietland Müller-Schwarze

  3. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Minnesota—St. Paul, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

    Peter W. Sorensen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hurst, J.L., Rich, T.J. (1999). Scent Marks as Competitive Signals of Mate Quality. In: Johnston, R.E., Müller-Schwarze, D., Sorensen, P.W. (eds) Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4733-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4733-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7145-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4733-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation